Structural insights into electron transfer in caa 3-type cytochrome oxidase

Nature

Volumn 487, Issue 7408, 2012, Pages 514-518

  Lyons, Joseph A ^a,b   Aragão, David ^b,c   Slattery, Orla ^a   Pisliakov, Andrei V ^d   Soulimane, Tewfik ^a   Caffrey, Martin ^b,e  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LIMERICK   (Ireland)

^b TRINITY COLLEGE DUBLIN   (Ireland)

^c AUSTRALIAN SYNCHROTRON   (Australia)

^d RIKEN   (Japan)

^e TRINITY COLLEGE DUBLIN   (Ireland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CUPREDOXIN; CYTOCHROME C OXIDASE; GLYCOGLYCEROPHOSPHOLIPID; MONOACYLGLYCEROL; OXYGEN; PHOSPHOLIPID; PROTEIN; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

BACTERIUM; BIOCHEMISTRY; CRYSTAL STRUCTURE; ELECTRON; ENZYME ACTIVITY; FUNCTIONAL ROLE; LIPID; MITOCHONDRION; OXIC CONDITIONS; OXYGEN; PROTEIN; REDUCTION; SOLUBILITY;

ARTICLE; COVALENT BOND; CRYSTAL STRUCTURE; ELECTRON TRANSPORT; ENZYME ACTIVE SITE; ENZYME STRUCTURE; ENZYME SUBUNIT; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN DOMAIN; THERMUS THERMOPHILUS;

AZURIN; CATALYTIC DOMAIN; CELL MEMBRANE; CRYSTALLIZATION; CRYSTALLOGRAPHY, X-RAY; CYTOCHROME C GROUP; CYTOCHROMES A; CYTOCHROMES A3; ELECTRON TRANSPORT; ELECTRON TRANSPORT COMPLEX IV; ELECTRONS; GLYCEROPHOSPHOLIPIDS; MODELS, MOLECULAR; OXYGEN; PROTEIN STRUCTURE, TERTIARY; PROTEIN SUBUNITS; PROTONS; THERMUS THERMOPHILUS; WATER;

PROKARYOTA; THERMUS THERMOPHILUS;

EID: 84864277239     PISSN: 00280836     EISSN: 14764687     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/nature11182     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. Ferguson-Miller, S. & Babcock, G. T. Heme/copper terminal oxidases. Chem. Rev. 96, 2889-2908 (1996).
2. Muresanu, L. et al. The electron transfer complex between cytochrome c552 and the CuA domain of the Thermus thermophilus ba3 oxidase. A combined NMR and computational approach. J. Biol. Chem. 281, 14503-14513 (2006).
3. Maneg, O., Ludwig, B. & Malatesta, F. Different interaction modes of two cytochrome-c oxidase soluble CuA fragments with their substrates. J. Biol. Chem. 278, 46734-46740 (2003).
4. Maneg, O., Malatesta, F., Ludwig, B. & Drosou, V. Interaction of cytochrome c with cytochromeoxidase: two different dockingscenarios. Biochim. Biophys.Acta 1655, 274-281 (2004).
5. Pereira, M. M.,Santana, M.&Teixeira, M.Anovel scenario for the evolutionof haemcopper oxygen reductases. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1505, 185-208 (2001).
6. Pereira, M. M., Sousa, F. L., Verissimo, A. F. & Teixeira, M. Looking for the minimum common denominator in haem-copper oxygen reductases: towards a unified catalytic mechanism. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1777, 929-934 (2008).
7. Misquitta, L. V. et al. Membrane protein crystallization in lipidic mesophases with tailored bilayers. Structure 12, 2113-2124 (2004).
8. Caffrey, M., Lyons, J., Smyth, T. & Hart, D. J. in Current Topics in Membranes Vol. 63 (ed. L. J. DeLucas) Ch. 4 83-108 (Academic Press, 2009).
9. Höfer, N., Aragão, D., Lyons, J. A. & Caffrey, M. Membrane protein crystallization in lipidic mesophases. Hosting lipid effects on the crystallization and structure of a transmembrane peptide. Cryst. Growth Des. 11, 1182-1192 (2011).
10. Li, D., Lee, J. & Caffrey, M. Crystallizing membrane proteins in lipidic mesophases. A host lipid screen. Cryst. Growth Des. 11, 530-537 (2011).
11. Rasmussen, S. G. et al. Crystal structure of the b2 adrenergic receptor-Gs protein complex. Nature 477, 549-555 (2011).
12. Caffrey, M. Crystallizing membrane proteins for structure determination: use of lipidic mesophases. Annu. Rev. Biophys. 38, 29-51 (2009).
13. Chen, V. B. et al. MolProbity: all-atom structure validation for macromolecular crystallography. Acta Crystallogr. D 66, 12-21 (2010).
14. Fee, J. A., Choc, M. G., Findling, K. L., Lorence, R.&Yoshida, T. Properties of a coppercontaining cytochrome c1aa3 complex: a terminal oxidase of the extreme thermophile Thermus thermophilus HB8. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 77, 147-151 (1980).
15. Steffens, G. C., Biewald, R. & Buse, G. Cytochrome c oxidase is a three-copper, twoheme-A protein. Eur. J. Biochem. 164, 295-300 (1987).
16. Mather, M. W., Springer, P., Hensel, S., Buse, G. & Fee, J. A. Cytochrome oxidase genes from Thermus thermophilus. Nucleotide sequence of the fused gene and analysis of the deduced primary structures for subunits I and III of cytochrome CAA3. J. Biol. Chem. 268, 5395-5408 (1993).
17. Mather, M. W., Springer, P. & Fee, J. A. Cytochrome oxidase genes from Thermus thermophilus. Nucleotide sequence and analysis of the deduced primary structure of subunit IIc of cytochrome CAA3. J. Biol. Chem. 266, 5025-5035 (1991).
18. Lüben, M. & Morand, K. Novel prenylated hemes as cofactors of cytochrome oxidases. Archaea have modified hemes A and O. J. Biol. Chem. 269, 21473-21479 (1994).
19. Backgren, C., Hummer, G., Wikstrom, M. & Puustinen, A. Proton translocation by cytochrome c oxidase can take place without the conserved glutamic acid in subunit I. Biochemistry 39, 7863-7867 (2000).
20. Pereira, M. M., Sousa, F. L., Teixeira, M., Nyquist, R. M. & Heberle, J. A tyrosine residue deprotonates during oxygen reduction by the CAA3 reductase from Rhodothermus marinus. FEBS Lett. 580, 1350-1354 (2006).
21. Soares, C. M., Baptista, A. M., Pereira, M. M. & Teixeira, M. Investigation of protonatable residues in Rhodothermus marinus CAA3 haem-copper oxygen reductase: comparison with Paracoccus denitrificans AA3 haem-copper oxygen reductase. J. Biol. Inorg. Chem. 9, 124-134 (2004).
22. Santana, M., Pereira, M. M., Elias, N. P., Soares, C. M. & Teixeira, M. Gene cluster of Rhodothermus marinus high-potential iron-sulfur protein: oxygen oxidoreductase, a caa(3)-type oxidase belonging to the superfamily of heme-copper oxidases. J. Bacteriol. 183, 687-699 (2001).
23. Srinivasan, V. et al. Structure at 1.3Å resolution of Rhodothermus marinus CAA3 cytochrome c domain. J. Mol. Biol. 345, 1047-1057 (2005).
24. Wienk, H. et al. Interaction of cytochrome c with cytochrome c oxidase: an NMR study on two soluble fragments derived from Paracoccus denitrificans. Biochemistry 42, 6005-6012 (2003).
25. Roberts, V. A. & Pique, M. E. Definition of the interaction domain for cytochrome c on cytochrome c oxidase. J. Biol. Chem. 274, 38051-38060 (1999).
26. Lange, C. & Hunte, C. Crystal structure of the yeast cytochrome bc1 complex with its bound substrate cytochrome c. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 99, 2800-2805 (2002).
27. Page, C. C., Moser, C. C. & Dutton, P. L. Mechanism for electron transfer within and between proteins. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 7, 551-556 (2003).
28. Drosou, V., Malatesta, F. & Ludwig, B. Mutations in the docking site for cytochrome c on the Paracoccus heme AA3 oxidase. Electron entry and kinetic phases of the reaction. Eur. J. Biochem. 269, 2980-2988 (2002).
29. Drosou, V., Reincke, B., Schneider, M. & Ludwig, B. Specificity of the interaction between the Paracoccus denitrificans oxidase and its substrate cytochrome c: comparing the mitochondrial to the homologous bacterial cytochrome c552, and its truncated and site-directed mutants. Biochemistry 41, 10629-10634 (2002).
30. Witt, H., Malatesta, F., Nicoletti, F., Brunori, M. & Ludwig, B. Tryptophan 121 of subunit II is the electron entry site to cytochrome-c oxidase in Paracoccus denitrificans. Involvement of a hydrophobic patch in the docking reaction. J. Biol. Chem. 273, 5132-5136 (1998).
31. Lomize, A. L., Pogozheva, I. D., Lomize, M. A.& Mosberg, H. I. Positioning of proteins in membranes: a computational approach. Protein Sci. 15, 1318-1333 (2006).
32. Buse, G., Soulimane, T.,Dewor, M.,Meyer, H. E.&Bluggel, M. Evidence for a coppercoordinated histidine-tyrosine cross-link in the active site of cytochrome oxidase. Protein Sci. 8, 985-990 (1999).
33. Soulimane, T., Kiefersauer, R. & Than, M. E. in Membrane Protein Purification and Crystallization (Second Edition) (eds Hunte, C., von Jagow, G.& Schager, H.) Ch. 14 229-251 (Academic Press, 2003).
34. Caffrey, M. & Cherezov, V. Crystallizing membrane proteins using lipidic mesophases. Nature Protocols 4, 706-731 (2009).
35. Cherezov, V., Peddi, A., Muthusubramaniam, L., Zheng, Y. F. & Caffrey, M. A robotic system for crystallizing membrane and soluble proteins in lipidic mesophases. Acta Crystallogr. D 60, 1795-1807 (2004).
36. 3-cytochrome oxidase from Thermus thermophilus. Protein Sci. 9, 2068-2073 (2000).
37. Fischetti, R. F. et al. Mini-beam collimator enables microcrystallography experiments on standard beamlines. J. Synchrotron Radiat. 16, 217-225 (2009).
38. Cherezov, V. et al. Rastering strategy for screening and centring of microcrystal samples of human membrane proteins with a sub-10 micron size X-ray synchrotron beam. J. R. Soc. Interface 6, S587-S597 (2009).
39. Winter, G. xia2: an expert system for macromolecular crystallography data reduction. J. Appl. Cryst. 43, 186-190 (2010).
40. Kabsch, W. XDS. Acta Crystallogr. D 66, 125-132 (2010).
41. Evans, P. Scaling and assessment of data quality. Acta Crystallogr. D 62, 72-82 (2006).
42. Collaborative Computational Project, number 4. The CCP4 suite: programs for protein crystallography. Acta Crystallogr. D 50, 760-763 (1994).
43. McCoy, A. J. et al. Phaser crystallographic software. J. Appl. Cryst. 40, 658-674 (2007).
44. Brüger, A. T. et al. Crystallography & NMR system: A new software suite for macromolecular structure determination. Acta Crystallogr. D 54, 905-921 (1998).
45. Adams, P. D. et al. PHENIX: a comprehensive Python-based system for macromolecular structure solution. Acta Crystallogr. D 66, 213-221 (2010).
46. Emsley, P. & Cowtan, K. Coot: model-building tools for molecular graphics. Acta Crystallogr. D 60, 2126-2132 (2004).
47. Bashford, D. & Gerwert, K. Electrostatic calculations of the pKa values of ionizable groups in bacteriorhodopsin. J. Mol. Biol. 224, 473-486 (1992).
48. Zhang, L.&Hermans, J. Hydrophilicity of cavities in proteins. Proteins24, 433-438 (1996).
49. Phillips, J. C. et al. Scalable molecular dynamics with NAMD. J. Comput. Chem. 26, 1781-1802 (2005).
50. MacKerell, A. D. et al. All atom empirical potential for molecular modeling and dynamics studies of proteins. J. Phys. Chem. B 102, 3586-3616 (1998).
51. MacKerell, A. D., Feig, M. & Brooks, C. L. Extending the treatment of backbone energetics in protein force fields: limitations of gas-phase quantummechanics in reproducing protein conformational distributions in molecular dynamics simulations. J. Comput. Chem. 25, 1400-1415 (2004).
52. Klauda, J. B. et al. Update of the CHARMM all-atom additive force field for lipids: validation on six lipid types. J. Phys. Chem. B 114, 7830-7843 (2010).
53. Vanommeslaeghe, K. et al. CHARMM general force field: a force field for drug-like molecules compatible with the CHARMM all-atom additive biological force fields. J. Comput. Chem. 31, 671-690 (2010).
54. Humphrey, W., Dalke, A. & Schulten, K. VMD: visual molecular dynamics. J. Mol. Graph. 14, 33-38 (1996).
55. Ho, B. K. & Gruswitz, F. HOLLOW: generating accurate representations of channel and interior surfaces in molecular structures. BMC Struct. Biol. 8, 49 (2008).
56. Krissinel, E. & Henrick, K. Secondary-structure matching (SSM), a new tool for fast protein structure alignment in three dimensions. Acta Crystallogr. D 60, 2256-2268 (2004).
57. Sali, A. & Blundell, T. L. Comparative protein modelling by satisfaction of spatial restraints. J. Mol. Biol. 234, 779-815 (1993).
58. Bond, C. S. & Schuttelkopf, A. W. ALINE: a WYSIWYG protein-sequence alignment editor for publication-quality alignments. Acta Crystallogr. D 65, 510-512 (2009).