Comparative debates in post-socialist urban studies

Urban Geography

Volumn 33, Issue 6, 2012, Pages 829-849

  Wiest, Karin ^a  

^a LEIBNIZ INSTITUTE FOR REGIONAL GEOGRAPHY   (Germany)

Author keywords

comparative urbanism; entangled modernities; post socialist urban development; socio spatial differentiation

Indexed keywords

COMPARATIVE STUDY; GLOBALIZATION; MODERNITY; POST-COMMUNISM; URBAN DEVELOPMENT; URBAN GEOGRAPHY;

BUDAPEST; BULGARIA; GERMANY; HUNGARY; LEIPZIG; LENINGRAD; LITHUANIA; RUSSIAN FEDERATION; SAINT PETERSBURG; SAXONY; SOFIA; VILNIUS;

EID: 84864475072     PISSN: 02723638     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2747/0272-3638.33.6.829     Document Type: Article

References (76)

1. Abu-Lughod, J. L., 1999, New York, Chicago, Los Angeles: America's Global Cities. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
2. Andrusz, G., 2001, Further thoughts on the post-socialist city, July 31, 2001. Retrieved June 29, 2012 from a target=-blank" href='http://www. anthropolis.dendrusz-2.htm'http://www.anthropolis.dendrusz-2.htm .
3. Barth, F., 1999, Comparative methodologies in the analysis of anthropological data. In J. Bowen and R. Petersen, editors, Critical Comparisons in Politics and Culture. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univerisyt Press, 78-90.
4. Beauregard, R., 2003, City of Superlatives, City & Community , Vol. 2, 183-199.
5. Beaverstock, J., Smith, R., and Taylor, P., 1999, A roster of World Cities. Cities , Vol. 16, 445-458.
6. Bodnár, J., 2001, Fin de Millénaire Budapest: Metamorphoses of Urban Life. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
7. Brade, I., Herfert, G., and Wiest, K., 2009, Recent trends and future prospects of sociospatial differentiation in urban regions of Central and East Europe: A lull efore the storm? Cities , Vol. 26, 233-244.
8. Brenner, N., 2001, World City. Theory, globalization, and the comparative-historical method: Reflections on Janet Abu-Lughod's interpretation of contemporary urban restructuring. Urban Affairs Review , Vol. 37, 124-147.
9. Brenner, N., 2003, Stereotypes, archetypes, and prototypes: Three uses oferlatives in contemporary urban studies. City & Community , Vol. 2, 205-216.
10. Burawoy, M., 1994, The end of Sovietology and the renaissance of modernization theory. Contemporary Sociology , Vol. 21, 774-784.
11. Czepczynki, M., 2008, Cultural Landscape of Post-socialist Cities. Representation of Powers and Needs. Adlershot, UK: Ashgate.
12. Dear, M., 2005, Comparative urbanism. Urban Geography , Vol. 26, 247-251.
13. Dingsdale, A., 1999, Budapest's uilt environment in transition, GeoJournal , Vol. 49, 63-78.
14. Eckardt, F., 2005, Paths of Urban Transformation. Frankfurt, Germany: Verlag Peter Lang.
15. Eisenstadt, S. N., 2000, Die Vielfalt der Moderne [ The Diversity of the Modern ]. Weilerswist, Germany: Velbrück Verlag.
16. Földi, Z., 2006, Neighbourhood Dynamics in Inner-Budapest: A Realist Approach. Utrecht, The Netherlands: Utrecht University, Netherlands Geographical Studies, No. 350.
17. Enyedi, G. and Kovács, Z., 2006, Social Changes and Social Sustainability in Historical Urban Centres. The Case of Central Europe. Pécs, Hungary: Centre for Regional Studies, Hungarian Academy of Sciences.
18. French, R. A., and Hamilton, F. E. I., 1979, The Socialist City: Spatial Structure and Urban Policy. New York, NY: John Willey and Sons.
19. Geéienë, I., 2005, Discourse on the middle class in post-communist context. Sociologija. Mintis ir Veiksmas , No. 2, 75-85.
20. Gdaniec, C., 2005, Kommunalka und Penthouse. Stadt und Stadtgesellschaft im postsowjetischen Moskau [ Commune and Penthouse. State and Urban Society in Post-Soviet Moscow ]. Berlin, Germany: Lit Verlag.
21. Glick Schiller, N. and Caglar, A., 2009, Towards a comparative theory of locality in migration studies: Migrant incorporation and city scale. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies , Vol. 35, 177-202.
22. Glatter, J. and Wiest, K., 2007, Zwischen universellen Mustern und individuellen Pfaden-Aspekte der vergleichenden Gentrification-Forschung am Beispiel der Dresdner Áußeren Neustadt [Patterns etween universal and individual paths-aspects of comparative research on the gentrification of Dresden Neustadt]. Geographische Zeitschrift , Vol. 95, 155-172.
23. Hamilton, F. E. I., Dimitrowska-Andrews, K., and Pichler-Milanovich, N., 2005, Transformation of Cities in Central and Eastern Europe. Tokyo, Japan: United Nations University Press.
24. Hantrais, L., 1999, Contextualization in cross-national comparative research. International Journal of Social Research Methodology , Vol. 2, 93-108.
25. Harris, A., 2008, From London to Mumbai and ack again: Gentrification and public policy in comparative perspective. Urban Studies , Vol. 45, 2407-2428.
26. Haworth, A., Kemeny, J., and Manzi, T., 2004, Social constructionism and international comparative housing research. In K. Jabobs, J. Kemeny, and T. Manzi, editors, Social Constructionism in Housing Research. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate, 159-177.
27. Häussermann, H., 1996, From the socialist to the capitalist city: Experiences from Germany. In G. Andrusz, M. Harloe, and I. Szelenyi, editors, Cities after Socialism: Urban and Regional Change and Conflict in Post-Socialist Societies. Malden, MA: Blackwell, 214-231.
28. Hirt, S., 2006, Post-socialist urban forms: Notes from Sofia. Urban Geography , Vol. 27, 464-488.
29. Hirt, S. and Stanilov, K., 2007, The perils of post-socialist transformation: Residential development in Sofia. In K. Stanilov, editor, The Post-socialist City: Urban Form and Space Transformations in Central and Eastern Europe. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer, 215-244.
30. Hörschelmann, K. and Stenning, A., 2008, Ethnographies of postsocialist change. Progress in Human Geography , Vol. 32, 339-361.
31. Humphrey, C., 2002, Does the category "postsocialist" still make sense? In C. M. Hann, editor, Postsocialism: Ideals, Ideologies and Practices in Eurasia. London, UK and New York, NY: Routledge, 12-14.
32. Kaelble, H., 2003, Die interdisziplinären debatten über vergleich und transfer [The interdisciplinary debates on comparison and transfer]. In H. Kaelble and J. Schriewer, editors, Vergleich und Transfer. Komparatistik in Sozial-, Geschichts- und Kulturwissenschaften [ Comparison and Transfer: Comparative Analyses in Social, Cultural, and Cultural Studies ]. Frankfurt, Germany and New York, NY: Campus, 469-493.
33. Kaelble, H., 2005, Die debatte über vergleich und transfer und was jetzt? [The debate on comparison and transfer and now what?]. H-Soz-u-Kult , February 8. Retrieved July 31, 2009 from a target=-blank" href='http://hsozkult.geschichte.hu-berin.de/forum/id=574&type=artikel'http: //hsozkult.geschichte.hu-berin.de/forum/id=574&type=artikel .
34. Kemeny, J. and Lowe, S., 1998, Schools of comparative housing research: from convergence to divergence. Housing Studies , Vol. 13, 161-176.
35. Kovács, Z., 1998, Ghettoization or gentrification? Post-socialist scenarios for Budapest. Netherlands Journal of Housing and the Built Environment , Vol. 13, 63-81.
36. Koch, F., 2010, Die Europäische stadt in transformation: Stadtplanung und stadtentwicklungspolitik im postsozialistischen Warschau [The European city in transition: Urban planning and urban development policy in post-socialist Warsaw]. Wiesbaden, Germany: Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
37. Marcinczak, S., 2007, The socio-spatial structure of post-socialist Lódz, Poland. Results of the National Census 2002. Bulletin of Geography , Vol. 8, 66-82.
38. McFarlane, C., 2010, The comparative city: Knowledge, learning, urbanism. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research , Vol. 34, 725-742.
39. McMichael, P., 1990, Incorporating comparison within a world-historical perspective: An alternative comparative method. American Sociological Review , Vol. 55, 385-397.
40. Mollenkopf, J. H. and Castells, M., 1991, Dual City: Restructuring New York. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
41. Nader, L., 1993, Comparative consciousness. In R. Borofsky, editor, Assessing Cultural Anthropology. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill, 84-96.
42. Nagy, E. and Timár, J., 2012, Urban restructuring in the grip of capital and politics: Gentrification in East Central Europe. In T. Check and A. Balogh, editors, Development of the Settlement Network in the Central European Countries: Past, Present, and Future. Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany: Springer Verlag, 121-135. (forthcoming
43. Nijman, J., 2007, Place-particularitiy and "deep analogies": A comparative essay on Miami's rise as a World City. Urban Geography , Vol. 28, 92-107.
44. Ourednícek, M., 2005, New suburban development in the post-socialist city: The case of Prague. In F. Eckardt, editor, Paths of Urban Transformation. Frankfurt, Germany: Peter Lang, 143-156.
45. Ourednícek, M. and Temelová, J., 2009, Twenty years after socialism: The transformation of Prague's inner structure. Studia Universitatis Babes-Bolyai, Sociologia , Vol. 54, 9-30.
46. Park, R. and Burgess, E., 1925, The City. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
47. Petrovic, M., 2004, Cities after Socialism as a Research Issue. London, UK: London School of Economics.
48. Pickles, J. and Smith, A., 2007, Post-socialist economic geographies and the politics of knowledge production. In A. Tickell, E. Sheppard, and J. Peck, editors, Politics and Practice in Economic Geography. London, UK: Sage, 151-162.
49. REAS, 2008, Residential markets in Central European capitals. Retrieved June 29, 2012 from a target=-blank" href='http://www.reas.pl/'http://www. reas.pl
50. Robinson, J., 2003, Postcolonialising geography: Tactics and pitfalls. Singapore Journal of Tropical Geography , Vol. 24, 273-289.
51. Robinson, J., 2004, In the tracks of comparative urbanism: Difference, urban modernity, and the primitive. Urban Geography , Vol. 25, 707-723.
52. Robinson, J., 2006, Ordinary Cities: Between Modernity and Development. London, UK and New York, NY: Routledge.
53. Robinson, J., 2010, Cities in a world of cities: The comparative gesture. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research , Vol. 35, 1-23.
54. Robinson, J., 2011, The travels of urban neoliberalism: Taking stock of the internationalization of urban theory. Urban Geography , Vol. 32, 1087-1109.
55. Sassen, S., 2001, The Global City: New York, London, Tokyo. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
56. Schmid, C., 2005, Stadt, Raum und Gesellschaft. Henri Lefebvre und die Theorie der Produktion des Raumes [City, Space, and Society. Henri Lefebvre and the Theory of the Production of Space ]. Stuttgart, Germany: Franz Steiner Verlag.
57. Schlögel, K., 2004, Bürgergesellschaft, neue urbanität und die zukunft der stadt in Osteuropa [Civil society, new urbanism, and the future of the city in Eastern Europe]. Zeitschrift für Staats- und Europawissenschaften , Vol. 2, 394-410.
58. Slater, T., 2002, What is gentrification. Retrieved September 2004 from a target=-blank" href='http://members.lycos.co.uk/gentrification'http:// members.lycos.co.uk/gentrification .
59. Smith, A. and Timár, J., 2010, Uneven transformations: Space, economy and society 20 years after the collapse of state socialism. European Urban and Regional Studies , Vol. 17, 115-120.
60. Smith, N., 1995, Remaking scale: Competition and cooperation in prenational and post-national Europe. In H. Eskelinen and F. Snickars, editors, Competitive European Peripheries. Berlin, Germany: Springer, 59-74.
61. Soja, E. W. and Scott, A. J., 1986, Los Angeles: Capital of the late twentieth century. Environment and Planning D , Vol. 4, 249-254.
62. Spohn, W., 2006, Globale, multiple und verwobene Modernen: Perspektiven der historisch-vergleichenden Soziologie [Global, multiple, and interwoven modernity: Perspectives on comparative sociology]. In T. Schwinn, editor, Die Vielfalt und Einheit der Moderne. Kultur- und strukturvergleichende Analysen [The Diversity and Unity of Modernity: Cultural and Structural Comparative Analyses]. Mainz, Germany: VS Verlag Sozialwissenschaften, 101-130.
63. Stenning, A. and Hörschelmann, K., 2008, History, geography and difference in the post-socialist world: Or, do we still need post-socialism? Antipode , Vol. 40, 313-335.
64. Sýkora, L., 1994, Local urban restructuring as a mirror of globalization processes: Prague in the 1990s. Urban Studies , Vol. 31, 1149-1166.
65. Sýkora, L., 1999, Processes of Socio-spatial Differentiation in Post-communist Prague, Housing Studies , Vol. 14, No. 5, 679-701. .
66. Sýkora, L., 2005, Gentrification in post-communist cities. In R. Atkinson and G. Bridge, editors, Gentrification in a Global Context. London, New York: Routledge, 90-105.
67. Therborn, G., 2003, Entangled modernities. European Journal of Social Theory , Vol. 6, 293-305.
68. Tilly, C., 1984, Big Structures, Large Processes, Huge Comparisons , New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
69. Timár, J., 2004, More than "Anglo-American", it is "Western": Hegemony in geography from a Hungarian perspective. Geoforum , Vol. 35, 533-538.
70. Tosics, I., 2005, City development in Central and Eastern Europe since 1990: The impacts of internal and external factors. In F. E. I. Hamilton, K. Dimitrovska-Andrews, and N. Pichler-Milanovich, editors, Globalization and Transformation in Eastern and Central European Cities. Tokyo, Japan: The United Nations University Press, 44-78.
71. Verdery, K., 1996, What Was Socialism and What Comes Next. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
72. Wacquant, L., 1995, The comparative structure and experience of urban exclusion: Race, class, and space in Chicago and Paris. In R. Lawson, K. MacFate, and W. J. Wilson, editors, Poverty, Inequality, and the Future of Social Policy: Western States in the New World Order. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation, 543-570.
73. Wasserstrom, J., 2007, Is global Shanghai "good to think"? Thoughts on comparative history and post-socialist cities. Journal of World History , Vol. 18, 199-234.
74. Werner, M. and Zimmermann, B., 2002, Vergleich, transfer, verflechtung. Der ansatz der histoire croisée und die herausforderung des transnationalen [Comparison, transfer, integration. The approach of the entangled history and the challenge of transnationalism]. Geschichte und Gesellschaft , Vol. 28, 607-636.
75. Wiest, K., 2006, Soziale grenzen in städten-repräsentationen von wohngebieten in den neuen ländern [Social oundaries in cities-representations of residential areas in Eastern Germany]. Europa Regional , Vol. 14, 33-40.
76. Young, C. and Kaczmarek, S., 2008, The socialist past und postsocialist urban identity in Central and Eastern Europe. European Urban and Regional Studies , Vol. 15, 53-70.