Stimulus selection for intranasal sensory isolation: Eugenol is an irritant

Chemical Senses

Volumn 37, Issue 6, 2012, Pages 509-514

  Wise, Paul M ^a   Wysocki, Charles J ^a,b   Lundström, Johan N ^a,b,c  

^a MONELL CHEMICAL SENSES CENTER   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

^c KAROLINSKA INSTITUTE   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Chemesthesis; Lateralization; Pure odorant; Trigeminal

Indexed keywords

EUGENOL;

ADULT; ARTICLE; CONCENTRATION (PARAMETERS); CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; NERVE STIMULATION; OLFACTORY DISCRIMINATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SENSORY STIMULATION; SMELLING; STIMULUS RESPONSE; TRIGEMINAL NERVE;

ADMINISTRATION, INTRANASAL; ADULT; ANESTHETICS; DOSE-RESPONSE RELATIONSHIP, DRUG; EUGENOL; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; ODORS; SENSORY THRESHOLDS; SMELL; STIMULATION, CHEMICAL; TRIGEMINAL NERVE; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84863876556     PISSN: 0379864X     EISSN: 14643553     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/chemse/bjs002     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Allen WF. 1929. Effect of various inhaled vapors on respiration and blood pressure in anesthetized, unanesthetized, sleeping, and anosmic subjects. Am J Physiol. 88:620-632.
2. Bengtsson S, Berglund H, Gulyas B, Cohen E, Savic I. 2001. Brain activation during odor perception in males and females. Neuroreport. 12:2027-2033.
3. Boyle JA, Lundström JN, Knecht M, Jones-Gotman M, Schaal B, Hummel T. 2006. On the trigeminal percept of androstenone and its implications on the rate of specific anosmia. J Neurobiol. 66:1501-1510.
4. Cain WS, Murphy CL. 1980. Interaction between chemoreceptive modalities of odour and irritation. Nature. 284:255-257.
5. Chen J, Zhou W, Chen D. 2011. A graded olfactory contrast between nasal passages enables stereo human olfaction. P#127. St Pete Beach (FL): Association of Chemoreception Sciences. p. 69.
6. Coates EL, Ballam GO. 1990. Olfactory receptor response to CO2 in bullfrogs. Am J Physiol. 258:R1207-R1212.
7. Cometto-Muñiz JE, Cain WS. 1990. Thresholds for odor and nasal pungency. Physiol Behav. 48:719-725.
8. Cometto-Muñiz JE, Cain WS, Abraham MH. 2005. Determinants for nasal trigeminal detection of volatile organic compounds. Chem Senses. 30:627-642.
9. Cometto-Muñiz JE, Cain WS, Abraham MH, Sanchez-Moreno R. 2007. Cutoff in detection of eye irritation from vapors of homologous carboxylic acids and aliphatic aldehydes. Neuroscience. 145:1130-1137.
10. Doty RL. 1975. Intranasal trigeminal detection of chemical vapors by humans. Physiol Behav. 14:855-859.
11. Doty RL, Brugger WE, Jurs PC, Orndorff MA, Snyder PJ, Lowry LD. 1978. Intranasal trigeminal stimulation from odorous volatiles: psychometric responses from anosmic and normal humans. Physiol Behav. 20:175-185.
12. Frasnelli J, Albrecht J, Bryant B, Lundström JN. 2011. Perception of specific trigeminal chemosensory agonists. Neuroscience. 189:377-383.
13. Frasnelli J, Charbonneau G, Collignon O, Lepore F. 2009. Odor localization and sniffing. Chem Senses. 34:139-144.
14. Frasnelli J, Hummel T, Berg J, Huang G, Doty RL. 2011. Intranasal localizability of odorants: influence of stimulus volume. Chem Senses. 36:405-410.
15. Frasnelli J, Schuster B, Hummel T. 2007. Subjects with congenital anosmia have larger peripheral but similar central trigeminal responses. Cereb Cortex. 17:370-377.
16. Frasnelli J, Schuster B, Zahnert T, Hummel T. 2006. Chemosensory specific reduction of trigeminal sensitivity in subjects with olfactory dysfunction. Neuroscience. 142:541-546.
17. Hu J, Zhong C, Ding C, Chi Q, Walz A, Mombaerts P, Matsunami H, Luo M. 2007. Detection of near-atmospheric concentrations of CO2 by an olfactory subsystem in the mouse. Science. 317:953-957.
18. Hummel T, Barz S, Lotsch J, Roscher S, Kettenmann B, Kobal G. 1996. Loss of olfactory function leads to a decrease of trigeminal sensitivity. Chem Senses. 21:75-79.
19. Hummel T, Kobal G. 1994. Chemosensory event related potentials: effects of dichotomous stimulation with eugenol and dipyridyl. In: Kurihara K, Suzuki N, Ogawa H, editors. Olfaction and taste XI. Berlin (Germany): Springer. p. 659-663.
20. Jacquot L, Monnin J, Brand G. 2004. Unconscious odor detection could not be due to odor itself. Brain Res. 1002:51-54.
21. Kobal G, Van Toller S, Hummel T. 1989. Is there directional smelling? Experientia. 45:130-132.
22. Lee MH, Yeon KY, Park CK, Li HY, Fang Z, Kim MS, Choi SY, Lee SJ, Lee S, Park K, et al. 2005. Eugenol inhibits calcium currents in dental afferent neurons. J Dent Res. 84:848-851.
23. Lundström JN, Goncalves M, Esteves F, Olsson MJ. 2003. Psychological effects of subthreshold exposure to the putative human pheromone 4,16-androstadien-3-one. Horm Behav. 44:395-401.
24. Lundström JN, Hummel T, Olsson MJ. 2003. Individual differences in sensitivity to the odor of 4,16-androstadien-3-one. Chem Senses. 28:643-650.
25. Park CK, Kim K, Jung SJ, Kim MJ, Ahn DK, Hong SD, Kim JS, Oh SB. 2009. Molecular mechanism for local anesthetic action of eugenol in the rat trigeminal system. Pain. 144:84-94.
26. Park SH, Sim YB, Lee JK, Kim SM, Kang YJ, Jung JS, Suh HW. 2011. The analgesic effects and mechanisms of orally administered eugenol. Arch Pharm Res. 34:501-507.
27. Porter J, Anand T, Johnson B, Khan RM, Sobel N. 2005. Brain mechanisms for extracting spatial information from smell. Neuron. 47:581-592.
28. Prah JD, Benignus VA. 1984. Trigeminal sensitivity to contact chemical stimulation: a new method and some results. Percept Psychophys. 35:65-68.
29. Savic I, Berglund H, Lindström P. 2005. Brain response to putative pheromones in homosexual men. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 102:7356-7361.
30. Savic I, Gulyas B. 2000. PET shows that odors are processed both ipsilaterally and contralaterally to the stimulated nostril. Neuroreport. 11:2861-2866.
31. Savic I, Gulyas B, Larsson M, Roland P. 2000. Olfactory functions are mediated by parallel and hierarchical processing. Neuron. 26:735-745.
32. Silver WL, Moulton DG. 1982. Chemosensitivity of rat nasal trigeminal receptors. Physiol Behav. 28:927-931.
33. Suzuki Y, Critchley HD, Suckling J, Fukuda R, Williams SC, Andrew C, Howard R, Ouldred E, Bryant C, Swift CG, et al. 2001. Functional magnetic resonance imaging of odor identification: the effect of aging. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 56:M756-M760.
34. Tizzano M, Gulbransen BD, Vandenbeuch A, Clapp TR, Herman JP, Sibhatu HM, Churchill ME, Silver WL, Kinnamon SC, Finger TE. 2010. Nasal chemosensory cells use bitter taste signaling to detect irritants and bacterial signals. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 107:3210-3215.
35. Trevisani M, Patacchini R, Nicoletti P, Gatti R, Gazzieri D, Lissi N, Zagli G, Creminon C, Geppetti P, Harrison S. 2005. Hydrogen sulfide causes vanilloid receptor 1-mediated neurogenic inflammation in the airways. Br J Pharmacol. 145:1123-1131.
36. Von Skramlik E. 1926. Handbuch der Physiologie der niederen Sinne. Leipzig (Germany): Georg Thieme.
37. Wetherill GB, Levitt H. 1965. Sequential estimation of points on a psychometric function. Br J Math Stat Psychol. 18:1-10.
38. Wise PM, Preti G, Eades J, Wysocki CJ. 2011. The effect of menthol vapor on nasal sensitivity to chemical irritation. Nicotine Tob Res. 13:989-997.
39. Wysocki CJ, Cowart BJ, Radil T. 2003. Nasal trigeminal chemosensitivity across the adult life span. Percept Psychophys. 65:115-122.
40. Wysocki CJ, Dalton P, Brody MJ, Lawley HJ. 1997. Acetone odor and irritation thresholds obtained from acetone-exposed factory workers and from control occupationally unexposed subjects. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J. 58:704-712.
41. Wysocki CJ, Wise P. 2003. Methods, approaches, and caveats for functionally evaluating olfaction and chemesthesis. In: Deibler K, Delwiche JF, editors. Handbook of flavor characterization: sensory, chemical and psychophysiological. New York: Marcel Dekker. p. 1-40.
42. Yousem DM, Maldjian JA, Siddiqi F, Hummel T, Alsop DC, Geckle RJ, Bilker WB, Doty RL. 1999. Gender effects on odor-stimulated functional magnetic resonance imaging. Brain Res. 818:480-487.