Tufts CTSI:: Comparative effectiveness research as a conceptual framework for a focus on impact

Clinical and Translational Science

Volumn 3, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 56-58

  Selker, Harry P ^a   Leslie, Laurel K ^a   Wasser, June S ^a   Plaut, Andrew G ^a   Wilson, Ira B ^a   Griffith, John L ^a  

^a TUFTS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BENIGN TUMOR; CANCER CELL; CLINICAL PRACTICE; COMMUNITY; COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS; CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK; COST EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS; DISEASE CLASSIFICATION; HEALTH; HEALTH CARE; HEALTH CARE POLICY; HUMAN; INFRARED SPECTROPHOTOMETRY; NOTE; OROPHARYNX CANCER; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RESEARCH; ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; EDUCATION; INTERDISCIPLINARY COMMUNICATION; MEDICAL RESEARCH; NEOPLASM; ORGANIZATION; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT; TRANSLATIONAL RESEARCH; UNITED STATES; UNIVERSITY; UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL;

ACADEMIC MEDICAL CENTERS; ACADEMIES AND INSTITUTES; BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH; CLINICAL TRIALS AS TOPIC; HUMANS; INTERDISCIPLINARY COMMUNICATION; MASSACHUSETTS; NEOPLASMS; PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT; TRANSLATIONAL RESEARCH; UNIVERSITIES;

EID: 77955300866     PISSN: 17528054     EISSN: 17528062     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1752-8062.2010.00184.x     Document Type: Note

References (9)

1. Zerhouni E. Translational and clinical science - time for a new vision. N Engl J Med. 2005; 353(15): 1621-1622.
2. Committee on Comparative Effectiveness Research Prioritization, Institute of Medicine (IOM). 2009. Initial National Priorities for Comparative Effectiveness Research. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
3. US Department of Health and Human Services. 2009. Federal Coordinating Council for Comparative Effectiveness Research: Report to the President and Congress. Washington, DC: US Department of Health and Human Services.
4. National Institutes of Health. Report and recommendations on public trust in clinical research for the NIH director from the director's council of public representatives (COPR). Bethesda, MD: National Institutes of Health, 2005.
5. Institute of Medicine. Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health System for the 21st Century. Washington, DC: The National Academies, 2001.
6. Seifer S, Sisco S. Mining the challenges of CBPR for improvements in urban health (editorial notes). J Urban Health. 2006; 83(6): 981-984.
7. Higgins D, Metzler M. Implementing community-based participatory research centers in diverse urban settings. J Urban Health. 2001; 78(3): 488-494.
8. Freeman E, Brugge D, Bennett-Bradley W, Levy J, Rivera Carrasco E. Challenges of conducting community-based participatory research in Boston's neighborhoods to reduce disparities in asthma. J Urban Health. 2006; 83(6): 1013-1021.
9. Selker HP, Strom BL, Ford DE, Meltzer DO, Pauker SG, Pincus HA, Rich EC, Tompkins C, Whitlock EP. White Paper on CTSA Consortium role in facilitating comparative effectiveness research. Clin Transl Sci. 2010; 3(1): 29-37.