Benefits and pitfalls of keyhole imaging, especially in first-pass perfusion studies

Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Volumn 11, Issue 3, 2000, Pages 312-323

  Oesterle, Claudia ^a   Strohschein, Ralf ^a   Köhler, Michael ^a   Schnell, Markus ^a   Hennig, Jürgen ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF FREIBURG   (Germany)

Author keywords

Keyhole imaging; Perfusion; Susceptibility weighted imaging

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; ARTIFACT; BRAIN PERFUSION; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; IMAGE QUALITY; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RAT;

ANIMALS; BRAIN; CONTRAST MEDIA; HEMODYNAMIC PROCESSES; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PHANTOMS, IMAGING; RATS; REGIONAL BLOOD FLOW;

EID: 0034051586     PISSN: 10531807     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1522-2586(200003)11:3<312::AID-JMRI10>3.0.CO;2-K     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Van Vaals J, Brummer M, Dixon W, et al. Keyhole method for accelerating imaging of contrast agent uptake. J Magn Reson Imaging 1993;3:671-675.
2. Jones R. Haraldseth O, Muller T, Rinck P. Oksendahl A. K-space substitution: a novel dynamic imaging technique. Magn Reson Med 1993;29:830-834.
3. Hu X. On the keyhole technique. J Magn Reson Imaging 1994;4: 231.
4. Strouse PJ, Prince MR, Chenevert TL. Effect of the rate of gadopentetate dimeglumine administration on abdominal vascular and soft-tissue MR imaging enhancement patterns. Radiology 1996; 201:809-816.
5. Miyati T, Banno T, Mase M, et al. Dual dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 1997;7:230-235.
6. Medic J, Tomazic S, Sersa I, Demsar F. Improved keyhole approach with motion-correction technique in contrast-enhanced dynamic MRI. Proc ISMRM, 1998, p 2064.
7. Plewes D, Bishop J, Soutar I, Cohen E. A segmented fc-space imaging method for 3D breast MRI. Proc SMRM, 1993, p 1251.
8. Chenevert T, Helvie M, Aisen A, et al. Dynamic three-dimensional imaging with partial k-space sampling: initial application for gadolinium-enhanced rate characterization of breast lesions. Radiology 1995;196:135-142.
9. Bishop J, Santyr G, Kelcz F, Plewes D. Limitations of the keyhole technique for quantitative dynamic contrast-enhanced breast MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging 1997;7:716-723.
10. Busch M, Bornstedt A, Wendt M, et al. Fast "real time" imaging with different k-space update strategies for interventional procedures. J Magn Reson Imaging 1998;8:944-954.
11. Duerk JL, Lewin JS, Wu DH. Application of keyhole imaging to interventional MRI: a simulation study to predict sequence requirements. J Magn Reson Imaging 1996;6:918-924.
12. Bakker CJ, Hoogeveen RM, Weber J, et al. Visualization of dedicated catheters using fast scanning techniques with potential for MR-guided vascular interventions. Magn Reson Med 1996;36:816-820.
13. Gao J, Xiong J, Lai S. Improving the temporal resolution of functional MR imaging using keyhole techniques. Magn Reson Med 1996;35:854-860.
14. Xiong J, Fox P, Gao J. The effects of fc-space undersampling and discontinuities in keyhole functional MRI. Magn Reson Imaging 1999;17:109-119.
15. Wlodarczyk W, Boroschewski R, Hentschel M, et al. Three-dimensional monitoring of small temperature changes for therapeutic hyperthermia using MR. J Magn Reson Imaging 1998;8:165-174.
16. Liang Z-P, Lauterbur P. An efficient method for dynamic magnetic resonance imaging. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 1994;13:677-686.
17. Oesterle C, Hennig J. Improvement of spatial resolution of keyhole effect images. Magn Res Med 1998;39:244-250. (Published erratum appears in Magn Reson Med 1998;40:341.)
18. Oesterle C, Hennig J. Sharp edges in keyhole difference images due to differences in signal phase. Proc ESMRMB, 1997, 515, p 186.
19. Strohschein R, Oesterle C, Köhler M, Schnell M, Hennig J. Pitfalls in keyhole imaging. Proc ISMRM, 1998, p 2121.