Guidelines for Developing Quantitative Safety Risk Criteria

Guidelines for Developing Quantitative Safety Risk Criteria

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 1-211

[No Author Info available]

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84971014172     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1002/9780470552940     Document Type: Book

References (149)

1. ABS, 2000: Guidance Notes on Risk Assessment Application for the Marine and Offshore Oil and Gas Industries, American Bureau of Shipping, June 2000.
2. ADL, 1974: A Modal Economic and Safety Analysis of the Transportation of Hazardous Substances in Bulk, Arthur D. Little, Inc., U. S. Department of Commerce, Maritime Administration, Office of Domestic Shipping, May 1974.
3. Ale, 1984: A computer based system for risk analysis ofprocess plants, Ale, B.J.M. and R. Whitehouse, Heavy Gas and Risk Assessment 111, 5. Hartwig (Ed) D. Reidel, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, November 1984.
4. Ale, 1991: Risk Analysis and Risk Policy in the Netherlands and the EEC, J. Loss Prev. Process Ind., Volume 4, 1991.
5. Ale, 2005a: Living With Risk: A Management Question, Reliability Engineering and System Safety 90, pp. 196-205,2005
6. Ale, 2000:Tolerable Or Acceptable: A Comparison Of Risk Regulation In The United Kingdom And In The Netherlands, Ale, B.J.M., Risk Analysis, Vol. 25, No. 2, 2005.
7. Arnauld, 1662: Logic, Or the Art Of Thinking (La Logique, Ou I 'Art de Penser), Antoine Arnauld and Pierre Nicole, Port Royal Monastery, Paris, France, 1662. [A 1992 reprinting is available at: http://gallica2.bnf.fr/ark:/1124 Wbpt6k25788r. image.fl.langFR].
8. Aven, 2006: Perspectives on Risk Acceptance Criteria and Management for Offshore Applications-Application to A Development Project, Aven, Terje, et al., International Journal of Materials & Structural Reliability Vo1. 4, No. 1, March 2006.
9. API, 2002: Risk-Based Inspection, API RP-5 80, American Petroleum Institute, Washington, DC, 2002.
10. API, 2003: Management of Hazards Associated with Location of Process Plant Buildings, API RP-752, American Petroleum Institute, Washington, DC, 2003.
11. Ball, 1998: Societal Risks, Final Report, D. J. Ball and P. J. Floyd, 1998.
12. Bekke, 2006: Risk Criteria, Background information for maritime decision makers, E.C.A. ter Bekke, Delft University of Technology, 2006. http://www.tudelft.nl/live/pagina.jsp?id=0f8a6619e 8b-c -4a7b-b78c-043 edc6c 1645&lang=en&binary=/doc/risk-criteria.pdf
13. Bernstein, 1998: Against The Gods-The Remarkable Story Of Risk, Bernstein, Peter L., John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 1998.
14. BLS, 2008: Fatal Occupational injuries, employment, and rates of fatal occupational injuries by selected worker characteristics, occupations, and industries, 2006, US Bureau of Labor Statistics. http:/lwww.bls,gov/iif/oshwc/cfoi/CFOI~Rates~2O06.pdf
15. Bottelberghs, 2000: Risk analysis and safetypolicy developments in the Netherlands, Bottelberghs, P.H., Journal of Hazardous Materials 71, p. 59-84, 2000.
16. Boult, 2000: Risk management of LPG transport activities in Hong Kong, Journal of Hazardous Materials, 71, pp. 85-100, 2000.
17. Cambridge, 2008: Cambridge Dictionary of American English (on-line version) Cambridge University Press, 2008. http://dictionary.cambridge.org/definea.s p?key=accept* l+O&dict=A
18. CCPS, 1992: Guidelines for Hazard Evaluation Procedures (2nd Edition) with Worked Examples, Center for Chemical Process Safety, New York, 1992.
19. CCPS, 1994: Guidelines for Evaluating the Characteristics of Vapor Cloud Explosions; Flash Fires; and BLE VEs, Center for Chemical Process Safety, New York, 1994.
20. CCPS, 1995: Tools for Making Acute Risk Decisions with Chemical Process Applications, Center for Chemical Process Safety, New York, 1995.
21. CCPS, 1996: Guidelines for Evaluating Process Plant Buildings for External Explosion and Fires, Center for Chemical Process Safety, New York, 1996.
22. CCPS, 2000a: Guidelines for Chemical Process Quantitative Risk Analysis, Second Edition, Center for Chemical Process Safety, New York, 2000.
23. CCPS, 2000b; Evaluating Process Safety in the Chemical Industry-A User's Guide to Quantitative Risk Analysis, Center for Chemical Process Safety, New York, 2000.
24. CCPS, 2001: Layer of Protection Analysis-SimpliJied Process Risk Analysis, Center for Chemical Process Safety, New York, 2001.
25. CCPS, 2007a: Guidelines for Risk Based Process Safety, Center for Chemical Process Safety, New York, 2007.
26. CCPS, 2007b: Guidelines for Safe and Reliable Instrumented Protective Systems, Center for Chemical Process Safety, New York, 2007.
27. CCPS, 2008: Guidelines for Chemical Transportation Safety, Security, and Risk Management, 2nd Edition, CCPS, 2008.
28. CEC, 2003: Liquefied Natural Gas in California: History, Risks, and Siting, California Energy Commission. http:/lwww.energy.ca.gov/reportsl200-30 7- 17 -700-03 -005.PDF
29. CETESB, 2003: Manual De Orientaqa'o Para A Elaboraqa'o De Estudos De Analise De Riscos, P4.261, May 2003. http:llwww.cetesb.sp.gov.brlEmergenciari/s coslestudo/norma.asp
30. Commission, 1997: Risk Assessment and Risk Management in Regulatory Decision-Making, The PresidentialICongressional Commission on Risk Assessment and Risk Management, 1997. http://www.riskworld.com/nreports/nr7me10.0htm
31. CSChE, 2004: Risk Assessment-Recommended Practices for Municipalities and Industry, Canadian Society for Chemical Engineering, ISBN No. 0-920804-92-6,2004.
32. Covey, 1990: The Seven Habits of Highly Effective People, Covey, Stephen R., Covey Leadership Center, 1990.
33. DNV, 2007: QRA 's for Dutch Installations. II. Overview of Risk Tools SAFETI-NL Selected by the Dutch Government, Worthington, D. and Witlox, H., Loss Prevention and Safety Performance in the Process Industries, 2007, IChemE Symposium Series No. 153, IChemE, 2007
34. DOD, 2000: Standard Practice for System Safety, MIL-STD-882D, U.S. Department of Defense, February 2000. http:/lwww.safetycenter.navy.mil/inst~ctions/osh/milstd882d.pdf
35. DOD, 2007a: Common Risk Criteria Standards for National Test Ranges, Standard 321-07, U S. Department of Defense, June 2007. https:/lwsmrc2vger.wsmr.army.mil/rcc/manuals1/-3027/32 1-07%20Common%20Risk%2OCriteria%20Standards%20for%20Nationa1%20Test%2ORanges.pdf
36. DOD, 2007b: Approved Methods And Algorithms For DOD Risk-Based Explosives Siting, Technical Paper No. 14, Revision 3, Department of Defense Explosives Safety Board, U.S. Department of Defense, February 2007. http://handle.dtic.mil/l00.2/ADA5476 13
37. DOE, 1991: Nuclear Safety Policy, Secretary of Energy Notice SEN-35-91, September 9, 1991. http://www.directives.doe.gov/pdfsldoe/doetext/senordl35/n315. 9h tml
38. DOE, 1994: Guidance for Preparation ofDOE 5480.22 (TSR) and 5480.23 (SAR) Implementation Plans, DOE-STD-3011-94, U.S. Department of Energy, November 1994. http:/lwww.osti.govlbridge/serlets/purll 1 0 1 94808-mY 7 Z J dwebviewable/lO 194808.pdf
39. DOE, 1998: DOE Regulatory Unit Evaluation Report of the BNFL Inc. Safety Requirements Document, =/REG-98-0 1, U.S. Department of Energy, Richland Operations Office, 1998.
40. DOE, 2002: Office Of Safety Regulation Position On Conformance With Risk Goals In DOE/RL-96-0006, RLIREG-2000-08, U.S. Department of Energy, 2002.
41. DOE, 2004: Top-Level Radiological, Nuclear, And Process Safety Standards And Principles For The RPP Waste Treatment Plant Contractor, U.S. Department of Energy, DOE/RL-96-0006,2004.
42. DOE, 2006: DOE Standard, Preparation Guide for US. Department of Energy Nonreactor Nuclear Facility Documented Safety Analysis, DOE-STD-3009-94, Change Notice 3, March 2006. http://www.hss.doe.gov/nuclearsafety/ns/techstdslstandard/std030 9Idoestd-3009-94-cn3-3-30-06.pdf
43. EU, 1997: Council Directive 96/82/EC of 9 December 1996 on the control of major-accident hazards involving dangerous substances, Official Journal of the European Communities No. L 1011 3, 1997.
44. EU, 2005: SHAPE-RISK, Sharing Experience on Risk Management (Health, Safety and Environment) to Design Future Industrial Systems, Heidebrink, Ingrid, European Commission project No. NMP2-CT-2003-505555, February 2005.
45. EU, 2006: Comparison Of Risk Analysis Methods And Development Of A Template For Risk Characterisation, Ham, K, et al., European Commission-Joint Research Center, 2006.
46. Farmer, 1967: Siting Criteria-A New Approach, Farmer, FR, Atom, Vol. 128, pp 152-170. Also presented at the IAEA Symposium on Containment and Siting, Vienna, 1967.
47. Farquharson, 2003: Using Quantitative Analysis to Make Risk-based Decisions, 2003RM-047, Farquharson, McDuffee, RAMS Symposium, Tampa, FL, 2003.
48. Farquharson, 2007: Facility Risk Review of a Uranium Processing Complex: A Risk-Informed Decision-Making Process, Farquharson, J. A., et al., EFCOG 2007.
49. FEEMA, 2007: Znstrupjo Tkcnica Para ElaboraqEo De Estudo De Zmpacto Ambiental- Eia E Seu Respectivo Relatorio De Impacto Ambiental- Rima Para 0 Complexo Petroquimico Do Rio de Janeiro-Comperj, Instru@o Tecnica Decon No 0112007, Govern0 Do Estado Do Rio De Janeiro, 2007.
50. FEPAM, 2001: Manual de Analise de Riscos Industriais, FEPAM N."01/01, FundaqZio Estadual de ProteqZio Ambiental, Brazil, 2001. www. fepam.rs.g ov.b r/central/formularios/arq/manual-risco. pdf
51. France, 2003: Loi no 2003-699 du 30 juillet 2003 relative a la prevention des risques technologiques et naturels et a la reparation des dommages, Paris, 2003.
52. France, 2005: Arrkte du 29 septembre 2005 relatif a l'evaluation et a la prise en compte de la probabilite d'occurrence, de la cinetique, de l'intensite des effets et de la gravitk des consequences des accidents potentiels dans les etudes de dangers des installations classees soumises a autorisation, Paris, 2005.
53. Gmunder, 2002: The Control Of Major Chemical Hazards In Switzerland In The Framework Of Sustainable Development-Liquefied Petroleum, Ammonia, and Chlorine As Examples, Gmunder, F. K., et al., 6th International Conference on Probabilistic Safety Assessment and Management, June 23-28,2002, San Juan, Puerto Rico. http://www.gmuender.org/stfv/ControlMaj orHazards.pdf
54. Groningen, 1978: Criteria for Risks Related to Dangerous Goods, Provincial Policy Document on Environmental Issues for the Province of Groningen, the Netherlands, 1978.
55. Hendershot, 1995: Risk guidelines as a risk management tool, Dennis C. Hendershot, Process Safety Progress, Volume 15, Issue 4, pp. 213-218, 1995.
56. Hendershot, 1997: No Good Deed Goes Unpunished: Case Studies of Incidents and Potential Incidents Caused by Protective Systems, Process Safety Progress 16,3 (Fall), pp. 132-139, 1997.
57. Hirst, 2002: A "worst case " methodology,for obtaining a rough but rapid indication of the societal risk from a major incident hazard installation, Hirst, I.L. and Carter, D.A., Journal of Hazardous Materials, A92, pp. 223-237. 2002.
58. HK-CEDD, 2007: Landslide Risk Management and the Role of Quantitative Risk Assessment Techniques, Information Note 1212007. http://www.cedd.gov.hkleng/publications/information~notes/doclin~2007-12e.pdf
59. HKEPD, 2008a: Environmental Impact Assessment Ordinance, Hong Kong, 2008. http://www.epd.gov.hkleialenglish/legis/inde1x. html
60. HKEPD, 2008b: Technical Memorandum to Environmental Impact Assessment Ordinance, Section 4, Hong Kong, 2008. http:llwww.epd.gov.hkleialenglish/legislmemorandumltext4h.tm l
61. HKPD, 2008: Hong Kong Planning Standards and Guidelines, Chapter 12: Miscellaneous Planning Standards and Guidelines, 2002. http:l/www.pland.gov.hkltech~doclhkpsglenglishlchl2/chl2~text.htm
62. HSC, 1976: The Control of Major Hazards, Advisory Committee on Major Hazards, First Report, Her Majesty's Stationery Office, London, 1976.
63. HSC, 1984: The Control ofMajor Hazards, Advisory Committee on Major Hazards, Third Report, Her Majesty's Stationery Office, London, 1984.
64. HSC, 1991: Major Hazard Aspects of the Transportation of Dangerous Substances, Advisory Committee on Dangerous Substances, Her Majesty's Stationery Office, London, 1991.
65. HSE, 1978: Canvey-An Investigation of Potential Hazards from Operations in the Canvey Island/Thurrock Area, Her Majesty's Stationery Office, London, UK, 1978.
66. HSE, 1981: Canvey-A Second Report, Her Majesty's Stationery Office, London, UK, 198 1.
67. HSE, 1988: The Tolerability of Risk from Nuclear Power Stations, Her Majesty's Stationery Office, London, 1988.
68. HSE, 1989a: QuantiJied Risk Assessment: Its Input to Decision Making, Her Majesty's Stationery Office, London, 1989.
69. HSE, 1989b: Risk Criteria for Land-use Planning in the Vicinity of Major Industrial Hazards, Her Majesty's Stationery Office, London, 1989.
70. HSE, 1992: The Tolerability ofRiskfrom Nuclear Power Stations (Revised), Her Majesty's Stationery Office, London, 1992.
71. HSE, 2001: Reducing Risks, Protecting People-HSE 's Decision-making Process, Her Majesty's Stationery Office, London, 2001.
72. HSE, 2004: Development of an intermediate societal risk methodology, an investigation of FN cuwe representation, Research report 283, HSE, 2004.
73. HSE, 2006a: Safety Assessment Principles for Nuclear Facilities, 2006. http://www.hse.gov.uWnuclearlsapslsaps2006.pdf
74. HSE, 2006b: Offshore Installations (Safety Case) Regulations 2005 Regulation 12, Demonstrating Compliance With The Relevant Statutory Provisions, Offshore Information Sheet No. 2/2006,2006. http:llwww.hse.gov.uWoffshore/sheet22006.pdf
75. HSE, 2007a: The Safety Report Assessment Manual, 2007. http:l/www.hse.gov.uWcomah/sram/
76. HSE, 2007b: Revised land use planning arrangements around large scale petroleum depots, UK HSE, 2007. http:l/www.hse.gov.uk/researchlrrpdf/rr5 1 1.pdf
77. HSE, 2008a: HID'S Approach To 'As Low As Reasonably Practicable' (ALARP) Decisions, 2008. http://www.hse,gov.uWcomahlcircular/perm09.htm
78. HSE, 2008b: Guidance on 'as low as reasonablypracticable'(ALARP) decisions in control of major accident hazards (COMAH), 2008. http://www.hse.gov.uWcomah/circular/perm 1 2. htm
79. HSE, 2008c: Principles and guidelines to assist HSE in its judgments that duty-holders have reduced risk as low as reasonably practicable, 2008. http:llwww.hse,gov.uk/risWtheory/alarp 1.htm
80. HSE, 2008d: PADHI- HSE's land use planning methodology, 2008. http:/lwww.hse.gov.uk/landuseplanninglpadhi.pdf
81. HSE, 2008e: HSE'S current approach to land use planning (LUP), 2008., http:/lwww.h se.gov,uWlanduseplanningllupcurrent,pdf
82. HSE, 2008f: PADHI Rule 4c (Existing Use Rule), Murray, John, HSE, 2008. http://www.hse.gov.uk/landuseplanning/rule4cletter.pdf
83. IMO, 1997: Interim Guidelines For The Application Of Formal Safety Assessment (FSA) To The IMO Rule-Making Process, MSCICirc. 829 & MEPClCirc. 335, International Maritime Organization, London, 1997.
84. IMO, 2000: Formal safety assessment-decision parameters including risk acceptance criteria, MSC 7211 6, submitted by Norway, InternationaI Maritime Organization, 2000.
85. IMO, 2002: Guidelines for Formal Safety Assessment (FSA) for use in the IMO rule-making process, MSClCirc. 1023, International Maritime Organization, London, 2002.
86. IMO, 2005: Risk Evaluation Criteria, D.4.5.2, International Maritime Organization, 2005.
87. Kletz, 2008: Personal communication with Trevor Kletz, 2008.
88. Kolluru, 1996: Risk assessment and management handbook for environmental, health and safety professionals, Kolluru, R., et al., New York: McGraw-Hill, 1996.
89. Lees, 2004: Loss Prevention in the Process Industries (3rd Edition), Mannan, S. (editor), Elsevier, 2004.
90. Lockwood, 2007: Personal communication, John R. Lockwood, 2007.
91. Malaysia, 2004: Environmental Impact Assessment Guidelines for Risk Assessment, Ministry of Natural Resources and Environment, Malaysia, 2004.
92. Malaysia, 2006: Occupational Safety and Health (Control of Industrial Major Accident Hazards) Regulations 1996, Malaysia, 2006. http:lldosh.mohr.gov,mylkoperatlLAWlOccupational%2OSafety%2Oand%20Health%20Act%20 1 994%20(Act%205 14)lRegulations/pua03 9y 1 996-cimahlpua0039yl996.pdf
93. MHIDAS, 2008: The Major Hazard Incidents Data Service.
94. MIACC, 1994: Hazardous Substances Risk Assessment: A MiniGuide for Municipalities and Industry, MIACC publication ISBN 1-89 5858-06-2, 1994.
95. MIIB, 2008: The Buncefield Incident, 11 December 2005-The final report of the Major Incident Investigation Board, Buncefield Major Incident Investigation Board, 2008. http:llwww.buncefieldinvestigation,gov.uk/reportslindex.htm
96. NASA, 1986: Report Of The Presidential Commission On The Space Shuttle Challenger Accident, Appendix F, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Washington, D.C. June 6, 1986.
97. New Jersey, 1994: Guidance on Preparing a Risk Assessment for Air Contaminant Emissions, TECHNICAL MANUAL 1003, New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection, 1994.
98. NORSOK, 2001: Risk and emergency preparedness analysis, NORSOK Standard 2-013, Norwegian Technology Centre, Oslo, Norway, 2001.
99. NRC, 1975: Nuclear Regulatory Commission, WASH 1400, NUREG-751014, The Reactor Safety Study, Rasmussen, 1975.
100. NRC, 1986: I0 CFR Part 50, 51 Federal Register 30028 et seq., Nuclear Regulatory Commission, August 1986.
101. NRC, 1995: Final Policy Statement on the Use of Probabilistic Risk Assessment Methods in Nuclear Regulatory Activities, SECY-95- 1 26, US. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC, May 18, 1995.
102. NRC, 1998: Regulatory Guide 1.1 74, An Approach for Using Probabilistic Risk Assessment in Risk-Informed Decisions on Plant-SpeciJic Changes to the Licensing Basis, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC, 1998.
103. NSC, 2007a: Report on Injuries in America, Selected Measures of Unintentional Injuries, U.S., 2001-2005, National Safety Council, 2007. http:llwww.nsc.orgllibrarylreport~table~2.htm
104. NSC, 2007b: What are the odds of dying?, National Safety Council, 2007 http:llwww,nsc.orgllrslstatinfolodds.htm
105. NSW, 1990: Hazardous Industry Planning Advisory Paper No. 4 -Risk Criteria for Land Use Safety Planning, New South Wales Department of Urban Affairs and Planning, 1990.
106. NSW, 2007: Hazardous Industry Planning Advisory Paper No I0-Land Use Safety Planning (Consultation Draft), New South Wales Department of Planning, 2007.
107. PCD, 2007: Guidelines for Quantitative Risk Assessment (QRA) Study, Pollution Control Department, Singapore, 2007. http:llwww.nea.gov.sglcmslpcdlqra-guidelines.pdf
108. Pfitzer, 2007: A Comparison of QRA Methods used by DOD for Explosives and Range Safety with Methods used by NRC and EPA, Pfitzer, B., et al., APT Research, Inc., 2007. http://www,apt-research,com/pages/Papers/T-04-00200~ComparisonOfTheQRAMethodsWhitePaper.pdf
109. Queensland, 1998: Hazardous industryplanning for safety-a guide for industry and local government, Chemical Hazards and Emergency Management Services, Queensland, 1998.
110. Queensland, 2002: Guidelines for Major Hazard Facilities-C-Systematic Risk Assessment, Chemical Hazards and Emergency Management Services, Queensland, 2002.
111. Rasmussen, 1975: Reactor Safety Study, An Assessment of Accident Risks in U. S. Nuclear Power Plants, Rasmussen, Norman et al., WASH-1400 (now NUREG-75/014), Washington DC: U.S. NRC, 1975.
112. RBESCT, 1999: Criteria Selection for Risk-Based Explosives Safety Standards, Pfitzer, Tom, et al., Risk-Based Explosives Safety Criteria Team, Department of Defense Explosives Safety Board, U.S. Department of Defense, 1999.
113. Rhomberg, 1996: A Survey of Methods for Chemical Health Risk Assessment Among Federal Regulatory Agencies, a report made to The PresidentialICongressional Commission on Risk Assessment and Risk Management, Lorenz R. Rhomberg, Harvard Center for Risk Analysis, 1996. http://www.riskworld.cominreportsll996/risk-rptlpdf/rhomberg.pdf
114. Rijnmond, 1982: Risk Analysis of Six Potentially Hazardous Industrial Objects in the Rijnmond Area-A Pilot Study, Rijnmond Public Authority, D. Reidel, Dordrecht, the Netherlands and Boston, MA (ISBN 90-277-1393-6).
115. RSSG, 1993: Risk Assessment. Report of a Royal Society Study Group, The Royal Society, London, 1983.
116. SAEFL, 1996: Evaluation Criteria for the Ordinance on Major Accidents, O M, Evaluation of the Extent of Damage, Evaluation of the Acceptability of Risk, Guidelines for Establishments with Substances, Products or Special Wastes (in French or German), Swiss Agency for the Environment, Forests and Landscape (SAEFL), Berne, Switzerland, 1996.
117. SAEFL, 2001: Evaluation Criteria for the Ordinance on Major Accidents, O M, Evaluation of the Extent of Damage, Evaluation of the Acceptability of Risk, Guidelines for Transportation Routes (in French or German), Swiss Agency for the Environment, Forests and Landscape (SAEFL), Berne, Switzerland, 200 1.
118. SAIC, 1995: Shuttle Probabilistic Risk Assessment, Washington, DC, Center for Aerospace Information, Science Applications International Corporation, 1995.
119. Santa Barbara, 2000: Santa Barbara County Comprehensive Plan Safety Element Supplement, Santa Barbara County, California, 2000.
120. Santa Barbara, 2006: County of Santa Barbara Environmental Thresholds and Guidelines Manual, Santa Barbara County, California, 2006. http:llwww.sbcountyplanning.orglPDFIManualsReportslManualslEnviro nmental-Thrshldspdf
121. Schofield, 1993: A Framework for Offshore Risk Criteria, Schofield, S.L., Safety and Reliability, vol. 13, no. 2, 1993.
122. Singapore, 2004: Code of Practice on Pollution Control (2000 Edition) (with amendments in Feb 2001, Jun 2002 and Feb 2004), Singapore, 2004.
123. Slovic, 1987: Perceptions of Risk, Science, Vol. 236, 1987.
124. TNO, 1983: LPG Integral. Comparative Risk Analysis Of The Storage, Transshipment And The Use Of LPG And Benzene, TNO-MT, Apeldoom, 1983.
125. Trbojevic, 2004: Risk Criteria in the UK and EU, Vladimir M. Trbojevic, Presentation at the Workshop on ALARP and Societal Risk, Loughborough University, September 15,2004.
126. Trbojevic, 2005: Risk Criteria in EU, Trbojevic, V.M., ESREL'O5, Poland, June 27-30, 2005. http:llwww.risk-support.co.uWB26P2-Trbojevic-final.pdf
127. Tweede Kamer, 1993: Riscobenadering in het Milieubeleid; Verslag modeling overleg, Tweede Kamer, 1993-94,22666, nr. 5, 1993.
128. Victoria, 1995: Interim Victorian Risk Criteria-Risk Assessment Guidelines, DNV Technica, 1995.
129. Victoria, 2006: The Requirements for "Demonstration" Under the Occupational Health and Safety (Major Hazard Facilities) Regulations, Major Hazard Facilities Regulations Guidance Note, MHD GN- 16, 2006.
130. Voogd, 2004: Disaster Prevention in Urban Environments, Voogd, Henk, European Journal of Spatial Development, no. 12, Sept. 2004.
131. VROM, 1984: LPG Integral Memorandum (Circulaire LPG Integraal Nota), Netherlands, Staatsuitgeverij, The Hague, 1984.
132. VROM, 1988: Major Incident Risk Order (Besluit Risico 's Zware Ongevallen, in Dutch), Staatsblad, 1988,432, The Hague, 1988.
133. VROM, 1989: Premises for Risk Management (Omgaan met Risico 's, in Dutch), Tweede Kamer, vergaderjaar, 1988/1989,21137, nr.5.
134. VROM, 1995: A Review ofRisk Control, M.J.Pikaar, M.A.Seaman, nr. 1995127A & 27B, The Netherlands, 1995.
135. VROM, 1999: Hazards of Major Accidents Decree (Besluit Risico 's Zware Ongevallen, in Dutch), Staatsblad, 1999, The Hague, 1999.
136. VROM, 2003: Summary of the advice on external safetypublished by the Advisory Council for Transport and Wuter Management and the Advisory Council for Housing, Spatial Planning and the Environment, 2003. http://international.vrom.nl/docs/internationaal/03016% 0 20Summary%2ORadenadviesEVH-engels.pdf
137. VROM, 2004a: Besluit Externe Veiligheid Inrichtingen (External Safety (Establishments) Decree), Staatscourant Sept. 23,2004, nt. 183,2004.
138. VROM, 2004b: Guidance on the Accountability for Societal Risk, The Hague, 2004. http://www2.vrom.nl/docs/internationaal/Accountabilitity.pdf
139. VROM, 2005: Safety In The Netherlands Five Years Afer "Enschede ", 2005. http://international.vrom.nlldocslinternationaal/O6%2OSafety%2Oin%2Othe%2ONetherlands.%2OFive%2Oyears%2Oafter%2Othe%2OEnschede%2Ofireworks%20disaster.pdf
140. VROM, 2007: Guidance on Justijkation of Societal Risk, http://www.vrom,nl/get.asp?file=docs/publicaties/8.0p4d3f &dn=8043&b=vrom
141. Western Australia, 1987: Risks and hazards of industrial developments on residential areas in Western Australia, EPA Bulletin 278, Environmental Protection Authority, Western Australia, Perth, Australia, 1987. http://www.epa.wa.gov.au/docs/242_B278.pdf
142. Western Australia, 1990: Review of the guidelines for risk assessment in Western Australia-Information to assess public input to the Environmental Protection Authority, Environmental Protection Authority, Western Australia, Perth, Australia, 1990.
143. Western Australia, 1992a: Criteria for assessment of risk from industry, Bulletin 611, Environmental Protection Authority, Western Australia, Perth, Australia, February 1992. http://www,epa.wa.gov.au/docs/675-1B 16. pdf
144. Western Australia, 199213: Criteria for assessment of risk from industry-expanded discussion, Bulletin 627, Environmental Protection Authority, Western Australia, Perth, Australia, May 1992. http://www.epa.wa,gov,au/docsl/-6B96 27.pdf
145. Western Australia, 1994: Risk Criteria-on site risk generation for sensitive developments, Bulletin 730, Environmental Protection Authority, Western Australia, Perth, Australia, January 1994. www.epa.wa.gov.au/docs/14 14-B73 O.pdf
146. Western Australia, 2000: Guidance for Risk Assessment and Management: Offsite individual risk from hazardous Industrial Plant, Environmental Protection Authority, Western Australia, Perth, Australia, 2000.
147. Western Australia, 2005: Separation Distances between Industrial and Sensitive Land Uses, Environmental Protection Authority, Western Australia, Perth, Australia, 2005
148. Western Australia, 2007a: Dangerous Goods Safety (Major Hazard Facilities) Regulations 2007, Western Australia, Perth, Australia, 2007. http://www.austlii.edu.au/aullegis/wa/consolregidgshfr200753 71
149. Western Australia, 2007b: Discussion Paper On Risk Acceptance Criteria For Major Hazard Facilities In Western Australia, Department of Consumer and Employment Protection, Western Australia, Perth, Australia, 2007.