Modeling styles in business process modeling

Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing

Volumn 113 LNBIP, Issue , 2012, Pages 151-166

  Pinggera, Jakob ^a   Soffer, Pnina ^b   Zugal, Stefan ^a   Weber, Barbara ^a   Weidlich, Matthias ^c   Fahland, Dirk ^c   Reijers, Hajo A ^d   Mendling, Jan ^e  

^a UNIVERSITY OF INNSBRUCK   (Austria)

^b UNIVERSITY OF HAIFA   (Israel)

^c EINDHOVEN UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Netherlands)

^d TECHNION ISRAEL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Israel)

^e VIENNA UNIVERSITY OF ECONOMICS AND BUSINESS   (Austria)

Author keywords

business process modeling; cluster analysis; modeling styles; process of process modeling

Indexed keywords

CLUSTER ANALYSIS; INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING; SYSTEMS ANALYSIS;

BUILDING BLOCKES; BUSINESS PROCESS MODEL; BUSINESS PROCESS MODELING; MODELING ENVIRONMENTS; PROCESS MODEL; PROCESS MODELING; SPECIALIZED TOOLS;

MATHEMATICAL MODELS;

EID: 84864258438     PISSN: 18651348     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-31072-0_11     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (27)

1. Mendling, J.: Metrics for Process Models: Empirical Foundations of Verification, Error Prediction, and Guidelines for Correctness. Springer (2008)
2. Lindland, O.I., Sindre, G., Sølvberg, A.: Understanding Quality in Conceptual Modeling. IEEE Softw. 11, 42-49 (1994)
3. Krogstie, J., Sindre, G., Jørgensen, H.: Process models representing knowledge for action: a revised quality framework. EJIS 15, 91-102 (2006)
4. Van der Aalst, W., Ter Hofstede, A.: Verification of workflow task structures: A petri-net-baset approach. IS 25, 43-69 (2000)
5. Gruhn, V., Laue, R.: Complexity metrics for business process models. In: Proc. ICBIS 2010, pp. 1-12 (2006)
6. Siau, K., Rossi, M.: Evaluation techniques for systems analysis and design modelling methods-a review and comparative analysis. ISJ 21, 249-268 (2011)
7. Moody, D.L.: The "Physics" of Notations: Toward a Scientific Basis for Constructing Visual Notations in Software Engineering. IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 35, 756-779 (2009)
8. Soffer, P., Kaner, M., Wand, Y.: Towards Understanding the Process of Process Modeling: Theoretical and Empirical Considerations. In: Proc. ER-BPM 2011, pp. 357-369 (2011)
9. Pinggera, J., Zugal, S., Weidlich, M., Fahland, D., Weber, B., Mendling, J., Reijers, H.A.: Tracing the process of process modeling with modeling phase diagrams. In: Proc. ER-BPM 2011, pp. 370-382 (2012)
10. Hoppenbrouwers, S.J.B.A., Proper, H.A., van derWeide, T.P.: A Fundamental View on the Process of Conceptual Modeling. In:Delcambre, L.M.L., Kop, C.,Mayr, H.C., Mylopoulos, J., Pastor, Ó. (eds.) ER 2005. LNCS, vol. 3716, pp. 128-143. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)
11. Crapo, A.W., Waisel, L.B., Wallace, W.A., Willemain, T.R.: Visualization and the process of modeling: a cognitive-theoretic view. In: Proc. KDD 2000, pp. 218-226 (2000)
12. Morris, W.T.: On the Art of Modeling. Management Science 13, B-707-B-717 (1967)
13. Willemain, T.R.: Model Formulation: What Experts Think about and When. Operations Research 43, 916-932 (1995)
14. Newell, A., Simon, H.: Human problem Solving. Prentice Hall (1972)
15. Petre, M.: Why Looking Isn't Always Seeing: Readership Skills and Graphical Programming. Commun. ACM, 33-44 (1995)
16. Mendling, J., Reijers, H.A., Cardoso, J.: What Makes Process Models Understandable? In: Alonso, G., Dadam, P., Rosemann, M. (eds.) BPM 2007. LNCS, vol. 4714, pp. 48-63. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)
17. Pinggera, J., Zugal, S., Weber, B.: Investigating the process of process modeling with cheetah experimental platform. In: Proc. ER-POIS 2010, pp. 13-18 (2010)
18. MacQueen, J.: Some methods of classification and analysis of multivariate observations. In: Proc. Berkeley Symposium on Math., Stat., and Prob., pp. 281-297 (1967)
19. Hamerly, G., Elkan, C.: Alternatives to the k-means algorithm that find better clusterings. In: Proc. CIKM 2002, pp. 600-607 (2002)
20. Ericsson, K.A., Simon, H.A.: Protocol analysis: Verbal reports as data. MIT Press (1993)
21. Reijers, H., Mendling, J.: A study into the factors that influence the understandability of business process models. IEEE Transactions on Systems Man and Cybernetics, Part A 41, 449-462 (2011)
22. Cardoso, J.: Business process control-flow complexity: Metric, evaluation, and validation. JWSR 5, 49-76 (2008)
23. Becker, J., Rosemann, M., von Uthmann, C.: Guidelines of Business Process Modeling. In: van der Aalst, W.M.P., Desel, J., Oberweis, A. (eds.) Business Process Management. LNCS, vol. 1806, pp. 30-49. Springer, Heidelberg (2000)
24. Mendling, J., Reijers, H.A., van der Aalst, W.M.P.: Seven process modeling guidelines (7pmg). Information & Software Technology 52, 127-136 (2010)
25. Frederiks, P., Weide, T.: Information modeling: The process and the required competencies of its participants. DKE 58, 4-20 (2006)
26. Rittgen, P.: Negotiating Models. In: Krogstie, J., Opdahl, A.L., Sindre, G. (eds.) CAiSE 2007. LNCS, vol. 4495, pp. 561-573. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)
27. Stirna, J., Persson, A., Sandkuhl, K.: Participative Enterprise Modeling: Experiences and Recommendations. In: Krogstie, J., Opdahl, A.L., Sindre, G. (eds.) CAiSE 2007. LNCS, vol. 4495, pp. 546-560. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)