Acute noise stress impairs feedback processing

Biological Psychology

Volumn 91, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 163-171

  Banis, Stella ^a   Lorist, Monicque M ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GRONINGEN   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER GRONINGEN   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Acute noise stress; Anterior cingulate cortex; ERP; Feedback processing; Feedback related negativity; Feedback related negativity measures

Indexed keywords

ACOUSTIC STRESS; ACUTE STRESS; ADULT; ANTERIOR CINGULATE; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; EXECUTIVE FUNCTION; FEEDBACK SYSTEM; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; NEGATIVE FEEDBACK; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TASK PERFORMANCE;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ATTENTION; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVOKED POTENTIALS; FEEDBACK, PSYCHOLOGICAL; GYRUS CINGULI; HUMANS; MALE; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS; NOISE; PHOTIC STIMULATION; REACTION TIME;

EID: 84864136705     PISSN: 03010511     EISSN: 18736246     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2012.06.009     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Arnsten A.F.T. Stress signalling pathways that impair prefrontal cortex structure and function. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 2009, 10:410-422.
2. Arnsten A.F.T., Goldman-Rakic P. Noise stress impairs prefrontal cortical cognitive function in monkeys: evidence for a hyperdopaminergic mechanism. Archives of General Psychiatry 1998, 55:362-368.
3. Babisch W. Stress hormones in the research on cardiovascular effects of noise. Noise Health 2003, 5:1-11.
4. Bogdan R., Pizzagalli D.A. Acute stress reduces reward responsiveness: implications for depression. Biological Psychiatry 2006, 60:1147-1154.
5. Botvinick M.M. Conflict monitoring and decision making: reconciling two perspectives on anterior cingulate function. Cognitive, Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience 2007, 7:356-366.
6. Botvinick M.M., Braver T.S., Barch D.M., Carter C.S., Cohen J.D. Conflict monitoring and cognitive control. Psychological Review 2001, 108:624-652.
7. Breier A., Albus M., Pickar D., Zahn T.P. Controllable and uncontrollable stress in humans: alterations in mood and neuroendocrine and psychophysiological function. American Journal of Psychiatry 1987, 144:1419-1425.
8. Foti D., Hajcak G. Depression and reduced sensitivity to non-rewards versus rewards: evidence from event-related potentials. Biological Psychology 2009, 81:1-8.
9. Gehring W.J., Willoughby A.R. The medial frontal cortex and the rapid processing of monetary gains and losses. Science 2002, 295:2279-2282.
10. Goyer J.P., Woldorff M.G., Huettel S.A. Rapid electrophysiological brain responses are influenced by both valence and magnitude of monetary rewards. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2008, 20:2058-2069.
11. Gratton G., Coles M.G., Donchin E. A new method for off-line removal of ocular artifact. Electroencephalography & Clinical Neurophysiology 1983, 55:468-484.
12. Hajcak G., Moser J.S., Holroyd C.B., Simons R.F. The feedback-related negativity reflects the binary evaluation of good versus bad outcomes. Biological Psychology 2006, 71:148-154.
13. Hartley L.R., Adams R.G. Effect of noise on the Stroop test. Journal of Experimental Psychology 1974, 102:62-66.
14. Hillier A., Alexander J.K., Beversdorf D.Q. The effect of auditory stressors on cognitive flexibility. Neurocase 2006, 12:228-231.
15. Hockey G.R. Effect of loud noise on attentional selectivity. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 1970, 22:28-36.
16. Holroyd C.B., Coles M.G.H. The neural basis of human error processing: reinforcement learning, dopamine, and the error-related negativity. Psychological Review 2002, 109:679-709.
17. Holroyd C.B., Hajcak G., Larsen J.T. The good, the bad and the neutral: electrophysiological responses to feedback stimuli. Brain Research 2006, 1105:93-101.
18. Holroyd C.B., Larsen J.T., Cohen J.D. Context dependence of the event-related brain potential associated with reward and punishment. Psychophysiology 2004, 41:245-253.
19. Holroyd C.B., Nieuwenhuis S., Yeung N., Cohen J.D. Errors in reward prediction are reflected in the event-related brain potential. NeuroReport: For Rapid Communication of Neuroscience Research 2003, 14:2481-2484.
20. Joëls M., Baram T.Z. The neuro-symphony of stress. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 2009, 10:459-466.
21. Luck S.J. An Introduction to the Event-related Potential Technique 2005, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
22. Lupien S.J., Maheu F., Tu M., Fiocco A., Schramek T.E. The effects of stress and stress hormones on human cognition: implications for the field of brain and cognition. Brain and Cognition 2007, 65:209-237.
23. Luque D., López F.J., Marco-Pallares J., Càmara E., Rodríguez-Fornells A. Feedback-related brain potential activity complies with basic assumptions of associative learning theory. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2012, 24:794-808.
24. Ma Q., Shen Q., Xu Q., Li D., Shu L., Weber B. Empathic responses to others' gains and losses: an electrophysiological investigation. Neuroimage 2011, 54:2472-2480.
25. Marco-Pallares J., Cucurell D., Cunillera T., García R., Andrés-Pueyo A., Münte T.F., Rodríguez-Fornells A. Human oscillatory activity associated to reward processing in a gambling task. Neuropsychologia 2008, 46:241-248.
26. Miltner W.H.R., Braun C.H., Coles M.G.H. Event-related brain potentials following incorrect feedback in a time-estimation task: evidence for a 'generic' neural system for error detection. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 1997, 9:788-798.
27. Nieuwenhuis S., Holroyd C.B., Mol N., Coles M.G.H. Reinforcement-related brain potentials from medial frontal cortex: origins and functional significance. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews 2004, 28:441-448.
28. Ossewaarde L., Qin S., Van Marle, Hein J.F., van Wingen G.A., Fernández G., Hermans E.J. Stress-induced reduction in reward-related prefrontal cortex function. Neuroimage 2011, 55:345-352.
29. Petzold A., Plessow F., Goschke T., Kirschbaum C. Stress reduces use of negative feedback in a feedback-based learning task. Behavioral Neuroscience 2010, 124:248-255.
30. Platt M.L., Huettel S.A. Risky business: the neuroeconomics of decision making under uncertainty. Nature Neuroscience 2008, 11:398-403.
31. Preston S.D., Buchanan T.W., Stansfield R.B., Bechara A. Effects of anticipatory stress on decision making in a gambling task. Behavioral Neuroscience 2007, 121:257-263.
32. Ridderinkhof K.R., Ullsperger M., Crone E.A., Nieuwenhuis S. The role of the medial frontal cortex in cognitive control. Science 2004, 306:443-447.
33. San Martín R., Manes F., Hurtado E., Isla P., Ibañez A. Size and probability of rewards modulate the feedback error-related negativity associated with wins but not losses in a monetarily rewarded gambling task. Neuroimage 2010, 51:1194-1204.
34. Sato A., Yasuda A., Ohira H., Miyawaki K., Nishikawa M., Kumano H., Kuboki T. Effects of value and reward magnitude on feedback negativity and P300. NeuroReport: For Rapid Communication of Neuroscience Research 2005, 16:407-411.
35. Steele J.D., Kumar P., Ebmeier K.P. Blunted response to feedback information in depressive illness. Brain 2007, 130:2367-2374.
36. Szalma J.L., Hancock P.A. Noise effects on human performance: a meta-analytic synthesis. Psychological Bulletin 2011, 137:682-707.
37. van der Helden J., Boksem M.A.S., Blom J.H.G. The importance of failure: feedback-related negativity predicts motor learning efficiency. Cerebral Cortex 2010, 20:1596-1603.
38. Wald F.D., Mellenbergh G.J. De verkorte versie van de Nederlandse vertaling van de Profile of Mood States (POMS). Nederlands Tijdschrift Voor de Psychologie En Haar Grensgebieden 1990, 45:86-90.
39. Wu Y., Zhou X. The P300 and reward valence, magnitude, and expectancy in outcome evaluation. Brain Research 2009, 1286:114-122.
40. Wu Y., Leliveld M.C., Zhou X. Social distance modulates recipient's fairness consideration in the dictator game: an ERP study. Biological Psychology 2011, 88:253-262.
41. Yeung N., Nieuwenhuis S. Dissociating response conflict and error likelihood in anterior cingulate cortex. The Journal of Neuroscience 2009, 29:14506-14510.
42. Yeung N., Sanfey A.G. Independent coding of reward magnitude and valence in the human brain. The Journal of Neuroscience 2004, 24:6258-6264.