Structure in creativity: An exploratory study to analyse the effects of structuring tools on scenario workshop results

Futures

Volumn 44, Issue 8, 2012, Pages 746-760

  van Vliet, Mathijs ^a,b   Kok, Kasper ^a   Veldkamp, A ^c   Sarkki, Simo ^d  

^a WAGENINGEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^b INSTITUTE FOR ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES   (Netherlands)

^c UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE   (Netherlands)

^d UNIVERSITY OF OULU   (Finland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DATA SET; INTEGRATED APPROACH; MODEL TEST; PARTICIPATORY APPROACH; QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS;

EUROPE;

EID: 84864015823     PISSN: 00163287     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.futures.2012.05.002     Document Type: Article

References (66)

1. Biggs R., Raudsepp-Hearne C., Atkinson-Palombo C., Bohensky E., Boyd E., Cundill G., Fox H., Ingram S., Kok K., Spehar S., Tengö M., Timmer D., Zurek M. Linking futures across scales: a dialog on multiscale scenarios. Ecology and Society 2007, 12.
2. Börjeson L., Höjer M., Dreborg K.-H., Ekvall T., Finnveden G. Scenario types and techniques: towards a user's guide. Futures 2006, 38:723-739.
3. Peterson G.D., Cumming G.S., Carpenter S.R. Scenario planning: a tool for conservation in an uncertain world. Conservation Biology 2003, 17:358-366.
4. Van Notten P.W.F., Rotmans J., Van Asselt M.B.A., Rothman D.S. An updated scenario typology. Futures 2003, 35:423-444.
5. Carlsson-Kanyama A., Dreborg K.H., Moll H.C., Padovan D. Participative backcasting: a tool for involving stakeholders in local sustainability planning. Futures 2008, 40:34-46.
6. Kok K., Patel M., Rothman D., Quaranta G. Multi-scale narratives from an IA perspective: Part II. Participatory local scenario development. Futures 2006, 38:285-311.
7. Rotmans J., van Asselt M., Anastasi C., Greeuw S., Mellors J., Peters S., Rothman D., Rijkens N. Visions for a sustainable Europe. Futures 2000, 32:809-831.
8. Svenfelt å., Engström R., Svane ö. Decreasing energy use in buildings by 50% by 2050 - a backcasting study using stakeholder groups. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 2011, 78:785-796.
9. Fontela E. The future societal bill: methodological alternatives. Futures 2003, 35:25-36.
10. Kok K., van Delden H. Combining two approaches of integrated scenario development to combat desertification in the Guadalentin watershed, Spain. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 2009, 36:49-66.
11. Nakićenović N. Greenhouse gas emissions scenarios. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 2000, 65:149-166.
12. Verburg P.H., Rounsevell M.D.A., Veldkamp A. Scenario-based studies of future land use in Europe. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 2006, 114:1-6.
13. van Vliet M., Kok K., Veldkamp T. Linking stakeholders and modellers in scenario studies; the use of fuzzy cognitive maps as a communication and learning tool. Futures 2010, 42:1-14.
14. Kok K., Rothman D., Patel M. Multi-scale narratives from an IA perspective: Part I. European and Mediterranean scenario development. Futures 2006, 38:261-284.
15. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment Ecosystems and Human Well-being: A Framework for Assessments 2003, Island Press, Washington, DC, USA.
16. Tapio P., Paloniemi R., Varho V., Vinnari M. The unholy marriage? Integrating qualitative and quantitative information in Delphi processes. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 2011, 78:1616-1628.
17. UNEP Global Environment Outlook-3: Past, Present and Future Perspectives 2002, Earthscan, London.
18. Alcamo J. The SAS approach: combining qualitative and quantitative knowledge in environmental scenarios. Environmental Futures: The Practice of Environmental Scenario Analysis 2008, 123-150. Elsevier, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. J. Alcamo (Ed.).
19. Xiang W.N., Clarke K.C. The use of scenarios in land-use planning. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 2003, 30:885-909.
20. van Vliet M. Bridging gaps in the scenario world - linking stakeholders, modellers and decision makers. Land Dynamics Group 2011, Wageningen University, Wageningen.
21. Giller K.E., Leeuwis C., Andersson J.A., Andriesse W., Brouwer A., Frost P., Hebinck P., Heitkönig I., Van Ittersum M.K., Koning N., Ruben R., Slingerland M., Udo H., Veldkamp T., Van de Vijver C., Van Wijk M.T., Windmeijer P. Competing claims on natural resources: what role for science?. Ecology and Society 2008, 13.
22. Pahl-Wostl C. The importance of social learning in restoring the multifunctionality of rivers and floodplains. Ecology and Society 2006, 11.
23. Albert C. Participatory scenario development, an effective tool to support sustainability transitions. ökologisches Wirtschaften 2008, 23-26.
24. Alcamo J., Henrichs T. Towards guidelines for environmental scenario analysis. Environmental Futures: The Practice of Environmental Scenario Analysis 2008, Elsevier, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, (Chapter 2). J. Alcamo (Ed.).
25. Girod B., Wiek A., Mieg H., Hulme M. The evolution of the IPCC's emissions scenarios. Environmental Science & Policy 2009, 12:103-118.
26. Hulme M., Dessai S. Negotiating future climates for public policy: a critical assessment of the development of climate scenarios for the UK. Environmental Science & Policy 2008, 11:54-70.
27. Vervoort J., Kok K., van Lammeren R., Veldkamp T. Stepping into futures: exploring the potential of interactive media for participatory scenarios on social-ecological systems. Futures 2010, 42:604-616.
28. Wilson I. Mental maps of the future. Scenario Building: A Suitable Method For Strategic Property Planning, The Cutting Edge 1999, The Property Research Conference of the RICS 1999, J. Ratcliff (Ed.).
29. Nowack M., Endrikat J., Guenther E. Review of Delphi-based scenario studies: quality and design considerations. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 2011, 78:1603-1615.
30. Heinecke A., Schwager M. Die szenario-technik als instrument der strategischen planung 1995, Braunschweig, Germany.
31. Schoemaker P.J.H. Multiple scenario development: its conceptual and behavioral foundation. Strategic Management Journal 1993, 14:193-213.
32. Postma T.J.B.M., Liebl F. How to improve scenario analysis as a strategic management tool?. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 2005, 72:161-173.
33. Chermack T.J. Studying scenario planning: theory, research suggestions, and hypotheses. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 2005, 72:59-73.
34. Chermack T.J. Improving decision-making with scenario planning. Futures 2004, 36:295-309.
35. Bruner J.S. Towards a Theory of Instruction 1968, Norton, New York.
36. Keil J.M. The Creative Corporation 1987, Dow Jones-Irwin, Homewood, IL.
37. Amabile T.M. Social psychology of creativity: a consensual assessment technique. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1982, 43:997-1013.
38. Baer J. Creative Teachers, Creative Students 1997, Allyn and Bacon, Boston.
39. Guilford J.P. The structure of intellect. Psychological Bulletin 1956, 53:267-293.
40. Silvia P.J., Martin C., Nusbaum E.C. A snapshot of creativity: evaluating a quick and simple method for assessing divergent thinking. Thinking Skills and Creativity 2009, 4:79-85.
41. Kaufman J.C., Lee J., Baer J., Lee S. Captions, consistency, creativity, and the consensual assessment technique: new evidence of reliability. Thinking Skills and Creativity 2007, 2:96-106.
42. Hocevar D. Measurement of creativity: review and critique. Journal of Personality Assessment 1981, 45:450.
43. Burgess J., Chilvers J. Upping the ante: a conceptual framework for designing and evaluating participatory technology assessments. Science and Public Policy 2006, 33:713-728.
44. Hermans F., Haarmann W., Dagevos J. Evaluation of stakeholder participation in monitoring regional sustainable development. Regional Environmental Change 2011, 1-11.
45. Kämäri J., Alcamo J., Bärlund I., Duel H., Farquharson F., Flörke M., Fry M., Houghton-Carr H., Kabat P., Kaljonen M., Kok K., Meijer K.S., Rekolainen S., Sendzimir J., Varjopuro R., Villars N. Envisioning the future of water in Europe - the SCENES project. E-WAter 2008, 1-28.
46. Website SCENES Water Scenarios for Europe and for Neighbouring States - SCENES, Project Website 2009, SYKE.
47. Kämäri J. Results of First Round of Pilot Area Workshops, SCENES Deliveralbe IA2. 2 2008, SYKE, Helsinki.
48. Descriptions of the Regions and the Pilot Areas, SCENES Deliverable IA2. 1, With Contributions From: Irene Blanco, Erol Cakmake, Gema Carmona, Daniela Rosa D'Agostino, Sara Fernandez, Zsuzsanna Flachner, Marek Gielczewski, Arvo Iital, Nicola Lamaddalena, Victor Lugovoy, Thierry Rieu, Aurel Varduca, Consuelo Varela-Ortega and Olga Zhovtonog 2008, SYKE, Helsinki. J. Kämäri (Ed.).
49. van Vliet M. Analysis of First Drafts of Conceptual Models and Narrative Storylines Over All Pilot Areas, SCENES Deliverable 2.5, with Contributions From all Pilot Area Coordinators 2008, Wageningen University, Wageningen.
50. Evans K., Velarde S.J., Prieto R., Rao S.N., Sertzen S., Dávila K., Cronkleton P., de Jong W. Field Guide to the Future, Four Ways for Communities to Think Ahead 2006, Centre for International Forestry Research (CIFOR), ASB, World Agroforesty Centre, Nairobi.
51. Patel M., Kok K., Rothman D. Participatory scenario construction in land use analysis. An insight into the experiences created by stakeholder involvement in the Northern Mediterranean. Land Use Policy 2007, 24:546-561.
52. Kosko B. Fuzzy cognitive maps. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies 1986, 24:65-75.
53. Kosko B. Fuzzy Thinking: The New Science of Fuzzy Logic 1993, Hyperion Press, New York.
54. özesmi U., özesmi S.L. A participatory approach to ecosystem conservation: fuzzy cognitive maps and stakeholder group analysis in Uluabat lake, Turkey. Environmental Management 2003, 31:518-531.
55. Kok K. The potential of fuzzy cognitive maps for semi-quantitative scenario development, with an example from Brazil. Global Environmental Change-Human and Policy Dimensions 2009, 19:122-133.
56. Lynam T., de Jong W., Sheil D., Kusumanto T., Evans K. A review of tools for incorporating community knowledge, preferences, and values into decision making in natural resources management. Ecology and Society 2007, 12.
57. Website SAS2 Social Analysis Systems 2009, SAS2 International.
58. Kok K., van Vliet M. Using a participatory scenario development toolbox: added values and impact on quality of scenarios. Journal of Water and Climate Change 2011, 2:87-105.
59. van Vliet M., Kok K., Sendzimir J., Lasut A. Report Describing Methodology for Scenario Development at Pan-European and Pilot Area Scales, SCENES Deliverable 2.1 2007, Wageningen University, Wageningen.
60. Karwowski M., Soszynski M. How to develop creative imagination?: assumptions, aims and effectiveness of Role Play Training in Creativity (RPTC). Thinking Skills and Creativity 2008, 3:163-171.
61. Couger J.D., Dengate G. Product measurement of creativity of IS products. Creativity and Innovation Management 1996, 5.
62. Jackson P.W., Messick S. The person, the product, and the response: conceptual problems in the assessment of creativity. Journal of Personality 1965, 33:309-329.
63. Beratan K.K. A cognition-based view of decision processes in complex social-ecological systems. Ecology and Society 2007, 12.
64. Raadgever G.T. Does Collaboration Enhance Learning? The Challenge of Learning from Collaborative Water Management Research 2009, VSSD, Delft.
65. M. van Vliet, K. Kok, M. Flörke, C. Varela-Ortega, E.H. Cakmak, R. Khadra, P. Esteve, D. D'Agostino, H. Dudu, I. Bärlund, FCMs as common base for linking participatory products and models, in prep.
66. Website MSP Portal Multi-Stakeholder Processes Resource Platform 2009, Wageningen International.