1D single-site and laterally constrained inversion of multifrequency and multicomponent ground-based electromagnetic induction data - Application to the investigation of a near-surface clayey overburden

Geophysics

Volumn 77, Issue 4, 2012, Pages

  Cyril, Schamper ^a   Rejiba, Fayçal ^a   Guérin, Roger ^a  

^a SORBONNE UNIVERSITÉ   (France)

Author keywords

Algorithm; Electromagnetics; Inversion; Near surface

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHMS; AQUIFERS; ELECTRIC CONDUCTIVITY; ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELDS; ELECTROMAGNETIC INDUCTION; HYDROGEOLOGY; MAGNETIC FIELDS;

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY; ELECTRICAL RESISTIVITY TOMOGRAPHY; ELECTROMAGNETIC INDUCTIONS (EMI); ELECTROMAGNETICS; INVERSION; LATERALLY CONSTRAINED INVERSIONS; NEAR SURFACES; VERTICAL MAGNETIC FIELDS;

SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS;

ALGORITHM; AQUIFER; DATA INTERPRETATION; DATA INVERSION; ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY; ELECTRICAL RESISTIVITY; ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELD; MAGNETIC FIELD; OVERBURDEN; TOMOGRAPHY;

FRANCE; HAUTE NORMANDIE; ROUEN; SEINE MARITIME;

EID: 84864107305     PISSN: 00168033     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1190/geo2011-0358.1     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Abubakar, A., T. M. Habashy, V. Druskin, L. Knizhnerman and S. Davydycheva, 2006, A 3D parametric inversion algorithm for triaxial induction data: Geophysics, 71, no. 1, G1-G9, http://dx.doi.org/10.1190/1.2168009 GPYSA7 0016-8033
2. Aksun, M. and G. Dural, 2005, Clarification of issues on the closed-form Green's functions in stratified media: IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, 53, 3644-3653, http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TAP.2005.858571 IETPAK 0018-926X
3. Auken, E. and A. V. Christiansen, 2004, Layered and laterally constrained 2D inversion of resistivity data: Geophysics, 69, 752-761, http://dx.doi.org/10.1190/1.1759461 GPYSA7 0016-8033
4. Auken, E., N. Foged, A. V. Christiansen and K. I. Sørensen, 2007, Enhancing the resolution of the subsurface by joint inversion of x- and z-component SkyTEM data: 19th International Geophysical Conference and Exhibition, ASEG, Expanded Abstracts, 1-4.
5. Auken, E., L. Pellerin, N. B. Christensen and K. Sørensen, 2006, A survey of current trends in near-surface electrical and electromagnetic methods: Geophysics, 71, no. 5, G249-G260, http://dx.doi.org/10.1190/1.2335575 GPYSA7 0016-8033
6. Brosten, T. R., F. D. Day-Lewis, G. M. Schultz, G. P. Curtis and J. W. Lane Jr., 2011, Inversion of multi-frequency electromagnetic induction data for 3D characterization of hydraulic conductivity: Journal of Applied Geophysics, 73, no. 4, 323-335, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jappgeo.2011.02.004 JAGPEA 0926-9851
7. Christiansen, A. V. and E. Auken, 2008, Presenting a free, highly flexible inversion code: 78th Annual International Meeting, SEG, Expanded Abstracts, 1228-1232.
8. Christiansen, A. V. and E. Auken, 2010, A global measure for depth of investigation: 16th European Meeting of Environmental and Engineering Geophysics, Near Surface, Expanded Abstracts, paper A13.
9. Constable, S. C., R. L. Parker and C. G. Constable, 1987, Occam's inversion: A practical algorithm for generating smooth models from electromagnetic sounding data: Geophysics, 52, 289-300, http://dx.doi.org/10.1190/1.1442303 GPYSA7 0016-8033
10. Farquharson, C. G., D. W. Oldenburg and P. S. Routh, 2003, Simultaneous 1D inversion of loop-loop electromagnetic data for magnetic susceptibility and electrical conductivity: Geophysics, 68, 1857-1869, http://dx.doi.org/10.1190/1.1635038 GPYSA7 0016-8033
11. Fraser, D. C., 1978, Resistivity mapping with an airborne multicoil electromagnetic system: Geophysics, 43, 144-172, http://dx.doi.org/10.1190/1.1440817 GPYSA7 0016-8033
12. Guptasarma, D. and B. Singh, 1997, New digital linear filters for Hankel J0 and J1 trans forms: Geophysical Prospecting, 45, no. 5, 745-762, http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2478.1997.500292.x GPPRAR 0016-8025
13. Huang, H. and D. C. Fraser, 1996, The differential parameter method for multifrequency airborne resistivity mapping: Geophysics, 61, 100-109, http://dx.doi.org/10.1190/1.1574674 GPYSA7 0016-8033
14. Keys, R., 1986, An application of Marquardt's procedure to the seismic inverse problem: Proceedings of the IEEE, 74, 476-486, http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/PROC.1986.13488 IEEPAD 0018-9219
15. Kollias, S. and D. Anastassiou, 1988, Adaptive training of multilayer neural networks using a least squares estimation technique: IEEE International Conference on Neural Networks, 383-390.
16. Kriegshäuser, B., O. Fanini, S. Forgang, G. Itskovich, M. Rabinovich, L. Tabarovsky, L. Yu, M. Epov, P. Gupta and J. Van der Horst, 2000, A new multi-component induction logging tool to resolve anisotropic formations: 41st Annual Logging Symposium, Society of Petrophysicists and Well Log Analysts, Extended Abstracts, paper 2000 D.
17. Lambot, S., E. Slob and H. Vereecken, 2007, Fast evaluation of zero-offset Green's function for layered media with application to ground-penetrating radar: Geophysical Research Letters, 34, 1-6, http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2007GL031459 GPRLAJ 0094-8276
18. Lavoué, F., J. van der Kruk, J. Rings, F. André, D. Moghadas, J. Huisman, S. Lambot, L. Weihermüller, J. Vanderborght and H. Vereecken, 2010, Electromagnetic induction calibration using apparent electrical conductivity modelling based on electrical resistivity tomography: Near Surface Geophysics, 8, 553-561, http://dx.doi.org/10.3997/1873-0604.2010037 1569-4445
19. Leclerc, V., 2008, Test de la méthode RISKE 2 en milieu karstique appliqué au bassin d'alimentation des sources de fontaine sous préaux: Master's thesis, Université de Rouen.
20. Loke, M. H. and R. D. Barker, 1996, Rapid least-squares inversion of apparent resistivity pseudosections by a quasi-newton method: Geophysical Prospecting, 44, no. 1, 131-152, http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/gpr.1996.44.issue-1 GPPRAR 0016-8025
21. Madsen, K., H. Bruun and O. Tingleff, 2004, Methods for non-linear least squares problems: IMM.
22. Marquardt, D. W., 1963, An algorithm for least-squares estimation of nonlinear parameters: Journal of the Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics on Control, 11, no. 2, 431-441, http://dx.doi.org/10.1137/0111030 JSMCAL
23. Marquardt, D. W., 1970, Generalized inverses, ridge regression, biased linear estimation and nonlinear estimation: Journal of the Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics on Control, 12, no. 3, 591-612, http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1267205 JSMCAL
24. Martinelli, P. and M. C. Duplaá, 2008, Laterally filtered 1D inversions of small-loop, frequency-domain EMI data from a chemical waste site: Geophysics, 73, no. 4, F143-F149, http://dx.doi.org/10.1190/1.2917197 GPYSA7 0016-8033
25. McKenna, S. P. and J. R. McKenna, 2010, Modeling and analysis of the response of a triaxial, frequency-domain electromagnetic induction sensor to a buried linear conductor: Geophysics, 75, no. 1, F1-F14, http://dx.doi.org/10.1190/1.3267876 GPYSA7 0016-8033
26. Meju, M., 1992, An effective ridge regression procedure for resistivity data inversion: Computers & Geosciences, 18, no. 2-3, 99-118, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0098-3004(92)90079-7 CGEODT 0098-3004
27. Menke, W., 1989, Geophysical data analysis: Discrete inversion theory: Academic Press Inc.
28. Newman, G. A. and D. L. Alumbaugh, 1997, Three-dimensional massively parallel electromagnetic inversion-I. theory: Geophysical Journal International, 128, 345-354, http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/gji.1997.128.issue-2 GJINEA 0956-540X
29. Newman, G. A. and M. Commer, 2005, New advances in three dimensional transient electromagnetic inversion: Geophysical Journal International, 160, 5-32, http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/gji.2005.160.issue-1 GJINEA 0956-540X
30. Oldenburg, D. W. and Y. Li, 1999, Estimating depth of investigation in DC resistivity and IP surveys: Geophysics, 64, 403-416, http://dx.doi.org/10.1190/1.1444545 GPYSA7 0016-8033
31. Pérez-Flores, M. A., S. Méndez-Delgado and E. Gómez-Treviño, 2001, Imaging low frequency and DC electromagnetic fields using a simple linear approximation: Geophysics, 66, 1067-1081, http://dx.doi.org/10.1190/1.1487054 GPYSA7 0016-8033
32. Sambuelli, L., S. Leggieri, C. Calzoni and C. Porporato, 2007, Study of riverine deposits using electromagnetic methods at a low induction number: Geophysics, 72, no. 5, B113-B120, http://dx.doi.org/10.1190/1.2754249 GPYSA7 0016-8033
33. Sasaki, Y., 2001, Full 3-D inversion of electromagnetic data on PC: Journal of Applied Geophysics, 46, no. 1, 45-54, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0926-9851(00)00038-0 JAGPEA 0926-9851
34. Sasaki, Y. and M. A. Meju, 2006, A multidimensional horizontal-loop controlled-source electromagnetic inversion method and its use to characterize heterogeneity in aquiferous fractured crystalline rocks: Geophysical Journal International, 166, 59-66, http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/gji.2006.166.issue-1 GJINEA 0956-540X
35. Schamper, C., 2009, Study by simulations of the monitoring of reservoir production by electromagnetic methods.: Ph.D. thesis, University of Pierre & Marie Curie.
36. Schamper, C. and F. Rejiba, 2011, 1D inversion of multi-component and multi-frequency low-induction number EM device (PROMIS) for near-surface exploration: 29th Progress In Electromagnetics Research Symposium, PIERS, Extended Abstracts, 507-511.
37. Schamper, C., F. Rejiba, A. Tabbagh and S. Spitz, 2011, Theoretical analysis of long offset time-lapse frequency domain controlled source electromagnetic signals using the method of moments: Application to the monitoring of a land oil reservoir: Journal of Geophysical Research, 116, B03101, http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2009JB007114 JGREA2 0148-0227
38. Sengpiel, K.-P. and B. Siemon, 2000, Advanced inversion methods for airborne electromagnetic exploration: Geophysics, 65, 1983-1992, http://dx.doi.org/10.1190/1.1444882 GPYSA7 0016-8033
39. Siemon, B., 2001, Improved and new resistivity-depth profiles for helicopter electromagnetic data: Journal of Applied Geophysics, 46, no. 1, 65-76, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0926-9851(00)00040-9 JAGPEA 0926-9851
40. Siemon, B., E. Auken and A. V. Christiansen, 2009, Laterally constrained inversion of helicopter-borne frequency-domain electromagnetic data: Journal of Applied Geophysics, 67, no. 3, 259-268, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jappgeo.2007.11.003 JAGPEA 0926-9851
41. Sinha, A. K., 1968, Electromagnetic fields of an oscillating magnetic dipole over an anisotropic earth: Geophysics, 33, 346-353, http://dx.doi.org/10.1190/1.1439934 GPYSA7 0016-8033
42. Tabbagh, A., 1986, What is the best coil orientation in the slingram electromagnetic prospecting method?: Archaeometry, 28, no. 2, 185-196, http://dx.doi.org/10.111/j.1475-4754.1986.tb00386.x ARCHAG
43. Tølbøll, R. J. and N. B. Christensen, 2007, Sensitivity functions of frequency-domain magnetic dipole-dipole systems: Geophysics, 72, no. 2, F45-F56, http://dx.doi.org/10.1190/1.2409623 GPYSA7 0016-8033
44. Tompkins, M. J., D. L. Alumbaugh, D. T. Stanley and X. Lu, 2004, Numerical analysis of near-borehole and anisotropeic layer effects on the response of multicomponent induction logging tools: Geophysics, 69, 140-151, http://dx.doi.org/10.1190/1.1649382 GPYSA7 0016-8033
45. Wannamaker, P. E., G. W. Hohmann and W. A. Sanfilipo, 1984, Electromagnetic modeling of three-dimensional bodies in layered earths using integral equations: Geophysics, 49, 60-74, http://dx.doi.org/10.1190/1.1441562 GPYSA7 0016-8033
46. Ward, S. H. and G. W. Hohmann, 1988, Electromagnetic methods in applied geophysics: SEG.
47. Xiong, Z., 1989, Electromagnetic fields of electric dipoles embedded in a stratified anisotropic earth: Geophysics, 54, 1643-1646, http://dx.doi.org/10.1190/1.1442633 GPYSA7 0016-8033