Modeling Microbial Dynamics in Heterogeneous Environments: Growth on Soil Carbon Sources

Microbial Ecology

Volumn 63, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 883-897

  Resat, Haluk ^a   Bailey, Vanessa ^a   McCue, Lee Ann ^a   Konopka, Allan ^a  

^a PACIFIC NORTHWEST NATIONAL LABORATORY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CARBON; CELLULOSE; HYDROLASE;

ARTICLE; BACTERIUM; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; CHEMISTRY; ENZYME SPECIFICITY; GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND AGING; HYDROLYSIS; KINETICS; METABOLISM; MICROBIOLOGY; SOIL;

BACTERIA; CARBON; CELLULOSE; HYDROLASES; HYDROLYSIS; KINETICS; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; SOIL; SOIL MICROBIOLOGY; SUBSTRATE SPECIFICITY;

BACTERIA (MICROORGANISMS);

EID: 84864377231     PISSN: 00953628     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00248-011-9965-x     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Allison SD (2005) Cheaters, diffusion and nutrients constrain decomposition by microbial enzymes in spatially structured environments. Ecol Lett 8: 626-635.
2. Allison SD, Martiny JBH (2008) Resistance, resilience, and redundancy in microbial communities. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 105: 11512-11519.
3. Anderson TH, Domsch KH (1985) Determination of ecophysiological maintenance carbon requirements of soil-microorganisms in a dormant state. Biol Fertil Soils 1(2): 81-89.
4. Anderson TH, Domsch KH (1985) Maintenance carbon requirements of actively metabolizing microbial populations under in situ conditions. Soil Biol Biochem 17(2): 197-203.
5. Azam F, Malfatti F (2007) Microbial structuring of marine ecosystems. Nat Rev Microbiol 5(10): 782-791.
6. Baloo S, Ramkrishna D (1991) Metabolic regulation in bacterial continuous cultures. 2. Biotechnol Bioeng 38(11): 1353-1363.
7. Baloo S, Ramkrishna D (1991) Metabolic regulation in bacterial continuous cultures. 1. Biotechnol Bioeng 38(11): 1337-1352.
8. Berg HC (1993) Random walks in biology. Princeton University Press, Princeton.
9. Bratbak G, Dundas I (1984) Bacterial dry-matter content and biomass estimations. Appl Environ Microbiol 48(4): 755-757.
10. Cambier C, Bousso M, Masse D, Perrier E (2007) A new, offer versus demand, modelling approach to assess the impact of micro-organisms spatio-temporal population dynamics on soil organic matter decomposition rates. Ecol Model 209(2-4): 301-313.
11. Chenu C, Roberson EB (1996) Diffusion of glucose in microbial extracellular polysaccharide as affected by water potential. Soil Biol Biochem 28(7): 877-884.
12. Creagh AL, Ong E, Jervis E, Kilburn DG, Haynes CA (1996) Binding of the cellulose-binding domain of exoglucanase cex from cellulomonas fimi to insoluble microcrystalline cellulose is entropically driven. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 93(22): 12229-12234.
13. Dethlefsen L, Schmidt TM (2007) Performance of the translational apparatus varies with the ecological strategies of bacteria. J Bacteriol 189(8): 3237-3245.
14. Di Mattia E, Grego S, Cacciari I (2002) Eco-physiological characterization of soil bacterial populations in different states of growth. Microb Ecol 43(1): 34-43.
15. Dorodnikov M, Blagodatskaya E, Blagodatsky S, Fangmeier A, Kuzyakov Y (2009) Stimulation of r- vs. K-selected microorganisms by elevated atmospheric co2 depends on soil aggregate size. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 69(1): 43-52.
16. Ensign JC (1970) Long-term starvation survival of rod and spherical cells of arthrobacter crystallopoietes. J Bacteriol 103(3): 569-577.
17. Fansler SJ, Smith JL, Bolton H, Bailey VL (2005) Distribution of two c cycle enzymes in soil aggregates of a prairie chronosequence. Biol Fertil Soils 42: 17-23.
18. Ginovart M, Lopez D, Gras A (2005) Individual-based modelling of microbial activity to study mineralization of c and n and nitrification process in soil. Nonlinear Analysis-Real World Applications 6(4): 773-795.
19. Gupta S, Pilyugin SS, Narang A (2005) The dynamics of single-substrate continuous cultures: the role of ribosomes. J Theor Biol 232(4): 467-490.
20. Hassink J, Bouwman LA, Zwart KB, Brussaard L (1993) Relationships between habitable pore-space, soil biota and mineralization rates in grassland soils. Soil Biol Biochem 25(1): 47-55.
21. Hellweger FL (2008) Spatially explicit individual-based modeling using a fixed super-individual density. Comput Geosci 34: 144-152.
22. Hellweger FL, Bucci V (2009) A bunch of tiny individuals-individual-based modeling for microbes. Ecol Model 220(1): 8-22.
23. Huang AA (1975) Kinetic studies on insoluble cellulose-cellulase system. Biotechnol Bioeng 17(10): 1421-1433.
24. Kjelleberg S, Albertson N, Flardh K, Holmquist L, Jouperjaan A, Marouga R et al (1993) How do nondifferentiating bacteria adapt to starvation. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek International Journal of General and Molecular Microbiology 63(3-4): 333-341.
25. Konopka A (2000) Microbial physiological state at low growth rate in natural and engineered ecosystems. Curr Opin Microbiol 3(3): 244-247.
26. Kreft JU, Booth G, Wimpenny JW (1998) Bacsim, a simulator for individual-based modelling of bacterial colony growth. Microbiology 144(Pt 12): 3275-3287.
27. Kreft JU, Picioreanu C, Wimpenny JW, van Loosdrecht MC (2001) Individual-based modelling of biofilms. Microbiology 147(Pt 11): 2897-2912.
28. Lu YP, Zhang YHP, Lynd LR (2006) Enzyme-microbe synergy during cellulose hydrolysis by clostridium thermocellum. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 103(44): 16165-16169.
29. Lynd LR, Weimer PJ, van Zyl WH, Pretorius IS (2002) Microbial cellulose utilization: fundamentals and biotechnology. Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews 66(3): 506.
30. Masse D, Cambier C, Brauman A, Sall S, Assigbetse K, Chotte JL (2007) Mior: an individual-based model for simulating the spatial patterns of soil organic matter microbial decomposition. Eur J Soil Sci 58(5): 1127-1135.
31. Moorhead DL, Sinsabaugh RL (2000) Simulated patterns of litter decay predict patterns of extracellular enzyme activities. Appl Soil Ecol 14(1): 71-79.
32. Moorhead DL, Sinsabaugh RL (2006) A theoretical model of litter decay and microbial interaction. Ecol Monogr 76(2): 151-174.
33. Moorhead DL, Sinsabaugh RL, Linkins AE, Reynolds JF (1996) Decomposition processes: modelling approaches and applications. Sci Total Environ 183(1-2): 137-149.
34. Nunan N, Wu K, Young IM, Crawford JW, Ritz K (2002) In situ spatial patterns of soil bacterial populations, mapped at multiple scales, in an arable soil. Microb Ecol 44(4): 296-305.
35. O'Donnell AG, Young IM, Rushton SP, Shirley MD, Crawford JW (2007) Visualization, modelling and prediction in soil microbiology. Nat Rev Microbiol 5(9): 689-699.
36. Or D, Smets BF, Wraith JM, Dechesne A, Friedman SP (2007) Physical constraints affecting bacterial habitats and activity in unsaturated porous media-a review. Adv Water Res 30: 1505-1527.
37. Panikov NS (1991) A synthetic chemostat model as a means of describing the complex behavior of microorganisms. Microbiology 60: 299-307.
38. Panikov NS (1995) Microbial growth kinetics. Chapman and Hall, London.
39. Panikov NS, Sizova MV (1996) A kinetic method for estimating the biomass of microbial functional groups in soil. J Microbiol Methods 24(3): 219-230.
40. Peth S, Horn R, Beckmann F, Donath T, Fischer J, Smucker AJM (2008) Three-dimensional quantification of intra-aggregate pore-space features using synchrotron-radiation-based microtomography. Soil Sci Soc Am J 72(4): 897-907.
41. Pianka ER (1970) R-selection and k-selection. American Naturalist 104(940): 592.
42. Resat H, Costa MN, Shankaran H (2011) Spatial aspects in biological system simulations. In: Johnson ML, Brand L (eds) Methods in enzymology: Computer methods, part c. Elsevier, p. 485-511.
43. Salyers AA, Reeves A, Delia J (1996) Solving the problem of how to eat something as big as yourself: diverse bacterial strategies for degrading polysaccharides. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol 17(5-6): 470-476.
44. Sinsabaugh RL, Lauber CL, Weintraub MN, Ahmed B, Allison SD, Crenshaw C et al (2008) Stoichiometry of soil enzyme activity at global scale. Ecol Lett 11(11): 1252-1264.
45. Six J, Bossuyt H, Degryze S, Denef K (2004) A history of research on the link between (micro)aggregates, soil biota, and soil organic matter dynamics. Soil Tillage Res 79: 7-31.
46. Sleutel S, Cnudde V, Masschaele B, Vlassenbroek J, Dierick M, van Hoorebeke L et al (2008) Comparison of different nano- and micro-focus x-ray computed tomography set-ups for the visualization of the soil microstructure and soil organic matter. Computers and Geosciences 34(8): 931-938.
47. Smith JL (1989) Sensitivity analysis of critical parameters in microbial maintenance-energy models. Biol Fertil Soils 8(1): 7-12.
48. Stenstrom J, Svensson K, Johansson M (2001) Reversible transition between active and dormant microbial states in soil. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 36(2-3): 93-104.
49. Strong DT, De Wever H, Merckx R, Recous S (2004) Spatial location of carbon decomposition in the soil pore system. Eur J Soil Sci 55(4): 739-750.
50. van Bodegom P (2007) Microbial maintenance: a critical review on its quantification. Microb Ecol 53(4): 513-523.
51. van Loosdrecht MCM, Lyklema J, Norde W, Zehnder AJB (1990) Influence of interfaces on microbial activity. Microbiol Rev 54(1): 75-87.
52. Vlachos C, Paton RC, Saunders JR, Wu QH (2005) A rule-based approach to the modelling of bacterial ecosystems. Biosystems 84(1): 49-72.
53. Young IM, Crawford JW (2004) Interactions and self-organization in the soil-microbe complex. Science 304(5677): 1634-1637.