Perceptual crossing: The simplest online paradigm

Frontiers in Human Neuroscience

Volumn , Issue JUNE 2012, 2012, Pages

  Auvray, Malika ^a   Rohde, Marieke ^b  

^a UFR 919 Laboratoire d'Informatique Pour la Mécanique et les Sciences de l'Ingénieur   (France)

^b BIELEFELD UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

Coordination; Online interaction; Perceptual crossing; Social cognition

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHM; ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORK; BEHAVIORAL SCIENCE; COMPUTER MODEL; EMOTIONALITY; HUMAN; ONLINE SYSTEM; PERCEPTION; REVIEW; ROBOTICS; SOCIAL COGNITION; SOCIAL INTERACTION; VIRTUAL REALITY;

EID: 84864242788     PISSN: 16625161     EISSN: 16625161     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2012.00181     Document Type: Review

References (66)

1. Amodio, D. M., and Frith, C. D. (2006). Meeting of minds: the medial frontal cortex and social cognition. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 7, 268-277.
2. Auvray, M., Lenay, C., and Stewart, J. (2009). Perceptual interactions in a minimalist environment. New Ideas Psychol. 27, 79-97.
3. Auvray, M., and Myin, E. (2009). Perception with compensatory devices. From sensory substitution to sensorimotor extension. Cogn. Sci. 33, 1036-1058.
4. Beer, R. D. (2008). "The dynamics of brain-body-environment systems: a status report," in Handbook of Cognitive Science: An Embodied Approach, eds P. Calvo and A. Gomila, (Amsterdam, Boston, London: Elsevier Science), 99-120.
5. Bird, J. (2011). The phenomenal challenge of designing transparent technologies. Interactions 18, 20-23.
6. Brown, J., Aczél, B., Jiménez, L., Kaufman, S. B., and Plaisted-Grant, K. (2010). Intact implicit learning in autism spectrum conditions. Q. J. Exp. Psychol. 63, 1789-1812.
7. Cangelosi, A., Metta, G., Sagerer, G., Nolfi, S., Nehaniv, C., Fischer, K., Tani, J., Belpaeme, T., Sandini, G., Nori, F., Fadiga, L., Wrede, B., Rohlfing, K., Tuci, E., Dautenhahn, K., Saunders, J., and Zeschel, A. (2010). Integration of action and language knowledge: a roadmap for developmental robotics. IEEE Trans. Auton. Ment. Dev. 2, 167-195.
8. Colombetti, G., and Torrance, S. (2009). Emotion and ethics: an inter-(en)active approach. Phenomenol. Cogn. Sci. 8, 505-526.
9. Cowley, S. J. (2008). "Social robotics and the person problem," in AISB 2008 Convention: Communication, Interaction and Social Intelligence, (Aberdeen: The Society for the Study of Artificial Intelligence and Simulation of Behaviour), 28-34.
10. De Jaegher, H. (2009). Social understanding through direct perception? Yes, by interacting. Conscious. Cogn. 18, 535-542.
11. De Jaegher, H., Di Paolo, E., and Gallagher, S. (2010). Can social interaction constitute social cognition? Trends Cogn. Sci. 14, 441-447.
12. De Jaegher, H., and Froese, T. (2009). On the role of social interaction in individual agency. Adapt. Behav. 17, 444-460.
13. De Jaegher, H., and Di Paolo, E. (2007). Participatory sense-making - An en-active approach to social cognition. Phenomenol. Cogn. Sci. 6, 485-507.
14. Declerck, G., Lenay, C., and Khatchatourov, A. (2009). Rendre tangible le visible. IRBM, Ingénierie et Recherche BioMédicale 30(5-6), Numérospécial "Technologies pour l'autonomie," 252-257.
15. Deschamps, L., Le Bihan, G., Lenay, C., Rovira, K., Stewart, J., and Aubert, D. (2012). "Interpersonal recognition through mediated tactile interaction," in Proceedings of IEEE Haptics Symposium (Vancouver, BC, Canada), March 4-7.
16. Dienes, Z. (2004). Assumptions of subjective measures of unconscious mental states: high order thoughts and bias. J. Conscious. Stud. 11, 25-45.
17. Di Paolo, E., Rohde, M., and De Jaegher, H. (2011). "Horizons for the enac-tive mind: values, social interaction, and play," in Enaction: Towards a New Paradigm for Cognitive Science, eds J. Stewart, O. Gapenne, and E. Di Paolo (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press), 33-87.
18. Di Paolo, E., Rohde, M., and Iizuka, H. (2008). Sensitivity to social contingency or stability of interaction? Modelling the dynamics of perceptual crossing. New Ideas Psychol. 26, 278-294.
19. Froese, T., and Di Paolo, E. (2008). "Stability of coordination requires mutuality of interaction in a model of embodied agents," in From Animats to Animals 10, The 10th International Conference on the Simulation of Adaptive Behavior, (Osaka), 52-61.
20. Froese, T., and Di Paolo, E. (2010). Modeling social interaction as perceptual crossing: an investigation into the dynamics of the interaction process. Connect. Sci. 22, 43-68.
21. Froese, T., and Di Paolo, E. (2011), "Toward minimally social behavior: social psychology meets evolutionary robotics," in Advances in Artificial Life: Proceedings of the 10th European Conference on Artificial Life, eds G. Kampis, I. Karsai, and E. Szathmary (Berlin, Germany: Springer Verlag), 426-433.
22. Fujii, N., Hihara, S., and Iriki, A. (2008). Social cognition in pre-motor and parietal cortex. Soc. Neurosci. 3, 250-260.
23. Fujii, N., Hihara, S., Nagasaka, Y., and Iriki, A. (2009). Social state representation in prefrontal cortex. Soc. Neurosci. 4, 73-84.
24. Gangopadhyay, N., and Schilbach, L. (2012). Seeing minds: a neurophilo-sophical investigation of the role of perception-action coupling in social perception. Soc. Neurosci. 7, 410-423.
25. Herschbach, M. (2012). On the role of social interaction in social cognition: a mechanistic alternative to Enactivism. Phenomenol. Cogn. Sci. doi: 10.1007/s11097-011-9209-z. [Epub ahead of print].
26. Husbands, P. (2009). Never mind the iguana, what about the tortoise? Models in adaptive behavior. Adapt. Behav. 17, 320-324.
27. Iizuka, H., Ando, H., and Maeda, T. (2009). "The anticipation of human behavior using 'Parasitic Humanoid'," in Human-Computer Interaction. Ambient, Ubiquitous and Intelligent Interaction, ed J. Jacko (Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag), 284-293.
28. Iizuka, H., and DiPaolo, E. (2007). "Minimal agency detection of embodied agents," in Proceedings of the 9th European Conference on Artificial life ECAL2007, LNAI 4648, (Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag), 485-494.
29. Iizuka, H., Ando, H., and Maeda, T. (2012a). "Emergence of communication and turn-taking behavior in nonverbal interaction (in Japanese)," IEICE Transactions on Fundamentals of Electronics, Communications and Computer Sciences J95-A, 165-174.
30. Iizuka, H., Marocco, D., Ando, H., and Maeda, T. (2012b). Experimental study on co-evolution of categorical perception and communication systems in humans. Psychol. Res. doi: 10.1007/s00426-012-0420-5. [Epub ahead of print].
31. Kampe, K. K. W., Frith, C. D., and Frith, U. (2003). "Hey John!": signals conveying communicative intention towards the self-activate brain regions associated with men-talizing regardless of modality. J. Neurosci. 23, 5258-5263.
32. Kirsh, D. (1991). Today the earwig, tomorrow man? Artif. Intell. 47, 161-184.
33. Lenay, C. (2010). It's so touching: emotional value in distal contact. Int. J. Des. 4, 15-25.
34. Lenay, C., Gapenne, O., Hanneton, S., Genouëlle, C., and Marque, C. (2003). "Sensory substitution: limits and perspectives," in Touching for Knowing, eds Hatwell, A. Streri, and E. Gentaz (Amsterdam: John Benjamins), 275-292.
35. Lenay C., and Stewart J. (2012). Minimalist approach to perceptual interactions. Front. Neurosci. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2012.00098. [Epub ahead of print].
36. Lenay, C., Stewart, J., Rohde, M., and Ali Amar, A. (2011). You never fail to surprise me: the hallmark of the other. Experimental study and simulations of perceptual crossing. Interact. Stud. 12, 373-396.
37. Marti, P. (2010). Perceiving while being perceived. Int. J. Des. 4, 27-38.
38. Martius, G., Nolfi, S., and Herrmann, J. M. (2008). "Emergence of interaction among adaptive agents," in From Animals to Animats 10, 10th International Conference on Simulation of Adaptive Behavior, (SAB, Japan, Proceedings. Springer), 457-466.
39. McGann, M., and De Jaegher, H. (2009). Self-other contingencies: enacting social perception. Phenomenol. Cogn. Sci. 8, 417-437.
40. McIntosh, D. N., Reichmann-Decker, A., Winkielman, P., and Wilbarger, J. L. (2006). When the social mirror breaks: deficits in automatic, but not voluntary, mimicry of emotional facial expressions in autism. Dev. Sci. 9, 295-302.
41. Michael, J. (2011). Interactionism and mindreading. Rev. Philos. Psychol. 2, 559-578.
42. Michael, J., and Overgaard, S. (2012). Interaction and social cognition: a commentary on Auvray et al.'s perceptual crossing paradigm. New Ideas Psychol. 30, 296-299.
43. Moran, N. (2011). Music, bodies and relationships: an ethnographic contribution to embodied cognition studies. Psychol. Music. doi: 10.1177/0305735611400174. [Epub ahead of print].
44. Murray, L., and Trevarthen, C. (1985). "Emotional regulations of interactions between two-month-olds and their mothers," in Social Perception in Infants, eds T. M. Field and N. A. Fox (Norwood: Ablex), 177-197.
45. Negrello, M. (2011). "Invariants of behavior: constancy and variability in neural systems," in Cognitive and Neural Systems Series, ed V. Cutsuridis (USA: Springer).
46. Niewiadomski, R., Prepin, K., Bevacqua, E., Ochs, M., and Pelachaud, C. (2010). "Towards a smiling ECA: studies on mimicry, timing and types of smiles," in Proceedings of the 2nd International Workshop on Social Signal Processing, (New York, NY: ACM), 65-70.
47. Pereira, A. F., Smith, L. B., and Yu, C. (2008). Social coordination in toddler's word learning: interacting systems of perception and action. Connect. Sci. 20, 73-89.
48. Pfeiffer, U., Timmermans, B., Bente, G., Vogeley, K., and Schilbach, L. (2011). The non-verbal Turing test: differentiating mind from machine in gaze-based social interaction. PLoS ONE 6:e27591. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0027591
49. Prepin, K., and Pelachaud, C. (2011a). "Effect of time delays on agents' interaction dynamics," in 10th conference on Autonomous Agent and Multiagents Systems AAMAS2011, (Taipei), 1055-1062.
50. Prepin, K., and Pelachaud, C. (2011b). "Shared understanding and synchrony emergence: synchrony as an indice of the exchange of meaning between dialog partners," in ICAART2011 International Conference on Agent and Artificial Intelligence, (Rome), 25-34.
51. Rohde, M. (2009). No need for intellectual straightjackets. Adapt. Behav. 17, 334-337.
52. Rohde, M. (2010). Enaction, Embodiment, Evolutionary Robotics. Simulation Models in the Study of Human Cognition, Series: Thinking Machines, Vol. 1, Amsterdam, Beijing, Paris: Atlantis Press.
53. Rohde, M., and Di Paolo, E. (2008). "Embodiment and perceptual crossing in 2D: a comparative evolutionary robotics study," in Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on the Simulation of Adaptive Behavior SAB 2008, (Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag), 83-92.
54. Rohde, M., and Stewart, J. (2008). Ascriptional and 'genuine' autonomy. BioSystems 91, 424-433; Special issue on modelling autonomy.
55. Schilbach, L. (2010). A second-person approach to other minds. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 11, 449.
56. Schilbach, L., Eickhoff, S. B., Cieslik, E., Shah, N. J., Fink, G. R., and Vogeley, K. (2010). Eyes on me: an fMRI study of the effects of social gaze on action control. Soc. Cogn. Affect. Neurosci. 6, 393-403.
57. Schilbach, L., Wohlschlaeger, A. M., Kraemer, N. C., Newen, A., Shah, N. J., Fink, G. R., and Vogeley, K. (2006). Being with virtual others: neural correlates of social interaction. Neuropsychologia 44, 718-730.
58. Sebanz, N., Knoblich, G., Stumpf, L., and Prinz, W. (2005). Far from action-blind: representation of others' actions in individuals with autism. Cogn. Neuropsychol. 22, 433-454.
59. Sribunruangrit, N., Marque, C., Lenay, C., Gapenne, O., and Vanhoutte, C. (2004). Speed-accuracy tradeoff during performance of a tracking task without visual feedback. IEEE Trans. Neural Syst. Rehabil. Eng. 12, 131-139.
60. tewart, J., and Gapenne, O. (2003). Reciprocal modelling of active perception of 2-D forms in a simple tactile-vision substitution system. Minds Mach. 14, 309-330.
61. Timmermans, B., Schilbach, L., and Vogeley, K. (2011). Can You Feel Me: Awareness to Dyadic Interaction in High Functioning Autism, ESCOP. Spain: San Sebastian, 29 Sep - 2 Oct.
62. Turing, A. M. (1950). Computing machinery and intelligence. Mind 59, 433-460.
63. Ware, E. (2011). Interactive Behaviour in Pigeons: Visual Display Interactions as a Model for Visual Communication, PhD thesis, Centre for Neuroscience Studies, Queen's University, Kingston, ON.
64. Webb, B. (2009). Animals versus ani-mats: or why not model the real iguana? Adapt. Behav. 17, 269-286.
65. Wilkinson, N., Metta, G., and Gredebäck, G. (2011). "Inter-facial relations: Binocular geometry when eyes meet," in Proceedings of ICMC International Conference on Morphology and Computation, (Venice), 70-72.
66. Wilms, M., Schilbach, L., Pfeiffer, U., Bente, G., Fink, G. R., and Vogeley, K. (2010). It's in your eyes: using gaze-contingent stimuli to create truly interactive paradigms for social, cognitive, and affective neuroscience. Soc. Cogn. Affect. Neurosci. 5, 98-107.