Grand challenges in HCI: The quest for theory-led design

People and Computers XIX - The Bigger Picture, Proceedings of HCI 2005

Volumn , Issue , 2006, Pages 491-505

  Sutcliffe, Alistair ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Bridging representations; Claims; Cognitive models; Theory

Indexed keywords

BRIDGING MODELS; BRIDGING REPRESENTATIONS; CLAIMS; COGNITIVE ASPECTS; COGNITIVE MODEL; GRAND CHALLENGE; STATE OF THE ART; THEORY;

PATIENT MONITORING;

EID: 84864051720     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1007/1-84628-249-7_31     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (62)

1. Alexander, C, Ishikawa, S., Silverstein, M., Jacobson, M., Fiksdahl-King, I. & Angel, S. [1977], A Pattern Language: Towns, Buildings, Construction, Oxford University Press.
2. Anderson, J. R. & Lebiere, C. [1998], Representing Cognitive Activity in Complex Tasks, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
3. Arrow, H., McGrath, J. E. & Berdahl, J. L. [2000], Small Groups as Complex Systems: Formation, Coordination, Development and Adaptation, Sage Publications.
4. Barnard, P., May, J., D, D. & Duce, D. [2000], Systems, Interactions and Macrotheory, ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction 7(2), 222-62.
5. Bellotti, v., Buckingham Shum, S., MacLean, A. & Hanmiond, N. [1995], Multidisciplinary Modelling in HCI Design: In Theory and in Practice, in I. Katz, R. Mack, L. Marks, M. B. Rosson & J. Nielsen (eds.). Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHr95), ACM Press, pp. 146-53.
6. Bertelsen, O. W. & Bødker, S. [2003], Activity Theory, in J. M. Carroll (ed.), HCI Models, Theories and Frameworks: Toward a Multidisciplinary Science, Morgan-Kaufmann, pp.291-324.
7. Blackmon, M. H., Kitajima, M. & Poison, P. G. [2003], Repairing Usability Problems Identified by the Cognitive Walkthrough for the Web, in V. Bellotti, T Erickson, G. Cockton & P. Korhonen (eds.), Proceedings of SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI'OS), CHI Utters 5(1), ACM Press, pp.497-504.
8. Borchers, J. [2001], A Pattern Approach to Interaction Design, John Wiley & Sons.
9. Brooks, F. P [2003], Three Grand Challenges for Half Century Old Computer Science, Journal of the ACM 50(10), 25-6.
10. Burke, M., Gorman, N., Nilsen, E. & Homof, A. [2004], Banner Ads Hinder Visual Search and Are Forgotten, in E. Dykstra-Erickson & M. Tscheligi (eds.), CHI'04 Extended Abstracts of the Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM Press, pp.1139-42.
11. Card, S. K., Moran, T. P & Newell, A. [1983], The Psychology of Human-Computer Interaction, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
12. Carroll, J. M. [2000], Making Use: Scenario-based Design of Human-Computer Interactions, MIT Press.
13. Carroll, J. M. & Rosson, M. B. [1992], Getting Around the Task-Artefact Framework: How to Make Claims and Design by Scenario, ACM Transactions on Office Information Systems 10(2), 181-212.
14. Cassell, J., Bickmore, J., Billinghurst, M., Campbell, L., Chang, K., Vilhjalmsson, H. & Yan, H. [1999], Embodiment in Conversational Interfaces: REA, in M. G. Williams & M. W. Altom (eds.). Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems: The CHI is the Limit (CHr99), ACM Press, pp.520-7.
15. Chewar, C. M., McCrickard, D. S. & Sutcliffe, A. G. [2004], Unpacking Critical Parameters for Interface Design: Evaluating Notification Systems with the IRC, in D. Gruen & I. McAra- McWilliams (eds.). Proceedings of the Symposium on Designing Interactive Systems: Processes, Practices, Methods and Techniques (DIS'04), ACM Press, pp.279-88.
16. Connell, I., Green, T. R. G. & Blandford, A. [2003], Ontological Sketch Models: Highlighting User-system Misfits, in E. O'Neill, P. Palanque & P. Johnson (eds.). People and Computers XVII: Designing for Society (Proceedings ofHCVOS), Springer-Verlag, pp. 163-78.
17. Diaper, D. [2002], Tasks, Scenarios and Thought, Interacting with Computers 15(4), 629-38.
18. Dix, A., Finlay, J., Abowd, G. D. & Beale, R. [2003], Human-Computer Interaction, third edition, Prentice-Hall.
19. Dix, A. & Mancini, R. [1998], Specifying History and Back Tracking Mechanisms, in Formal Methods in Human-Computer Interaction, Formal Approaches to Computing and Information Technology, Springer-Verlag, Chapter 1, pp. 1-23.
20. Dowell, J. & Long, J. B. [1998], Conception of the Cognitive Engineering Design Problem, Ergonomics 41(2), 126-39.
21. Green, T. R. G. & Petre, M. [1996], Usability Analysis of Visual Progranmiing Environments: A 'Cognitive Dimensions' Framework, Journal of Visual Languages and Computing 7(2), 131-74.
22. Harrison, M. D. & Barnard, P. J. [1993], On Defining the Requirements for Interaction, in S. Fickas & A. Finkelstein (eds.). Proceedings of the IEEE International Symposium on Requirements Engineering (RE'93), IEEE Computer Society Press, pp.50-5.
23. Hollnagel, E. [1998], Cognitive Reliability and Error Analysis Method (CREAM), Elsevier.
24. Horvitz, E., Kadie, C. M., Paek, T. & Hovel, D. [2003], Models of Attention in Computing and Conmiunications: From Principles to Application, Communications of the ACM 46(3). 52-9.
25. Ishii, H., Mazalek, A. & Lee, J. [2001], Bottles as a Minimal Interface to Access Digital Information, in J. A. Jacko & A. Sears (eds.), CHI'Ol Extended Abstracts of the Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM Press, pp. 187-8.
26. ISO [1997], ISO 9241 International Standard. Ergonomic Requirements for Office Systems with Visual Display Terminals (VDTs). International Organization for Standardization, Geneve, Switzerland.
27. ISO [1998], ISO 14915 International Standard. Multimedia User Interface Design Software Ergonomic Requirements - Part 1: Introduction and Framework. International Organization for Standardization, Geneve, Switzerland.
28. ISO [2000], ISO 14915 International Standard. Multimedia User Interface Design Software Ergonomic Requirements - Part 3: Media Combination and Selection. International Organization for Standardization, Geneve, Switzerland.
29. John, B. E. & Kieras, R. E. [1995], The GOMS Family of User Interface Analysis Techniques: Comparison and Contrast, ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction 3(4), 320-51.
30. Johnson, P. [1992], Human-Computer Interaction: Psychology, Task Analysis and Software Engineering, McGraw-Hill.
31. Kieras, D. E. & Meyer, D. E. [1997], An Overview of the EPIC Architecture for Cognition and Performance with Application to Human-Computer Interaction, Human-Computer Interaction 12(4), 391-438.
32. Kitajima, M. & Poison, P. G. [1997], A Comprehension-based Model of Exploration, Human-Computer Interaction 12(4), 345-89.
33. Long, J. & Dowell, J. [1989], Conceptions of the Discipline of HCI: Craft, Applied Science and Engineering, in A. Sutcliffe & L. Macaulay (eds.), People and Computers V (Proceedings ofHCP89), Cambridge University Press, pp.9-34.
34. Maglio, P P & Campbell, C. S. [2000], Trade-offs in Displaying Peripheral Information, in T. Turner & G. Szwillus (eds.), Proceedings of the SlGCHl Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI'OO), CHI Utters 2(1), ACM Press, pp.241-8.
35. McCrickard, D. S., Catrambone, R., Chewar, C. M. & Stasko, J. T. [2003], Establishing Tradeoffs that Leverage Attention for Utility: Empirically Evaluating Information Display in Notification Systems, International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 58(5), 547-82.
36. McCrickard, D. S. & Chewar, C. M. [2003], Attuning Notification Design to User Goals and Attention Costs, Communications of the ACM 46(3), 67-72.
37. Nardi, B. A. (ed.) [1996], Context and Consciousness: Activity Theory and Human-Computer Interaction, MIT Press.
38. Newman, W. M., Taylor, A. S., Dance, C. R. & Taylor, S. A. [2000], Performance Targets, Model and Innovation in Design of Interactive Systems, in D. Boyarski & W. A. Kellogg (eds.). Proceedings of the Symposium on Designing Interactive Systems: Processes, Practices, Methods and Techniques (DIS2000), ACM Press, pp.381-7.
39. Norman, D. A. [1986], Cognitive Engineering, in D. A. Norman & S. W. Draper (eds.). User Centered System Design: New Perspectives on Human-Computer Interaction, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp.31-62.
40. Norman, D. A. [1988], The Psychology of Everyday Things, Basic Books.
41. Norman, D. A. [2004], Emotional Design: Why We Love (or Hate) Everyday Things, Basic Books.
42. NSF [2004], Science of Design, http://www.nsf.gov/funding/pgm-summ.jsp? pims-id= 12766 (last accessed 2005-04-26) National Science Foundation: Directorate for Computer & Information Science & Engineering.
43. Ortony, A., Clore, G. L. & Collins, A. [1988], The Cognitive Structure of Emotions, Cambridge University Press.
44. Pirolli, P & Card, S. [1999], Information Foraging, Psychological Review 106(4), 643-75.
45. Preece, J., Rogers, Y. & Sharp, H. (eds.) [2002], Interaction Design: Beyond Human-Computer Interaction, John Wiley & Sons.
46. Rasmussen, J. [1986], Information Processing and Human-Machine Interaction: An Approach to Cognitive Engineering, North-Holland.
47. Reason, J. [1990], Human Error, Cambridge University Press.
48. Shneiderman, B. & Plaisant, C. [2004], Designing the User Interface: Strategies for Effective Interaction, fourth edition, Addison-Wesley.
49. Stasko, J., Miller, T, Pousman, Z., Plaue, C. & Ullah, O. [2004], Personalized Peripheral Information Awareness through Information Art, in N. Davies, E. Mynatt & I. Siio (eds.), UbiComp 2004: Ubiquitous Computing (Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Ubiquitous Computing), Vol. 3205 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Springer, pp. 18-35.
50. Sutcliffe, A. G. [2000], On the Effective Use and Reuse of HCI Knowledge, ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction 7(2), 197-221.
51. Sutcliffe, A. G. [2002], The Domain Theory: Patterns for Knowledge and Software Reuse, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
52. Sutcliffe, A. G. [2003], Multimedia and Virtual Reality: Designing Multisensory User Interfaces, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
53. Sutcliffe, A. G. [2005], Extending Small Group Theory for Analysing Complex Systems, in C. W. Johnson (ed.). Proceedings of the Workshop on Complexity in Design and Engineering, Department of Computer Science, University of Glasgow, pp. 139-48. GIST Report 2005-1.
54. Sutcliffe, A. G. Fickas, S., Sohlberg, M. M. & Ehlhardt, L. A. [2003], Investigating the Usability of Assistive User Interfaces, Interacting with Computers 15(4), 577-601.
55. Sutcliffe, A. G. & Carroll, J. M. [1999], Designing Claims for Reuse in Interactive Systems Design, International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction 50(3), 213-42.
56. Teasdale, J. D. & Barnard, P J. [1993], Affect, Cognition and Change: Re-modelling Depressive Thought, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
57. UKCRC [2005], Grand Challenges for Computing Research,http://www.ukcrc. org.uk/grand-challenges/index.cfm (last accessed 2005-04-26). UK Computing Research Conmiittee
58. Van Welie, M. [2005], Patterns in Interaction Design: Web Design Patterns, http://www.welie.com/pattems (last accessed 2005-04-26).
59. Vicente, K. J. [1999], Cognitive Work Analysis: Towards Safe, Productive and Healthy Computer-based Work, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
60. Ware, C. [2000], Information Visualization: Perception for Design, Morgan-Kaufmann.
61. Wickens, C. [2002], Multiple Resources and Performance Prediction, Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science 3(2), 150-77.
62. Wright, P C, Fields, R. E. & Harrison, M. D. [2000], Analysing Human-Computer Interaction as Distributed Cognition: The Resources Model, Human-Computer Interaction 15(1), 1-41.