The discrepancy between chromatin factor location and effect

Nucleus (United States)

Volumn 3, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 213-219

  Lenstra, Tineke L ^a   Holstege, Frank C P ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER UTRECHT   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Chromatin; Epigenetics; Genome wide; Promoter occupancy; Transcription

Indexed keywords

HISTONE DEACETYLASE;

ARTICLE; CELL CYCLE PHASE; CHROMATIN; CHROMATIN ASSEMBLY AND DISASSEMBLY; DOWN REGULATION; GENE DELETION; GENE EXPRESSION; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; GENE INTERACTION; GENETIC TRANSCRIPTION; NONHUMAN; PROTEIN LOCALIZATION; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; TRANSCRIPTION INITIATION SITE; TRANSCRIPTION REGULATION; UPREGULATION;

SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE;

EID: 84863850960     PISSN: 19491034     EISSN: 19491042     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4161/nucl.19513     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Strahl BD, Allis CD. The language of covalent histone modifications. Nature 2000; 403:41-5; PMID: 10638745; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/47412
2. Narlikar GJ, Fan HY, Kingston RE. Cooperation between complexes that regulate chromatin structure and transcription. Cell 2002; 108:475-87; PMID: 11909519; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0092-8674(02) 00654-2
3. Berger SL. The complex language of chromatin regulation during transcription. Nature 2007; 447: 407-12; PMID:17522673; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature05915
4. Lee J-S, Smith E, Shilatifard A. The language of histone crosstalk. Cell 2010; 142:682-5; PMID:20813257; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2010.08.011
5. Campos EI, Reinberg D. Histones: annotating chromatin. Annu Rev Genet 2009; 43:559-99; PMID: 19886812; http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.genet.032608.103928
6. Rando OJ, Chang HY. Genome-wide views of chromatin structure. Annu Rev Biochem 2009; 78:245-71; PMID:19317649; http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev. biochem.78.071107.134639
7. Venters BJ, Wachi S, Mavrich TN, Andersen BE, Jena P, Sinnamon AJ, et al. A comprehensive genomic binding map of gene and chromatin regulatory proteins in Saccharomyces. Mol Cell 2011; 41:480-92; PMID: 21329885; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2011.01.015
8. Lenstra TL, Benschop JJ, Kim T, Schulze JM, Brabers NACH, Margaritis T, et al. The specificity and topology of chromatin interaction pathways in yeast. Mol Cell 2011; 42:536-49; PMID:21596317; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2011.03.026
9. Huisinga KL, Pugh BF. A genome-wide housekeeping role for TFIID and a highly regulated stress-related role for SAGA in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell 2004; 13:573-85; PMID:14992726; http://dx.doi.org/10. 1016/S1097-2765(04)00087-5
10. Grant PA, Schieltz D, Pray-Grant MG, Steger DJ, Reese JC, Yates JR, 3rd, et al. A subset of TAF(II)s are integral components of the SAGA complex required for nucleosome acetylation and transcriptional stimulation. Cell 1998; 94:45-53; PMID:9674426; http://dx.doi. org/10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81220-9
11. Kobor MS, Venkatasubrahmanyam S, Meneghini MD, Gin JW, Jennings JL, Link AJ, et al. A protein complex containing the conserved Swi2/Snf2-related ATPase Swr1p deposits histone variant H2A. Z into euchromatin. PLoS Biol 2004; 2:E131; PMID:15045029; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.0020131
12. Krogan NJ, Keogh M-C, Datta N, Sawa C, Ryan OW, Ding H, et al. A Snf2 family ATPase complex required for recruitment of the histone H2A variant Htz1. Mol Cell 2003; 12:1565-76; PMID:14690608; http://dx. doi.org/10.1016/S1097-2765(03)00497-0
13. Mizuguchi G, Shen X, Landry J, Wu W-H, Sen S, Wu C. ATP-driven exchange of histone H2AZ variant catalyzed by SWR1 chromatin remodeling complex. Science 2004; 303:343-8; PMID:14645854; http://dx. doi.org/10.1126/science.1090701
14. Smith RL, Johnson AD. Turning genes offby Ssn6-Tup1: a conserved system of transcriptional repression in eukaryotes. Trends Biochem Sci 2000; 25:325-30; PMID:10871883; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0968-0004(00)01592-9
15. Newman JRS, Ghaemmaghami S, Ihmels J, Breslow DK, Noble M, DeRisi JL, et al. Single-cell proteomic analysis of S. cerevisiae reveals the architecture of biological noise. Nature 2006; 441:840-6; PMID: 16699522; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature04785
16. Raj A, van Oudenaarden A. Nature, nurture, or chance: stochastic gene expression and its consequences. Cell 2008; 135:216-26; PMID:18957198; http://dx.doi. org/10.1016/j.cell.2008.09.050
17. Bar-Even A, Paulsson J, Maheshri N, Carmi M, O'Shea E, Pilpel Y, et al. Noise in protein expression scales with natural protein abundance. Nat Genet 2006; 38:636-43; PMID:16715097; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ng1807
18. Maheshri N, O'Shea EK. Living with noisy genes: how cells function reliably with inherent variability in gene expression. Annu Rev Biophys Biomol Struct 2007; 36:413-34; PMID:17477840; http://dx.doi.org/10. 1146/annurev.biophys.36.040306.132705
19. Pokholok DK, Harbison CT, Levine S, Cole M, Hannett NM, Lee TI, et al. Genome-wide map of nucleosome acetylation and methylation in yeast. Cell 2005; 122:517-27; PMID:16122420; http://dx.doi. org/10.1016/j.cell.2005.06.026
20. Fan Y, Nikitina T, Zhao J, Fleury TJ, Bhattacharyya R, Bouhassira EE, et al. Histone H1 depletion in mammals alters global chromatin structure but causes specific changes in gene regulation. Cell 2005; 123: 1199-212; PMID:16377562; http://dx.doi.org/10. 1016/j.cell.2005.10.028
21. Jiang H, Shukla A, Wang X, Chen WY, Bernstein BE, Roeder RG. Role for Dpy-30 in ES cell-fate specification by regulation of H3K4 methylation within bivalent domains. Cell 2011; 144:513-25; PMID: 21335234; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2011.01. 020
22. Yildirim O, Li R, Hung J-H, Chen PB, Dong X, Ee L-S, et al. Mbd3/NURD complex regulates expression of 5-hydroxymethylcytosine marked genes in embryonic stem cells. Cell 2011; 147:1498-510; PMID:22196727; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2011.11.054
23. Prince VE, Pickett FB. Splitting pairs: the diverging fates of duplicated genes. Nat Rev Genet 2002; 3:827-37; PMID:12415313; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nrg928
24. Hartman JL, 4th, Garvik B, Hartwell L. Principles for the buffering of genetic variation. Science 2001; 291:1001-4; PMID:11232561; http://dx.doi.org/10. 1126/science.291.5506.1001
25. Collins SR, Miller KM, Maas NL, Roguev A, Fillingham J, Chu CS, et al. Functional dissection of protein complexes involved in yeast chromosome biology using a genetic interaction map. Nature 2007; 446:806-10; PMID:17314980; http://dx.doi. org/10.1038/nature05649
26. Jacob F. Evolution and tinkering. Science 1977; 196:1161-6; PMID:860134; http://dx.doi.org/10. 1126/science.860134
27. Carrozza MJ, Li B, Florens L, Suganuma T, Swanson SK, Lee KK, et al. Histone H3 methylation by Set2 directs deacetylation of coding regions by Rpd3S to suppress spurious intragenic transcription. Cell 2005; 123:581-92; PMID:16286007; http://dx.doi.org/10. 1016/j.cell.2005.10.023
28. Joshi AA, Struhl K. Eaf3 chromodomain interaction with methylated H3-K36 links histone deacetylation to Pol II elongation. Mol Cell 2005; 20:971-8; PMID: 16364921; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2005.11.021
29. Keogh M-C, Kurdistani SK, Morris SA, Ahn SH, Podolny V, Collins SR, et al. Cotranscriptional set2 methylation of histone H3 lysine 36 recruits a repressive Rpd3 complex. Cell 2005; 123:593-605; PMID: 16286008; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2005.10.025
30. Li B, Gogol M, Carey M, Pattenden SG, Seidel C, Workman JL. Infrequently transcribed long genes depend on the Set2/Rpd3S pathway for accurate transcription. Genes Dev 2007; 21:1422-30; PMID: 17545470; http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gad.1539307
31. Lickwar CR, Rao B, Shabalin AA, Nobel AB, Strahl BD, Lieb JD. The Set2/Rpd3S pathway suppresses cryptic transcription without regard to gene length or transcription frequency. PLoS One 2009; 4:e4886; PMID:19295910; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal. pone.0004886
32. Meneghini MD, Wu M, Madhani HD. Conserved histone variant H2A. Z protects euchromatin from the ectopic spread of silent heterochromatin. Cell 2003; 112:725-36; PMID:12628191; http://dx.doi.org/10. 1016/S0092-8674(03)00123-5
33. Filion GJ, van Bemmel JG, Braunschweig U, Talhout W, Kind J, Ward LD, et al. Systematic protein location mapping reveals five principal chromatin types in Drosophila cells. Cell 2010; 143:212-24; PMID: 20888037; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2010.09.009
34. Cairns BR. The logic of chromatin architecture and remodelling at promoters. Nature 2009; 461: 193-8; PMID:19741699; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature08450
35. Basehoar AD, Zanton SJ, Pugh BF. Identification and distinct regulation of yeast TATA box-containing genes. Cell 2004; 116:699-709; PMID:15006352; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0092-8674(04)00205-3
36. Harbison CT, Gordon DB, Lee TI, Rinaldi NJ, Macisaac KD, Danford TW, et al. Transcriptional regulatory code of a eukaryotic genome. Nature 2004; 431:99-104; PMID:15343339; http://dx.doi.org/10. 1038/nature02800
37. Hager GL, McNally JG, Misteli T. Transcription dynamics. Mol Cell 2009; 35:741-53; PMID:19782025; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2009.09.005
38. Nagalakshmi U, Wang Z, Waern K, Shou C, Raha D, Gerstein M, et al. The transcriptional landscape of the yeast genome defined by RNA sequencing. Science 2008; 320:1344-9; PMID:18451266; http://dx.doi. org/10.1126/science.1158441
39. Tisseur M, Kwapisz M, Morillon A. Pervasive transcription-Lessons from yeast. Biochimie 2011; 93:1889-96; PMID:21771634; http://dx.doi.org/10. 1016/j.biochi.2011.07.001