Advanced stereoscopic projection technology significantly improves novice performance of minimally invasive surgical skills

Surgical Endoscopy

Volumn 26, Issue 6, 2012, Pages 1522-1527

  Smith, R ^a   Day, A ^a   Rockall, T ^a   Ballard, K ^a   Bailey, M ^a   Jourdan, I ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SURREY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

3D; Passive polarising displays; Stereoscopic surgery; Surgical training

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; DISPLAY SYSTEM; ENDOSCOPE; EXPERIMENTAL TEST; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; IMAGING AND DISPLAY; IMAGING SYSTEM; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; KNOT TYING TEST; MALE; MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY; NEEDLE CAPPING TEST; NORMAL HUMAN; OPTICS; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PAPER CUT TEST; PASSIVE POLARISING STEROSCOPIC DISPLAY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RESPONSE TIME; ROPE PASS TEST; STEREOSCOPIC PROJECTION TECHNOLOGY; STUDY SKILLS; SURGEON; SURGICAL EQUIPMENT; SURGICAL ERROR; SURGICAL GRASPER; SURGICAL SCISSOR; SURGICAL TECHNOLOGY; SURGICAL TRAINING; SUTURE; SYSTEM ANALYSIS; TASK PERFORMANCE; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; TWO DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; VALIDATION STUDY;

EID: 84863988604     PISSN: 09302794     EISSN: 14322218     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00464-011-2080-8     Document Type: Article

References (11)

1. Wheatstone C (1838) Contributions to the physiology of vision- part the first. On some remarkable, and hitherto unobserved, phenomena of binocular vision. Philos Trans R Soc Lond 128: 371-394
2. Saxena A, Chung SH, Ng A (2006) Learning depth from single monocular images. Adv Neural Inform Process Syst 18:1161
3. Patel HR, Ribal MJ, Arya M, Nauth-Misir R, Joseph JV (2007) Is it worth revisiting laparoscopic three-dimensional visualization? A validated assessment. Urology 70(1):47-49
4. Bhayani SB, Andriole GL (2005) Three-dimensional (3D) vision: does it improve laparoscopic skills? An assessment of a 3D headmounted visualization system. Rev Urol 7(4):211-214
5. Taffinder N, Smith SG, Huber J, Russell RC, Darzi A (1999) The effect of a second-generation 3D endoscope on the laparoscopic precision of novices and experienced surgeons. Surg Endosc 13(11): 1087-1092
6. Hubber JW, Taffinder N, Russell RC, Darzi A (2003) The effects of different viewing conditions on performance in simulated minimal access surgery. Ergonomics 46(10):999-1016
7. Kong SH, Oh BM, Yoon H, Ahn HS, Lee HJ, Chung SG, Yang HK (2010) Comparison of two- and three-dimensional camera systems in laparoscopic performance: a novel 3D system with one camera. Surg Endosc 24(5):1132-1143
8. Jourdan IC, Dutson E, Garcia A, Vleugels T, Leroy J, Mutter D, Marescaux J (2004) Stereoscopic vision provides a significant advantage for precision robotic laparoscopy. Br J Surg 91(7): 879-885
9. Blavier A, Nyssen AS (2009) Influence of 2D and 3D view on performance and time estimation in minimal invasive surgery. Ergonomics 52(11):1342-1349
10. Falk V, Mintz D, Grünenfelder J, Fann JI, Burdon TA (2001) Influence of three-dimensional vision on surgical telemanipulator performance. Surg Endosc 15(11):1282-1288
11. Munz Y, Moorthy K, Dosis A, Hernandez JD, Bann S, Bello F, Rockall T (2004) The benefits of stereoscopic vision in roboticassisted performance on bench models. Surg Endosc 18(4): 611-616