Limitations of nuclear power as a sustainable energy source

Sustainability

Volumn 4, Issue 6, 2012, Pages 1173-1187

  Pearce, Joshua M ^a  

^a Michigan Technological University   (United States)

Author keywords

Future; Green wash; Life cycle analysis; Nuclear energy; Nuclear power; Sustainability nuclear insecurity

Indexed keywords

EID: 84864385665     PISSN: 20711050     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3390/su4061173     Document Type: Review

References (84)

1. International Energy Agency. World Energy Outlook; International Energy Agency: Paris, France, 2010.
2. Elliot, D. Nuclear or Not? Does Nuclear Power Have a Place in Sustainable Energy Future?; Palgrave Macmillan: Houndmills, Basingstoke, UK, 2007.
3. Goswami, D.Y. A review and future prospects of renewable energy in the global energy system. Adv. Technol. Electr. Eng. Energy 2008, 27, 55-62.
4. Abbott, D. Keeping the energy debate clean: How do we supply the world's energy needs? Proc. IEEE 2010, 98, 42-66.
5. Grimes, R.W.; Nuttall, W.J. Generating the option of a two-stage nuclear renaissance. Science 2010, 329, 799-803.
6. Sovacool, B. Contesting the Future of Nuclear Power: A Critical Global Assessment of Atomic Energy; World Scientific: Hackensack, NJ, USA, 2011.
7. Ferguson, C.D. Nuclear Energy: Balancing Benefits and Risks; Council of Foreign Relations: New York, NY, USA, 2007; CRS No. 28.
8. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Climate Change 2007: Synthesis Report. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2008.
9. Stern, N. The Economics of Climate Change: The Stern Review; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2007.
10. Hoffert, M.I.; Caldeira, K.; Benford, G.; Criswell, D.R.; Green, C.; Herzog, H.; Jain, A.K.; Kheshgi, H.S.; Lackner, K.S.; Lewis, J.S.; et al. Advanced technology paths to global climate stability: Energy for a greenhouse planet. Science 2002, 298, 981-987.
11. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Summary for Policymakers. In Climate Change 2007: Mitigation. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change; Metz, B., Davidson, O.R., Bosch, P.R., Dave, R., Meyer, L.A., Eds.; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK and New York, NY, USA, 2007.
12. Partidario, M.R. Perspectives on Strategic Environmental Assessment; CRC Press: Boca Laton, FL, USA, 1999.
13. Agyeman, J. Sustainable Communities and the Challenge of Environmental Justice; New York University Press: New York, NY, USA, 2005.
14. Schlosberg, D. Environmental Justice and the New Pluralism: The Challenge of Difference for Environmentalism; Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK, 1999.
15. Domenici, P.V. Emissions-Free Nuclear Energy Could Reduce U.S.'s Dangerous Over-Reliance on Natural Gas, Senate Committee on Energy and Natural Resources. U.S. Senate Committee on Energy and Natural Resources. Washington, DC, USA, 2004. Available online: http://www.energy.senate.gov/public/index.cfm/2004/3/press-122dfd14-13c9-438d-be8f-020259fb42dc (accessed on 11 April 2012).
16. Voorspools, K.R.; D'haeseleer, W.D. An evaluation method for calculating the emission responsibility of specific electric applications. Energ. Pol. 2000, 28, 967-980.
17. Voorspools, K.R.; Peersman, I.; D'haeseleer, W.D. A comparative analysis of energy and CO2 taxes on the primary energy mix for electricity generation. Int. J. Energy Res. 2005, 29, 879-890.
18. Nuclear Energy Institute. New Nuclear Energy Facilities Will Support Growth, Provide Clean Electricity. 2012. Available online: http://www.nei.org/resourcesandstats/documentlibrary/reliableandaffordableenergy/factsheet/usneedsnewplants (accessed on 5 May 2012).
19. U.S. Department of Energy. Department of Energy Issues $14 Million in Funding Opportunity Announcements to U.S. Universities for Nuclear Research. U.S. Department of Energy, Washington, DC, USA, 2007. Available online: http://www.ne.doe.gov/newsroom/2007PRs/nePR032807.html (accessed on 11 April 2012).
20. Johansson, T.; Williams, R.; Ishitani, H.; Edmonds, J. Options for reducing CO2 emissions from the energy supply sector. Energ. Pol. 1996, 24, 985-1003.
21. Sailor, W.C.; Bodansky, D.; Braun, C.; Fetter, S.; van der Zwaan, B. Nuclear power: A nuclear solution to climate change? Science 2000, 288, 1177-1178.
22. Cheney, D.; Powell, C.L.; O'Neill, P.; Norton, G.; Veneman, A.M.; Evans, D.L.; Mineta, N.Y.; Abraham, S.; Allbaugh, J.M.; Whitman, C.T.; et al. National Energy Policy, Report of the National Energy Policy Development Group; U.S. Government Printing Office: Washington, DC, USA, 2001.
23. Gagnona, L.; Belanger, C.; Uchiyama, Y. Life-cycle assessment of electricity generation options: The status of research in year 2001. Energ. Pol. 2002, 30, 1267-1278.
24. Rohatgi, U.; Jo, J.H.; Lee, J.C.; Bari, R.A. Impact of the nuclear option on the environment and the economy. Nuclear Technol. 2002, 137, 252-264.
25. Moore, P. Going Nuclear: A Green Makes the Case. Washington Post, April 16, 2006, Page B01.
26. Barnaby, F.; Kemp, J. Secure Energy? Civil Nuclear Power, Security and Global Warming; Oxford Research Group: London, UK, March 2007. Available online: http://www.oxfordresearchgroup.org.uk/publications/briefing_papers/secure_energy_civil_nuclear_power_security_and_global_warming (accessed on 11 April 2012).
27. Fthenakis, V.M.; Kim, H.C. Greenhouse-gas emissions from solar electric- and nuclear power: A life-cycle study. Energ. Pol. 2007, 35, 2549-2557.
28. Vattenfall, A.B. Generation Nordic Countries Certified Environmental Product Declaration of Electricity from Ringhals NPP. 2004; S-P-00026.
29. Hondo, H. Life cycle GHG emission analysis of power generation systems: Japanese case. Energy 2005, 30, 2042-2056.
30. DeLucchi, M. Emissions of Greenhouse Gases from the Use of Transportation Fuel and Electricity; Argonne National Laboratory: Downers Grove, IL, USA, 1991; Volume 2, ANL/ESD/TM-22.
31. Kim, S.; Dale, B.E. Life cycle inventory information of the United States Electricity System. Int. J. LCA 2005, 10, 294-310.
32. Rutledge, D. Estimating long-term world coal production with logit and probit transforms. Int. J. Coal Geol. 2011, 85, 23-33.
33. WEC. WEC, Survey of Energy Resources; World Energy Council: London, UK, 2010.
34. Volkers, C. Appendix SRES Version 1.1, an Excel Workbook With a Spreadsheet for Each Scenario; UNEP: Arendal, Norway, 2010. Available online: http://www.grida.no/climate/ipcc/emission/data/allscen.xls (accessed on 1 October, 2010).
35. Pearce, J.M. Thermodynamic limitations to nuclear energy deployment as a greenhouse gas mitigation technology. Int. J. Nuclear Gov. Econ. Ecol. 2008, 2, 113-130.
36. Kenny, R.; Law, C.; Pearce, J.M. Towards real energy economics: Energy policy driven by life-cycle carbon emission. Energ. Pol. 2010, 38, 1969-1978.
37. Abbott, D. Is nuclear power globally scalable? Proc. IEEE 2011, 99, 1611-1617.
38. Antunes, S.C.; Pereira, R.; Marques, S.M.; Castro, B.B.; Gonçalves, F. Impaired microbial activity caused by metal pollution: A field study in a deactivated uranium mining area. Sci. Total Environ. 2011, 410, 87-95.
39. Lochbaum, D. Got Water?; Union of Concerned Scientists: Cambridge, MA, USA. 2007.
40. CBC News. The catastrophe of Chornobyl. CBC News. April 26, 2006. Available online: http://www.cbc.ca/news/background/ukraine/chernobyl.html (accessed on 11 April 2012).
41. BBC News. Neighbours Count Cost of Chernobyl Disaster. BBC News, April 26, 1998.
42. UNSCREAR. Sources and Effects of Ionizing Radiation. Vol. II, Scientific Annexes C, D, E; United Nations: New York, NY, USA, 2008.
43. Lavelle, M. A Search for Answers; National Geographic News: Washington, DC, USA, 2011.
44. Kuletz, V. Invisible Spaces, Violent Places: Cold War Nuclear and Militarised Landscapes. In Violent Environments; Peluso, N.L., Watts, M., Eds.; Cornell University Press: Ithaca, NY, USA, 2001.
45. Hooks, G.; Smith, C.L. The Treadmill of Destruction: National Sacrifice Areas and Native Americans. Am. Sociol. Rev. 2004, 69, 558-575.
46. Behrens, C.; Holt, M. Nuclear Power Plants: Vulnerability to Terrorist Attack; Report for Congress, Order Code RS21131; Congressional Research Service: Washington D.C., USA, 2005.
47. Ramberg, B. Nuclear plants-Military hostages? Bull. At. Sci. 1936, 43, 3-17.
48. Cochran, T.B.; Feiveson, H.A.; Patterson, W.; Pshakin, G.; Ramana, M.V.; Schneider, M.; Suzuki, T.; von Hippel, F. Fast Breeder Reactor Programs: History and Status, Report 8 in the International Panel on Fissile Material (IPFM); Princeton University: Princeton, NJ, USA, 2010.
49. Deutch, J.M.; Forsberg, C.W.; Kadak, A.C.; Kazimi, M.S.; Moniz, E.J.; Ansolabehere, J.E.; Du, Y.; Pierpoint, L. Update of the MIT 2003 Future of Nuclear Power: An Interdisciplinary MIT Study; Massachusetts Institute of Technology: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2009.
50. Clark, D.E.; Allison, T. Spent nuclear fuel and residential property values: The influence of proximity, visual cues and public information. Papers Reg. Sci. 1999, 78, 403-421.
51. Clark, D.E.; Nieves, L.A. An interregional hedonic analysis of noxious impacts on local wages and property values. J. Environ. Econ. Manag. 1994, 27, 235-253.
52. Folland, S.; Hough, R. Externalities of nuclear power plants: Further evidence. J. Reg. Sci. 2000, 40, 735-753.
53. Cooper, M. All Risk, No Reward for Taxpayers and Ratepayers: The Economics of Subsidizing the 'Nuclear Renaissance' With Loan Guarantees and Construction Work in Progress; Report of the Institute for Energy and the Environment; Vermont Law School: Royalton, VT, USA, 2009.
54. Blackburn, J.; Cunningham, S. Solar and Nuclear Costs-The Historic Crossover: Solar Energy is Now the Better Buy; NC WARN-Waste Awareness & Reduction Network: Durham, NC, USA, 2010. Available online: http://www.ncwarn.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/NCW-SolarReport_final1.pdf (accessed on 11 April 2012).
55. van Leeuwen, J.W.S.; Smith, P. Nuclear Power-The Energy Balance; Chaam: Netherlands, 2008. Available online: http://www.stormsmith.nl (accessed on 11 April 2012).
56. Goldberg, M. Federal Energy Subsidies: Not All Technologies Are Created Equal; Research Report No. 11; Renewable Energy Policy Project: Washington, DC, USA, 2000. Available online: http://www.repp.org/repp_pubs/pdf/subsidies.pdf (accessed on 11 April 2012).
57. Martin, H.D.; Pearson, B., The Canadian Nuclear Lesson; Sierra Club of Canada and Greenpeace International Briefing Paper; Sierra Club Canada: Ottowa, Canada, 2001. Available online: http://www.sierraclub.ca/national/programs/atmosphere-energy/nuclear-free/reactors/nuclearand-climate-change.pdf (accessed on 11 April 2012).
58. Slavin, M. The Federal Energy Subsidy Scorecard: How Renewables Stack Up. Renewable Energy World, 2009. Available online: http://www.renewableenergyworld.com/rea/news/article/2009/11/the-federal-energy-subsidy-scorecard-how-renewables-stack-up (accessed on 21 April 2012).
59. Branker, K.; Pathak, M.J.M.; Pearce, J.M. A review of solar photovoltaic levelized cost of electricity. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2011, 15, 4470-4482.
60. McNeil, B. The costs of introducing nuclear power to Australia. J. Aust. Polit. Econ. 2007, 59, 5-29.
61. Hans-Holger, R. Carbon Free Energy. In Proceedings of the 2nd Canadian Climate Change Technology Conference, Hamilton, Canada, 12-15 May 2009.
62. Trebilcock, M.; Winter, R.A. The economics of nuclear accident law. Int. Rev. Law Econ. 1997, 17, 215-243.
63. United States General Accounting Office. Nuclear Regulation: NRC's Liability Insurance Requirements for Nuclear Power Plants Owned by Limited Liability Companies; Report to Congressional Requesters GAO-04-654; U.S. Government Accountability Office: Washington D.C., USA, May 2004.
64. Reuters. Cheney Says Push Needed to Boost Nuclear Power. Reuters News Service, May 15, 2001.
65. Dubin, J.A.; Rothwell, G.S. Subsidy to nuclear-power through price-anderson liability limit. Contemp. Policy Issues 1990, 8, 73-79.
66. Heyes, A. Determining the price of price-anderson. Regulation 2003, 25, 105-110.
67. The Chernobyl Forum. 2003-2005, Chernobyl's Legacy: Health, Environmental and Socio-Economic Impacts and Recommendations to the Governments of Belarus, the Russian Federation and Ukraine, 2nd revised version; IAEA/PI/A.87 Rev.2/06-09181IAEA; Division of Public Information: Vienna, Austria, 2006.
68. United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission. The Price-Anderson Act: The Third Decade; NUREG-0957; United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission: Washington, DC, USA, 1983.
69. Zelenika-Zovko, I.; Pearce, J.M. Diverting indirect subsidies from the nuclear industry to the photovoltaic industry: Energy and economic returns. Energ. Pol. 2011, 39, 2626-2632.
70. Rothwell, G.; van der Zwaan, B.C.C. Are light water reactor systems sustainable? J. Energy Dev. 2003, 29, 65-79.
71. Adamantiades, A; Kessides, I. Nuclear power for sustainable development: Current status and future prospects. Energ. Pol. 2009, 37, 5149-5166.
72. President's Commission on the Accident at Three Mile Island. The Need for Change, the Legacy of TMI: Report of the President's Commission on the Accident at Three Mile Island; President's Commission: Washington, DC, USA, 1979.
73. Thompson, J.; Thompson, R.; Bear, D. TMI Assessment, Part 2. 1995. Available online: http://www.southernstudies.org/images/sitepieces/ThompsonTMIassessment.pdf (accessed on 11 April 2012).
74. Gundersen, A. Three Myths of the Three Mile Island Accident. Lecture. Fairewinds Energy Education Corp.: Burlington, VT, USA. 2009.
75. Hatch, M.C.; Beyea, J.; Nieves, J.W.; Susser, M. Cancer near the Three Mile Island nuclear plant: Radiation emissions. Am. J. Epidemiol. 1990, 132, 397-417.
76. Wing, S.; Richardson, D.; Armstrong, D.; Crawford-Brown, D. A reevaluation of cancer incidence near the Three Mile Island nuclear plant: The collision of evidence and assumptions. Environ. Health Perspect. 1997, 105, 52-57.
77. Hatch, M.C.; Wallenstein, S.; Beyea, J.; Nieves, J.W.; Susser, M. Cancer rates after the Three Mile Island nuclear accident and proximity of residence to the plant. Am. J. Public Health 1991, 81, 719-724.
78. Gur, D.; Good, W.F.; Tokuhata, G.K.; Goldhaber, M.K.; Rosen, J.C.; Rao, G.R. Radiation dose assignment to individuals residing near the Three Mile Island nuclear station. Proc. PA Acad. Sci. 1983, 57, 99-102.
79. Talbott, E.O.; Youk, A.O.; McHugh, K.P.; Shire, J.D.; Zhang, A.; Murphy, B.P.; Engberg, R.A. Mortality among the residents of the Three Mile Island accident area: 1979-1992. Environ. Health Perspect. 2000, 108, 545-552.
80. Wing, S.; Richardson, D. Collision of evidence and assumptions: TMI déjà view. Environ. Health Perspect. 2000, 108, A546-A547.
81. Talbott, E.O.; Zhang, A.; Youk, A.O.; McHugh-Pemu, K.P.; Zborowski, J.V. Re: "Collision of evidence and assumptions: TMI déjà view." Environ. Health Perspect. 2000, 108, A547-A549.
82. Brasor, P. Public wary of official optimism. The Japan Times. Sunday, March 11, 2012. Available online: http://www.japantimes.co.jp/text/fd20120311pb.html (accessed on 11 April 2012).
83. You Can View Official EPA Radiation Readings. Washington Post. Available online: http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2011/03/you-can-view-official-epa-radiation-readings.html (accessed on 11 April 2012).
84. Japan Geigermap: At-a-glance. Available online: http://japan.failedrobot.com/ (accessed on 11 April 2012).