Magnetic resonance imaging to identify risk of lymph node metastasis in patients with endometrial cancer

International Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics

Volumn 104, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 233-235

  Undurraga, Manuela ^a   Petignat, Patrick ^a   Pelte, Marie Françoise ^a   Jacob, Sandrine ^a   Dubuisson, Jean Bernard ^a   Loubeyre, Pierre ^a  

^a GENEVA UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Cervical invasion; Endometrial cancer; Magnetic resonance imaging; Myometrial invasion; Risk of lymph node metastasis

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CANCER INVASION; CANCER RISK; CANCER STAGING; CLINICAL FEATURE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; ENDOMETRIUM BIOPSY; ENDOMETRIUM CANCER; FEMALE; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; LAPAROSCOPY; LYMPH NODE METASTASIS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; METRORRHAGIA; MINIMALLY INVASIVE PROCEDURE; MYOMETRIUM; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; RISK ASSESSMENT; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; ADENOCARCINOMA; CONFIDENCE INTERVAL; ENDOMETRIUM TUMOR; LYMPH NODE; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; PATHOLOGY; PREDICTION AND FORECASTING; PREOPERATIVE CARE; RISK; UTERINE CERVIX;

ADENOCARCINOMA; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; CERVIX UTERI; CONFIDENCE INTERVALS; ENDOMETRIAL NEOPLASMS; FEMALE; HUMANS; LYMPH NODES; LYMPHATIC METASTASIS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MIDDLE AGED; MYOMETRIUM; NEOPLASM INVASIVENESS; NEOPLASM STAGING; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; PREOPERATIVE CARE; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RISK; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 66549121062     PISSN: 00207292     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2008.10.021     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Benedet J.L., Bender H., Jones III H., Ngan H.Y., and Pecorelli S. FIGO staging classifications and clinical practice guidelines in the management of gynecologic cancers. FIGO Committee on Gynecologic Oncology. Int J Gynecol Obstet 70 2 (2000) 209-262
2. Morrow C.P., Bundy B.N., Kurman R.J., Creasman W.T., Heller P., Homesley H.D., et al. Relationship between surgical-pathological risk factors and outcome in clinical stage I and II carcinoma of the endometrium: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study. Gynecol Oncol 40 1 (1991) 55-65
3. Boronow R.C., Morrow C.P., Creasman W.T., Disaia P.J., Silverberg S.G., Miller A., et al. Surgical staging in endometrial cancer: clinical-pathologic findings of a prospective study. Obstet Gynecol 63 6 (1984) 825-832
4. Creasman W.T., Morrow C.P., Bundy B.N., Homesley H.D., Graham J.E., and Heller P.B. Surgical pathologic spread patterns of endometrial cancer. A Gynecologic Oncology Group Study. Cancer 60 8 Suppl (1987) 2035-2041
5. Creasman W.T., Odicino F., Maisonneuve P., Quinn M.A., Beller U., Benedet J.L., et al. Carcinoma of the corpus uteri. FIGO 6th Annual Report on the Results of treatment in Gynecological Cancer. Int J Gynecol Obstet 95 Suppl 1 (2006) S105-143
6. Kinkel K., Kaji Y., Yu K.K., Segal M.R., Lu Y., Powell C.B., et al. Radiologic staging in patients with endometrial cancer: a meta-analysis. Radiology 212 3 (1999) 711-718
7. Rieck G.C., Bulman J., Whitaker R., and Leeson S.C. A retrospective review of magnetic resonance imaging in assessing the extent of myometrial infiltration for patients with endometrial carcinoma. J Obstet Gynaecol 25 8 (2005) 765-768
8. Nakao Y., Yokoyama M., Hara K., Koyamatsu Y., Yasunaga M., Araki Y., et al. MR imaging in endometrial carcinoma as a diagnostic tool for the absence of myometrial invasion. Gynecol Oncol 102 2 (2006) 343-347
9. Nagar H., Dobbs S., McClelland H.R., Price J., McCluggage W.G., and Grey A. The diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging in detecting cervical involvement in endometrial cancer. Gynecol Oncol 103 2 (2006) 431-434
10. Vasconcelos C., Félix A., and Cunha T.M. Preoperative assessment of deep myometrial and cervical invasion in endometrial carcinoma: comparison of magnetic resonance imaging and histopathologic evaluation. J Obstet Gynaecol 27 1 (2007) 65-70
11. Rockall A.G., Meroni R., Sohaib S.A., Reynolds K., Alexander-Sefre F., Shepherd J.H., et al. Evaluation of endometrial carcinoma on magnetic resonance imaging. Int J Gynecol Cancer 17 1 (2007) 188-196
12. Chung H.H., Kang S.B., Cho J.Y., Kim J.W., Park N.H., Song Y.S., et al. Accuracy of MR imaging for the prediction of myometrial invasion of endometrial carcinoma. Gynecol Oncol 104 3 (2007) 654-659
13. Cunha T.M., Félix A., and Cabral I. Preoperative assessment of deep myometrial and cervical invasion in endometrial carcinoma: comparison of magnetic resonance imaging and gross visual inspection. Int J Gynecol Cancer 11 2 (2001) 130-136
14. Sanjuan A., Cobo T., Pahisa J., Escaramis G., Ordi J., Ayuso J.R., et al. Preoperative and intraoperative assessment of myometrial invasion and histologic grade in endometrial cancer: role of magnetic resonance imaging and frozen section. Int J Gynecol Cancer 16 1 (2006) 385-390
15. Kirby T.O., Leath III C.A., and Kilgore L.C. Surgical staging in endometrial cancer. Oncology (Williston Park) 20 1 (2006) 45-50
16. Chan J.K., and Kapp D.S. Role of complete lymphadenectomy in endometrioid uterine cancer. Lancet Oncol 8 9 (2007) 831-841
17. Pecorelli S., Ngan H.Y.S., and Hacker N.F. Staging Classifications and Clinical Practice Guidelines for Gynaecological Cancers. A collaboration between FIGO and IGCS. Third edition (2006), FIGO, London, UK. http://www.figo.org/docs/staging_booklet.pdf Available at: http://www.figo.org/docs/staging_booklet.pdf
18. Homesley H.D., Kadar N., Barrett R.J., and Lentz S.S. Selective pelvic and periaortic lymphadenectomy does not increase morbidity in surgical staging of endometrial carcinoma. Am J Obstet Gynecol 167 5 (1992) 1225-1230