Benefits and uses of urban forests and trees

Urban Forests and Trees: A Reference Book

Volumn , Issue , 2005, Pages 81-114

  Tyrväinen, Liisa ^a   Pauleit, Stephan ^b   Seeland, Klaus ^c   De Vries, Sjerp ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HELSINKI   (Finland)

^b DANISH FOREST LANDSCAPE RES INST   (Denmark)

^c SWISS FEDERAL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Switzerland)

^d WAGENINGEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84860900222     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1007/3-540-27684-X_5     Document Type: Chapter

References (86)

1. Ashcroft P (2002) Case study: walking the way to health initiative. Summary of papers of the National Conference Green space and healthy living, 14 May 2002, Manchester. National Urban Forestry Unit (NUFU), Wolverhampton
2. Axelsson-Lindgren C (1995) Forest aesthetics. In: Hytönen M (ed) Multiple-use forestry in the Nordic countries. METLA, The Finnish Forest Research Institute, pp 279-294
3. Barker G (1997) A framework for the future: green networks with multiple uses in and around towns and cities. English Nature Research Report No. 256. English Nature, Peterborough
4. Beckett KP, Freer-Smith PH, Taylor G (1998) Urban woodlands: their role in reducing the effects of particulate pollution. Environ Pollut 99:347-360
5. Bell S (1999) Landscape. Pattern, perception and process. Spon, London
6. Brahe P (1974) Klimatische Auswirkungen von Gehölzen auf unbebaute Stadtplätze (Climatic impacts of woody vegetation on non-built city squares). Gartenamt 23(2):61-70, (in German)
7. Burkhardt I, Duhme F (1996) Ökologische Bausteine Messestadt-Riem. Teil I - Stadtplanung (Ecological building stones Messestadt-Riem. Part I - City planning). Referat für Bauordnung und Stadtplanung, LH München, (in German)
8. CITYgreen (2003) http://www.americanforests.org/productsandpubs/ citygreen/(last accessed July 2004)
9. Coles RW, Bussey SC (2000) Urban forest landscapes in the UK - Progressing the social agenda. Landscape Urban Plan 52:181-188
10. Däßler HG (1991) Einfluß von Luftverunreinigungen auf die Vegetation (Influence of air pollution on vegetation). Gustav Fischer, Jena, (in German)
11. Daniel TC, Vining J (1983) Methodological issues in the assessment of landscape quality. In: Altman I, Wohlwill JF (eds) Behavior and the natural environment (human behavior and environment, Vol. 6). Plenum Press, New York NY, pp 39-84
12. Dawson D (1994) Are habitat corridors conduits for animals and plants in a fragmented landscape? A review of the scientific evidence. English Nature Research Report No. 94. English Nature, Peterborough
13. De Vries S (2000). Regional differences in the demand for and supply of nature-based recreation within The Netherlands. In: Krishnapillay, B, et al. (eds) Forests and Soiety: the role of research. Proceedings of the XXI IUFRO World Congress 2000, Malaysia, 7-12 August. IUFRO/FRIM, Vienna/Kuala Lumpur, Vol. 1, pp 453-464
14. De Vries S, Goossen M (2002) Modelling recreational visits to forests and nature areas. Urban For Urban Green 1(1):5-15
15. De Vries S, Verheij R, Groenewegen P, Spreeuwenberg P (2003). Natural environments, healthy environments? An exploratory analysis of the relationship between nature and health. Environ Plann A A 35(10):1717-1731
16. Duhme F, Pauleit S (1992) Naturschutzprogramm für München. Landschaftsökologisches Rahmenkonzept (Nature protection programme for Munich. Landscape ecological frame concept). Georgrapische Rundschau 44(10):554-561, (in German)
17. Eliasson I (2000) The use of climate knowledge in urban planning. Landscape Urban Plan 48:31-44
18. Elsasser P (1996) der Erholungwert des Waldes: Monetare Bewertung der Erholungsleistung ausgewählter Wälder in Deutchland (The recreational value of forests: Monetary valuation of the recreational performance of selected forests in Germany). Schriften zur Forstökonomie Bd. 11. Sauerländer, Frankfurt am Main, (in German)
19. Forrest M, Konijnendijk CC, Randrup TB (eds) (1999) COST Action E12 - research and development in urban forestry in Europe. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg
20. Freer-Smith PH, Broadmeadow M S J (1996) Urban woodland and the benefits for local air quality. Arboriculture Advisory and Information Service Research Note, Farnham
21. German-Chiari C, Seeland K (2004) Are urban green spaces optimally distributed to act as places for social integration? Results of a geographical information system (GIS) approach for urban forestry research. For Policy Econ 6(1):3-13
22. Gilbert OL (1989) The ecology of urban habitats. Chapmann and Hall, London and New York
23. Givoni B (1991) Impact of planted areas on urban environmental quality: a review. Atmos Environ B-Urb 25(3):289-299
24. Grahn P (1997) Lekar i skog ger barn identitet (Plays in the forest gives the child identity). Skog & Forskning 1:52-57, (in Swedish)
25. Grahn P, Stigsdotter U (2003) Landscape planning and stress. Urban For Urban Green 2(1):1-18
26. Hartig T, Böök A, Garvill J, Olsson T, Gärling T (1996). Environmental influences on psychological restoration. Scand J Psychol 37:378-393
27. Jensen FS (1995) Forest recreation. In: Hytönen M (ed) Multiple-use forestry in the Nordic countries. METLA, The Finnish Forest Research Institute, Helsinki, pp 245-278
28. Jensen FS (1999) Forest recreation in Denmark from the 1970s to the 1990s. The Research Series No. 26. Danish Forest and Landscape Research Institute, Hørsholm
29. Jókövi EM (2000). Vrijetijdsbesteding van allochtonen en autochtonen in de openbare ruimte. Een onderzoek naar de relatie met sociaal-economische en etnisch-culturele kenmerken (Immigrant leisure time spending in public space. A study of the relation with socio-economic and ethnic-cultural characteristics). Alterra-rapport 295. Alterra, Wageningen, (in Dutch)
30. Kaplan R, Kaplan S (1989) The experience of nature - a psychological perspective. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
31. Karjalainen E, Tyrväinen L (2002) Visualisation in landscape preference research: a review of Finnish forest visualization systems. Landscape Urban Plan 885:1-16
32. Kuttler W (1993) Stadtklima. In: Sukopp H, Wittig R (eds) Stadtökologie (urban ecology). G. Fischer Verlag, Stuttgart, pp 113-153, (in German)
33. Kweon BC, Sullivan WC, Wiley AR (1998) Green common spaces and the social integration of inner city older adults. Environ Behav 30(6):832-858
34. Lothian A (1999) Landscape and the philosophy of aesthetics: is landscape quality inherent in the landscape or in the eye of the beholder? Landscape Urban Plan 44:177-198
35. Lucas O W R (1991) The design of forest landscapes. Forestry Commission, Oxford University Press, Oxford
36. Luttik J (2000) The value of trees, water and open space as reflected by house prices in The Netherlands. Landscape Urban Plan 48:161-167
37. Manning WJ, Feder WA (1980) Biomonitoring air pollutants with plants. Applied Science Publishers, London
38. th symposium on the urban environment, AMS, pp 172-173, available from http://www.mif.uni-freiburg.de/matzarakis/papers/ norfolk-rayman.pdf (last accessed July 2004)
39. Mayer H (1990) Human-biometeorologische Bewertung des Stadtklimas (Human-biometeorological valuation of the city climate). In: Verein Deutscher Ingenieure, VDI-Kommission Reinhaltung der Luft (ed) Umweltmeteorologie. VDI-Schriftenreihe 15, pp 87-104, (in German)
40. Mayer H, Matzarakis A (2003) Human-biometeorological assessment of the urban climate: methods, results, deficiencies. In: Klysik K, Oke TR, Fortuniak K, Grimmond CSB, Wibig J (eds) Proceedings, 5th International Conference on Urban Climate (ICUC 5), 1-5 September 2003, Lodz, Poland, Vol. 2. International Association of Urban Climate/World Meteorological Society/University of Lodz, Lodz etc., pp 87-90
41. McPherson EG (1994) Energy-saving potential of trees in Chicago. In: McPherson EG, Nowak DL, Rowntree RA (eds) Chicago's urban forest ecosystem: results of the Chicago Urban Forest Climate Project. USDA Forest Service General Technical Report NE-186. Radnor, Pennsylvania, pp 95-114
42. McPherson EG (1998) Atmospheric carbon dioxide reduction by Sacramento's urban forest. J Arboriculture 24(4):215-223
43. McPherson EG, Simpson JR (2002) A comparison of municipal forest benefits and costs in Modesto and Santa Monica, California, USA. Urban For Urban Green 2(1):61-74
44. Mitchell RC, Carson RT (1989) Using surveys to value public goods: the contingent valuation method. Resources for the Future, Washington
45. Nachbarschaftsverband Stuttgart (1992) Klimaatlas. Klimauntersuchung fur den Nachbarschaftsverband Stuttgart und angrenzende Teile der Region Stuttgart (Climate atlas. Climate research for the Nachschaftsverband Stuttgart and adjoining parts of the Region Stuttgart). Stuttgart, (in German)
46. Nowak DJ (1994) Air pollution removal by Chicago's urban forest. In: McPherson EG, Nowak DJ, Rowntree RA (eds) Chicago's urban forest ecosystem: results of the Chicago Urban Forest Climate Project. USDA Forest Service General Technical Report NE-186, Radnor PA, pp 63-81
47. Nowak DJ, Crane DE, Stevens JC, Ibarra M (2002) Brooklyn's urban forest. United States Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, North-eastern Forest Experiment Station, General Technical Report NE-290, Radnor PA
48. NUFU (1999) Trees and healthy living. Proceedings of National Conference, Wolverhampton, UK, 17 November 1999. National Urban Forestry Unit, Wolverhampton
49. NUFU (2002) Summary of papers of the National Conference Greenspace and Healthy Living, 14 May 2002, Manchester. National Urban Forestry Unit, Wolverhampton
50. Ode Å, Fry G (2002) Visual aspects in urban woodland management. Urban For Urban Green 1:15-24
51. Oke TR (1989) The micrometeorology of the urban forest. Philos T Roy Soc B 324(1223):335-349
52. Palmquist RB (1991) Hedonic methods. In: Braden JB, Kolstad CD (eds) Measuring the demand for environmental quality. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 77-120
53. Parsons R, Tassinary LG, Ulrich RS, Hebl MR, Grossman-Alexander M (1998) The view from the road: implications for stress recovery and immunization. J Environ Psychol 18:113-140
54. Pauleit S, Duhme F (2000a) Assessing the environmental performance of land cover types for urban planning. J Landscape Urban Plan 52(1):1-20
55. Pauleit S, Duhme F (2000b) GIS assessment of Munich's urban forest structure for urban planning. J Arboriculture 26(3):133-141
56. Perry D, Handley JF (2000) The potential for woodland on urban and industrial wasteland in England and Wales. Forestry Commission Technical Paper 29. Forestry Commission, Edinburgh
57. Peterken GF (1974) A method for assessing woodland flora for conservation using indicator species. Biol Conserv 6:239-245
58. th century. The art of walking - The place of the walk in the city and its surroundings). A. Colin, Paris, (in French)
59. Pouta E, Sievänen T (2001). Luonnon virkistyskäytön kysyntätutkimuksen tulokset - Kuinka suomalaiset ulkoilevat? (Results of a demand study on outdoor recreation.) In: Sievänen T (ed) Luonnon virkistyskäyttö 2000. Summary: Outdoor recreation 2000. Finnish Forest Research Institute, Research papers 802:32-76, 195-196
60. Randrup TB, Paulsen L, Holgersen S (2003) VAT 03 - Værdisæ tning af træer I byrum, have, park og landskab (Monetary valuation of trees in urban space, garden, park and landscape). Forlaget Grønt Miljø, Frederiksberg, (in Danish)
61. Robinette C (1972) Plants, people and environmental quality. Department of the Interior. National Park Service, Washington DC
62. Ribe RG (1989) The aesthetics of forestry: What has empirical preference research taught us? Environ manage 13(1):55-74
63. Schmithüsen F, Kazemi Y, Seeland K (1997) Perceptions and attitudes of the population towards forests and their social benefits. Social origins and research topics of studies conducted in Germany, Austria and Switzerland between 1960 and 1995. IUFRO Occasional Paper 7. IUFRO, Vienna
64. Scrinzi GJ, Tosi V, Agatea P, Flamminj T (1995) Gli Italiani e il bosco; coordinate quali-quantitative dell'utenza turistica in Italia (Italians and the wood. The forest recreantion demand in Italy). Comunicazioni di Ricerca ISAFA 95/1, Trento, (in Italian)
65. Seeland K, Moser K, Scheuthle H, Kaiser FG (2002) Public acceptance of restrictions imposed on recreati-onal activities in the peri-urban nature reserve Sihlwald, Switzerland. Urban For Urban Green 1(1):49-57
66. Sievänen T, De Vries S, Scrinzi G, Floris A (2000) The recreational function of European forests. In: Forests and society: the role of research, proceedings of the XXI IUFRO World Congress 2000, Malaysia, 7-12 August. Vol. 1, Sub-plenary sessions. IUFRO/FRIM, Vienna/Kuala Lumpur, pp 453-463
67. Silva MA (1996) La signification de l'arbre pour la ville et les habitants de Genève. Une étude à l'exemple de certains arbres et des traditions genevoises et leur continuité à travers les siècles (The importance of the tree for the city and inhabitants of Geneva. A study on the example of certain trees and Geneva traditions and their continuity over time). Unpublished diploma thesis. Chair of Forest Policy and Forest Economics, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, Zurich, (in French)
68. Silvennoinen H, Pukkala T, Tahvanainen L (2002) Effect of cuttings on the scenic beauty of a tree stand. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research 17:263-273
69. Statistics Netherlands (1997) Dagrecratie 1995/1996 (Daytrips 1995/1996). Statistics Netherlands (CBS), Voorburg/Heerlen, (in Dutch)
70. Steidle-Schwahn A (2002) Das Management der Pflege kommunaler Grünflächen (Management of municipal greenspace maintenance). Eigenverlag, München, (in German)
71. Stewart H, Owen S, Donovan R, MacKenzie R, Hewitt N (2001) Trees and sustainable urban air quality. Brochure, Lancaster University and Centre for Ecology and Hydrology, Lancaster
72. Sukopp H, Wittig R (eds) (1993) Stadtökologie (Urban ecology). G. Fischer Verlag, Stuttgart, (in German)
73. Turner K, Pearce D, Bateman I (1994) Environmental economics. An elementary introduction. Harvester, Wheatsheaf
74. Tyrväinen L (1999) Monetary valuation of urban forest amenities in Finland. Academic dissertation. Finnish Forest Research Institute, Research papers 739. Finnish Forest Research Institute, Vantaa
75. Tyrväinen L (2001) Use and valuation of urban forest amenities in Finland. J Environ manage 62:75-92
76. Tyrväinen L, Miettinen A (2000) Property prices and urban forest amenities. J Environ Econ Manag 39(2):205-223
77. Tyrväinen L, Väänänen, H (1998). The economic value of urban forest amenities: an application of the Contingent Valuation Method. Landscape Urban Plan 43:105-118
78. Tyrväinen L, Silvennoinen H, Kolehmainen O (2003) Can ecological and aesthetic values be combined in urban forest management? Urban For Urban Green 1(3):135-149
79. Ulrich RS, Simons RF, Losito BD, Fiorito E, Miles MA, Zelson M (1991) Stress recovery during exposure to natural and urban environments. J Environ Psychol 11:201-230
80. Van Der Zande AN, Berkhuizen JC, Van Latesteijn HC, Ter Keurs WJ, Poppelaars AC (1984) Impact of ourdoor recreation on the density of a number of breeding bird species in woods adjacent to urban residential areas. Biol Conserv 30(1):1-39
81. Van Dorp D, Opdam P F D (1987) Effects of patch size, isolation and regional abundance on forest bird communities. Landscape Ecol 1:59-73
82. Van Herzele A, Wiedemann T (2003). A monitoring tool for the provision of accessible and attractive urban green spaces. Landscape Urban Plan 63:109-126
83. Whitford V, Handley J, Ennos R (2001) City form and natural process - Indicators for the ecological performance of urban areas. Landscape Urban Plan 57:91-103
84. Willaert D (1999) Stadsvlucht of verstedelijking? Een analyse van migratiebewegingen in België (Urban espace or urbanisation? Analysis of migration flows in Belgium). Planologisch Nieuws 19:109-126, (in Dutch)
85. Xiao Q, McPherson EG, Ustin SL, Grismer ME, Simpson JR (2000) Winter rainfall interception by two mature open-grown trees in Davis, California. Hydrol Process 14:763-784
86. Zube EH, Sell JL, Taylor JG (1982). Landscape perception: research, application and theory. Landscape Plan 9:1-33