An evolutionary view on persistence in innovation: An empirical application of duration models

Applied Evolutionary Economics: New Empirical Methods and Simulation Techniques

Volumn , Issue , 2003, Pages 210-232

  Le Bas, C ^a   Cabagnols, A ^a   Gay, C ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE LYON   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84896090363     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4337/9781781952894.00015     Document Type: Chapter

References (44)

1. Archibugi, D. (1988), 'The inter-industry distribution of technological capabilities:a case study in the application of the Italian patenting in the USA'. Technovation, 7: 259-74.
2. Archibugi, D. and Michie, J. (1995), 'The globalisation of technology: a new taxonomy'. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 19(1): 121-40.
3. Arrow, K. (1962), 'Economic welfare and the allocation of resources for inventions', in Nelson, R.R. (ed.), The Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity:Economic and Social Factors, NJ: Princeton University Press.
4. Arundel, A. and Kabla, I. (1998), 'What percentage of innovations are patented? Empirical estimates for European firms'. Research Policy, 27: 127-41.
5. Basberg, B. (1982), 'Technological change in the Norwegian whaling industry: A case study in the use of patent-statistics as a technology indicator'. Research Policy, 11: 163-71.
6. Basberg, B. (1983), 'Foreign patenting in the US as a technology indicator'. Research Policy, 12: 227-37.
7. Bel, F. and Bourgeois, B. (1999), 'Innovation direction and persistence within an industry: the refining processes case', Communication to the European Meeting on Applied Evolutionary Economics, 7-9 June, Grenoble.
8. Cabagnols, A. (2000), 'Les déterminants des types de comportements innovants et de leur persistance', Thèse, Université Lyon 2.
9. Carlsson, B. and Eliasson, G. (1994), 'The nature and importance of economic competence'. Industrial and Corporate Change, 3(3): 687-711.
10. Cefis, H. (1999), 'Persistence in profitability and in innovative activities', Communication EMAEE, 7-9 June.
11. Cohen, W. (1995), 'Empirical studies of innovative activity', in Stoneman, P. (ed.), Handbook: The Economics of Innovation and Technical Change, Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
12. Cohen,W.M. and Levin, R.C. (1989), 'Empirical studies of innovation and market structure', in Schmalensee, R. and Willig, R. (eds), Handbook of Industrial Economics, Amsterdam: North-Holland.
13. Crepon, B and Duguet, E. (1994), 'Research and development, competition and innovation: what the patent data show', Centre de Mathematiques Economiques, CNRS URA 924 12.
14. Gallini, N. (1992), 'Patent policy and costly imitation'. Rand Journal of Economics, 23: 52-63.
15. Geroski, P. (1994), Market Structure, Corporate Performance and Innovative Activity, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
16. Geroski, P., Van Reenen, J. and Walters, C.F. (1997), 'How persistently do firms innovate?' Research Policy, 26: 33-48.
17. Gilbert, R. and Newberry, D. (1982), 'Pre-emptive patenting and the persistence of monopoly'. American Economic Review, 72: 514-26.
18. Gourieroux, G. (1989), Économétrie des variables qualitatives. 2nd edition, Économica.
19. Greene, W.H. (1997), Econometric Analysis, 3rd edition, New York: Prentice Hall International Editions.
20. Griliches, Z. (1990), 'Patent statistics as economic indicators: a survey'. Journal of Economic Literature, 28: 1661-707.
21. Iosso, T.R. (1993), 'Industry evolution with a sequence of technologies and heterogenous ability. A model of creatrice destruction'. Journal of Economic Behaviour and Organization, 21: 109-29.
22. Kieffer, N. (1988), 'Economic duration data and hazard functions', Journal of Economic Literature, XXVI: 646-79.
23. Le Bas, C. and Pavitt, K. (1999), 'What do patents tell us about the rate and direction of technical change?', in Allegrezza, S. and Serbat, H. (eds), Appropriability and Patent Value. Econometrical Aspects, London: Macmillan.
24. Le Bas, C., Picard, F. and Suchecki, B. (1998), 'Innovation technologique, comportement de réseaux et performances: une analyse sur données individuelles', Revue d'Economie Politique, 108(5), septembre-octobre: 625-44.
25. Lhuillery, S. (1996), 'L'innovation dans l'industrie manufacturière française: une revue des résultats de l'enquête communautaire sur l'innovation', in Innovation, brevets et stratégies technologiques, OCDE.
26. Malerba, F. and Orsenigo, L. (1997), 'Schumpeterian patterns of innovation'. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 19: 47-65.
27. Malerba, F., Orsenigo, L. and Peretto, P. (1997), 'Persistence of innovative activities, sectoral patterns of innovation and international technological specialization'. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 15: 801-26.
28. Metcalfe, J.S. (1993), 'Some Lamarkian themes in the theory of growth and economic selection'. Revue internationale de systémique, 7(5): 487-504.
29. Metcalfe, J.S. and Gibbons, M. (1986), 'Technological variety and the process of competition'. Économie Appliquée, 3: 493-520.
30. Nelson, R. and Winter, S. (1982), An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
31. Pakes, A. (1985), 'On patents, R&D and the stock market rate of return'. Journal of Political Economy, 93: 390-409.
32. Patel, P. (1995), 'Localised production of technology for global markets'. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 19(1): 141-54.
33. Patel, P. and Pavitt, K. (1994), 'The continuing, widespread (and neglected) importance of improvements in mechanical technologies'. Research Policy, 23: 533-46.
34. Patel, P. and Pavitt, K. (1995), 'Patterns of technological activity: their measurement and interpretation', in Stoneman, P. (ed.), Handbook of the Economics of Innovation and Technical Change, Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
35. Pavitt, K. et al. (1987), 'The size distribution of innovating firms in the UK:1945-1983'. Journal of Industrial Economics, 35: 297-316.
36. Pavitt, K. and Soete, L. (1980), 'Innovative activities and export shares', in Pavitt, K. (ed.), Technical Innovation and British Economic Performance, London:Macmillan.
37. Saviotti, P. (1996), 'Technology evolution, variety and the economy', Cheltenham, UK and Brookfield, USA: Edward Elgar.
38. Scherer, F. (1965), 'The propensity to patent'. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 1: 107-28.
39. Scherer, F.M. (1986), Innovation and Growth. Schumpeterian Perspectives, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
40. Schmookler, J. (1966), Invention and Economic Growth, Harvard University Press.
41. Soete, L. (1981), 'A general test of the technological gap trade theory'. Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv, 117(4): 638-60.
42. Teece, J. and Pisano,G. (1994), 'The dynamic capabilities of firms: an introduction'. Industrial and Corporate Change, 3: 537-56.
43. Tirole, J. (1988), The Theory of Industrial Organization, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
44. Winter, S.G. (1984), 'Schumpeterian competition in alternative technological regimes'. Journal of Economic Behaviour and Organization, 5: 287-320.