A kinetic method for estimating the biomass of microbial functional groups in soil

Journal of Microbiological Methods

Volumn 24, Issue 3, 1996, Pages 219-230

  Panikov, Nicolai S ^a   Sizova, Maria V ^a  

^a RUSSIAN ACADEMY OF SCIENCES   (Russian Federation)

Author keywords

Mathematical simulation; Physiological state of microorganisms in situ; Soil microbial biomass

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ASSAY; BIOMASS; CONTROLLED STUDY; MATHEMATICS; MICROBIAL GROWTH; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SAMPLING; SIMULATION; SOIL;

EUKARYOTA; PROKARYOTA;

EID: 0030053025     PISSN: 01677012     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/0167-7012(95)00074-7     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Akimenko, V.K., Trutko, S.M., Medentsev, A.G., Korobov, V.P. (1983) Distribution of cyanide-resistant respiration among yeasts and bacteria and its relation to oversynthesis of metabolites. Arch. Microbiol. 136, 234-241.
2. Anderson, J.P.I. and Domsch, K.H. (1973) Quantification of bacterial and fungal contribution to soil respiration. Arch. Mikrobiol. 93, 113-127.
3. Anderson, J.P.I. and Domsch, K.H. (1978) A physiological method for the quantitative measurement of microbial biomass in soils. Soil Biol. Biochem. 10, 215-221.
4. Dedysh, S.N., Paleyeva, M.V. and Panikov, M.S. (1991) A kinetic method for the determination of algal biomass in soil. Microbiology (Engl. transl.) 60, 387-394.
5. Jenkinson, D.S. and Ladd, J.N. (1981) Microbial biomass in soils: measurement and turnover. In Soil Biochemistry, Vol. 5 (ed. by E.A. Paul and J.N. Ladd), 415-471. Marcel Dekker, New York.
6. Jenkinson, D.S. & Powlson, D.S. (1976) The effect of biocidal treatments on metabolism in soil. V. A method for measuring soil biomass. Soil Biol. Biochem. 17, 57-63.
7. Ingham, E.R., Griffiths, R.P., Cromack, K. & Entry, J.A. (1991) Comparison of direct vs fumigation incubation microbial biomass estimates from ectomycorrhizal mat and non-mat soils. Soil Biol. Biochem. 23, 465-471.
8. Mirchink, T.G. and Panikov, N.S. (1985) Modern approaches for determining the biomass and productivity of fungi and bacteria in soil. Adv. Microbiol. (Usp. Mikrobiol.) 20, 198-226 (in Russian).
9. Paleyeva, M.V., Svetlov, S.V. and Panikov, N.S. (1990) Measurement of the biomass of soil microorganisms utilizing molecular hydrogen. Microbiology (Engl. transl.) 59, 344-349.
10. Panikov, N.S. (1991a) Kinetics of Microbial Growth: General Principles and Ecological Applications. Nauka Publ., Moscow.
11. Panikov, N.S. (1991a) A synthetic chemostat model as a means of describing the complex dynamic behavior of microorganisms. Microbiology (Engl. transl.) 60, 299-307.
12. Parkinson, D. and Coleman, D.C. (1991) Microbial communities, activity and biomass. Agricult., Ecosyst. Envir. 34: 3-33.
13. Payne, W.J. (1970) Energy yields and growth of heterotrophs. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 24, 17-52.
14. Popov, A.I. and Panikov, N.S. (1990) A kinetic method for the measurement of the numbers of nitrifying bacteria in soil. Microbiology (Engl. trans.) 59, 482-486.
15. Petersen, S.O., Henriksen, K., Blackburn, T.H., and King, G.M. (1991) A comparison of phospholipid and chloroform fumigation analysis for biomass in soil: potentials and limitations. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 85, 257-268.
16. Pirt, S.J. (1975) Principles of Microbe and Cell Cultivation. Blackwell Science, London.
17. Schmidt, S.K. (1992) A substrate-induced growth-response method for estimating the biomass of microbial functional groups in soil and aquatic systems. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 101, 197-206.
18. Tempest, D.W. and Neijssel, O.M. (1984) The status of YATP and maintenance energy as biologically interpretable phenomena. Ann. Rev. Microbiol. 38, 459-486.