Homogenous agendas, disparate frames: CNN and CNN international coverage online

Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media

Volumn 52, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 52-68

  Groshek, Jacob ^a,b  

^a MARQUETTE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 41549135642     PISSN: 08838151     EISSN: 15506878     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/08838150701820809     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. Aday, S., Cluverius, J., & Livingston, S. (2005). As goes the statue, so goes the war: The emergence of the victory frame in television coverage of the Iraq war. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 49, 314-331.
2. Allen, R., & Izcaray, F. (1988). Nominal agenda diversity in a media-rich, less-developed society. Communication Research, 15, 29-50.
3. Annual Report on American Journalism. (2007a). Cable TV audience. Retrieved March 10, 2007, from http://www.stateofthenewsmedia.org/2007/ narrative_cabletv_audience.asp? cat =2&media=6
4. Annual Report on American Journalism. (2007b). Top online news sites. Retrieved March 10, 2007, from http://www.stateofthemedia.org/2007/ chartland.asp?id=486&ct=col&dir=&sort =&col1_box=1 &col2_box=1
5. Bae, H. S. (2000). Product differentiation in national TV newscasts: A comparison of the cable all-news networks and the broadcast networks. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 44, 62-77.
6. Boczkowski, P. J., & de Santos, M. (2007). When more media equals less news: Patterns of content homogenization in Argentina's leading print and online newspapers. Political Communication, 24, 167-180.
7. CNN International Press Release. (2005). CNN International figures. Retrieved April 14, 2005, from http://www.cnnasiapacific.com/en/ groups/international/index.asp
8. CNN International Press Release. (2006). CNN news at a glance. Retrieved March 15, 2007, from http://www.cnnasiapacific.com/factsheets/?catID=9
9. Entman, R. (1991). Framing U.S. coverage of international news: Contrasts in narratives of the KAL and Iran Air incidents. Journal of Communication, 41, 6-26.
10. Entman, R., & Page, B. (1994). The news before the storm: The Iraq war debate and the limits to media independence. In W. L. Bennett & D. Paletz (Eds.), Taken by storm (pp. 82-104). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
11. Fishman, J., & Marvin, C. (2003). Portrayals of violence and group difference in newspaper photographs: Nationalism and media. Journal of Communication, 53, 32-44.
12. Flint, J., Goldsmith, C., & Kahn, G. (2003, April 11). A global journal report: CNN gives U.S., world audiences different views. The Wall Street Journal, B1.
13. Flournoy, D.M., & Stewart, R. K. (1997). CNN: Making news in the global market. London: University of Luton Press.
14. Foote, J. S. (1995). The structure and marketing of global television news. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 39, 127-134.
15. nd ed.). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
16. Gans, H. (2003). Democracy and the news. New York: Oxford University Press.
17. Gilboa, E. (2005). Global television news and foreign policy: Debating the CNN effect. International Studies Perspectives, 6, 325-341.
18. Global Capital Markets Survey. (2006). CNN global television reach. Retrieved March 12, 2007, from http://www.cnnmediainfo.com/mediainfo/ index.html
19. Goodman, A. (Host) (2003). Independent media in a time of war [Motion picture and transcript]. Retrieved October 15, 2004, from http://www.democracynow.org . New York: Democracy Now!
20. Goodman, A., & Goodman, D. (2004). The exception to the rulers: Exposing oily politicians, war profiteers, and the media that love them. New York: Hyperion.
21. th ed.). Washington, DC: CQ Press.
22. Kaufmann, C. (2004). Threat inflation and the failure of the marketplace of ideas: The selling of the Iraq war. International Security, 29(1), 5-48.
23. Kull, S., Ramsay, C., & Lewis, E. (2003). Misperception, the media, and the Iraq war. Political Science Quarterly, 118(4), 569-598.
24. Lee, J., & Craig, R. (1992). News as an ideological framework: Comparing US newspapers'coverage of labor strikes in South Korea and Poland. Discourse and Society, 3(3), 341-363.
25. Lerner, D. (1958). The passing of traditional society. New York: The Free Press.
26. Livingston, S. (1992). The politics of international agenda-setting: Reagan and North-South relations. International Studies Quarterly, 36, 313-330.
27. Livingston, S. (1997). Beyond the "CNN effect": The media-foreign policy dynamic. In P. Norris (Ed.), Politics and the press: The news media and their influences (pp. 291-318). Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner Publishers.
28. Malinkina, O., & McLeod, D. M. (2000). From Afghanistan to Chechnya: News coverage by Izvestia and the New York Times. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 77(1), 37-49.
29. McChesney, R. (1999). Rich media, poor democracy: Communication politics in dubious times. Chicago: University of Illinois Press.
30. McCombs, M. (1997). Building consensus: The news media's agenda-setting roles. Political Communication, 14, 433-443.
31. McCombs, M. (2004). Setting the agenda: The mass media and public opinion. Maiden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.
32. McCombs, M., & Bell, T. (1996). The agenda-setting role of mass communication. In M. Salwen & D. Stacks (Eds.), An integrated approach to communication theory and research (pp. 93-110). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
33. McCombs, M., & Shaw, D. (1972). The agenda-setting function of the mass media. Public Opinion Quarterly, 36(2), 176-185.
34. McCombs, M., and Zhu, J. (1995). Capacity, diversity, and volatility of the public agenda. Public Opinion Quarterly, 59(4), 495-525.
35. Media Tenor. (2003a). The war on TV: "Better" is not good enough. Media Tenor Quarterly Journal, 2, 39-43.
36. Media Tenor. (2003b). Reality: Bush's PR fiasco or success story? Media Tenor Quarterly Journal, 2, 46-47.
37. Media Tenor. (2004). No global media? Media Tenor Quarterly Journal, 2, 58-59.
38. Natarajan, K., & Xiaoming, H. (2003). An Asian voice? A comparative study of Channel News Asia and CNN. Journal of Communication, 53, 300-314.
39. Pan Asian Cross Media Survey. (2006). Ten years at the top - CNN's decade at number one in news and business. Retrieved March 10, 2007, from http://www.cnnasia pacific.com/press/ en/content/162
40. Pan, Z., & Kosicki, G. M. (1993). Framing analysis: An approach to news discourse. Political Communication, 10, 55-75.
41. Peter, J., & de Vreese, C. (2003). Agenda-rich, agenda-poor: A cross national comparative investigation of nominal and public agenda diversity. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 15(1), 44-64.
42. Plasser, F. (2005). From hard to soft news standards?: How political journalists in different media systems evaluate the shifting quality of news. The Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics, 70(2), 47-68.
43. Reese, S. D. (in press). Theorizing a globalized journalism. In M. Loeffelholz & D. H. Weaver (Eds.), Global journalism research: Theories, methods, findings, future (pp. 240-252). London: Blackwell.
44. Rendall, S., & Broughel, T. (2003, May/June). Amplifying officials, squelching dissent. Extra. Retrieved June 25, 2005, from http://www.fair.org/index.php?page=1145
45. Roberts, M., Wanta, W., & Dzwo, T. (2002). Agenda setting and issue salience online. Communication Research, 29(4), 452-465.
46. Robinson, P. (2000). World politics and media power: Problems of research design. Media, Culture, and Society, 22, 227-232.
47. Robinson, P. (2002). The CNN effect: The myth of news, foreign policy, and intervention. New York: Routledge.
48. Rogers, E., & Dearing, J. (1988). Agenda-setting research: Where has it been, where is it going? In D. Graber (Ed.), Media power in politics (pp. 68-98). Washington, DC: CQ Press.
49. Shoemaker, P., & Reese, S. (1991). Mediating the message: Theories of mass media content. White Plains, NY: Longman Publishing Group.
50. Tuchman, G. (1978). Making news: A study in the construction of reality. New York: The Free Press.
51. Turner Webstats. (2006). Online distribution. Retrieved March 19, 2007, from http://www.cnnmediainfo.com/mediainfo/index.html
52. Volkmer, I. (1999). CNN: News in the global sphere. Luton, UK: University of Luton Press.
53. Wanta, W., Golan, G., & Lee, C. (2004). Agenda setting and international news: Media influence on public perceptions of foreign nations. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 81(2), 364-377.
54. Wanta, W., & Hu, D. (1993). The agenda-setting effects of international news coverage: An examination of differing news frames. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 5, 250-264.
55. Wanta, W., King, P., & McCombs, M. (1995). A comparison of factors influencing issue diversity in the U.S. and Taiwan. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 7, 353-365.
56. Yang, J. (2003). Framing the NATO air strikes on Kosovo across countries: Comparison of Chinese and US newspaper coverage. International Communication Gazette, 65(3), 231-249.
57. Zillmann, D., Chen, L., Knobloch, S., & Callison, C. (2004). Effects of lead framing on selective exposure to Internet news reports. Communication Research, 37(1), 58-81.