Local velocity representation: Evidence from motion adaptation

Vision Research

Volumn 38, Issue 24, 1998, Pages 3899-3912

  Schrater, Paul R ^a   Simoncelli, Eero P ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

^b NEW YORK UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Adaptation; After effect; Matching; Motion; Velocity

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; GRATING; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; HYPOTHESIS; MOVEMENT PERCEPTION; NORMAL HUMAN; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; VELOCITY; VISUAL ADAPTATION; VISUAL STIMULATION;

ADAPTATION, OCULAR; HUMANS; MALE; MATHEMATICS; MOTION PERCEPTION; OPTICAL ILLUSIONS; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 0031687957     PISSN: 00426989     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0042-6989(98)00088-1     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. Gibson JJ. The Perception of the Visual World. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin, 1950.
2. Koenderink JJ, van Doom AJ. Affine structure from motion. J Opt Soc Am A 1990;8:377-85.
3. Warren WH, Hannon DJ. Direction of self-motion is perceived from optical flow. Nature 1988;336:162-3.
4. Graham N. Visual Pattern Analyzers. New York, NY: Oxford University Press, 1989.
5. Movshon JA, Adelson EH, Gizzi MS, Newsome WT. The analysis of moving visual patterns. In: Chagas C, Gattass R, Gross C, editors. Experimental Brain Research Supplementum II: Pattern Recognition Mechanisms. New York: Springer, 1986:117-51.
6. Watson AB, Ahumada AJ. A look at motion in the frequency domain. In: Tsotsos JK, editor, Motion: Perception and representation, pages 1-10. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, 1983.
7. Albright TD. Direction and orientation selectivity of neurons in visual area MT of the macaque. J Neurophysiol -30.
8. Adelson EH, Movshon JA. Phenomenal coherence of moving visual patterns. Nature 1982;300(5892):523-5.
9. Maunsell JHR, Essen DCV. Functional properties of neurons in middle temporal visual area of the macaque monkey I. Selectivity for stimulus direction, speed, and orientation. J Neurophysiol 1983;49:1127-47.
10. Rodman HR, Albright TD. Coding of visual stimulus velocity in area MT of the macaque. Vis Res 1987;27:2035-48.
11. Movshon JA, Newsome WT. Visual response properties of striate cortical neurons projecting to ar ea MT in macaque monkeys. Vis Neurosci 1996;16(23):7733-41.
12. Heeger DJ. Model for the extraction of image flow. J Opt Soc Am A 1987;4(8):1455-71.
13. Grzywacz NM, Yuille AL. A model for the estimation of local image velocity by cells in the visual cortex. Proc R Soc London A 1990;239:129-61.
14. Simoncelli EP. Distributed Analysis and Representation of Visual Motion. PhD thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Cambridge, MA, 1993.
15. Sereno ME. Neural Computation of Pattern Motion: Modeling Stages of Motion Anaysis in the Primate Visual Cortex. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1993.
16. Nowlan SJ, Sejnowski TJ. A selection model for motion processing in area MT of primates. J Neurosci 1995;15:1195-214.
17. Simoncelli EP, Heeger DJ. A model of neuronal responses in visual area MT. Vis Res 1998;38(5):743-61.
18. Yang Y, Blake R. Broad tuning for spatial frequency of neural mechanisms underlying visual perception of coherent motion. Nature 1994;371:793-6.
19. Sekuler AB. Motion segregation from speed differences: evidence for nonlinear processing. Vis Res 1990;30:785-95.
20. Driver J, McLeod P, Dienes Z. Are direction and speed coded independently by the visual system? evidence from visual search. Vis Res 1992;6:133-47.
21. Osgood CE, Heyer AW. A new interpretation of the figural after-effect. Psychol Rev 1952;59.
22. Sutherland NS. Figural after-effects and apparent size. Q J Exp Psychol 1961;13:222-8.
23. Pantle A. Size-detecting mechanisms in human vision. Science 1968;162:1146-8.
24. Blakemore CB, Sutton P. Size adaptation: a new aftereffect. Science 1969;166:245-7.
25. Blakemore CB, Nachrnias J, Sutton P. The perceived spatial frequency shift: evidence for frequency selective neurons in the human brain. J Physiol 1970;210:727-50.
26. Coltheart M. Visual feature-analyzers and after-effects of tilt and curvature. Psychol Rev 1971;78:114-21.
27. Georgeson MA, Harris MG. Spatial selectivity of contrast adaptation: models and data. Vis Res 1984;24:729-41.
28. Ross J, Speed HD. Contrast adaptation and contrast masking in human vision. Proc R Soc London B 1991;246:61-9.
29. Snowden RJ. Adaptability of the visual system is inversely related to its sensitivity. J Opt Soc Am A 1994;11:25-32.
30. Wade NJ. A selective history of the study of visual motion aftereffects. Perception 1994;23:1111-34.
31. Levinson E, Sekuler R. Adaptation alters perceived direction of motion. Vis Res 1976;16:779-81.
32. Mather G. The movement aftereffect and a distribution-shift model for coding the direction of visual movement. Perception 1980;9:379-92.
33. Clymer AB. The effect of seen movement on the apparent speed of subsequent test velocities: speed tuning of movement. PhD thesis, Columbia University, NY, 1973.
34. Thompson P. Velocity after-effects: the effects of adaptation to moving stimuli on the perception of subsequently seen moving stimuli. Vis Res 1980;21:337-45.
35. Smith AT. Velocity coding: evidence from perceived velocity shifts. Vis Res 1985;27:1491-500.
36. Smith AT, Edgar GK. Antagonistic comparison of temporal frequency filter outputs as a basis for speed perception. Vis Res 1994;34:253-65.
37. Sekuler R, Pantle A, Levinson E. Physiological basis of motion perception. In: Held R, Leibowitz H W, Teuber H, editors. Handbook of Sensory Physiology VIII, Perception. New York: Springer, 1978:67-96.
38. Smith AT. Velocity perception and discrimination: relation to temporal mechanisms. Vis Res 1987;27:1491-500.
39. Schrater P, Simoncelli EP. Motion adaptation effects suggest an explicit representation of velocity. Investigative Opthalmology and Visual Science Supplement (ARVO), vol. 35, 1994:1268.
40. Schrater P, Simoncelli E. Biases in speed perception due to motion aftereffect. Investigative Opthalmology and Visual Science Supplement (ARVO), vol. 36, 1995:S-54.
41. Lew AC, Song EY, Friedman-Hill SR, Adelson EH, Wolfe JM. A different aftereffect of motion: altering perceived direction of gratings and plaids. Investigative Opthalmology and Visual Science Supplement (ARVO), vol. 32, 1991:827.
42. Ashida H, Osaka N. Difference of spatial frequency selectivity between static and flicker motion aftereffects. Perception 1994;23:1313-20.
43. Over R, Broerse J, Crassini B, Lovegrove W. Spatial determinants of the aftereffects of seen motion. Vis Res 1973;13:1681-90.
44. Cameron EL, Baker C, Boulton JC. Spatial frequency selective mechanisms underlying the motion aftereffect. Vis Res 1992;32:561-8.
45. Derrington AM, Suero M. Motion of complex patterns is computed from the perceived motions of their components. Vis Res 1991;31:139-49.
46. Press WH, Flannery BP, Teukolsky SA, Vetterling WT. Numerical Recipes in C. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1988.
47. Smith AT, Hammond P. The pattern specificity of velocity aftereffects. Exp Brain Res 1985;60:71-8.
48. Loomis JM, Nakayama K. A velocity analogue of brightness contrast. Perception 1973;2:425-8.
49. Murakami I, Shimojo S. Motion capture changes to induced motion at higher luminance contrasts, smaller eccentricities and larger inducer sizes. Vis Res 1993;33:2091-107.
50. Watson AB, Pelli DG. QUEST: a Bayesian adaptive psychophysical method. Percept Psychophys 1983;33:113-20.
51. Lee C, Rohrer WH, Sparks DL. Population coding of saccadic eye movements by neurons in the superior colliculus. Nature 1988;332:357.
52. Barlow HB. A theory about the functional role and synaptic mechanism of visual after-effects. In: Blakemore C, editor. Vision: Coding and Efficiency. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1990:363-75.
53. Pantle A. Motion aftereffect magnitude as a measure of the spatio-temporal response properties of direction-sensitive analyzers. Vis Res 1974;14:1229-36.
54. Ashida H, Osaka N. Motion aftereffect with flickering test stimuli depends on adapting velocity. Vis Res 1995;35(1):1825-33.
55. Hiris E, Blake R. Another perspective on the visual motion aftereffect. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1992;89:9025-8.
56. Nishida S, Sato T. Motion aftereffect with flickering test patterns reveals higher stages of motion processing. Vis Res 1994;35(4):477-90.
57. Pantle A, Lehmkuhle S, Caudill M. On the capacity of directionally selective mechanisms to encode different dimensions of moving stimuli. Perception 1978;7:261-7.