Learning relational affordance models for robots in multi-object manipulation tasks

Proceedings - IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages 4373-4378

  Moldovan, Bogdan ^a   Moreno, Plinio ^b   Van Otterlo, Martijn ^c   Santos Victor, José ^b   De Raedt, Luc ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEUVEN   (Belgium)

^b INSTITUTO SUPERIOR TÉCNICO   (Portugal)

^c RADBOUD UNIVERSITY NIJMEGEN   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACTION RECOGNITION; ARBITRARY NUMBER; COGNITIVE CAPABILITY; MULTI-OBJECTS; MULTIPLE OBJECTS; OBJECT INTERACTIONS; ROBOTIC INTERACTION; STATISTICAL RELATIONAL LEARNING;

ROBOTICS;

EID: 84864469930     PISSN: 10504729     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/ICRA.2012.6225042     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (23)

1. C. M. Christoudias, B. Georgescu, P. Meer, and C. M. Georgescu. Synergism in low level vision. In In International Conference on Pattern Recognition, pages 150-155, 2002.
2. S. Coradeschi and A. Saffiotti. An introduction to the anchoring problem. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 43(2-3):85-96, 2003.
3. L. De Raedt. Logical and Relational Learning. Springer, 2008.
4. L. De Raedt and K. Kersting. Probabilistic inductive logic programming. In Prob. Ind. Log. Progr., pages 1-27, 2008.
5. L. De Raedt, A. Kimmig, and H. Toivonen. Problog: A probabilistic prolog and its application in link discovery. In IJCAI, pages 2462-2467, 2007.
6. R. E. Fikes and N. Nilsson. STRIPS: A new approach to the application theorem proving to problem solving. Artificial Intelligence, 5(2):189-208, 1971.
7. J. J. Gibson. The Ecologial Approach to visual perception. Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1979.
8. B. Gutmann, I. Thon, and L. De Raedt. Learning the parameters of probabilistic logic programs from interpretations. In ECML, 2011.
9. J. Hertzberg and R. Chatila. AI reasoning methods for robotics. In B. Siciliano and O. Khatib, editors, Handbook of Robotics, pages 207-223. Springer, 2008.
10. D. Jain, L. Mösenlechner, and M. Beetz. Equipping robot control programs with first-order probabilistic reasoning capabilities. In ICRA, pages 3626-3631, 2009.
11. V. Krunic, G. Salvi, A. Bernardino, L. Montesano, and J. Santos-Victor. Affordance based word-to-meaning association. In ICRA, 2009.
12. T. Lang and M. Toussaint. Approximate inference for planning in stochastic relational worlds. In ICML, pages 585-592, 2009.
13. S. Lloyd. Least squares quantization in PCM. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 28(2):129-137, 1982.
14. M. Lopes, F. S. Melo, and L. Montesano. Affordance-based imitation learning in robots. In IROS, pages 1015-1021, 2007.
15. M. Lungarella, G. Metta, R. Pfeifer, and G. Sandini. Developmental robotics: A survey. Connection Science, 15:151-190, 2003.
16. G. Metta, G. Sandini, D. Vernon, L. Natale, and F. Nori. The iCub humanoid robot: an open platform for research in embodied cognition. In Proceedings of the 8th Workshop on Performance Metrics for Intelligent Systems, 2008.
17. L. Montesano, M. Lopes, A. Bernardino, and J. Santos-Victor. Learning object affordances: From sensory-motor coordination to imitation. IEEE Transactions on Robotics, 24:15-26, 2008.
18. U. Pattacini, F. Nori, L. Natale, G. Metta, and G. Sandini. An experimental evaluation of a novel minimum-jerk cartesian controller for humanoid robots. In IROS, pages 1668-1674, 2010.
19. J. Pearl. Probabilistic Reasoning in Intelligent Systems: Networks of Plausible Inference. Morgan Kaufmann, 1988.
20. F. Stulp and M. Beetz. Combining declarative, procedural, and predictive knowledge to generate, execute, optimize robot plans. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 56:967-979, 2008.
21. S. Thrun, W. Burgard, and D. Fox. Probabilistic Robotics. MIT Press, 2005.
22. J. Vennekens, M. Denecker, and M. Bruynooghe. CP-logic: A language of causal probabilistic events and its relation to logic programming. Journal of Theory and Practice of Logic Programming, 9(3):245-308, 2009.
23. F. Wörgötter, A. Agostini, N. Krüger, N. Shylo, and B. Porr. Cognitive agents - a procedural perspective relying on the predictability of object-action complexes (OACs). Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 57:420-432, 2009.