Early postoperative functional differences between total knee arthroplasties supplied with mobile-bearing platform or fixed-bearing system - An analysis of gait pattern

Zeitschrift fur Orthopadie und Ihre Grenzgebiete

Volumn 142, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 40-45

  Mockel G ^a,b   Perka, C ^a   Gabler J ^a   Zippel, H ^a  

^a HUMBOLDT UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^b CHARITÉ UNIVERSITÄTSMEDIZIN BERLIN   (Germany)

Author keywords

Gait analysis; Mobile bearing platform; Total knee arthroplasty

Indexed keywords

CEFOTIAM; CLEXANE 40; ENOXAPARIN;

AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL EXAMINATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMUR HEAD NECROSIS; GAIT; HUMAN; IMPLANTATION; JOINT FUNCTION; KNEE FUNCTION; NERVE LESION; OSTEOARTHRITIS; POSTOPERATIVE CARE; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; POSTOPERATIVE INFECTION; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS; STANDING; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; TIME SERIES ANALYSIS; TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT; WEIGHT BEARING; ADULT; BIOMECHANICS; COMPARATIVE STUDY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; JOINT CHARACTERISTICS AND FUNCTIONS; KNEE OSTEOARTHRITIS; KNEE PROSTHESIS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; PROSTHESIS; RADIOGRAPHY; REFERENCE VALUE; WALKING;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ARTHRITIS, RHEUMATOID; BIOMECHANICS; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; GAIT; HUMANS; KNEE PROSTHESIS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OSTEOARTHRITIS, KNEE; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; RANGE OF MOTION, ARTICULAR; REFERENCE VALUES; WALKING; WEIGHT-BEARING;

EID: 1542313762     PISSN: 00443220     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1055/s-2004-818028     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Buechel Sr FF, Buechel Jr FF, Pappas MJ, D'Allesio J. Twenty year evaluation of meniscal bearing and rotating platform knee replacements. Clin Orthop 2001; 388: 41-50
2. Blunn GW, Walker PS, Joshi A, Hardinge K. The dominance of cyclic sliding in producing wear in total knee replacements. Clin Orthop 1991; 273: 253-260
3. Callaghan JJ. Reduction of polyethylene wear in mobile bearing knees. Orthop today 2000; 12: 8-9
4. Kadaba MP, Ramakrishnan HK, Wootten ME, Gainey J, Gorton G, Cochran GV. Repeatability of kinematic, kinetic and electromyographic data in normal adult gait. J Orthop Research 1989; 7: 849-860
5. Rösler J, Perka C. The effect of anatomical positional relationships on kinetic parameters after total hip replacement. Int Orthop 2000; 24: 23-27
6. Andersson GBJ, Andriacchi TP, Galante JO. Correlations between changes in gait and in clinical status after knee athroplasty. Acta Orthop Scand 1981; 52: 569-573
7. Kirtley C, Whittle MW, Jefferson RJ. Influence of walking speed on gait parameters. J Biomed Eng 1985; 7: 282-288
8. Chao EYS, Laugham RK, Stauffer RN. Biomechanical gait evaluation of pre and postoperative total knee replacement patients. Arch Orthop Traumat Surg 1980; 97: 309-317
9. Kaufman KR, Hughes C, Morrey BF, Morrey M, An KN. Gait characteristics of patients with knee osteoarthritis. J Biomech 2001; 34: 907-915
10. Perka C, Möckel G, Boenick U. Kinematische und kinetische Ganganalyse vor und nach Knietotalendoprothesenimplantation. Z Orthop 2000; 138: 191-196
11. Andriacchi TP, Galante JO, Fermier RW. The influence of total knee-replacement design on walking and stair-climbing. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1982; 64: 1328-1335
12. Hatanaka Y, Takai S, Hase H, Kubo S, Hirasawa Y. Kinematic gait analysis of patients after total knee arthroplasty. In: Hirasawa YCB, Sledge SLY (eds). Clinical biomechanics and related research. Tokyo, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, London, Paris, Hong Kong, Barcelona, Budapest: Springer, 1994: 401-411
13. Ranawat CS, Flynn Jr WF, Saddler S, Hansraj KK, Maynard MJ. Results of the total condylar knee arthroplasty: A fifteen year survivorship study. Clin Orthop 1993; 286: 94-102
14. Callaghan JJ, Squire MW, Goetz DD, Sullivan PM, Johnston RC. Cemented rotating-platform total knee replacement. A nine-to twelve year follow up study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2000; 82: 705-711
15. Dennis DA. Technical aspects of mobile-bearing knee implants. Orthop today 2000; 12: 6-7
16. Rostoker W, Galante JO. Contact pressure dependence of wear rates of ultra high molecular weight polyethylene. J Biomed Mater Res 1979; 13: 957-964
17. Harman MK, Banks SA, Hodge WA. Polyethylene damage and knee kinematics after total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 2001; 392: 383-393
18. Matsuda S, White SE, Williams 2nd VG, McCarthy DS, Whiteside LA. Contact stress analysis in meniscal bearing total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 1998; 13: 699-706
19. Stiehl JB. World experience with low contact stress mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty: a literature review. Orthopedics 2002; 25: 213-217
20. Dennis DA, Komistek RD, Colwell CW, et al. In vivo anterioposterior femoral tibial translation: A multicenter analysis. Clin Orthop 1998; 256: 47-57
21. Jones VC, Barton DC, Fitzpatrick DP, Auger DD, Stone MH, Fisher J. An experimental model of tibial counterface polyethylene wear in mobile beraing knees: the influence of design and kinematics. Biomed Mater Eng 1999; 9: 189-196