Beliefs about urban fringe forests among urban residents in Sweden

Urban Forestry and Urban Greening

Volumn 11, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 321-328

  Eriksson, Louise ^a   Nordlund, Annika ^a   Olsson, Olof ^a   Westin, Kerstin ^a  

^a UMEÅ UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Basic values; Environmental beliefs; Forest beliefs; Urban fringe forest beliefs

Indexed keywords

COGNITION; ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT; ENVIRONMENTAL VALUES; FOREST MANAGEMENT; HIERARCHICAL SYSTEM; PERCEPTION; PUBLIC ATTITUDE; RESIDENT POPULATION; URBAN FORESTRY; URBAN PLANNING; URBAN POPULATION;

SWEDEN;

EID: 84863782266     PISSN: 16188667     EISSN: 16108167     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ufug.2012.02.004     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Andersson K., Lindgren M., Lundgren P. Kund-och intressentanalys 2005, Slutrapport[[nl]]Final report Kairos Future AB[[nl]]Kairos Future inc., (in Swedish).
2. Balram S., Dragicevic S. Attitudes toward urban green spaces. Integrating questionnaire survey and collaborative GIS techniques to improve attitude measurements. Landscape and Urban Planning 2005, 71:147-162.
3. Bell S., Blom D., Rautamäki M., Castel-Branco C., Simson A., Olsen I.A. Design of urban forests. Urban Forests and Trees. A Reference Book 2005, 149-186. Springer, Berlin. C.C. Konijnendijk, K. Nilsson, T.B. Randrup, J. Schipperijn (Eds.).
4. Dietz T., Stern P.C., Guagnano G.A. Social structural and social psychological bases of environmental concern. Environment and Behavior 1998, 30:450-471.
5. Dunlap R.E, Van Liere K.D., Mertig A.G., Jones R.E. Measuring endorsement of the New Ecological Paradigm: a revised NEP Scale. Journal of Social Issues 2000, 56:425-442.
6. Dwyer J.F., McPherson E.G., Schroeder H.W., Rowntree R.A. Assessing the benefits and costs of the urban forest. Journal of Arboriculture 1992, 18:227-234.
7. Eagly A.H., Chaiken S. The Psychology of Attitudes 1993, Harcourt, Brace, Jovanovich, Fort Worth, TX.
8. Eagly A.H., Kulesa P. Attitudes, attitude structure, and resistance to change: implications for persuasion on environmental issues. Environment, Ethics and Behavior: The Psychology of Environmental Valuation and Degradation 1997, 122-153. New Lexington Press, San Francisco. M.H. Bazerman, D.M. Messick, A.E. Tenbrunsel, K.A. Wade-Benzoni (Eds.).
9. Elasser P. Do " stakeholders" represent citizen interest? An empirical inquiry of into assessments of policy aims in the National Forest Programme for Germany. Forest Policy and Economics 2007, 9:1018-1030.
10. Evans J. The Forests Handbook: Applying Forest Science for Sustainable Management 2001, vol. 2. Blackwell Science Ltd, Oxford.
11. Forrest M., Konijnendijk C. A history of urban forests and trees in Europe. Urban Forests and Trees. A Reference Book 2005, 23-48. Springer, Berlin. C.C. Konijnendijk, K. Nilsson, T.B. Randrup, J. Schipperijn (Eds.).
12. Hartig T., Staats H. The need for psychological restoration as a determinant of ecological preferences. Journal of Ecological Psychology 2006, 26:215-226.
13. Hedblom M., Söderström B. Woodlands across Swedish urban gradients: status, structure and management implications. Landscape and Urban Planning 2008, 84:62-73.
14. Hladnik D., Pirnat J. Urban forestry - linking naturalness and amenity: the case of Ljubljana, Slovenia. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening 2011, 105-112.
15. Hunter I.R. What do people want from urban forestry? - The European experience. Urban Ecosystems 2003, 5:277-284.
16. Kant S., Lee S. A social choice approach to sustainable forest management: an analysis of multiple forest values in Northwestern Ontario. Forest Policy and Economics 2004, 6:215-227.
17. Kaplan R., Kaplan S. The Experience of Nature: A Psychological Perspective 1989, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
18. Konijnendijk C.C. Adapting forestry to urban demands - role of communication in urban forestry in Europe. Landscape and Urban Planning 2000, 52:89-100.
19. Konijnendijk C.C A decade of urban forestry in Europe. Forest Policy and Economics 2003, 5:175-186.
20. Konijnendijk C.C., Nilsson K., Randrup T.B., Schipperijn J. Urban Forests and Trees. A Reference Book 2005, Springer, Berlin.
21. Lindhagen A., Hörnsten L. Forest recreation in 1977 and 1997 in Sweden: changes in public preferences and behaviour. Forestry 2000, 73:143-153.
22. Lindkvist A., Mineur E., Nordlund A., Nordlund C., Olsson O., Sandström C., Westin K. Konflikt och konsensus: Intensivodling av skog ur ett humanistiskt och samhällsvetenskapligt perspektiv 2009, Faktaunderlag till MINT-utredningen[[nl]]Facts to the MINT-investigation. SLU[[nl]]SLU Department of Forest Resource Management Rapport[[nl]]Report, (in Swedish).
23. Lundmark, L., 2006. Restructuring and employment change in sparsely populated areas: examples from northern Sweden and Finland. Ph.D. Thesis. Department of Social and Economic Geography, Umeå University, Umeå.
24. Manning R., Valliere W., Minteer B. Values, ethics, and attitudes toward national forest management. Ethics, Place and Environment 1999, 3:47-60.
25. McFarlane B.L., Boxall P.C. Factors influencing forest values and attitudes of two stakeholder groups: the case of the Foothills Model Forest, Alberta, Canada. Society and Natural Resources 2000, 13:649-661.
26. McFarlane B.L., Boxall P.C. The role of social psychological and social structural variables in environmental activism: an example of the forest sector. Journal of Environmental Psychology 2003, 23:79-87.
27. Nordlund A., Westin K. Forest values and forest management attitudes among private forest owners in Sweden. Forests 2011, 2:30-50.
28. Real E., Arce C., Sabucedo J.M. Classification of landscapes using quantitative and categorical data, and prediction of their scenic beauty in north-western Spain. Journal of Environmental Psychology 2000, 20:355-373.
29. Roovers P., Hermy M., Gulinck H. Visitor profile, perceptions and expectations in forests from a gradient of increasing urbanization in central Belgium. Landscape and Urban Planning 2002, 59:129-145.
30. Rydberg D. Skogens sociala värden: Skogsvårdsorganisationens utvärdering av skogspolitikens effekter 2001, SUS 2001 Skogsstyrelsen[[nl]]The Swedish Forest Agency.
31. Rydberg D., Falck J. Urban forestry in Sweden from a silvicultural perspective: a review. Landscape and Urban Planning 2000, 47:1-18.
32. Schwartz S.H Universals in the content and structure of values: theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology 1992, 25:1-65.
33. Schwartz S.H. Are there universal aspects in the structure and contents of human values?. Journal of Social Issues 1994, 50:19-45.
34. Staats H., Gatersleben B., Hartig T. Change in mood as a function of environmental design. Arousal and pleasure on a simulated forest hike. Journal of Environmental Psychology 1997, 17:283-300.
35. Statistics Sweden Tätorter 2005, Retrieved from http://www.scb.se/statistik/MI/MI0810/2005A01/MI0810_2005A01_SM_MI38SM0601.pdf.
36. Statistics Sweden Tätorter - befolkning och bebyggelsestruktur 2008, Retrieved from http://www.scb.se/statistik/MI/MI0810/2005A03A/MI0810_2005A03A_SM_MI38SM0701.pdf (in Swedish).
37. Statistics Sweden Inrikes omflyttning 2010, Retrieved from http://www.scb.se/Statistik/BE/BE0101/2010A01L/Inrikes_omflyttning.pdf (in Swedish).
38. Stern P.C., Dietz T., Kalof L., Guagnano G.A. Values, beliefs, and proenvironmental action: attitude formation toward emergent attitude objects. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 1995, 25:1611-1636.
39. Swedish Forest Agency Nationella Skogliga Sektorsmål 2005, Retrieved from http://www. skogsstyrelsen.se/Global/myndigheten/Miljo-%20och%20sektorsmal/Skogliga%20sektorsm%C3%A5l%202005.pdf (in Swedish).
40. Swedish Forest Agency Tätortsnära skog 2010, Retrieved from http://www.skogsstyrelsen.se/Upptack-skogen/Upplev-skogen/Skog-nara-dig/Tatortsnara-skog/ (in Swedish).
41. Tahvanainen L., Tyrväinen L., Ihalainen M., Vuorela N., Kolehmainen O. Forest management and public perceptions - visual versus verbal information. Landscape and Urban Planning 2001, 53:53-70.
42. Tarrant M.A., Cordell H.K. Environmental assessment. Amenity values of public and private forests: examining the value-attitude relationship. Environmental Management 2002, 30:692-703.
43. Tyrväinen L., Pauleit S., Seeland K., de Vries S. Benefits and uses of urban forests and trees. Urban Forests and Trees. A Reference Book 2005, 81-114. Springer, Berlin. C.C. Konijnendijk, K. Nilsson, T.B. Randrup, J. Schipperijn (Eds.).
44. United Nations Statistics Division Definition of " urban" 2005, Retrieved from http://unstats.un.org/unsd/demographic/sconcerns/densurb/Defintion_of%20Urban.pdf.
45. Van Herzele, A., 2005. A tree on your doorstep, a forest in your mind: greenspace planning at the interplay between discourse, physical conditions, and practice. Ph.D. Thesis. Wageningen Universiteit, Wageningen.
46. Vaske J.J., Donnelly M.P., Williams D.R., Jonker S. Demographic influences on environmental value orientations and normative beliefs about national forest management. Society and Natural Resources 2001, 14:761-776.
47. Westphal L.M. Urban greening and social benefits - a study of empowerment outcomes. Journal of Arboriculture 2003, 23:137-147.