A Bayesian framework for sensory adaptation

Neural Computation

Volumn 14, Issue 3, 2002, Pages 543-559

  Grzywacz, Norberto M ^a   Balboa, Rosario M ^b  

^a University of Southern California ^*  (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ALICANTE   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADAPTATION; ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BAYES THEOREM; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; HUMAN; PHYSIOLOGY; SENSATION;

ADAPTATION, PHYSIOLOGICAL; ANIMALS; BAYES THEOREM; HUMANS; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; SENSATION;

EID: 0036514267     PISSN: 08997667     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1162/089976602317250898     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Adorjan, P., Piepenbrock, C., & Obermayer, K. (1999). Contrast adaptation and infomax in visual cortical neurons. Rev. Neurosci., 10(3-4), 181-200.
2. Atick, J. J., & Redlich, A. N. (1992). What does the retina know about natural scenes? Neural Comp., 4, 196-210.
3. Balboa, R. M., & Grzywacz, N. M. (1999). Biological evidence for an ecological-based theory of early retinal lateral inhibition. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., 40, S386.
4. Balboa, R. M., & Grzywacz, N. M. (2000a). The role of early retinal lateral inhibition: More than maximizing luminance information. Visual Neurosci., 17, 77-89.
5. Balboa, R. M., & Grzywacz, N. M. (2000b). The minimal-local asperity hypothesis of early retinal lateral inhibition. Neural Comp., 12, 1485-1517.
6. Balboa, R. M., & Grzywacz, N. M. (2000c). Occlusions and their relationship with the distribution of contrasts in natural images. Vision. Res., 40, 2661-2669.
7. Balboa, R. M., Tyler, C. W., & Grzywacz, N. M. (2001). Occlusions contribute to scaling in natural images. Vision Res., 41, 955-964.
8. Barlow, H. B., Fitzhugh, R., & Kuffler, S. W. (1957). Change of organisation in the receptive fields of the cat's retina during dark adaptation. J. Physiol., 137, 338-354.
9. Baylor, D. A., Lamb, T. D., & Yau, K.-W. (1979). Responses of retinal rods to single photons. J. Physiol., 288, 613-634.
10. Berger, J. O. (1985). Statistical decision theory and Bayesian analysis. New York: Springer-Verlag.
11. Bowling, D. B. (1980). Light responses of ganglion cells in the retina of the turtle. J. Physiol., 209, 173-196.
12. Carlson, C. R. (1978). Thresholds for perceived image sharpness. Phot. Sci. and Eng., 22, 69-71.
13. Dowling, J. E. (1987). The retina: An approachable part of the brain. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press, Harvard University Press.
14. Fain, G. L., Matthews, H. R., Cornwall, M. C., & Koutalos, Y. (2001). Adaptation in vertebrate photoreceptors. Physiol. Rev., 81, 117-151.
15. Field, D. J. (1994). What is the goal of sensory coding? Neural Comp., 6, 559-601.
16. Field, D. J., Hayes, A., & Hess, R. F. (1993). Contour integration by the human visual system: Evidence for a local "association field." Vision Res., 33(2), 173-193.
17. Fiorentini, A., & Radici, T. (1957). Binocular measurements of brightness on a field presenting a luminance gradient. Atti. Fond. Giorgio Ronchi, 12, 453-461.
18. Fuortes, M. G. F., & Yeandle, S. (1964). Probability of occurrence of discrete potential waves in the eye of the Limulus. J. Physiol., 47, 443-463.
19. Haft, M., & van Hemmen, J. L. (1998). Theory and implementation of infomax filters for the retina. Network, 9(1), 39-71.
20. ++-dependent gain changes in PDE activation in vertebrate rod phototransduction. Mol. Vis., 6, 265-286.
21. Hateren, J. H. van (1992). Theoretical predictions of spatiotemporal receptive fields of fly LMC's, and experimental validation. J. Comp. Physiol. A, 171, 157-170.
22. Hayashi, J. H., Moore, J. W., & Stuart, A. E. (1985). Adaptation in the input-output relation of the synapse made by the barnacle's photoreceptor. J. Physiol., 368, 179-195.
23. Kamermans, M., Haak, J., Habraken, J. B., & Spekreijse, H. (1996). The size of the horizontal cell receptive fields adapts to the stimulus in the light adapted goldfish retina. Vision Res., 36, 4105-4119.
24. Knill, D. C., Kersten, D., & Mamassian, P. (1996). Implications of a Bayesian formulation of visual information for processing for psychophysics. In D. C. Knill & R. Whitman (Eds.), Perception as Bayesian inference (pp. 239-286). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
25. Knill, D. C., Kersten, D., & Yuille, A. (1996). Introduction: A Bayesian formulation of visual perception. In D. C. Knill & R. Whitman (Eds.), Perception as Bayesian inference (pp. 1-21). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
26. Kovacs, I., & Julesz, B. (1993). A closed curve is much more than an incomplete one: Effect of closure in figure-ground segmentation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 90, 7495-7497.
27. Krebs, W., & Schaten, B. (1976). The lateral photoreceptor of the barnacle, Balanus eburneus: quantitative morphology and fine structure. Cell Tissue Res., 168, 193-207.
28. Laughlin, S. B. (1989). The role of sensory adaptation in the retina. J. Exp. Biol., 146, 39-62.
29. Marr, D. (1982). Vision. San Francisco: Freeman.
30. Oland, L. A., & Stuart, A. E. (1986). Pattern of convergence of the photoreceptors of the barnacle's three ocelli onto second-order cells. J. Neurophysiol., 55, 882-895.
31. Pettet, M. W., McKee, S. P., & Grzywacz, N. M. (1997). Constraints of long range interactions mediating contour detection. Vision Res., 38, 865-879.
32. Ratliff, F. (1965). Mach bands: Quantitative studies on neural networks in the retina. San Francisco: Holden-Day.
33. Reifsnider, E. S., & Tranchina, D. (1995). Background contrast modulates kinetics and lateral spread of responses to superimposed stimuli in outer retina. Vis. Neurosci., 12, 1105-1126.
34. Riesz, F., & -Nagy, B. S. Z. (1990). Functional analysis. New York: Dover.
35. Ruderman, D. E., & Bialek, W. (1994). Statistics of natural images: Scaling in the woods. Phys. Rev. Letter, 73, 814-817.
36. Rushton, W. A. H. (1961). The intensity factor in vision. In W. D. McElroy & H. B. Glass (Eds.), Light and life (pp. 706-722). Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
37. Shapley, R. (1997). Retinal physiology: Adapting to the changing scene. Curr. Biol., 7(7), R421-R423.
38. Smirnakis, S. M., Berry, M. J., Warland, D. K., Bialek, W., & Meister, M. (1997). Adaptation of retinal processing to image contrast and spatial scale. Nature, 386(6620), 69-73.
39. Srinivasan, M. V., Laughlin, S. B., & Dubs, A. (1982). Predictive coding: A fresh view of inhibition in the retina. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B, 216, 427-459.
40. Stevens, S. S. (1970). Neural events and the psychophysical law. Science, 170, 1043-1050.
41. Thorson, J., & Biederman-Thorson, M. (1974). Distributed relaxation processes in sensory adaptation. Science, 183, 161-172.
42. Tranchina, D., Gordon, J., Shapley, R., & Toyoda, J. (1981). Linear information processing in the retina: A study of horizontal cell responses. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 78, 6540-6542.
43. Van Ness, F. L., & Bouman M. A. (1967). Spatial modulation transfer in the human eye. J. Opt. Soc. Am., 57, 401-406.
44. Wainwright, M. J. (1999). Visual adaptation as optimal information transmission. Vision Res., 39, 3960-3974.
45. Yuille, A., & Bülthoff, H. H. (1996). Bayesian decision theory and psychophysics. In D. C. Knill & R. Whitman (Eds.), Perception as Bayesian inference (pp. 123-161). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
46. Zhu, S. C., & Mumford, D. (1997). Prior learning and Gibbs reaction-diffusion. IEEE Trans. on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 19, 1236-1250.