Different Forms of Agency and Institutional Influences within Multinational Enterprises

Management International Review

Volumn 51, Issue 5, 2011, Pages 567-592

  Saka Helmhout, Ayse ^a   Geppert, Mike ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SURREY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Embedded agency; Host institutions; Institutional incompatibility; MNE coordination structures

Indexed keywords

EID: 84864487523     PISSN: 09388249     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11575-011-0091-2     Document Type: Article

References (79)

1. Aguilera, R. V., & Jackson, G. (2003). The cross-national diversity of corporate governance: Dimensions and determinants. Academy of Management Review, 28(3), 447-465.
2. Almond, P., Edwards, T., Colling, T., Ferner, A., Gunnigle, P., Muller, M., Quintanilla, J., & Waechter, H. (2005). Unravelling home and host country effects: An investigation of the HR policies of an American multinational in four European countries. Industrial Relations: A Journal of Economy and Society (Berkeley), 44(2), 276-306.
3. Alvarez, J. L., Mazza, C., Pedersen, J. S., & Svejenova, S. (2005). Shielding idiosyncracy from isomorphic pressures: Towards optimal distinctiveness in European filmmaking. Organization, 12(6), 863-888.
4. Bartlett, C., & Ghoshal, S. (1989). Managing across borders: The transnational solution. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
5. Battilana, J., & D'Aunno, T. (2009). Institutional work and the paradox of embedded agency. In T. Lawrence, et al. (Eds.), Institutional work: Actors and agency in institutional studies of organizations (pp. 31-58). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
6. Börsch, A. (2007). Global pressure, national system: How German corporate governance is changing. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
7. Brouthers, K. D. (2002). Institutional, cultural and transaction cost influences on entry mode choice and performance. Journal of International Business Studies, 33(2), 203-221.
8. Bruton, G. D., & Ahlstrom, D. (2003). An institutional view of China's venture capital industry: Explaining the differences between China and the West. Journal of Business Venturing, 18(2), 233-259.
9. Buckley, J., & Casson, M. C. (1976). The future of the multinational enterprise. London: Macmillan.
10. Clark, E., & Geppert, M. (2006). Socio-political processes in international management in post-socialist contexts: Knowledge, learning and transnational institution building. Journal of International Management, 12(3), 340-357.
11. Crouch, C. (2005). Capitalist diversity and change. Recombinant governance and institutional entrepreneurs. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
12. Cuervo-Cazurra, A., & Genc, M. (2008). Transforming disadvantages into advantages: Developing country MNEs in the least developed countries. Journal of International Business Studies, 39(6), 957-979.
13. Czaban, L., Hocevar, M., Jaklic, M., & Whitley R. (2003). Path dependence and contractual relations in emergent capitalism: Contrasting state socialist legacies and inter-firm cooperation in Hungary and Slovenia. Organization Studies, 24(1), 7-28.
14. Dacin, M. T., Goodstein, J., & Scott, W. (2002). Institutional theory and institutional change: Introduction to the special research forum. Academy of Management Journal, 45(1), 45-57.
15. Delios, A., & Beamish, P. W. (1999). Ownership strategy of Japanese firms: Transaction, institutional and experience influences. Strategic Management Journal, 20(10), 915-933.
16. Delios, A., & Henisz, W. J. (2000). Japanese firms' investment strategies in emerging economies. Academy of Management Journal, 43(3), 305-323.
17. Dikova, D., & van Witteloostuijn, A. (2007). Foreign direct investment mode choice: Entry and establishment modes in transition economies. Journal of International Business Studies, 38(6), 1013-1033.
18. Djelic, M.-L., & Quack, S. (2003). Governing globalization-bringing institutions back in. In M.-L. Djelic & S. Quack (Eds.), Globalization and institutions: Redefining the rules of the economic game (pp. 1-14). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
19. Dorado, S. (2005). Institutional entrepreneurship, partaking, and convening. Organization Studies, 26(3), 385-414.
20. Edwards, T., & Ferner, A. (2002). The renewed 'American challenge': A review of employment practice in US multinationals. Industrial Relations Journal, 33(2), 94-111.
21. Emirbayer, M., & Mische, A. (1998). What is agency? American Journal of Sociology, 103(4), 962-1023.
22. Ferner, A., Quintanilla, J., & Varul, M. Z. (2001). Country-of-origin effects, host-country effects, and the management of human resources in multinationals: German companies in Britain and Spain. Journal of World Business, 36(2), 107-127.
23. Friedland, R., & Alford, R. R. (1991). Bringing society back in: Symbols, practice, and institutional contradictions. In W. Powell & P. DiMaggio (Eds.), The new institutionalism in organizational analysis (pp. 232-263). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
24. George, A. L., & Bennett, A. (2005). Case studies and theory development in the social science. Cambridge: MIT Press.
25. Geppert, M., Williams, K., & Matten, D. (2003) The social construction of contextual rationalities in MNCs: An Anglo-German comparison of subsidiary choice. Journal of Management Studies, 40(3), 617-641.
26. Ghemawat, P. (2001). Distance still matters: The hard reality of global expansion. Harvard Business Review, 79(8), 137-147.
27. Greenwood, R., Suddaby, R., & Hinings, C. R. (2002). Theorizing change: The role of professional associations in the transformation of institutional fields. Academy of Management Journal, 45(1), 58-80.
28. Hall, P. A., & Soskice, D. (2001). Varieties of capitalism: The institutional foundations of comparative advantage. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
29. Hall, P. A., & Thelen, K. (2009). Institutional change in varieties of capitalism. Socio-Economic Review, 7(1), 7-34.
30. Hancké, B., & Goyer, M. (2005). Degree of freedom: Rethinking the institutional analysis of economic change. In G. Morgan, R. Whitley, & E. Moen (Eds.), Changing capitalisms? Institutional change and systems of economic organization (pp. 53-77). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
31. Hardy, C., & Maguire, S. (2008). Institutional entrepreneurship. In R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, K. Sahlin, & R. Suddaby (Eds.), Organizational institutionalism (pp. 198-217). London: Sage.
32. Harzing, A.-W. (1999). Managing the multinationals: An international study of control mechanisms. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
33. Harzing, A.-W. (2001). An analysis of the functions of international transfer of managers in MNCs. Employee Relations, 23(6), 581-598.
34. Henisz, W. J., & Delios, A. (2001). Uncertainty, imitation, and plant location: Japanese multinational corporations, 1990-1996. Administrative Science Quarterly, 46(3), 443-475.
35. Henisz, W. J., & Zelner, B. A. (2005). Legitimacy, interest group pressures and change in emergent institutions: The case of foreign investors and host country governments. Academy of Management Review, 30(2), 361-382.
36. Hill, C. W. L., Hwang, P., & Kim, W. C. (1990). An eclectic theory of the choice of international market entry mode. Strategic Management Journal, 9(Summer Special Issue), 93-104.
37. Hollingsworth, J. R. (2003). Advancing the socio-economic paradigm with institutional analysis. Socio-Economic Review, 1(1), 130-134.
38. Howard-Grenville, J. A (2005). The persistence of flexible organizational routines: The Role of agency and organizational context. Organization Science, 16(6), 618-636.
39. Jackson, G. (2005). Contested boundaries: Ambiguity and creativity in the evolution of German codetermination. In W. Streeck & K. Thelen (Eds.), Beyond continuity: Explorations in the dynamics of advanced political economies (pp. 229-254). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
40. Jackson, G., & Deeg, R. (2008). Comparing capitalisms: Understanding institutional diversity and its implications for international business. Journal of International Business Studies, 39(4), 540-561.
41. Kostova, T., Kendall, R., & Dacin, M. T. (2008). Institutional theory in the study of multinational corporations: A critique and new directions. Academy of Management Review, 33(4), 994-1006.
42. Lane, C. (1996). The social constitution of supplier relations in Britain and Germany: An institutionalist analysis. In R. Whitley & P. H. Kristensen (Eds.), The changing European firm: Limits to convergence (pp. 271-304). London: Routledge.
43. Lane, C. (2000a). Understanding the globalization strategies of German and British multinational companies: Is a 'societal effects' approach still useful? In M. Maurice & A. Sorge (Eds.), Embedding organizations (pp. 271-304). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
44. Lane, C. (2000b). Globalization and the German model of capitalism-erosion or survival? British Journal of Sociology, 51(2), 207-234.
45. Lawrence, T. B., & Suddaby, R. (2006). Institutions and institutional work. In S. R. Clegg, et al. (Eds.), Handbook of organization studies (pp. 215-254). London: Sage.
46. Lee, C., & Beamish, P. W. (1995). The characteristics and performance of Korean joint ventures in LDCs. Journal of International Business Studies, 26(3), 637-654.
47. Meardi, G., Marginson, P., Fichter, M., Frybes, M., Stanojevic, M., & Toth A. (2009). Varieties of capitalism: Adapting employment practices in Central Eastern Europe. Industrial Relations, 48(3), 489-511.
48. Meyer, K. E. (2001). Institutions, transaction costs, and entry mode choice in Eastern Europe. Journal of International Business Studies, 32(2), 357-367.
49. Meyer, K. E., & Nguyen, H. V. (2005). Foreign investment strategies and sub-national institutions in emerging markets: Evidence from Vietnam. Journal of Management Studies, 42(1), 63-93.
50. Meyer, K. E., Estrin, S., Bhaumik, S. K., & Peng, M. W. (2009). Institutions, resources, and entry strategies in emerging economies. Strategic Management Journal, 30(1), 61-80.
51. Mill, J. S. (1974). A system of logic ratiocinative and inductive: Being a connected view of the principles of evidence and the methods of scientific investigation. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
52. North, D. C. (1990). Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
53. Oliver, C. (1991). Strategic responses to institutional processes. Academy of Management Review, 16(1), 145-179.
54. Otterbeck, L. (1981). The management of headquarters-subsidiary relations in multinational corporations. Hampshire: Gower Publishing.
55. Peng, M. W. (2001). The resource-based view and international business. Journal of Management, 27(6), 803-829.
56. Peng, M. W. (2002). Towards an institution-based view of business strategy. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 19(2/3), 251-267.
57. Peng, M. W. (2003). Institutional transitions and strategic choices. Academy of Management Review, 28(2), 275-296.
58. Peng, M. W. (2008). Global business. Cincinnati: South-Western College Publishing.
59. Peng, M. W., Sun, S. L., Pinkham, B., & Chen, H. (2009). The institution-based view as a third leg for a strategy tripod. Academy of Management Perspectives, 23(3), 63-81.
60. Ragin, C. C. (1987). The comparative method: Moving beyond qualitative and quantitative methods. Berkeley: University of California.
61. Reay, T., Golden-Biddle, K., & Germann, K. (2006). Legitimizing a new role: Small wins and microprocesses of change. Academy of Management Journal, 49(4), 977-998.
62. Redding, G. (2005). The thick description and comparison of societal systems of capitalism. Journal of International Business Studies, 36(2), 123-155.
63. Rihoux, B., & Ragin, C. C. (2009). Configurational comparative methods: Qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) and related techniques. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
64. Rohwer, G. (2011). 'Qualitative comparative analysis: A discussion of interpretations'. European Sociological Review, forthcoming. doi: 10. 1093/esr/jcq034.
65. Rogers, J., & Streeck, W. (1994). Workplace representation overseas: "The works council story". In R. Freeman (Ed.), Working under different rules (pp. 97-156). New York: Sage.
66. Sadler-Smith, E., Spicer, D. P., & Chaston, I. (2001). Learning orientations and growth in smaller firms. Long Range Planning, 34(2), 139-158.
67. Saka, A. (2004). Cross-national diffusion of work systems: Translation of Japanese operations in the UK. Organization Studies, 25(2), 209-228.
68. Seo, M.-G., & Creed, W. (2002). Institutional contradictions, praxis, and institutional change: A dialectical perspective. Academy of Management Review, 27(2), 222-247.
69. Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
70. Streeck, W. (1992). Social institutions and economic performance: Studies of industrial relations in advanced capitalist economies. London: Sage.
71. Streeck, W. (1997). Beneficial constraints: On the economic limits of rational voluntarism. In J. R. Hollingsworth & R. Boyer (Eds.), Contemporary capitalism: The embeddedness of institutions (pp. 197-219). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
72. Streeck, W., & Thelen, K. (2005). Beyond continuity: Explorations in the dynamics of advanced political economies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
73. Treviňo, L., & Mixon, F. (2004). Strategic factors affecting foreign direct investment decisions by multinational enterprises in Latin America. Journal of World Business, 39(3), 233-243.
74. Wever, K. S. (1995). Negotiating competitiveness: Employment relations and organisational innovation in Germany and the United States. Cambridge: Harvard Business School Press.
75. Whitley, R. (1999). Divergent capitalisms: The social structuring and change of business systems. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
76. Whitley, R. (2007). Business systems and organizational capabilities: The institutional structuring of competitive competences. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
77. Williams, K., & Geppert, M. (2011). Bargained globalization: Employment relations providing robust "tool kits" for socio-political strategizing in MNCs in Germany. In C. Dörrenbächer & M. Geppert (Eds.), Politics and power in the multinational corporation: The role of interests, identities, and institution (pp. 72-100). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
78. Zander, I., & Sölvell, Ö. (2000). Cross-border innovation in the multinational corporation: A research agenda. International Studies of Management and Organization, 30(1), 44-67.
79. Zhao, M. (2006). Conducting R&D in countries with weak intellectual property rights protection. Management Science, 52(8), 1185-1199.