Interviewing Techniques for Darwinian Facial-Composite Systems

Applied Cognitive Psychology

Volumn 26, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 576-584

  Frowd, Charlie D ^a   Nelson, Laura ^a   Skelton, Faye ^a   Noyce, Rosie ^b   Atkins, Rebecca ^a   Heard, Priscilla ^c   Morgan, David ^c   Fields, Steve ^d   Henry, Joanne ^e   Mcintyre, Alex ^e   Hancock, Peter J B ^e  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL LANCASHIRE   (United Kingdom)

^b LANCASTER UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF THE WEST OF ENGLAND   (United Kingdom)

^d HM Prison Peterhead ^*  (United Kingdom)

^e UNIVERSITY OF STIRLING   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; DARWINIAN METHOD; FACE PROFILE; FEMALE; HAIR; HOLISTIC COMPONENT INTERVIEW; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; INTERVIEW; MALE; METHODOLOGY; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; WITNESS;

EID: 84864008012     PISSN: 08884080     EISSN: 10990720     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/acp.2829     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Berman, G. L., & Cutler, B. L. (1998). The influence of processing instructions at encoding and retrieval on face recognition accuracy. Psychology, Crime & Law, 4, 89-106.
2. Brace, N., Pike, G., & Kemp, R. (2000). Investigating E-FIT using famous faces. In A. Czerederecka, T. Jaskiewicz-Obydzinska, & J. Wojcikiewicz (Eds.), Forensic psychology and law (pp. 272-276). Krakow: Institute of Forensic Research Publishers.
3. Bruce, V., & Young, A. (1998). In the eye of the beholder: The science of face perception. New York: Oxford University Press.
4. Bruce, V., Ness, H., Hancock, P. J. B, Newman, C., & Rarity, J. (2002). Four heads are better than one. Combining face composites yields improvements in face likeness. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 894-902.
5. Cabeza, R., & Kato, T. (2000). Features are also important: Contributions of featural and configural processing to face recognition. Psychological Science, 11, 429-433.
6. Clark, H. H. (1973). The language-as-fixed-effect fallacy: A critique of language statistics in psychological research. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 12, 335-359.
7. Dando, C. J., Wilcock, R., & Milne, R. (2009). The cognitive interview: The efficacy of a modified mental reinstatement of context procedure for frontline police investigators. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 15, 679-696.
8. Davies, G. M., & Christie, D. (1982). Face recall: An examination of some factors limiting composite production accuracy. Journal of Applied Psychology, 67, 103-109.
9. Davies, G. M., Shepherd, J., & Ellis, H. (1978). Remembering faces: Acknowledging our limitations. Journal of Forensic Science, 18, 19-24.
10. Davies, G. M., van der Willik, P., & Morrison, L. J. (2000). Facial composite production: A comparison of mechanical and computer-driven systems. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 119-124.
11. Ellis, H. D. Shepherd, J. W., & Davies, G. M. (1975). Use of photo-fit for recalling faces. British Journal of Psychology, 66, 29-37.
12. Ellis, H. D., Shepherd, J. W., & Davies, G. M. (1979). Identification of familiar and unfamiliar faces from internal and external features: Some implications for theories of face recognition. Perception, 8, 431-439.
13. Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A. G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioural, and biomedical Sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 175-191.
14. Finger, K., & Pezdek, K. (1999). The effect of the cognitive interview on face identification accuracy: Release from verbal overshadowing. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84, 340-348.
15. Frowd, C. D., Carson, D., Ness, H., McQuiston, D., Richardson, J., Baldwin, H., & Hancock, P. J. B. (2005a). Contemporary composite techniques: The impact of a forensically-relevant target delay. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 10, 63-81.
16. Frowd, C. D., Carson, D., Ness, H., Richardson, J., Morrison, L., McLanaghan, S., & Hancock, P. J. B. (2005b). A forensically valid comparison of facial composite systems. Psychology, Crime & Law, 11, 33-52.
17. Frowd, C. D., & Fields, S. (2011). Verbalisation effects in facial composite production. Psychology, Crime & Law. DOI: 10.1080/10683161003623264
18. Frowd, C. D., & Hepton, G. (2009). The benefit of hair for the construction of facial composite images. British Journal of Forensic Practice, 11, 15-25.
19. Frowd, C. D., Bruce, V., & Hancock, P. J. B. (2008a). Changing the face of criminal identification. The Psychologist, 21, 670-672.
20. Frowd, C. D., Bruce, V., & Hancock, P. J. B. (2009a). Evolving facial composite systems. Forensic Update, 98, 25-32.
21. Frowd, C. D., Bruce, V., Ness, H., Bowie, L., Thomson-Bogner, C., Paterson, J., McIntyre, A., & Hancock, P. J. B. (2007b). Parallel approaches to composite production. Ergonomics, 50, 562-585.
22. Frowd, C. D., Bruce, V., Pitchford, M., Gannon, C., Robinson, M., Tredoux, C., Park, J., McIntyre, A., & Hancock, P. J. B. (2009b). Evolving the memory of a criminal's face: Methods to search a face space more effectively. Soft computing, 14, 81-90.
23. Frowd, C. D., Bruce, V., Smith, A., & Hancock, P. J. B. (2008b). Improving the quality of facial composites using a holistic cognitive interview. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Applied, 14, 276-287.
24. Frowd, C. D., Hancock, P. J. B., & Carson, D. (2004). EvoFIT: A holistic, evolutionary facial imaging technique for creating composites. ACM Transactions on Applied Psychology (TAP), 1, 1-21.
25. Frowd, C. D., McQuiston-Surrett, D., Anandaciva, S., Ireland, C. E., & Hancock, P. J. B. (2007d). An evaluation of US systems for facial composite production. Ergonomics, 50, 1987-1998.
26. Frowd, C. D., McQuiston-Surrett, D., Kirkland, I., & Hancock, P. J. B. (2005c). The process of facial composite production. In A. Czerederecka, T. Jaskiewicz-Obydzinska, R. Roesch, & J. Wojcikiewicz (Eds.), Forensic psychology and law (pp. 140-152). Krakow: Institute of Forensic Research Publishers.
27. Frowd, C. D., Nelson, L., & Atkins, R. (2011a). Interviewing for holistic systems: The impact of recalling holistic and feature information. Unpublished.
28. Frowd, C. D., Pitchford, M., Bruce, V., Jackson, S., Hepton, G., Greenall, M., McIntyre, A. H., & Hancock, P. J. B. (2010). The psychology of face construction: Giving evolution a helping hand. Applied Cognitive Psychology. DOI: 10.1002/acp.1662
29. Frowd, C. D., Skelton, F., Atherton, C., Pitchford, M., Hepton, G., Holden, L., McIntyre, A., & Hancock, P. J. B. (in press-a). Recovering faces from memory: The distracting influence of external facial features. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Applied.
30. Frowd, C. D., Skelton F. C., & Butt, N., Hassan, A., & Fields, S. (in press-b). Familiarity effects in the construction of facial composite images using software systems. Ergonomics.
31. Geiselman, R. E., Fisher, R. P., MacKinnon, D. P., & Holland, H. L. (1986). Eyewitness memory enhancement with the cognitive interview. The American Journal of Psychology, 99, 385-401.
32. Gibson, S. J., Solomon, C. J., Maylin, M. I. S., & Clark, C. (2009). New methodology in facial composite construction: from theory to practice. International Journal of Electronic Security and Digital Forensics, 2, 156-168.
33. Hancock, P. J. B. (2000) Evolving faces from principal components. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 32-2, 327-333.
34. Hancock, P. J. B., Burke, K., & Frowd, C. D. (2011). Testing facial composite construction under witness stress. International Journal of Bio-Science and Bio-Technology, 3, 65-71
35. Laughery, K., & Fowler, R. (1980). Sketch artist and identikit procedures for generating facial images. Journal of Applied Psychology, 65, 307-316.
36. McQuiston-Surrett, D., Topp, L. D., & Malpass, R. S. (2006). Use of facial composite systems in U.S. law enforcement agencies. Psychology, Crime and Law, 12, 505-517.
37. Meissner, C. A., & Brigham, J. C. (2001). A meta-analysis of the verbal overshadowing effect in face identification. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 15, 603-616.
38. Meissner, C. A., Brigham, J. C., & Kelley, C. M. (2001). The influence of retrieval processes in verbal overshadowing. Memory & Cognition, 29, 176-186.
39. Meissner, C. A., Sporer, S. L., & Susa, K. J. (2008). A theoretical review and meta-analysis of the description-identification relationship in memory for faces. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 20, 414-455.
40. Memon, A., & Bruce, V. (1985). Contexts effects in episodic studies of verbal and facial memory: A review. Current Psychological Research & Reviews, Winter 1985-86, 349-369.
41. Memon, A., Cronin, O., Eaves, R, & Bull, R. (1996). An empirical test of the 'mnemonics components' of the cognitive interview. In G. M. Davies, S. Lloyd-Bostock, M. McMurran, & C. Wilson, (Eds.), Psychology and law: Advances in research. Berlin: De Gruyter.
42. Schooler, J. W. (2002). Verbalization produces a transfer inappropriate processing shift. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 16, 989-997.
43. Schooler, J. W., & Engstler-Schooler, T. Y. (1990). Verbal overshadowing of visual memories: Some things are better left unsaid. Cognitive Psychology, 22, 36-71.
44. Shapiro, P. N., & Penrod, S. D. (1986). Meta-analysis of facial identification rates. Psychological Bulletin, 100, 139-156.
45. Tanaka, J. W., & Farah, M. J. (1993). Parts and wholes in face recognition. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Experimental Psychology, 46A, 225-245.
46. Tredoux, C. G., Nunez, D. T., Oxtoby, O., & Prag, B. (2006). An evaluation of ID: An eigenface based construction system. South African Computer Journal, 37, 1-9.
47. Tulving, E., & Thomson, D. M. (1973). Encoding specificity and retrieval processes in episodic memory. Psychological Review, 80, 352-373.
48. Valentine, T., Davis, J. P., Thorner, K., Solomon, C., & Gibson, S. (2010). Evolving and combining facial composites: Betweenhyphen;witness and within-witness morphs compared. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 16, 72-86.
49. Wells, G. L., & Hryciw, B. (1984). Memory for faces: Encoding and retrieval operations. Memory & Cognition, 12, 338-344.
50. Wells, G., Memon, A., & Penrod, S. D. (2007). Eyewitness evidence: Improving its probative value. Psychological sciences in the public interest, 7, 45-75.
51. Young, A. W., Hay, D. C., McWeeny, K. H., Flude, B. M., & Ellis, A. W. (1985). Matching familiar and unfamiliar faces on internal and external features. Perception, 14, 737-746.