Image-derived input function in PET brain studies: Blood-based methods are resistant to motion artifacts

Nuclear Medicine Communications

Volumn 33, Issue 9, 2012, Pages 982-989

  Zanotti Fregonara, Paolo ^a   Liow, Jeih San ^a   Comtat, Claude ^b   Zoghbi, Sami S ^a   Zhang, Yi ^a   Pike, Victor W ^a   Fujita, Masahiro ^a   Innis, Robert B ^a  

^a NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF MENTAL HEALTH   (United States)

^b DIF   (France)

Author keywords

image derived input function; neuroreceptor tracers; PET

Indexed keywords

RADIOPHARMACEUTICAL AGENT; ROLIPRAM C 11; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ARTICLE; ARTIFACT; BLOOD SAMPLING; BLOOD VESSEL FUNCTION; COMPUTER SIMULATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC PROCEDURE; HIGH RESOLUTION COMPUTER TOMOGRAPHY; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; IMAGE DERIVED INPUT FUNTION; IMAGE RECONSTRUCTION; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; INTERNAL CAROTID ARTERY; MOTION ANALYSIS SYSTEM; NORMAL HUMAN; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PHANTOM; POSITRON EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC; ROTATION; SCINTIANGIOGRAPHY;

AREA UNDER CURVE; ARTIFACTS; BRAIN; CAROTID ARTERIES; HUMANS; KINETICS; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; MOVEMENT; PHANTOMS, IMAGING; POSITRON-EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY; ROLIPRAM;

EID: 84864469598     PISSN: 01433636     EISSN: 14735628     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/MNM.0b013e328356185c     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Zanotti-Fregonara P, Chen K, Liow JS, Fujita M, Innis RB. Image-derived input function for brain PET studies: many challenges and few opportunities. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 2011; 31:1986-1998.
2. Mourik JE, Lubberink M, Lammertsma AA, Boellaard R. Image derived input functions: effects of motion on tracer kinetic analyses. Mol Imaging Biol 2011; 13:25-31.
3. 18F-fluoro-2-deoxyglucose, the Patlak method, and an image-derived input function. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 1998; 18:716-723.
4. Guo H, Renaut RA, Chen K. An input function estimation method for FDG-PET human brain studies. Nucl Med Biol 2007; 34:483-492. (Pubitemid 46963013)
5. 11Cflumazenil kinetic analysis in human brain. Mol Imaging Biol 2003; 5:72-78. (Pubitemid 36676013)
6. Croteau E, Lavallee E, Labbe SM, Hubert L, Pifferi F, Rousseau JA, et al. Image-derived input function in dynamic human PET/CT: methodology and validation with (11)C-acetate and (18)F-fluorothioheptadecanoic acid in muscle and (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose in brain. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2010; 37:1539-1550.
7. 11Cflumazenil. Neuroimage 2008; 39:1041-1050.
8. 18Ffluorodeoxyglucose brain positron emission tomography using independent component analysis. Nucl Med Commun 2005; 26: 995-1004.
9. Cook GJ, Lodge MA, Marsden PK, Dynes A, Fogelman I. Non-invasive assessment of skeletal kinetics using fluorine-18 fluoride positron emission tomography: evaluation of image and population-derived arterial input functions. Eur J Nucl Med 1999; 26:1424-1429. (Pubitemid 29515603)
10. 11C(R)-rolipram, a positron emission tomographic radioligand to image phosphodiesterase 4: a retest study and use of an image-derived input function. Neuroimage 2011; 54:1903-1909.
11. Zanotti-Fregonara P, Liow JS, Fujita M, Dusch E, Zoghbi SS, Luong E, et al. Image-derived input function for human brain using high resolution PET imaging with C(R)-rolipram and CPBR28. Plos One 2011; 6:e17056.
12. Zubal IG, Harrell CR, Smith EO, Rattner Z, Gindi G, Hoffer PB. Computerized three-dimensional segmented human anatomy. Med Phys 1994; 21:299-302. (Pubitemid 24068796)
13. Comtat C, Kinahan P, Defrise M, Michel C, Townsend D. Simulating whole-body PET scanning with rapid analytical methods. IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record, Vol. 3; 24-30 October 1999; Seattle, Washington, USA 1999.
14. Dusch E, Comtat C, Trebossen R. Simulation-based evaluation of OSEM reconstruction bias on low activity PET data for the HRRT scanner. IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record (NSS/MIC); 24 October to 1 November; Orlando, Florida, USA; 2009. pp. 2770-2773.
15. Comtat C, Sureau F, Sibomana M, Hong I, Sjoholm N, Trebossen R. Image based resolution modeling for the HRRT OSEM reconstructions software. IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record; 19-25 October 2008; Dresden, Germany; 2008. pp. 4120-4123.
16. Bloomfield PM, Spinks TJ, Reed J, Schnorr L, Westrip AM, Livieratos L, et al. The design and implementation of a motion correction scheme for neurological PET. Phys Med Biol 2003; 48:959-978. (Pubitemid 36553316)
17. Rahmim A, Dinelle K, Lidstone S, Blinder S, Cheng J, Topping G, et al. Impact of accurate motion-corrected statistical reconstruction on dynamic PET kinetic parameter estimation. IEEE Nuclear Science Sympoium Conference Record; 26 October to 3 November 2007; Honolulu, Hawaii; 2007. pp. 2697-2704.
18. Carson RE, Barker WC, Liow J-S, Yao R, Thada S, Zhao Y, et al. List-mode reconstruction for the HRRT. J Nucl Med 2004; 45:105P.
19. 11Crolipram-PET. Neuroimage 2005; 26:1201-1210. (Pubitemid 40806499)
20. 18F-FECNT: a polar radiometabolite confounds brain radioligand measurements. J Nucl Med 2006; 47:520-527. (Pubitemid 46768495)
21. Mourik JE, van Velden FH, Lubberink M, Kloet RW, van Berckel BN, Lammertsma AA, Boellaard R. Image derived input functions for dynamic high resolution research tomograph PET brain studies. Neuroimage 2008; 43:676-686.
22. Mourik JE, Lubberink M, Schuitemaker A, Tolboom N, van Berckel BN, Lammertsma AA, Boellaard R. Image-derived input functions for PET brain studies. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2009; 36: 463-471.
23. Zanotti-Fregonara P, Fadaili el M, Maroy R, Comtat C, Souloumiac A, Jan S, et al. Comparison of eight methods for the estimation of the image-derived input function in dynamic (18)F-FDG PET human brain studies. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 2009; 29:1825-1835.