The impact of rail access on condominium prices in Hamburg

Transportation

Volumn 39, Issue 5, 2012, Pages 997-1017

  Brandt, Sebastian ^a   Maennig, Wolfgang ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HAMBURG   (Germany)

Author keywords

Accessibility; Hamburg; Location choice; Public transport; Real estate economics

Indexed keywords

ACCESSIBILITY; HAMBURG; LOCATION CHOICE; PUBLIC TRANSPORT; REAL ESTATE;

APARTMENT HOUSES; ECONOMICS; MASS TRANSPORTATION; RAILROAD STATIONS; RAILROAD TRANSPORTATION;

COSTS;

ACCESSIBILITY; HEDONIC ANALYSIS; HOUSING MARKET; LOCATION DECISION; PRICE DYNAMICS; PUBLIC TRANSPORT; RAILWAY TRANSPORT;

GERMANY; HAMBURG [GERMANY];

EID: 84864287620     PISSN: 00494488     EISSN: 15729435     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11116-011-9379-0     Document Type: Article

References (74)

1. Agostini, C. A., Palmucci, G. A.: The anticipated capitalisation effect of a new metro line on housing prices. Fiscal Stud. 29, 233-256 (2008).
2. Ahlfeldt, G. M., Maennig, W.: Substitutability and complementarity of urban amenities: external effects of built heritage in Berlin. Real Estate Econ. 38(2), 285-323 (2010).
3. Alonso, W.: Location and Land Use: Toward a General Theory of Land Rent. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (1964).
4. Andersson, D. E., Shyr, O. F., Fu, J.: Does high-speed rail accessibility influence residential property prices? Hedonic estimates from southern Taiwan. J. Transp. Geogr. 18, 166-174 (2010).
5. Andersson, H., Jonsson, L., Ögren, M.: Property prices and exposure to multiple noise sources: hedonic regression with road and railway noise. Environ. Resour. Econ. (2009). doi: 10. 1007/s10640-009-9306-4.
6. Armstrong, R. J., Rodríguez, D. A.: An evaluation of the accessibility benefits of commuter rail in eastern Massachusetts using spatial hedonic price functions. Transportation 33, 21-43 (2006).
7. Baum-Snow, N., Kahn, M. E.: The effects of new public projects to expand urban rail transit. J. Public Econ. 77, 241-263 (2000).
8. Benjamin, J. D., Sirmans, G. S.: Mass transportation, apartment rent and property values. J. Real Estate Res. 12, 1-8 (1996).
9. Bowes, D. R., Ihlanfeldt, K. R.: Identifying the impacts of rail transit stations on residential property values. J. Urban Econ. 50, 1-25 (2001).
10. BMVBW: Bericht der Bundesregierung über den Öffentlichen Personennahverkehr in Deutschland nach der Vollendung der deutschen Einheit. Bundesministerium für Verkehr, Bau- und Wohnungswesen, Berlin (1999).
11. Box, G. E. P., Cox, D. R.: An analysis of transformations. J. R. Stat. Soc. B 26, 211-252 (1964).
12. BSU: Fahrgeschwindigkeiten im Straßenverkehr - Hamburg vorn im Städtevergleich. Behörde für Stadtentwicklung und Umwelt, Hamburg (2001).
13. BSU: Zentren: Zentrale Standorte nach Flächennutzungsplan und Bestand der Nahversorgungszentren. Behörde für Stadtentwicklung und Umwelt, Hamburg (2003).
14. Can, A., Megbolugbe, I.: Spatial dependence and house price index construction. J. Real Estate Finance Econ. 14, 203-222 (1997).
15. Cassel, E., Mendelsohn, R.: The choice of functional forms for hedonic price equations: comment. J. Urban Econ. 18, 135-142 (1985).
16. Cervero, R., Duncan, M.: Land value impacts of rail transit services in Los Angeles County. Report prepared for National Association of Realtors & Urban Land Institute. Washington, DC (2002).
17. Committee of Valuation Experts in Hamburg: Grundstücksmarktbericht 2007. Gutachterausschuss für Grundstückswerte in Hamburg, Hamburg (2008).
18. Crafts, N.: Market potential in British regions, 1871-1931. Reg. Stud. 39, 1159-1166 (2005).
19. Cropper, M. L., Deck, L. B., McConnell, K. E.: On the choice of functional form for hedonic price functions. Rev. Econ. Stat. 70, 668-675 (1988).
20. Debrezion, G., Pels, E., Rietveld, P.: The impact of rail transport on real estate prices: an empirical analysis of the Dutch housing market. Tinbergen Institute discussion paper, TI 2006-031/3 (2006).
21. Debrezion, G., Pels, E., Rietveld, P.: The impact of railway stations on residential and commercial property value: a meta-analysis. J. Real Estate Finance Econ. 35, 161-180 (2007).
22. Forrest, D., Glen, J., Ward, R.: The impact of a light rail system on the structure of house prices: a hedonic longitudinal study. J. Transp. Econ. Policy 30, 15-29 (1996).
23. F+B: Vergleich von Angebots- und Verkaufspreisen auf dem Hamburger Immobilienmarkt: Studie für die LBS Bausparkasse Hamburg AG. F+B Forschung und Beratung für Wohnen, Immobilien und Umwelt GmbH, Hamburg (2002).
24. Gassdorf, U.: HVV-Warum sind die Preise so hoch? Hamburger Abendblatt, March 15 (2007).
25. Gatzlaff, D. H., Smith, M. T.: The impact of the Miami Metrorail on the value of residences near station locations. Land Econ. 69, 54-66 (1993).
26. Gibbons, S., Machin, S.: Valuing rail access using transport innovations. J. Urban Econ. 57, 148-169 (2005).
27. Grass, G.: The estimation of residential property values around transit station sites in Washington D. C. J. Econ. Finance 16, 139-146 (1992).
28. Green, R. D., James, D. M.: Rail Transit Station Area Development: Small Area Modeling in Washington D. C. M. E. Sharpe, Armonk (1993).
29. Grether, D. M., Mieszkowski, P.: Determinants of real estate values. J. Urban Econ. 1, 127-145 (1974).
30. Halvorsen, R., Palmquist, R.: The interpretation of dummy variables in semilogarithmic equations. Am. Econ. Rev. 70, 474-475 (1980).
31. Halvorsen, R., Pollakowski, H. O.: Choice of functional form for hedonic price equations. J. Urban Econ. 10, 37-49 (1981).
32. Henneberry, J.: Transport investment and house prices. J. Prop. Valuat. Invest. 16, 144-158 (1998).
33. Hochbahn: Annual Report 2008. Hochbahn AG, Hamburg (2009).
34. HVV: Hamburger Verkehrsverbund: Bericht 2008. http://www. hvv. de/pdf/wissenwertes/hvv_bericht_2008. pdf (2009). Accessed 29 March 2010.
35. IFEU: UmweltMobilCheck: Wissenschaftlicher Grundlagenbericht. IFEU-Institut für Energie- und Umweltforschung Heidelberg GmbH, Heidelberg (2008).
36. Infas: Mobilität in Deutschland: Ergebnisbericht Hamburg und Umland (Verbundgebiet HVV). Infas Institut für angewandte Sozialwissenschaft GmbH, Bonn (2004).
37. Infas, DIW: Mobilität in Deutschland: Ergebnisbericht. Infas Institut für angewandte Sozialwissenschaft GmbH and Deutsches Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung, Bonn/Berlin (2004).
38. Kennedy, C. A.: A comparison of the sustainability of public and private transportation systems: study of the Greater Toronto Area. Transportation 29, 459-493 (2002).
39. Kim, C. W., Phipps, T. T., Anselin, L.: Measuring the benefits of air quality improvement: a spatial hedonic approach. J. Environ. Econ. Manag. 45, 24-39 (2003).
40. Kim, S. G.: Beeinflussung der Wohnstandortentscheidung für ÖPNV-Lagen durch die Anreizstrategie Location Efficient Value (LEV). Dissertation, Technische Universität Hamburg-Harburg (2003).
41. Knight, J. R.: Listing price, time on market, and ultimate selling price: causes and effects of listing price changes. Real Estate Econ. 30, 213-237 (2002).
42. Leggett, C. G., Bockstael, N. E.: Evidence of the effects of water quality on residential land prices. J. Environ. Econ. Manag. 39, 121-144 (2000).
43. Li, M. M., Brown, H. J.: Micro-neighbourhood externalities and hedonic housing prices. Land Econ. 56, 125-141 (1980).
44. Linneman, P.: Some empirical results on the nature of the hedonic price function for the urban housing market. J. Urban Econ. 8, 47-68 (1980).
45. Löchl, M., Axhausen, K. W.: Modeling hedonic residential rents for land use and transport simulation while considering spatial effects. J. Transp. Land Use 3, 39-63 (2010).
46. McDonald, J. F.: The identification of urban employment subcenters. J. Urban Econ. 21, 242-258 (1987).
47. McMillen, D. P.: Airport expansion and property values: the case of Chicago O'Hare Airport. J. Urban Econ. 55, 627-640 (2004).
48. McMillen, D. P., McDonald, J. F.: Reaction of house prices to a new rapid transit line: Chicago's Midway Line, 1983-1999. Real Estate Econ. 32, 463-486 (2004).
49. Merlo, A., Ortalo-Magné, F.: Bargaining over residential real estate: evidence from England. J. Urban Econ. 56, 192-216 (2004).
50. Mills, E. S.: Studies in the Structure of the Urban Economy. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore (1972).
51. Muth, R. F.: Cities and Housing. University of Chicago Press, Chicago (1969).
52. Nelson, A. C.: Effects of elevated heavy-rail transit stations on house prices with respect to neighbourhood income. Transp. Res. Rec. 1359, 127-132 (1992).
53. NEORail II: The Effect of Rail Transit on Property Values: A Summary of Studies. NEORail, Cleveland (2001).
54. Poister, T. H.: Transit related crime in suburban areas. J. Urban Aff. 18, 63-75 (1996).
55. Pope, J. C.: Buyer information and the hedonic: the impact of a seller disclosure on the implicit price for airport noise. J. Urban Econ. 63, 498-516 (2008).
56. Redfearn, C. L.: How informative are average effects? Hedonic regression and amenity capitalization in complex urban housing markets. Reg. Sci. Urban Econ. 39, 297-306 (2009).
57. Rosen, S.: Hedonic prices and implicit markets: product differentiation in pure competition. J. Polit. Econ. 82, 34-55 (1974).
58. S-Bahn Hamburg: Die S-Bahn Hamburg in Zahlen. http://www. s-bahn-hamburg. de/s_hamburg/view/wir/daten-zahlen-fakten. shtml (2009). Accessed 29 March 2010.
59. Schwanen, T., Mokhtarian, P. L.: What affects commute mode choice: neighborhood physical structure or preferences toward neighborhoods? J. Transp. Geogr. 13, 83-99 (2005).
60. Shin, K., Washington, S., Choi, K.: Effects of transportation accessibility on residential property values: application of spatial hedonic price model in Seoul, South Korea metropolitan area. Transp. Res. Rec. 1994, 66-73 (2007).
61. Simma, A., Axhausen, K. W.: Commitments and modal usage: analysis of German and Dutch panels. Transp. Res. Rec. 1854, 22-31 (2003).
62. Sirpal, R.: Empirical modeling of the relative impacts of various sizes of shopping centers on the values of surrounding residential properties. J. Real Estate Res. 9, 487-505 (1994).
63. Sirmans, G. S., Macpherson, D. A., Zietz, E. N.: The composition of hedonic pricing models. J. Real Estate Lit. 13, 3-43 (2005).
64. Statistikamt Hamburg: Hamburger Stadtteilprofile 2008. Statistisches Amt für Hamburg und Schleswig-Holstein, Hamburg (2009).
65. Strand, J., Vågnes, M.: The relationship between property values and railroad proximity: a study based on hedonic prices and real estate brokers' appraisals. Transportation 28, 137-156 (2001).
66. Theebe, M. A. J.: Planes, trains and automobiles: the impact of traffic noise on house prices. J. Real Estate Finance Econ. 28, 209-234 (2004).
67. Vessali, K. V.: Land use impacts of rapid transit: a review of the empirical literature. Berkeley Plan. J. 11, 71-105 (1996).
68. Voith, R.: Changing capitalization of CBD-oriented transportation systems: evidence from Philadelphia, 1970-1988. J. Urban Econ. 33, 361-376 (1993).
69. von Thünen, J. H.: Der isolierte Staat in Beziehung auf Landwirtschaft und Nationalökonomie, oder Untersuchungen über den Einfluß, den die Getreidepreise, der Reichthum des Bodens und die Abgaben auf den Ackerbau ausüben. Perthes, Hamburg (1826).
70. Wheaton, W. C.: Urban residential growth under perfect foresight. J. Urban Econ. 12, 1-21 (1982).
71. White, M. J.: Location choice and commuting behavior in cities with decentralized employment. J. Urban Econ. 24, 129-152 (1988).
72. Wilhelmsson, M.: The impact of traffic noise on the values of single-family houses. J. Environ. Plan. Manag. 43, 799-815 (2000).
73. Williams, C. The Pricing of Housing Characteristics in South-East Queensland: An Application of Hedonic Pricing. Working Paper. Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane (1995).
74. Wrigley, M., Wyatt, P. (2001) Transport policy and property values. Paper presented at RICS Cutting Edge Conference, 5-7 September 2001.