Using a TRIZ framework for systems engineering trade studies

Systems Engineering

Volumn 15, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 355-367

  Blackburn, Timothy D ^a,b   Mazzuchi, Thomas A ^b,c   Sarkani, Shahram ^b  

^a PFIZER INC   (United States)

^b George Washington University   (United States)

^c GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

fundamental limits; pharmaceutical; QbD; systems engineering; trade studies; tradeoff analysis; TRIZ

Indexed keywords

FUNDAMENTAL LIMITS; QBD; TRADE-OFF ANALYSIS; TRADE-STUDY; TRIZ;

DRUG PRODUCTS; PROBLEM SOLVING; SYSTEMS ENGINEERING;

COMMERCE;

EID: 84863847209     PISSN: 10981241     EISSN: 15206858     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/sys.21199     Document Type: Article

References (64)

1. C. Alexander, S. Ishikawa, M. Silverstein, M. Jacobson, I. Fiksdahl-King, and, S. Angel, A pattern language, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1977.
2. P. Bariani, G. Berti, and, G. Lucchetta, A combined DFMA and TRIZ approach to the simplification of product structure, Proc Inst Mech Eng Part B J Eng Manuf, Prof Eng Publishing, 218 (8) (2004).
3. J. Berridge, (2005). Overview: Quality by Design (QbD), Engineering Pharmaceutical Innovation KB-0001. ISPE, Tampa.
4. T.D. Blackburn, QbD (Quality by Design) and pharmaceutical production system fundamental sigma limits, The George Washington University, Systems Engineering Ph.D. Dissertation, 2011
5. T.D. Blackburn, T.A. Mazzuchi, and, S. Sarkani, Overcoming inherent limits to pharmaceutical manufacturing quality performance with QbD (Quality by Design), J Pharm Innov 6 (2) (2011), 69-76.
6. B.S. Blanchard, and, W.J. Fabrycky, Systems engineering and analysis, Pearson Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ, 2006.
7. G.M. Bonnema, Insight, innovation, and the big picture in system design, Syst Eng 14 (2011), 223-238.
8. T.R. Browning, E. Fricke, and, H. Negele, Key concepts in modeling product development processes, Syst Eng 9 (2) (2006), 104-128.
9. D.M. Buede, The engineering design of systems: Models and methods, Wiley, Hoboken, NJ, 2000.
10. G. Cascini, and, P. Rissone, Plastics design: Integrating TRIZ creativity and semantic knowledge portals, J Eng Des 15 (4) (2004), 405-424.
11. L.S. Chen, and, S.H. Chen, Applying TRIZ techniques to innovative product functions creation: An example of smart phones, 11th Asia Pacific Indust Eng Management Syst Conf, The 14th Asia Pacific Regional Meet Int Found Prod Res, 2010, pp. 387-400.
12. D.P. Clausing, and, K.V. Katsikopoulos, Rationality in systems engineering: Beyond calculation or political action, Syst Eng 11 (4) (2008), 309-328.
13. J. Daniels, P.W. Werner, and, A.T. Bahill, Quantitative methods for tradeoff analyses, Syst Eng 4 (3) (2001), 190-212.
14. W. Edwards, How to use multiattribute utility measurement for social decisionmaking, IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybernet 7 (5) (1977), 326-340.
15. FDA, Drug administration. Guidance for industry PAT: A framework for innovative pharmaceutical development, manufacturing, and quality assurance, Federal Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD, 2004.
16. P. Filmore, and, P. Thomond, Why reinvent the wheel? The efficacy of systematic problem solving method TRIZ and its value for innovation in engineering and its implications for engineering management, Hong Kong Inst Value Management 7th Int Conf, 2005, 1-6.
17. M. Frank, Knowledge, abilities, cognitive characteristics and behavioral competences of engineers with high capacity for engineering systems thinking (CEST), Syst Eng 9 (2) (2006), 91-103.
18. G. Frenklach, Effectively using the Contradiction Matrix, TRIZ J 9 (2) (2007), 91-103.
19. D. Frey, J. Palladino, J. Sullivan, and, M. Atherton, Part count and design of robust systems, Syst Eng 10 (3) (2007), 203-221.
20. E. Fricke, B. Gebhard, H. Negele, and, E., Igenbergs, Coping with changes: Causes, findings, and strategies, Syst Eng 3 (4) (2000), 169-179.
21. A. Hari, J.E. Kasser, and, M.P. Weiss, How lessons learned from using QFD led to the evolution of a process for creating quality requirements for complex systems, Syst Eng 10 (1) (2007), 45-63.
22. Harvard Business Review, "The S-curve and its strategic lessons; what curve are you on?" Innovator's toolkit: 10 practical strategies to help you develop and implement innovation, Harvard Business Essentials, Harvard Business Press, Cambridge, MA, 2009, Chapter 8.
23. C. Haskins, Editor, Systems engineering handbook: A guide for system life cycle process and activities, Version 3, INCOSE, San Diego, CA, 2006.
24. C. Haskins, Using patterns to transition systems engineering from a technological to social context, Syst Eng 11 (2) (2008), 147-155.
25. J. Hauser, and, D. Clausing, The house of quality, Harvard Bus Rev 66 (3) (1988), 63-73.
26. S. Henry, S. Hoon, M. Hwang, D. Lee, and, M.D. DeVore, Engineering trade study: Extract, transform, load tools for data migration, Syst Inform Eng Des Symp, IEEE, 2005, pp. 1-8.
27. J. Hipple, The integration of TRIZ problem solving techniques with other problem solving and assessment tools, TRIZ J 1 (1) (2003), 111-128.
28. J. Holmberg, and, K.H. Robert, Backcasting from non-overlapping sustainability principles a framework for strategic planning, Int J Sustainable Dev World Ecol 7 (4) (2000), 291-308.
29. Z. Hua, J. Yang, S. Coulibaly, and, B. Zhang, Integration TRIZ with problem-solving tools: a literature review from 1995 to 2006, Int J Bus Innovation Res 1 (1) (2006), 111-128.
30. International Conference on Harmonisation, Pharmaceutical development Q8, ICH 10 (2005), 30.
31. Y.J. Kang, The method for uncoupling design by contradiction matrix of TRIZ and case study, Proc International Conference on Axiomatic Design, Seoul, 2004.
32. R.L. Keeney, Value-focused thinking: A path to creative decisionmaking, Harvard University Press, Boston, 1996.
33. R.L. Keeney, and, H. Raiffa, Decisions with multiple objectives: preferences and value tradeoffs, Addison Wesley, New York, 1976, pp. 224-241.
34. R. Kenett, and, D. Kenett, Quality by Design applications in biosimilar pharmaceutical products, Accreditation Qual Assur J Qual Comparab Reliab Chem Measure 13 (12) (2008), 681-690.
35. C.-C. Lai, S. Deng, H. Chin, and, Y. Peng, Development of platform for system architecture of small service business, Syst Eng 14 (2) (2011), 111-128.
36. P. Livotov, The undervalued innovation potential, TRIZ J (2004).
37. M. Low, T. Lamvik, K. Walsh, and, O. Myklebust, Manufacturing a green service: Engaging the TRIZ model of innovation, IEEE Trans Electron Packaging Manuf 24 (1) (2002), 10-17.
38. M. Maier, and, E. Rechtin, The art of systems architecting, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 2000.
39. D. Mann, Manufacturing technology evolution trends, Integrated Manuf Syst 13 (2) (2002), 86-90.
40. D. Mann, and, E. Domb, 40 inventive (business) principles with examples, TRIZ J (1999), 1-19.
41. M.G. Moehrle, How combinations of TRIZ tools are used in companies-results of a cluster analysis, R&D Management 35 (3) (2005a), 285-296.
42. M.G. Moehrle, What is TRIZ? From conceptual basics to a framework for research, Creativity Innovation Management 14 (1) (2005b), 3-13.
43. National Airspace System (NAS), NAS systems engineering manual, version 3.1, FAA, Washington, DC, June 6, 2006.
44. A.T. Perez, and, A.R. Puigdomenech, Charting the course of QbD implementation, Pharm Manuf (June) (2009), 17-19.
45. J. ReVelle, Manufacturing handbook of best practices: An innovation, productivity, and quality focus, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 2002.
46. A.M. Ross, and, D.E. Hastings, (2005). The tradespace exploration paradigm, INCOSE Int Symp, Rochester, NY, 2005, pp. 1-13.
47. T.L. Saaty, The analytic hierarchy process: planning, priority setting, resource allocation, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1980.
48. A.P. Sage, and, W.B. Rouse, Handbook of systems engineering and management, Wiley-Interscience, Hoboken, NJ, 2009.
49. S. Savransky, Engineering of creativity, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 2000.
50. A.P. Schulz, D.P. Clausing, E. Fricke, and, H. Negele, Development and integration of winning technologies as key to competitive advantage, Syst Eng 3 (4) (2000), 180-211.
51. M. Shahbazpour, and, R. Seidel, Strategic manufacturing system and process innovation through elimination of trade-offs, Int J Comput Integrated Manuf 20 (5) (2007), 413-422.
52. R.A. Shirwaiker, and, G.E. Okudan, TRIZ and axiomatic design: A review of case-studies and a proposed synergistic use, J Intell Manuf 19 (1) (2008), 33-47.
53. D. Silverstein, N. DeCarlo, and, M. Slocum, Insourcing innovation: How to achieve competitive excellence using TRIZ, Auerbach Publications, New York, 2007.
54. E.D. Smith, Y.J. Son, M. Piattelli Palmarini, and, A. Terry Bahill, Ameliorating mental mistakes in tradeoff studies, Syst Eng 10 (3) (2007), 222-240.
55. L. Smith, Six Sigma and the evolution of quality in product development, Six Sigma Forum Mag (ASQ). 1 (2001), 28-35.
56. A. Squires, W. Larson, and, B. Sauser, Mapping space based systems engineering curriculum to government industry vetted competencies for improved organizational performance, Syst Eng 13 (3) (2010), 246-260.
57. R. Stratton, and, D. Mann, Systematic innovation and the underlying principles behind TRIZ and TOC, J Mater Process Technol 139 (1-3) (2003), 120-126.
58. N.P. Suh, A.C. Bell, and, D.C. Gossard, On an axiomatic approach to manufacturing and manufacturing systems, ASME J Eng Indust 100 (2) (1978), 127-130.
59. G. Tennant, TRIZ-table of contradictions, Mulbury Six Sigma, 2003.
60. F. Vanek, P. Jackson, and, R. Grzybowski, Systems engineering metrics and applications in product development: A critical literature review and agenda for further research, Syst Eng 11 (2) (2008), 107-124.
61. S.R. Watson, and, D.M. Buede, Decision synthesis: The principles and practice of decision analysis, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1987.
62. K.P. White, Systems design engineering, Syst Eng 1 (4) (1998), 285-302.
63. L. Yilmaz, and, T. Ören, Agent-directed simulation and systems engineering, WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim, Germany, 2009.
64. X. Zhao, and, S. Zhang, The evolvement of automobile steering system based on TRIZ, Growth and Development of Computer-Aided Innovation (2009), 185-192.