The preoperative assessment of deep myometrial invasion by three-dimensional ultrasound versus MRI in endometrial carcinoma

Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica

Volumn 91, Issue 8, 2012, Pages 983-990

  Saarelainen, Sami K ^a   KÖÖbi, Lea ^a   JÎrvenpÎÎ, Ritva ^a   Laurila, Marita ^a   MÎenpÎÎ, Johanna U ^a,b  

^a TAMPERE UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Finland)

^b TAMPERE UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Finland)

Author keywords

Endometrial carcinoma; magnetic resonance imaging; staging; three dimensional power Doppler angiography; three dimensional ultrasound

Indexed keywords

ANGIOGRAPHY; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC TEST ACCURACY STUDY; DOPPLER ANGIOGRAPHY; ENDOMETRIUM CARCINOMA; FEMALE; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; MYOMETRIUM; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; OBSERVATIONAL STUDY; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; VASCULARIZATION;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ANGIOGRAPHY; CARCINOMA, ENDOMETRIOID; ENDOMETRIAL NEOPLASMS; FEMALE; HUMANS; HYSTERECTOMY; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; LAPAROSCOPY; LYMPH NODE EXCISION; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MIDDLE AGED; MYOMETRIUM; NEOPLASM INVASIVENESS; NEOPLASM STAGING; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; PREOPERATIVE PERIOD; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; ULTRASONOGRAPHY;

EID: 84863914030     PISSN: 00016349     EISSN: 16000412     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0412.2012.01439.x     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. American Cancer Society. Cancer Statistics, 2009.
2. Parkin DM, Bray F, Ferlay J, Pisani P,. Global cancer statistics, 2002. CA Cancer J Clin. 2005; 55: 74-108. (Pubitemid 40372904)
3. Sorosky JI,. Endometrial cancer. Obstet Gynecol. 2008; 111: 436-47. (Pubitemid 351653438)
4. Amant F, Moerman P, Neven P, Timmerman D, van Limbergen E, Vergote I,. Treatment modalities in endometrial cancer. Curr Opin Oncol. 2007; 19: 479-85. (Pubitemid 47356606)
5. Ben-Shachar I, Pavelka J, Cohn DE, Copeland LJ, Ramirez N, Manolitsas T, et al,. Surgical staging for patients presenting with grade 1 endometrial carcinoma. Obstet Gynecol. 2005; 105: 487-93. (Pubitemid 40271211)
6. Karlsson B, Norström A, Granberg S, Wikland M,. The use of endovaginal ultrasound to diagnose invasion of endometrial carcinoma. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 1992; 2: 35-9.
7. Ozdemir S, Celik C, Emlik D, Kiresi D, Esen H,. Assessment of myometrial invasion in endometrial cancer by transvaginal sonography, Doppler ultrasonography, magnetic resonance imaging and frozen section. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2009; 19: 1085-90.
8. Alcázar JL, Jurado M, Lõpez-García G,. Comparative study of transvaginal ultrasonography and CA 125 in the preoperative evaluation of myometrial invasion in endometrial carcinoma. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 1999; 14: 210-4. (Pubitemid 29509419)
9. Alcázar JL, Galván R, Albela S, Martinez S, Pahisa J, Jurado M, et al,. Assessing myometrial infiltration by endometrial cancer: uterine virtual navigation with three-dimensional US. Radiology. 2009; 250: 776-83.
10. Mercé LT, Alcázar JL, Lõpez C, Iglesias E, Bau S, Alvarez de los Heros J, et al,. Clinical usefulness of 3-dimensional sonography and power Doppler angiography for diagnosis of endometrial carcinoma. J Ultrasound Med. 2007; 26: 1279-87. (Pubitemid 47606811)
11. Geomini PM, Coppus SF, Kluivers KB, Bremer GL, Kruitwagen RF, Mol BW,. Is three-dimensional ultrasonography of additional value in the assessment of adnexal masses? Gynecol Oncol. 2007; 106: 153-9. (Pubitemid 46898583)
12. Chase DM, Crade M, Basu T, Saffari B, Berman ML,. Preoperative diagnosis of ovarian malignancy: preliminary results of the use of 3-dimensional vascular ultrasound. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2009; 19: 354-60.
13. Testa AC, Ferrandina G, Distefano M, Fruscella E, Mansueto D, Basso D, et al,. Color Doppler velocimetry and three-dimensional color power angiography of cervical carcinoma. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2004; 24: 445-52. (Pubitemid 39179483)
14. Peungjesada S, Bhosale PR, Balachandran A, Iyer RB,. Magnetic resonance imaging of endometrial carcinoma. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2009; 33: 601-8.
15. Sanjuán A, Escaramís G, Ayuso JR, Román SM, Torné A, Ordi J, et al,. Role of magnetic resonance imaging and cause of pitfalls in detecting myometrial invasion and cervical involvement in endometrial cancer. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2008; 278: 535-9.
16. Torricelli P, Ferraresi S, Fiocchi F, Ligabue G, Jasonni VM, Di Monte I, et al,. 3-T MRI in the preoperative evaluation of depth of myometrial infiltration in endometrial cancer. Am J Roentgenol. 2008; 190: 489-95. (Pubitemid 351196622)
17. Hwang JH, Lee NW, Lee KW, Lee JK,. Magnetic resonance imaging for assessment of deep endometrial invasion for patients with endometrial carcinoma. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2009; 49: 537-41.
18. Ortashi O, Jain S, Emannuel O, Henry R, Wood A, Evans J,. Evaluation of the sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values of preoperative magnetic resonance imaging for staging endometrial cancer. A prospective study of 100 cases at the Dorset Cancer Centre. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2008; 137: 232-5. (Pubitemid 351423455)
19. Ryoo UN, Choi CH, Yoon JY, Noh SK, Kang H, Kim WY, et al,. MR imaging in endometrial carcinoma as a diagnostic tool for the prediction of myometrial invasion and lymph node metastasis. Cancer Res Treat. 2007; 39: 165-70.
20. Rockall AG, Meroni R, Sohaib SA, Reynolds K, Alexander-Sefre F, Shepherd JH, et al,. Evaluation of endometrial carcinoma on magnetic resonance imaging. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2007; 17: 188-96. (Pubitemid 46213990)
21. Sanjuán A, Cobo T, Pahisa J, Escaramís G, Ordi J, Ayuso JR, et al,. Preoperative and intraoperative assessment of myometrial invasion and histologic grade in endometrial cancer: role of magnetic resonance imaging and frozen section. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2006; 16: 385-90.
22. Undurraga M, Petignat P, Pelte MF, Jacob S, Dubuisson JB, Loubeyre B,. Magnetic resonance imaging to identify risk of lymph node metastasis in patients with endometrial cancer. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2009; 104: 233-5.
23. Cicinelli E, Marinaccio M, Barba B, Tinelli R, Colafiglio G, Pedote P, et al,. Reliability of diagnostic fluid hysteroscopy in the assessment of cervical invasion by endometrial carcinoma: a comparative study with transvaginal sonography and MRI. Gynecol Oncol. 2008; 111: 55-61.
24. Nagar H, Dobbs S, McClelland HR, Price J, McGluggage WG, Grey A,. The diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging in detecting cervical involvement in endometrial cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2006; 103: 431-4. (Pubitemid 44602147)
25. Sala E, Crawford R, Senior E, Shaw A, Simcock B, Vrotsou K, et al,. Added value of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in predicting advanced stage disease in patients with endometrial carcinoma. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2009; 19: 141-6.
26. Marcickiewicz J, Sundfedt K,. Accuracy of intraoperative gross visual assessment of myometrial invasion in endometrial cancer. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2011; 90: 846-51.
27. Creasman WT,. New gynecologic cancer staging. Obstet Gynecol. 1990; 75: 287-8. (Pubitemid 20062249)
28. Mutch DG,. The new FIGO staging system for cancers of the vulva, cervix, endometrium and sarcomas. Gynecol Oncol. 2009; 115: 325-8.
29. Alcazar JL, Galvan R,. Three-dimensional power Doppler ultrasound scanning for the prediction of endometrial cancer in women with postmenopausal bleeding and thickened endometrium. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2009; 200: 44.e1-6.
30. Manfredi R, Mirk P, Maresca G, Margariti PA, Testa A, Zannoni GF, et al,. Local-regional staging of endometrial carcinoma: role of MR imaging in surgical planning. Radiology. 2004; 231: 372-8. (Pubitemid 38552891)
31. Kinkel K, Forstner R, Danza FM, Oleaga L, Cunha TM, Bergman A, et al,. Staging of endometrial cancer with MRI: guidelines of the European Society of Urogenital Imaging. Eur Radiol. 2009; 19: 1565-74.