Clinicians' perspectives on a web-based system for routine outcome monitoring in old-age psychiatry in the Netherlands

Journal of Medical Internet Research

Volumn 14, Issue 3, 2012, Pages

  Veerbeek, Marjolein A ^a   Voshaar, Richard C Oude ^b   Pot, Anne Margriet ^a,c  

^a NETHERLANDS INSTITUTE OF MENTAL HEALTH AND ADDICTION   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER GRONINGEN   (Netherlands)

^c VU UNIVERSITY AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Clinicians; Feedback; Health care; Quality of care; Routine outcome monitoring; Web based monitoring

Indexed keywords

AGED; ARTICLE; HEALTH CARE PERSONNEL; HEALTH PERSONNEL ATTITUDE; HUMAN; INTERNET; MONITORING; NETHERLANDS; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; QUESTIONNAIRE;

AGED; ATTITUDE OF HEALTH PERSONNEL; HEALTH PERSONNEL; HUMANS; INTERNET; MONITORING, PHYSIOLOGIC; NETHERLANDS; QUESTIONNAIRES;

EID: 84864246747     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14388871     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2196/jmir.1937     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (27)

1. Wu RC, Delgado D, Costigan J, Maciver J, Ross H. Pilot study of an Internet patient-physician communication tool for heart failure disease management. J Med Internet Res 2005 Feb;7(1):e8 [FREE Full text] [doi: 10.2196/jmir.7.1.e8] [Medline: 15829480]
2. Mazzi CP, Kidd M. A framework for the evaluation of Internet-based diabetes management. J Med Internet Res 2002 Feb;4(1):e1 [FREE Full text] [doi: 10.2196/jmir.4.1.e1] [Medline: 11956033]
3. Gillespie G. Deploying an I.T. cure for chronic diseases. Health Data Manag 2000 Jul;8(7):68-70, 72, 74. [Medline: 11067308]
4. van der Krieke L, Emerencia AC, Aiello M, Sytema S. Usability evaluation of a web-based support system for people with a schizophrenia diagnosis. J Med Internet Res 2012 Feb;14(1):e24 [FREE Full text] [doi: 10.2196/jmir.1921] [Medline: 22311883]
5. Gilbody SM, House AO, Sheldon TA. Outcome measures and needs assessment tools for schizophrenia and related disorders. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2003(1): CD003081. [doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003081] [Medline: 12535453]
6. Lambert MJ, Harmon C, Slade K, Whipple JL, Hawkins EJ. Providing feedback to psychotherapists on their patients' progress: clinical results and practice suggestions. J Clin Psychol 2005 Feb;61(2):165-174. [doi: 10.1002/jclp.20113] [Medline: 15609358] (Pubitemid 40289030)
7. de Beurs E, den Hollander-Gijsman ME, van Rood YR, van der Wee NJ, Giltay EJ, van Noorden MS, et al. Routine outcome monitoring in the Netherlands: practical experiences with a web-based strategy for the assessment of treatment outcome in clinical practice. Clin Psychol Psychother 2011 Feb;18(1):1-12. [doi: 10.1002/cpp.696] [Medline: 20238371]
8. Zwanepol F, de Groot W. [Implementation of routine outcome monitoring: experiences with clients with mood and anxiety disorders]. Maandblad Geestelijke Volksgezondheid 2008 Feb;63:118-129.
9. Srebnik D, Hendryx M, Stevenson J, Caverly S, Dyck DG, Cauce AM. Development of outcome indicators for monitoring the quality of public mental health care. Psychiatr Serv 1997 Jul;48(7):903-909. [Medline: 9219298] (Pubitemid 27295210)
10. Madan A, Borckardt JJ, Connell A, Book SB, Campbell S, Gwynette MF, et al. Routine assessment of patient-reported outcomes in behavioral health: room for improvement. Qual Manag Health Care 2010 Mar;19(1):70-81. [doi: 10.1097/QMH.0b013e3181ccbc53] [Medline: 20042935]
11. de Nooijer J, de Vries NK. Monitoring health risk behavior of Dutch adolescents and the development of health promoting policies and activities: the E-MOVO project. Health Promot Int 2007 Mar;22(1):5-10 [FREE Full text] [doi: 10.1093/heapro/dal036] [Medline: 17015406] (Pubitemid 46364525)
12. Shervin N, Dorrwachter J, Bragdon CR, Shervin D, Zurakowski D, Malchau H. Comparison of paper and computer-based questionnaire modes for measuring health outcomes in patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2011 Feb 2;93(3):285-293. [doi: 10.2106/JBJS.I.01104] [Medline: 21266642]
13. Touvier M, Méjean C, Kesse-Guyot E, Pollet C, Malon A, Castetbon K, et al. Comparison between web-based and paper versions of a self-administered anthropometric questionnaire. Eur J Epidemiol 2010 May;25(5):287-296. [doi: 10.1007/s10654-010-9433-9] [Medline: 20191377]
14. Whitehead L. Methodological issues in Internet-mediated research: a randomized comparison of internet versus mailed questionnaires. J Med Internet Res 2011 Dec;13(4):e109 [FREE Full text] [doi: 10.2196/jmir.1593] [Medline: 22155721]
15. Leece P, Bhandari M, Sprague S, Swiontkowski MF, Schemitsch EH, Tornetta P, et al. Internet versus mailed questionnaires: a controlled comparison (2). J Med Internet Res 2004 Oct 29;6(4):e39 [FREE Full text] [doi: 10.2196/jmir.6.4.e39] [Medline: 15631963]
16. McMahon SR, Iwamoto M, Massoudi MS, Yusuf HR, Stevenson JM, David F, et al. Comparison of e-mail, fax, and postal surveys of pediatricians. Pediatrics 2003 Apr;111(4 Pt 1):e299-e303. [Medline: 12671142]
17. Kim HL, Gerber GS, Patel RV, Hollowell CM, Bales GT. Practice patterns in the treatment of female urinary incontinence: a postal and internet survey. Urology 2001 Jan;57(1):45-48. [Medline: 11164141] (Pubitemid 32065817)
18. Harewood GC, Yacavone RF, Locke GR, Wiersema MJ. Prospective comparison of endoscopy patient satisfaction surveys: e-mail versus standard mail versus telephone. Am J Gastroenterol 2001 Dec;96(12):3312-3317. [doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2001.05331.x] [Medline: 11774942] (Pubitemid 34036490)
19. Raziano DB, Jayadevappa R, Valenzula D, Weiner M, Lavizzo-Mourey R. E-mail versus conventional postal mail survey of geriatric chiefs. Gerontologist 2001 Dec;41(6):799-804. [Medline: 11723348] (Pubitemid 33139637)
20. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders: DSM-IV-TR. 4th edition, text revision. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association; 2000.
21. Burns A, Beevor A, Lelliott P, Wing J, Blakey A, Orrell M, et al. Health of the Nation Outcome Scales for elderly people (HoNOS 65+). Br J Psychiatry 1999 May;174:424-427. [Medline: 10616609] (Pubitemid 29232096)
22. Sheikh RL, Yesavage JA. Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS): recent evidence and development of a shorter version. Clin Gerontol 1986;5(1-2):165-173. (Pubitemid 17221439)
23. Kok I, Mulder E. [Client Satisfaction in Mental Health Care: Manual for Different Client Thermometers in Use]. Utrecht: Trimbos-instituut; 2005.
24. Kelly G, McKenzie B. Security, privacy, and confidentiality issues on the Internet. J Med Internet Res 2002;4(2):e12 [FREE Full text] [doi: 10.2196/jmir.4.2.e12] [Medline: 12554559]
25. van den Berg MH, Overbeek A, van der Pal HJ, Versluys AB, Bresters D, van Leeuwen FE, et al. Using web-based and paper-based questionnaires for collecting data on fertility issues among female childhood cancer survivors: differences in response characteristics. J Med Internet Res 2011;13(3):e76 [FREE Full text] [doi: 10.2196/jmir.1707] [Medline: 21955527]
26. McGrath BM, Tempier RP. Implementing quality management in psychiatry: from theory to practice-shifting focus from process to outcome. Can J Psychiatry 2003 Aug;48(7):467-474. [Medline: 12971017] (Pubitemid 37295205)
27. Robertson L, Smith M, Castle D, Tannenbaum D. Using the Internet to enhance the treatment of depression. Australas Psychiatry 2006 Dec;14(4):413-417. [doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1665.2006.02315.x] [Medline: 17116083] (Pubitemid 44762511)