What Can CIS Data Tell Us about Technological Regimes and Persistence of Innovation?

Industry and Innovation

Volumn 19, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 285-306

  Frenz, Marion ^a   Prevezer, Martha ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b QUEEN MARY UNIVERSITY OF LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Community Innovation Survey; persistence of innovation; technological regimes

Indexed keywords

INDUSTRY; INNOVATION; SURVEY; TECHNOLOGICAL CHANGE;

EID: 84863936137     PISSN: 13662716     EISSN: 14698390     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/13662716.2012.694676     Document Type: Review

References (46)

1. Abramovitz, M. 1956. Resource and output trends in the United States since 1870. American Economic Review, 46(2): 5-23.
2. Aghion, P. and Howitt, p. 1992. A model of growth through creative destruction. Econometrica, 60: 323-351.
3. Barro, R. J. and Sala-I-Martin, X. 2004. Economic Growth, 2nd edn, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
4. Breschi, S., Malerba, F. and Orsenigo, L. 2000. Technological regimes and Schumpeterian patterns of innovation. The Economic Journal, 111(463): 388-410.
5. Bresnahan, T. F. and Trajtenberg, M. (1995) General purpose technologies 'engines of growth'?, NBR working paper, 4148
6. Cantwell, J. 1989. Technological Innovation and Multinational Corporations, Oxford: Blackwell.
7. Castellacci, F. 2008. Technological paradigms, regimes and trajectories: manufacturing and service industries in a new taxonomy of sectoral patterns of innovation. Research Policy, 37(6-7): 978-994.
8. Cefis, E. 2003. Is there persistence in innovative activities?. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 21(4): 489-515.
9. Cefis, E. and Orsenigo, L. 2001. The persistence of innovative activities: a cross-country and cross-sector comparative analysis. Research Policy, 30(7): 1139-1158.
10. Cohen, W. 1995. "Empirical studies of innovative activity". In Handbook of the Economics of Innovation and Technological Change, Edited by: Stoneman, P. 182-264. Oxford: Blackwell.
11. Cohen, W. and Levinthal, D. A. 1989. Innovation and learning: the two faces of R&D - implications for the analysis of R&D investment. Economic Journal, 99 Setember: 569-596.
12. Cohen, W. and Levinthal, D. A. 1990. Absorptive capacity: a new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1): 128-152.
13. Dasgupta, P. S. and Stiglitz, J. E. 1980. Industrial structure and the nature of innovative activity. Economic Journal, 90: 266-293.
14. Duguet, E. and Monjon, S. 2002. Les Fondements Microeconomiques de la Persistance de l'Innovation. Revue Economique, 55(3): 625-636.
15. Duguet, E. and Monjon, S. (2004) Is innovation persistent at the firm level? An econometric examination comparing the propensity score, Cahiers de la Maison des Sciences Economiques v04075, Université Panthéon-Sorbonne, Paris 1
16. Geroski, P. A. 1990. Innovation, technological opportunity, and market structure. Oxford Economic Papers, 42: 586-602.
17. Geroski, P. A., van Reenen, J. and Walters, C. F. 1997. How persistently do firms innovate?. Research Policy, 26: 33-48.
18. Grossman, G. and Helpman, E. 1991. Innovation and Growth in the Global Economy, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
19. Jaffe, A. B. 1986. Technological opportunity and spillovers of R&D. American Economic Review, 76(5): 984-1001.
20. Jaffe, A. B. 1988. Demand and supply influences on R&D intensity and productivity growth. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 70(3): 431-437.
21. Jaffe, A. B. 1989. Characterizing the 'technological position' of firms, with application to quantifying technological opportunity and research spillovers. Research Policy, 18(2): 87-97.
22. Klevorick, A. K., Levin, R. C., Nelson, R. and Winter, S. 1995. "On the sources and significance of interindustry differences in technological opportunities". In Research Policy Vol. 24, 195-205. 2
23. Le Bas, C., Cabagnols, A. and Gay, C. 2003. "An evolutionary view on persistence in innovation: an empirical application of duration model". In Applied Evolutionary Economics, Edited by: Saviotti, P. 210Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.
24. Levin, R. C. and Reiss, P. C. 1984. "Test of a Schumpeterian model of R&D and market structure". In R&D Patents and Productivity, Edited by: Griliches, Z. 175-208. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press for the NBER.
25. Levin, R. C., Klevorick, A. K., Nelson, R. and Winter, S. G. 1987. Appropriating the returns from industrial R&D. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity,: 783-820.
26. Malerba, F. and Orsenigo, L. 1996. Schumpeterian patterns of innovation are technology-specific. Research Policy, 25(3): 451-478.
27. Malerba, F., Orsenigo, L. and Peretto, P. 1997. Persistence of innovative activities, sectoral patterns of innovation and international technological specialization. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 15(6): 801-826.
28. Nelson, R. 1991. Why do firms differ and how does it matter?. Strategic Management Journal, 12: 61-74. (special issue)
29. Nelson, R. and Winter, S. G. 1982. An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change, Cambridge, MA; London: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
30. Pakes, A. and Schankerman, M. 1984. "An exploration into the determinants of research intensity". In R&D Patents and Productivity, Edited by: Griliches, Z. 73-88. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press for the NBER.
31. Patel, P. and Pavitt, K. 1998. "The wide (and increasing) spread of technological competencies in the world's largest firms: a challenge to conventional wisdom". In The Dynamic Firm. The Role of Technology, Strategy, Organization, and Regions, Edited by: Chandler, A. D., Hageström, P. and Slölvell, Ö. 192-213. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
32. Pavitt, K. 1987. "International patterns of technological accumulation". In Strategies in Global Competition, Edited by: Hood, N. and Vahne, J.-E. 126-157. London: Croom Helm.
33. Peters, B. 2009. Persistence of innovation: stylised facts and panel data evidence. Journal of Technology Transfer, 34(2): 226-243.
34. Rivera-Batiz, L. A. and Romer, P. M. 1991. International trade with endogenous technological change. European Economic Review, 35(4): 971-1001.
35. Romer, P. M. 1986. Increasing returns and long-run growth. Journal of Political Economy, 94(5): 1002-1037.
36. Romer, P. M. 1987. Growth based on increasing returns due to specialization. American Economic Review, 77(2): 56-62.
37. Roper, S. and Hewitt-Dundas, N. 2008. Innovation persistence: survey and case-study evidence'. Research Policy, 37(1): 149-162.
38. Scherer, F. M. 1965. Firm size, market structure, opportunity and the output of patented inventions. American Economic Review, 55(5): 1097-1125.
39. Schumpeter, J. A. 1911, translated 1934. The Theory of Economic Development: An Inquiry into Profits, Capital, Credit, Interest, and the Business Cycle, New Brunswick, NJ; London: Transaction Books.
40. Schumpeter, J. A. 1942. Capitalism, Socialism, and Democracy, London: G. Allen & Unwin Ltd.
41. Segerstrom, P. S., Anant, T.C.A. and Dinopoulos, E. (1990) A schumpeterian model of the product life cycle, The American Economic Review 80(5), 1077-1091
42. Solow, R. M. 1988. Growth theory and after. American Economic Review, 78(3): 307-317.
43. Spence, A. M. 1984. Cost reduction, competition, and industry performance. Econometrica, 52(1): 101-121.
44. Teece, D. and Pisano, G. 1994. The dynamic capabilities of firms: an introduction. Industrial and Corporate Change, 3(3): 537-556.
45. Trajtenberg, M. 1990. A penny for your quotas: patent citations and the value of innovations. The Rand Journal of Economics, 21(1): 172-187.
46. Winter, S. 1984. Schumpeterian competition in alternative technological regimes. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 5(3-4): 287-320.