Effect of abnormal screening mammogram on quality of life

British Journal of Surgery

Volumn 98, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 537-542

  Van Der Steeg, A F W ^a,b   Keyzer Dekker, C M G ^c   De Vries, J ^a,b   Roukema, J A ^a,b  

^a CPRLab   (Netherlands)

^b TILBURG UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^c Location Alkmaar   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AGED; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ANXIETY; ARTICLE; BREAST TUMOR; EARLY DIAGNOSIS; FEMALE; HUMAN; MAMMOGRAPHY; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; PERSONALITY; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; QUALITY OF LIFE; RADIOGRAPHY; RISK FACTOR;

AGED; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ANXIETY; BREAST NEOPLASMS; EARLY DETECTION OF CANCER; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAMMOGRAPHY; MIDDLE AGED; PERSONALITY; QUALITY OF LIFE; RISK FACTORS;

EID: 79951968515     PISSN: 00071323     EISSN: 13652168     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/bjs.7371     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Fenton JJ, Elmore JG,. Balancing mammography's benefits and harms. BMJ 2004; 328: E301-E302.
2. Schwartz LM, Woloshin S, Fowler FJ, Welch HG,. Enthusiasm for cancer screening in the United States. JAMA 2004; 291: 71-78. (Pubitemid 38040537)
3. Otten JD, Karssemeijer N, Hendriks JH, Groenewoud JH, Fracheboud J, Verbeek AL, et al., Effect of recall rate on earlier screen detection of breast cancer on the Dutch performance indicators. J Natl Cancer Inst 2005; 97: 748-754. (Pubitemid 40872381)
4. Otto SJ, Fracheboud J, Looman CW, Broeders MJ, Boer R, Hendriks JH, et al., Initiation of population-based mammography screening in Dutch municipalities and effect on breast-cancer mortality: a systematic review. Lancet 2003; 361: 1411-1417. (Pubitemid 36515040)
5. Fracheboud J, de Koning HJ, Boer R, Groenewoud JH, Verbeek AL, Broeders MJ, et al., Nationwide breast cancer screening programme fully implemented in The Netherlands. Breast 2001; 10: 6-11. (Pubitemid 32124124)
6. Spiegel D,. Cancer and depression. Br J Psychiatry Suppl 1996; (30): 109-116. (Pubitemid 26000493)
7. Woods M, Williams L,. Cancer care. Part 1. Mental health care for women with breast cancer. Nurs Times 2002; 98: 34-35.
8. Gilbert F, Cordiner C, Affleck IR, Hood DB, Mathieson D, Walker LG,. Breast screening: the psychological sequelae of false-positive recall in women with and without a family history of breast cancer. Eur J Cancer 1998; 34: 2010-2014. (Pubitemid 28546933)
9. Lampic C, Thurfjell E, Bergh J, Sjödén PO,. Short- and long-term anxiety and depression in women recalled after breast cancer screening. Eur J Cancer 2001; 37: 463-469. (Pubitemid 32232110)
10. Elmore JG, Barton MB, Moceri VM, Polk S, Arena PJ, Fletcher SW,. Ten-year risk of false positive screening mammograms and clinical breast examinations. N Engl J Med 1998; 338: 1089-1096. (Pubitemid 28227478)
11. De Vries J, Van Heck GL,. De Nederlandse Versie van de WHOQOL-100. Tilburg University: Tilburg, 1995.
12. Den Oudsten BL, Van Heck GL, Van der Steeg AF, Roukema JA, De Vries J,. The WHOQOL-100 has good psychometric properties in breast cancer patients. J Clin Epidemiol 2009; 62: 195-205.
13. van der Ploeg HM, Defares PB, Spielberger CD,. ZBV. A Dutch-language Adaptation of the Spielberger State-Trait Anxiety Inventory. Swets & Zeitlinger: Lisse, 1980.
14. Hoekstra HA, Ormel J, de Fruyt F,. Handleiding bij de NEO Persoonlijkheids Vragenlijsten NEO-PI-R, NEO-FFI. Swets & Zeitlinger: Lisse, 1996.
15. Cohen J,. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd edn). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates: Hillsdale, 1988.
16. Fletcher SW, Elmore JG,. Clinical practice. Mammographic screening for breast cancer. N Engl J Med 2003; 348: 1672-1680. (Pubitemid 36459474)
17. Olsen O, GÃtzsche PC,. Cochrane review on screening for breast cancer with mammography. Lancet 2001; 358: 1340-1342. (Pubitemid 33016501)
18. Welch HG,. Right and wrong reasons to be screened. Ann Intern Med 2004; 140: 754-755.
19. Lowe JB, Balanda KP, Del Mar C, Haws E,. Psychological distress in women with abnormal findings in mass mammographic screening. Cancer 1999; 85: 1114-1118. (Pubitemid 29115591)
20. Hofvind S, Thoresen S, Tretli S,. The cumulative risk of a false-positive recall in the Norwegian Breast Cancer Screening Program. Cancer 2004; 101: 1501-1507. (Pubitemid 39318894)
21. Barratt A, Howard K, Irwig L, Salkeld G, Houssami N,. Model of outcomes of screening mammography: information to support informed choices. BMJ 2005; 330: 936-940.
22. Schwartz LM, Woloshin S, Sox HC, Fischhoff B, Welch HG,. US women's attitudes to false positive mammography results and detection of ductal carcinoma in situ: cross sectional survey. BMJ 2000; 320: 1635-1640. (Pubitemid 30364633)
23. Lampic C, Thurfjell E, Sjöden PO,. The influence of a false-positive mammogram on a woman's subsequent behavior for detecting breast cancer. Eur J Cancer 2003; 39: 1730-1737. (Pubitemid 36897610)
24. Barton MB, Moore S, Polk S, Shtatland E, Elmore JG, Fletcher SW,. Increased patient concern after false-positive mammograms: clinician documentation and subsequent ambulatory visits. J Gen Intern Med 2001; 16: 150-156. (Pubitemid 34208868)
25. Nekhlyudov L, Li R, Fletcher SW,. Information and involvement preferences of women in their 40s before their first screening mammogram. Arch Intern Med 2005; 165: 1370-1374. (Pubitemid 40973419)
26. JÃrgensen KJ, GÃtzsche P,. Presentation on websites of possible benefits and harms from screening for breast cancer: cross sectional study. BMJ 2004; 328: 148-154.