An abnormal screening mammogram causes more anxiety than a palpable lump in benign breast disease

Breast Cancer Research and Treatment

Volumn 134, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 253-258

  Keyzer Dekker, C M G ^a,b   Van Esch, L ^c   De Vries, J ^c,d   Ernst, M F ^e   Nieuwenhuijzen, G A P ^f   Roukema, J A ^c,d   Van Der Steeg, A F W ^a,c,d  

^a EMMA CHILDREN S HOSPITAL   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY OF GRONINGEN   (Netherlands)

^c TILBURG UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^d CPRLab   (Netherlands)

^e JEROEN BOSCH HOSPITAL   (Netherlands)

^f CATHARINA HOSPITAL   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Anxiety; Benign breast disease; Depressive symptoms; False positive; Quality of life; Screening mammogram

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ANXIETY; ARTICLE; BREAST DISEASE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEPRESSION; DISEASE PREDISPOSITION; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; LONGITUDINAL STUDY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MAMMOGRAPHY; NETHERLANDS; PATIENT REFERRAL; PERSONALITY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; PSYCHOLOGIC ASSESSMENT; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUESTIONNAIRE;

ADULT; ANXIETY; BREAST DISEASES; DEPRESSION; EARLY DETECTION OF CANCER; FEMALE; HUMANS; MIDDLE AGED; PALPATION; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUESTIONNAIRES;

EID: 84863981251     PISSN: 01676806     EISSN: 15737217     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10549-012-2025-5     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. National Cancer Institute (2011) Probability of breast cancer in American women. http://www.cancer.gov/cancertopics/factsheet/Detection/probability- breast-cancer. Accessed 28 Sep 2011
2. Integraal Kanker Centrum Nederland (2011) Meest voorkomende kankersoorten in Nederland. http://www.ikcnet.nl/page.php?id=2985&nav-id=114. Accessed 28 Sep 2011
3. L Van Esch BL Den Oudsten J De Vries 2011 The World Health Organization quality of life instrument-short form (WHOQOL-BREF) in women with breast problems Int J Clin Health Psychol 11 5 22
4. GT Meechan JP Collins RE Moss-Morris KJ Petrie 2005 Who is not reassured following benign diagnosis of breast symptoms? Psychooncology 14 239 246 15386770 10.1002/pon.841 1:STN:280:DC%2BD2M7itVShtQ%3D%3D
5. V Woodward C Webb 2001 Women's anxieties surrounding breast disorders: a systematic review of the literature J Adv Nurs 33 29 41 11155106 10.1046/j.1365-2648.2001.01635.x 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3M7ktVKntw%3D%3D
6. N Ando Y Iwamitsu M Kuranami S Okazaki Y Nakatani K Yamamoto M Watanabe H Miyaoka 2011 Predictors for psychological distress after diagnosis in breast cancer patients and patients with benign breast problems Psychosomatics 52 56 64 21300196 10.1016/j.psym.2010.11.012
7. J Brett C Bankhead B Henderson E Watson J Austoker 2005 The psychological impact of mammographic screening. A systematic review Psychooncology 14 917 938 15786514 10.1002/pon.904 1:STN:280:DC%2BD2MrotVamtg%3D%3D
8. NT Brewer T Salz SE Lillie 2007 Systematic review: the long-term effects of false-positive mammograms Ann Intern Med 146 502 510 17404352
9. T Salz AR Richman NT Brewer 2010 Meta-analyses of the effect of false-positive mammograms on generic and specific psychosocial outcomes Psychooncology 19 1026 1034 20882572 10.1002/pon.1676
10. AFW Van der Steeg CMG Keyzer-Dekker J De Vries JA Roukema 2011 Effect of abnormal screening mammogram on quality of life Br J Surg 98 537 542 21656719 10.1002/bjs.7371
11. Hafslund B, Nortvedt MW (2009) Mammography screening from the perspective of quality of life: a review of the literature. Scand J Caring Sci. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-6712.2008.00634.x
12. M Montgomery SH McCrone 2010 Psychological distress associated with the diagnostic phase for suspected breast cancer: systematic review J Adv Nurs 66 2372 2390 21039773 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2010.05439.x
13. Spielberger CD, Gorsuch RL, Lushene RE (1970) The state-trait anxiety inventory manual. Consulting Psychologists Press, Palo Alto
14. PC Gøtzsche M Nielsen 2011 Screening for breast cancer with mammography Cochrane Database Syst Rev 1 CD001877 21249649
15. SA Feig 2004 Adverse effects of screening mammography Radiol Clin North Am 42 807 819 15337417 10.1016/j.rcl.2004.06.013
16. Keyzer-Dekker CMG, De Vries J, Van Esch L, Ernst MF, Nieuwenhuijzen GA, Roukema JA, Van der Steeg AFW (2011) Anxiety after a false positive screenings mammogram is a serious problem. Breast (Epub ahead of print)
17. National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (2011) The Netherlands. http://www.rivm.nl. Accessed 28 Sep 2011
18. Van der Ploeg HM, Defares PB, Spielberger CD (1980) ZBV. A Dutch-language adaptation of the Spielberger state-trait anxiety inventory. Swets & Zeitlinger, Lisse
19. AK Van der Bij S De Weerd RJ Cikot EA Steegers JC Braspenning 2003 Validation of the Dutch short form of the state scale of the Spielberger state-trait anxiety inventory: considerations for usage in screening outcomes Community Genet 6 84 87 14560068 10.1159/000073003
20. MP Bogaarts BL Den Oudsten JA Roukema JM Van Riel LV Beerepoot J De Vries 2011 Development of the psychosocial distress questionnaire-breast cancer (PDQ-BC): a breast cancer-specific screening instrument for psychosocial problems Support Care Cancer 19 1485 1493 20814700 10.1007/s00520-010-0968-9
21. MJ Schroevers R Sanderman E van Sonderen AV Ranchor 2000 The evaluation of the center for epidemiologic studies depression (CES-D) scale: depressed and positive affect in cancer patients and healthy reference subjects Qual Life Res 9 1015 1029 11332223 10.1023/A:1016673003237 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3M3ovVagsA%3D%3D
22. D Hann K Winter P Jacobsen 1999 Measurement of depressive symptoms in cancer patients: evaluation of the Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale (CES-D) J Psychosom Res 46 437 443 10404478 10.1016/S0022-3999(99)00004-5 1:STN:280:DyaK1Mzjt1GmtQ%3D%3D
23. WHOQOL Group 1998 Development of the world health organization WHOQOL-bref quality of life assessment Psychol Med 28 551 558 10.1017/S0033291798006667
24. De Vries J, Van Heck GL (1995) De Nederlandse versie van de WHOQOL-100 (The Dutch version of the WOQOL-100). Tilburg University, Tilburg
25. P Autier M Boniol A Gavin LJ Vatten 2011 Breast cancer mortality in neighbouring European countries with different levels of screening but similar access to treatment: trend analysis of WHO mortality database BMJ 343 d4411 10.1136/bmj.d4411 21798968 10.1136/bmj.d4411
26. K McPherson 2010 Screening for breast cancer-balancing the debate BMJ 340 c3106 20576707 10.1136/bmj.c3106
27. HG Welch 2010 Screening mammography-a long run for a short slide? N Engl J Med 363 1276 1278 20860510 10.1056/NEJMe1008369 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC3cXht1SitrvE
28. L Bonneux 2009 Advantages and disadvantages of breast cancer screening: time for evidence-based information Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd 153 A887 19900321
29. CJ Baines 2005 Are there downsides to mammography screening? Breast J 11 S7 S10 15725116 10.1111/j.1075-122X.2005.217162.x
30. H Thornton A Edwards M Baum 2003 Women need better information about routine mammography BMJ 327 101 103 12855532 10.1136/bmj.327.7406.101
31. HG Welch BA Frankel 2011 Likelihood that a woman with screen-detected breast cancer has had her "life saved" by that screening Arch Intern Med 171 2043 2046 22025097 10.1001/archinternmed.2011.476
32. EK Slaytor JE Ward 1998 How risks of breast cancer and benefits of screening are communicated to women: analysis of 58 pamphlets BMJ 317 263 264 9677220 10.1136/bmj.317.7153.263 1:STN:280:DyaK1czkt1aqsQ%3D%3D
33. KJ Jorgenson P Gøtzsche 2004 Presentation on websites of possible benefits and harms from screening for breast cancer: cross sectional study BMJ 328 148 154 10.1136/bmj.328.7432.148