Transmembrane helix: Simple or complex

Nucleic Acids Research

Volumn 40, Issue W1, 2012, Pages

  Wong, Wing Cheong ^a   Maurer Stroh, Sebastian ^a,b   Schneider, Georg ^a   Eisenhaber, Frank ^a,c,d  

^a BIOINFORMATICS INSTITUTE   (Singapore)

^b NANYANG TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY   (Singapore)

^c NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF SINGAPORE   (Singapore)

^d NANYANG TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY   (Singapore)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CHOLECYSTOKININ A RECEPTOR; MEMBRANE PROTEIN; RHODOPSIN;

AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; ARTICLE; INFORMATION PROCESSING; MOLECULAR BIOLOGY; NONHUMAN; NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN POLYMORPHISM; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; WEB BROWSER;

ALGORITHMS; HYDROPHOBIC AND HYDROPHILIC INTERACTIONS; INTERNET; MEMBRANE PROTEINS; PROTEIN STRUCTURE, SECONDARY; RECEPTOR, CHOLECYSTOKININ A; RHODOPSIN; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS, PROTEIN; SOFTWARE; USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE;

EID: 84864457014     PISSN: 03051048     EISSN: 13624962     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/nar/gks379     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Dayhoff, M.O. (1969) Computer analysis of protein evolution. Sci. Am., 221, 86-95.
2. Jardine, N., van Rijsbergen, C.J. and Jardine, C.J. (1969) Evolutionary rates and the inference of evolutionary tree forms. Nature, 224, 185.
3. Doolittle, R.F. and Blombach, E. (1964) Amino-acid sequence investigations of fibrinopeptides from various mammals: evolutionary implications. Nature, 202, 147-152.
4. Fitch, W.M. and Margoliash, E. (1967) Construction of phylogenetic trees: a method based on mutational distances as estimated from cytochrome c sequences is of general applicability. Science, 155, 279-284.
5. Brew, K., Vanaman, T.C. and Hill, R.L. (1967) Comparison of the amino acid sequence of bovine alpha-lactalbumin and hens egg white lysozyme. J. Biol. Chem., 242, 3747-3749.
6. Allen, S.C., Acharya, K.R., Palmer, K.A., Shapiro, R., Vallee, B.L. and Scheraga, H.A. (1994) A comparison of the predicted and X-ray structures of angiogenin. Implications for further studies of model building of homologous proteins. J. Protein Chem., 13, 649-658.
7. Palmer, K.A., Scheraga, H.A., Riordan, J.F. and Vallee, B.L. (1986) A preliminary three-dimensional structure of angiogenin. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 83, 1965-1969.
8. Bork, P. and Gibson, T.J. (1996) Applying motif and profile searches. Methods Enzymol., 266, 162-184.
9. Devos, D. and Valencia, A. (2000) Practical limits of function prediction. Proteins, 41, 98-107.
10. Sander, C. and Schneider, R. (1991) Database of homology-derived protein structures and the structural meaning of sequence alignment. Proteins, 9, 56-68.
11. Todd, A.E., Orengo, C.A. and Thornton, J.M. (2001) Evolution of function in protein superfamilies, from a structural perspective. J. Mol. Biol., 307, 1113-1143.
12. Doolittle, R.F. (1994) Convergent evolution: the need to be explicit. Trends Biochem. Sci., 19, 15-18.
13. Gough, J. (2005) Convergent evolution of domain architectures (is rare). Bioinformatics., 21, 1464-1471.
14. Doolittle, R.F. (1981) Similar amino acid sequences: chance or common ancestry? Science, 214, 149-159.
15. Doolittle, R.F. (1989) Similar amino acid sequences revisited. Trends Biochem. Sci., 14, 244-245.
16. Reeck, G.R., de, H.C., Teller, D.C., Doolittle, R.F., Fitch, W.M., Dickerson, R.E., Chambon, P., McLachlan, A.D., Margoliash, E., Jukes, T.H. et al. (1987) "Homology" in proteins and nucleic acids: a terminology muddle and a way out of it. Cell, 50, 667.
17. Altschul, S.F., Madden, T.L., Schaffer, A.A., Zhang, J., Zhang, Z., Miller, W. and Lipman, D.J. (1997) Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Res., 25, 3389-3402.
18. Eddy, S.R. (2004) What is a hidden Markov model? Nat. Biotechnol., 22, 1315-1316.
19. Eddy, S.R. (2008) A probabilistic model of local sequence alignment that simplifies statistical significance estimation. PLoS Comput. Biol., 4, e1000069.
20. Wong, W.C., Maurer-Stroh, S. and Eisenhaber, F. (2011) The Janus-faced E-values of HMMER2: extreme value distribution or logistic function? J. Bioinform. Comput. Biol., 9, 179-206.
21. Wong, W.C., Maurer-Stroh, S. and Eisenhaber, F. (2010) More than 1, 001 problems with protein domain databases: transmembrane regions, signal peptides and the issue of sequence homology. PLoS Comput. Biol., 6, e1000867.
22. Wong, W.C., Maurer-Stroh, S. and Eisenhaber, F. (2011) Not all transmembrane helices are born equal: Towards the extension of the sequence homology concept to membrane proteins. Biol. Direct., 6, 57.
23. Andreeva, A., Howorth, D., Chandonia, J.M., Brenner, S.E., Hubbard, T.J., Chothia, C. and Murzin, A.G. (2008) Data growth and its impact on the SCOP database: new developments. Nucleic Acids Res., 36, D419-D425.
24. Murzin, A.G., Brenner, S.E., Hubbard, T. and Chothia, C. (1995) SCOP: a structural classification of proteins database for the investigation of sequences and structures. J. Mol. Biol., 247, 536-540.
25. Cserzo, M., Eisenhaber, F., Eisenhaber, B. and Simon, I. (2002) On filtering false positive transmembrane protein predictions. Protein Eng, 15, 745-752.
26. Cserzo, M., Eisenhaber, F., Eisenhaber, B. and Simon, I. (2004) TM or not TM: transmembrane protein prediction with low false positive rate using DAS-TMfilter. Bioinformatics., 20, 136-137.
27. Sonnhammer, E.L., von, H.G. and Krogh, A. (1998) A hidden Markov model for predicting transmembrane helices in protein sequences. Proc. Int. Conf. Intell. Syst. Mol. Biol., 6, 175-182.
28. Tusnady, G.E. and Simon, I. (1998) Principles governing amino acid composition of integral membrane proteins: application to topology prediction. J. Mol. Biol., 283, 489-506.
29. Brendel, V., Bucher, P., Nourbakhsh, I.R., Blaisdell, B.E. and Karlin, S. (1992) Methods and algorithms for statistical analysis of protein sequences. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 89, 2002-2006.
30. Kall, L., Krogh, A. and Sonnhammer, E.L. (2004) A combined transmembrane topology and signal peptide prediction method. J. Mol. Biol., 338, 1027-1036.
31. Kall, L., Krogh, A. and Sonnhammer, E.L. (2007) Advantages of combined transmembrane topology and signal peptide prediction-the Phobius web server. Nucleic Acids Res., 35, W429-W432.
32. Wootton, J.C. and Federhen, S. (1996) Analysis of compositionally biased regions in sequence databases. Methods Enzymol., 266, 554-571.
33. White, S.H. and Wimley, W.C. (1998) Hydrophobic interactions of peptides with membrane interfaces. Biochim. Biophys. Acta, 1376, 339-352.
34. White, S.H. and Wimley, W.C. (1999) Membrane protein folding and stability : physical principles. Annu. Rev. Biophys. Biomol. Struc., 28, 365.
35. Bosch, L., Ramon, E., Del Valle, L.J. and Garriga, P. (2003) Structural and functional role of helices I and II in rhodopsin. A novel interplay evidenced by mutations at Gly-51 and Gly-89 in the transmembrane domain. J. Biol. Chem., 278, 20203-20209.
36. Borhan, B., Souto, M.L., Imai, H., Shichida, Y. and Nakanishi, K. (2000) Movement of retinal along the visual transduction path. Science, 288, 2209-2212.
37. Li, J., Edwards, P.C., Burghammer, M., Villa, C. and Schertler, G.F. (2004) Structure of bovine rhodopsin in a trigonal crystal form. J. Mol. Biol., 343, 1409-1438.
38. Shimamura, T., Hiraki, K., Takahashi, N., Hori, T., Ago, H., Masuda, K., Takio, K., Ishiguro, M. and Miyano, M. (2008) Crystal structure of squid rhodopsin with intracellularly extended cytoplasmic region. J. Biol. Chem., 283, 17753-17756.
39. Bywater, R.P. (2005) Location and nature of the residues important for ligand recognition in G-protein coupled receptors. J. Mol. Recognit., 18, 60-72.
40. Murakami, M. and Kouyama, T. (2008) Crystal structure of squid rhodopsin. Nature, 453, 363-367.
41. Archer, E., Maigret, B., Escrieut, C., Pradayrol, L. and Fourmy, D. (2003) Rhodopsin crystal: new template yielding realistic models of G-protein-coupled receptors? Trends Pharmacol Sci., 24, 36-40.
42. Archer-Lahlou, E., Tikhonova, I., Escrieut, C., Dufresne, M., Seva, C., Pradayrol, L., Moroder, L., Maigret, B. and Fourmy, D. (2005) Modeled structure of a G-protein-coupled receptor: the cholecystokinin-1 receptor. J. Med. Chem., 48, 180-191.