Efficacy of a computerized simulation in promoting walking in individuals with diabetes

Journal of Medical Internet Research

Volumn 14, Issue 3, 2012, Pages

  Gibson, Bryan ^a,b   Marcus, Robin L ^c   Staggers, Nancy ^d   Jones, Jason ^e   Samore, Matthew ^a,b   Weir, Charlene ^a,b  

^a IDEAS Research Center   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF UTAH SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF UTAH   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND   (United States)

^e KAISER PERMANENTE   (United States)

Author keywords

Blood glucose; Computer simulation; Physical activity; Type 2 diabetes mellitus

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; CASE CONTROL STUDY; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DIABETES MELLITUS; FEMALE; GLUCOSE BLOOD LEVEL; HEALTH PROMOTION; HUMAN; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; QUESTIONNAIRE; WALKING;

ADULT; AGED; BLOOD GLUCOSE; CASE-CONTROL STUDIES; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DIABETES MELLITUS; FEMALE; HEALTH KNOWLEDGE, ATTITUDES, PRACTICE; HEALTH PROMOTION; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; QUESTIONNAIRES; WALKING;

EID: 84864210740     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14388871     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2196/jmir.1965     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (43)

1. American Diabetes Association. 2011. Diabetes Statistics URL: http://www.diabetes.org/diabetes-basics/diabetes-statistics/ [accessed 2011-10-21] [WebCite Cache ID 62bXVPKIV]
2. Boulé NG, Haddad E, Kenny GP, Wells GA, Sigal RJ. Effects of exercise on glycemic control and body mass in type 2 diabetes mellitus: a meta-analysis of controlled clinical trials. JAMA 2001 Sep 12;286(10):1218-1227 [FREE Full text] [Medline: 11559268] (Pubitemid 33015552)
3. Snowling NJ, Hopkins WG. Effects of different modes of exercise training on glucose control and risk factors for complications in type 2 diabetic patients: a meta-analysis. Diabetes Care 2006 Nov;29(11):2518-2527. [doi: 10.2337/dc06-1317] [Medline: 17065697] (Pubitemid 44912265)
4. Chudyk A, Petrella RJ. Effects of exercise on cardiovascular risk factors in type 2 diabetes: a meta-analysis. Diabetes Care 2011 May;34(5):1228-1237. [doi: 10.2337/dc10-1881] [Medline: 21525503]
5. Jakicic JM, Jaramillo SA, Balasubramanyam A, Bancroft B, Curtis JM, Mathews A, Look AHEAD Study Group. Effect of a lifestyle intervention on change in cardiorespiratory fitness in adults with type 2 diabetes: results from the Look AHEAD Study. Int J Obes (Lond) 2009 Mar;33(3):305-316. [doi: 10.1038/ijo.2008.280] [Medline: 19153582]
6. Nylen ES, Kokkinos P, Myers J, Faselis C. Prognostic effect of exercise capacity on mortality in older adults with diabetes mellitus. J Am Geriatr Soc 2010 Oct;58(10):1850-1854. [doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2010.03068.x] [Medline: 20929462]
7. Colberg S. Being active: a commentary. Diabetes Educ 2007;33(6):989-990. [doi: 10.1177/0145721707308479]
8. Zhao G, Ford ES, Li C, Balluz LS. Physical activity in U.S. older adults with diabetes mellitus: prevalence and correlates of meeting physical activity recommendations. J Am Geriatr Soc 2011 Jan;59(1):132-137. [doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2010.03236.x] [Medline: 21226683]
9. Lippa KD, Klein HA. Portraits of patient cognition: how patients understand diabetes self-care. Can J Nurs Res 2008 Sep;40(3):80-95. [Medline: 18947093]
10. Lippa KD, Klein HA, Shalin VL. Everyday expertise: cognitive demands in diabetes self management. Hum Factors 2008 Feb;50(1):112-120. [Medline: 18354975] (Pubitemid 351346108)
11. Klein H, Lippa K. Type 2 diabetes self-management: controlling a dynamic system. J Cogn Eng Decis Making 2008;2(1):48-62. [doi: 10.1518/155534308X284363]
12. Gollwitzer P, Sheeran P. Implementation intentions and goal achievement: a meta-analysis of effects and processes. Adv Exp Soc Psychol 2006;38:69-119. [doi: 10.1016/S0065-2601(06)38002-1] (Pubitemid 43649352)
13. Hedbrant J, Ludvigsson J. Use of computer simulator training in the education of diabetic teenagers. Pract Diabetes Int 1995;12(1):18-21. [doi: 10.1002/pdi.1960120109]
14. Tatti P, Lehmann ED. A prospective randomised-controlled pilot study for evaluating the teaching utility of interactive educational diabetes simulators. Diabetes Nutr Metab 2003 Feb;16(1):7-23. [Medline: 12848301] (Pubitemid 36675422)
15. Fritschi C, Quinn L, Penckofer S, Surdyk PM. Continuous glucose monitoring: the experience of women with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Educ 2010;36(2):250-257. [doi: 10.1177/0145721709355835] [Medline: 20016057]
16. Plotnikoff RC, Lippke S, Courneya K, Birkett N, Sigal R. Physical activity and diabetes: an application of the theory of planned behaviour to explain physical activity for Type 1 and Type 2 diabetes in an adult population sample. Psychol Health 2010 Jan;25(1):7-23. [doi: 10.1080/08870440802160984] [Medline: 20391204]
17. Plotnikoff R. Physical activity and social cognitive theory: a test in a population sample of adults with type 1 or type 2 diabetes. Appl Psychol 2008;57(4):628-643. [doi: 10.1111/j.1464-0597.2008.00344.x]
18. Glasgow RE, Hampson SE, Strycker LA, Ruggiero L. Personal-model beliefs and social-environmental barriers related to diabetes self-management. Diabetes Care 1997 Apr;20(4):556-561. [Medline: 9096980] (Pubitemid 27143415)
19. Broadbent E, Donkin L, Stroh JC. Illness and treatment perceptions are associated with adherence to medications, diet, and exercise in diabetic patients. Diabetes Care 2011 Feb;34(2):338-340. [doi: 10.2337/dc10-1779] [Medline: 21270191]
20. Williams DM, Anderson ES, Winett RA. A review of the outcome expectancy construct in physical activity research. Ann Behav Med 2005 Feb;29(1):70-79. [doi: 10.1207/s15324796abm2901-10] [Medline: 15677303] (Pubitemid 40170657)
21. Webb TL, Sheeran P. Does changing behavioral intentions engender behavior change? A meta-analysis of the experimental evidence. Psychol Bull 2006 Mar;132(2):249-268. [doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.132.2.249] [Medline: 16536643] (Pubitemid 43439928)
22. Webb T, Sheeran P. How do implementation intentions promote goal attainment? A test of component processes. J Exp Soc Psychol 2007;43(2):295-302. [doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2006.02.001]
23. Knauper B, Roseman M, Johnson P, Krantz L. Using mental imagery to enhance the effectiveness of implementation intentions. Curr Psychol 2009;28:181-186.
24. Knäuper B, McCollam A, Rosen-Brown A, Lacaille J, Kelso E, Roseman M. Fruitful plans: adding targeted mental imagery to implementation intentions increases fruit consumption. Psychol Health 2011 May;26(5):601-617. [doi: 10.1080/08870441003703218] [Medline: 21337259]
25. Gibson B, Weir C. Development and preliminary evaluation of a simulation-based diabetes education module. AMIA Annu Symp Proc 2010;2010:246-250. [Medline: 21346978]
26. Markman KD, McMullen MN. A reflection and evaluation model of comparative thinking. Pers Soc Psychol Rev 2003;7(3):244-267. [Medline: 12788690] (Pubitemid 36891965)
27. Smallman R, Roese NJ. Counterfactual Thinking Facilitates Behavioral Intentions. J Exp Soc Psychol 2009 Jul;45(4):845-852. [doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2009. 03.002] [Medline: 20161221]
28. Sheeran P, Webb TL, Gollwitzer PM. The interplay between goal intentions and implementation intentions. Pers Soc Psychol Bull 2005 Jan;31(1):87-98. [doi: 10.1177/0146167204271308] [Medline: 15574664] (Pubitemid 40030791)
29. Huizinga MM, Elasy TA, Wallston KA, Cavanaugh K, Davis D, Gregory RP, et al. Development and validation of the Diabetes Numeracy Test (DNT). BMC Health Serv Res 2008;8:96 [FREE Full text] [doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-8-96] [Medline: 18452617]
30. Ajzen I. University of Massachusetts Amherst. Constructing a Theory of Planned Behavior Questionnaire URL: http://people.umass.edu/aizen/pdf/tpb. measurement.pdf [accessed 2012-04-23] [WebCite Cache ID 6798bwmnz]
31. Hagströmer M, Oja P, Sjöström M. The International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ): a study of concurrent and construct validity. Public Health Nutr 2006 Sep;9(6):755-762. [Medline: 16925881] (Pubitemid 46211749)
32. Fitzgerald JT, Funnell MM, Hess GE, Barr PA, Anderson RM, Hiss RG, et al. The reliability and validity of a brief diabetes knowledge test. Diabetes Care 1998 May;21(5):706-710. [Medline: 9589228] (Pubitemid 28487059)
33. Berikai P, Meyer PM, Kazlauskaite R, Savoy B, Kozik K, Fogelfeld L. Gain in patients' knowledge of diabetes management targets is associated with better glycemic control. Diabetes Care 2007 Jun;30(6):1587-1589. [doi: 10.2337/dc06-2026] [Medline: 17372160] (Pubitemid 46871178)
34. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. The Comprehensive R Archive Network URL: http://cran.r-project.org/ [accessed 2012-04-23] [WebCite Cache ID 6798f0Utx]
35. Bandura A. Social cognitive theory: an agentic perspective. Asian J Soc Psychol 1999;2:21-41. [doi: 10.1111/1467-839X.00024]
36. Bandura A. Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychol Rev 1977 Mar;84(2):191-215. [Medline: 847061]
37. Allen NA, Fain JA, Braun B, Chipkin SR. Continuous glucose monitoring counseling improves physical activity behaviors of individuals with type 2 diabetes: A randomized clinical trial. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 2008 Jun;80(3):371-379. [doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2008.01.006] [Medline: 18304674]
38. Prestwich A, Perugini M, Hurling R. Can implementation intentions and text messages promote brisk walking? A randomized trial. Health Psychol 2010 Jan;29(1):40-49. [doi: 10.1037/a0016993] [Medline: 20063934]
39. Reyna VF. A theory of medical decision making and health: fuzzy trace theory. Med Decis Making 2008;28(6):850-865. [doi: 10.1177/0272989X08327066] [Medline: 19015287]
40. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 2011 Nov 14. Data 2010: The Healthy People 2010 Database URL: http://wonder.cdc.gov/data2010/focus.htm [accessed 2012-01-29] [WebCite Cache ID 654DQ6MDx]
41. Tate DF, Finkelstein EA, Khavjou O, Gustafson A. Cost effectiveness of internet interventions: review and recommendations. Ann Behav Med 2009 Aug;38(1):40-45. [doi: 10.1007/s12160-009-9131-6] [Medline: 19834778]
42. Fisher L, Polonsky W, Parkin C, Jelsovsky Z, Wagner R. Structured SMBG promotes positive changes in self-management attitudes in non-insulin treated T2DM: STeP Study Results. 2011 Presented at: 71st Scientific Sessions of the American Diabetes Association; June 24-28, 2011; San Diego, CA, USA.
43. Polonsky WH, Fisher L, Schikman CH, Hinnen DA, Parkin CG, Jelsovsky Z, et al. Structured self-monitoring of blood glucose significantly reduces A1C levels in poorly controlled, noninsulin-treated type 2 diabetes: results from the Structured Testing Program study. Diabetes Care 2011 Feb;34(2):262-267. [doi: 10.2337/dc10-1732] [Medline: 21270183]