Mitigation of fire damage and escalation by fireproofing: A risk-based strategy

Reliability Engineering and System Safety

Volumn 105, Issue , 2012, Pages 25-35

  Tugnoli, Alessandro ^a   Cozzani, Valerio ^a   Di Padova, Annamaria ^a,b   Barbaresi, Tiziana ^b   Tallone, Fabrizio ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BOLOGNA   (Italy)

^b SAIPEM S P A   (Italy)

Author keywords

Domino effect; Escalation; Fireproofing; Major accident hazard; Passive fire protection

Indexed keywords

DESIGN APPLICATIONS; DOMINO EFFECTS; ESCALATION; FIRE DAMAGES; FIRE SCENARIOS; INITIAL PHASIS; JET FIRE; LAY-OUT; MAJOR-ACCIDENT HAZARDS; PASSIVE FIRE PROTECTION; POOL FIRES; RISK-BASED; SAFETY BARRIERS; STRUCTURAL ELEMENTS; SUPPORT STRUCTURES;

FIRES; RISK PERCEPTION;

FIREPROOFING;

EID: 84863983663     PISSN: 09518320     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2011.11.002     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (55)

1. F.I. Khan, and S.A. Abbasi The worlds worst industrial accident of the 1990s Process Safety Progress 18 1999 135 145
2. F.I. Khan, and S.A. Abbasi An assessment of the likelihood of occurrence, and the damage potential of domino effect (chain of accidents) in a typical cluster of industries Journal of Loss Preventionin the Process Industries 14 2001 283 306
3. R.M. Darbra, A. Palacios, and J. Casal Domino effect in chemical accidents: main features and accident sequences Journal of Hazardous Materials 183 1-3 2010 565 573
4. V. Cozzani, A. Tugnoli, and E. Salzano Prevention of domino effect: from active and passive strategies to inherently safer design Journal of Hazardous Materials 139 2007 209 219
5. V. Cozzani, A. Tugnoli, and E. Salzano The development of an inherent safety approach to the prevention of domino accidents Accident Analysis & Prevention 41 2009 1216 1227
6. S. Mannan Lees loss prevention in the process industries 3rd ed. 2005 Elsevier Oxford (UK)
7. US Chemical Safety and Hazard Investigation Board. Investigation report: LPG fire at Valero - McKee refinery, Report NO. 2007-05-I-TX. Washington, DC: US CSB; 2008. 〈http://purl.access.gpo.gov/GPO/LPS100916〉.
8. Center for Chemical Process Safety (CCPS). Guidelines for fire protection in chemical, petrochemical, and hydrocarbon processing facilities. New York: CCPS/AIChE; 2003.
9. Society of Fire Protection Engineers (SFPE) National Fire Protection Association (NFPA). SFPE handbook of fire protection engineering 3rd ed. 2002 NFPA Quincy
10. UK Offshore Operators Association Limited (UKOOA)/Health and Safety Executive (HSE). Fire and explosion guidance - part 2: avoidance and mitigation of fires. HS025. UKOOA/HSE; 2007.
11. NORSOK. Standard M-501 - surface preparation and protective coating. 5th rev. Lysaker, Norway: NORSOK; 2004.
12. Scandpower Risk Management AS. Guidelines for protection of pressurised systems exposed to fire. Report n. 27.207.291/R1 - Version 2. Kjeller, Norway: Scandpower; 2004.
13. NORSOK. Standard S-001 - Technical safety. 4th ed. Lysaker, Norway: NORSOK; 2008.
14. American Petroleum Institute (API) Recommended practice for design of offshore facilities against fire and blast loading, API RP 2FB 1st ed. 2006 API Washington, D.C
15. American Petroleum Institute (API) Recommended practice for fire prevention and control on fixed open-type offshore production platforms, API RP 14G 4th ed. 2007 API Washington, D.C
16. Det Norske Veritas (DNV). Fire Protection, Offshore Standard DNV-OS-D301. Hovik, Norway: DNV; 2008.
17. International Organization for Standardization (ISO) International Standard ISO 13702, petroleum and natural gas industries - control and mitigation of fires and explosions on offshore production installations - requirements and guidelines 1st ed. 1999 ISO
18. International Organization for Standardization (ISO) International Standard ISO 22899-1, determination of the resistance to jet fires of passive fire protection materials - part 1: general requirements 1st ed. 2007 ISO
19. NORSOK Standard N-004 - design of steel structures. Rev. 2 2004 NORSOK Lysaker, Norway
20. T. Moan Development of accidental collapse limit state criteria for offshore structures Structural Safety 31 2009 124 135
21. G. Landucci, G. Gubinelli, G. Antonioni, and V. Cozzani The assessment of the damage probability of storage tanks in domino events triggered by fire Accident Analysis & Prevention 41 6 2009 1206 1215
22. G. Landucci, M. Molag, and V. Cozzani Modeling the performance of coated LPG tanks engulfed in fires Journal of Hazardous Materials 172 1 2009 447 456
23. V. Cozzani, G. Gubinelli, and E. Salzano Escalation thresholds in the assessment of domino accidental events Journal of Hazardous Materials 129 2006 1 21
24. American Petroleum Institute (API) Fireproofing practices in petroleum and petrochemical processing plants 2nd ed. 1999 API publication 2218 Washington D.C
25. American Petroleum Institute (API) Design and construction of LPG installations 8th ed. 2001 API publication 2510 Washington D. C
26. A. Di Padova, A. Tugnoli, V. Cozzani, T. Barbaresi, and F. Tallone Identification of fireproofing zones in oil&gas facilities by a risk-based procedure Journal of Hazardous Materials 191 2011 83 93
27. A. Di Padova, A. Tugnoli, V. Cozzani, T. Barbaresi, and F. Tallone A risk-based methodology to identify fire protection zones B. Ale, I. Papazoglou, E. Zio, Reliability, risk and safety 2010 Taylor & Francis Group London 572 580
28. International Organization for Standardization (ISO) International Standard ISO 17776, petroleum and natural gas industries - offshore production installations - guidelines on tools and techniques for hazard identification and risk assessment 2000 ISO
29. Center for Chemical Process Safety (CCPS) Layer of protection analysis - simplified process risk assessment 2001 CCPS/AIChE New York
30. Center for Chemical Process Safety (CCPS) Guidelines for developing quantitative safety risk criteria 2009 AIChE New York
31. Health and Safety Executive (HSE) PADHI - HSEs land use planning methodology 2009 〈http://www.hse.gov.uk/landuseplanning/methodology. htm〉
32. Ministero dellAmbiente. Decreto Ministeriale 9/5/2001 n. 151. Requisiti minimi di sicurezza in material di pianificazione urbanistica e territoriale per le zone interessate da stabilimenti a rischio di incidente rilevante. Gazzetta ufficiale supplemento ordinario n.228 del 16/06/2001. Roma; 2001.
33. Shell Chemicals. Prioritization, risk characterization and management process summary; 2008. 〈http://www-static.shell.com/static/chemicals/ downloads/responsible-energy/sc-product-risk-characterization.pdf〉.
34. A. Heidarpour, and M.A. Bradford Generic nonlinear modelling of restrained steel beams at elevated temperatures Engineering Structures 31 11 2009 2787 2796
35. K.H. Lien, Y.J. Chiou, R.Z. Wang, and P.A. Hsiao Vector form intrinsic finite element analysis of nonlinear behavior of steel structures exposed to fire Engineering Structures 32 1 2010 80 92
36. A. Landesmann, E.D.M. Batista, and J.L.D. Alves Implementation of advanced analysis method for steel-framed structures under fire conditions Fire Safety Journal 40 4 2005 339 366
37. Committee for the Prevention of Disasters (TNO) Methods for the determination of possible damage to people and objects resulting from release of hazardous materials, CPR 16E 1st ed. 1992 TNO The Hague (NL)
38. Center for Chemical Process Safety (CCPS) Guidelines for chemical process quantitative risk analysis 2nd ed. 2000 CCPS/AIChE New York
39. J.Y.R. Liew, L.K. Tang, T. Holmaas, and Y.S. Choo Advanced analysis for the assessment of steel frames in fire Journal of Constructional Steel Research 47 1998 19 45
40. A. Tugnoli, V. Cozzani, and G. Landucci A consequence based approach to the quantitative assessment of inherent safety AIChE Journal 53 12 2007 3171 3182
41. Dow Chemical Company Dows chemical exposure index guide 2nd ed. 1993 AIChE New York
42. F.I. Khan, R. Sadiq, and B. Veitch Life cycle iNdeX (LInX): a new indexing procedure for process and product design and decision-making Journal of Cleaner Production 12 2004 59 76
43. American Petroleum Institute (API) Risk-based inspection base resource document 1st ed. 2000 API publication 581 Washington, D.C
44. P.A.M. Uijt de Haag, and B.J.M. Ale Guidelines for quantitative risk assessment (purple book) 2005 Committee for the Prevention of Disasters The Hague (NL)
45. C. Delvosalle, C. Fievez, A. Pipart, and B. Debray ARAMIS project: a comprehensive methodology for the identification of reference accident scenarios in process industries Journal of Hazardous Materials 130 2006 200 219
46. C.J.H. Van Den Bosch, and R.A.P.M. Weterings Methods for the calculation of physical effects (yellow book) 3rd ed. (2nd rev.) 2005 Committee for the Prevention of Disasters The Hague (NL)
47. J. Spouge New generic leak frequencies for process equipment Process Safety Progress 24 4 2005 249 257
48. A. Ronza, J.A. Vílchez, and J. Casal Using transportation accident databases to investigate ignition and explosion probabilities of flammable spills Journal of Hazardous Materials 146 2007 106 123
49. European Committee for Electrotechnical Standardization (CENELEC). Standard EN 61511:2004, Functional safety - safety instrumented systems for the process industry sector. CENELEC; 2004.
50. Det Norske Veritas (DNV). PHAST version 6.4 - Online Help Manual. DNV; 1999.
51. V. Cozzani, G. Gubinelli, G. Antonioni, G. Spadoni, and S. Zanelli The assessment of risk caused by domino effect in quantitative area risk analysis Journal of Hazardous Materials 127 1-3 2005 14 30
52. G. Landucci, A. Tugnoli, and V. Cozzani Inherent safety key performance indicators for hydrogen storage systems Journal of Hazardous Materials 159 2-3 2008 554 566
53. T.A. Kletz Process plants: a handbook for inherent safer design 1998 Taylor & Francis Bristol (PA)
54. R.E. Bollinger, D.G. Clark, A.M. Dowell, R.M. Ewbank, D.C. Hendershot, W.K. Lutz, S.I. Meszaros, D.E. Park, and ED Wixom Inherently safer chemical processes: a life cycle approach 1996 American Institute of Chemical Engineers New York
55. F.I. Khan, and P.R. Amyotte How to make inherent safety practice a reality Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering 81 2003 2 16