Classification of landscapes using quantitative and categorical data, and prediction of their scenic beauty in north-western Spain

Journal of Environmental Psychology

Volumn 20, Issue 4, 2000, Pages 355-373

  Real, Eulogio ^a   Arce, Constantino ^a   Sabucedo, José Manuel ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SANTIAGO DE COMPOSTELA   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0346676612     PISSN: 02724944     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1006/jevp.2000.0184     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. Appleton, J. (1988). Prospects and refuges revisited. In J. L. Nasar, (Ed.), Environmental Aesthetics. Theory, Research and Applications. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 27-44.
2. Benzecri, J.P. (1973). L'Analyse des Données, Tomo II, L'Analyse des Correspondences. París: Dunod.
3. Buhyoff, G. J. & Wellman, J. D. (1980). The specification of a non-linear psychophysical function for visual landscape dimensions. Journal of Leisure Research, 12, 257-272.
4. Carroll, J. D. (1972). Individual differences and multidimensional scaling. In R. N. Shepard, A. K. Romney & S. Nerlove, (Eds), Multidimensional Scaling: Theory and Applications in the Social Sciences, Vol. I: Theory. New York: Seminaar Press, pp. 105-155.
5. Carroll, J. D. (1980). Model and methods for multidimensional scaling of preferential choice (or other dominance data). In E. D. Lantermann & H. Feger, (Eds), Similarity and Choice. Vienna: Hans Huber, pp. 234-289.
6. Craik, K. H. (1983). The psychology of the large-scale environment. In N. R. Feimer & E. S. Geller, (Eds), Environmental Psychology: Directions and Perspectives. New York: Praeger, pp. 67-105.
7. Daniel, T. C. & Boster, R. S. (1976). Measuring Landscape Aesthetics: The Scenic Beauty Method (USDA Forest Service Research Paper RM-167), Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Fort Collins, CO.
8. Daniel, T. C. & Vining, J. (1983). Methodological issues in the assessment of landscape quality. In I. Altman & J. F. Wohlwill, (Eds), Human Behaviour and Environment, Vol. 6: Behaviour and the Natural Environment. New York: Plenum Press, pp. 39-84.
9. Feimer, N. R. (1984). Environmental perception: the effects of media, evaluative context, and observer sample. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 4, 61-80.
10. Gifi, A. (1981). Nonlinear Multivariate Analysis. Leiden: Department of Data Theory.
11. Hartig, T., Mang, M. & Evans, G. W. (1991). Restorative effects of natural environment experiences. Environment and Behavior, 23, 3-26.
12. Herzog, T. R. (1985). A cognitive analysis of preference for waterscapes. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 5, 225-241.
13. Herzog, T. R. (1989). A cognitive analysis of preference for urban nature. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 9, 27-43.
14. Herzog, T. R. & Bosley P. J. (1992). Tranquility and preference as affective qualities of natural environments. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 12, 115-127.
15. Hodgson, R. W. & Thayer, R. L. (1980). Implied human influence reduces landscape quality. Landscape Planning, 7, 171-179.
16. Holland, B. S. & DiPonzio, M. (1988). Improved Bonferroni-type multiple-testing procedures. Psychological Bulletin, 104, 145-149.
17. Hull, R. B. & Buhyoff, G. J. (1983). Distance and scenic beauty. A nonmonotonic relationship. Environment and Behavior, 15, 77-81.
18. Hull, R. B. & Revell, G. B. R. (1989). Cross-cultural comparison of landscape scenic beauty evaluations: a case study in Bali. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 9, 177-191.
19. Johnson, S. (1967). Hierarchical clustering schemes. Psychometrika, 38, 241-254.
20. Kaplan, R. (1977). Patterns of environmental preference. Environment and Behavior, 9, 195-215.
21. Kaplan, S. (1977). Participation in the design process: a cognitive approach. In D. Stokols, (Ed.), Perspectives on Environment and Behavior. Theory, Research and Applications. New York: Plenum Press, pp. 221-234.
22. Kaplan, S. (1983). A model of person-environment compatibility. Environment and Behavior, 15, 311-332.
23. Kaplan, S. (1987). Aesthetics, affect and cognition. Environmental preference from an evolutionary perspective. Environment and Behavior, 19, 3-32.
24. Kaplan, S. (1988a). Perception and landscape: conceptions and misconceptions. In J. L. Nasar, (Ed.), Environmental Aesthetics. Theory, Research and Applications. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 45-55.
25. Kaplan, S. (1988b). Where cognition and affect meet: a theoretical analysis of preference. In J. L. Nasar, (Ed.), Environmental Aesthetics. Theory, Research and Applications. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 56-63.
26. Knopf, R. C. (1987). Human behavior, cognition and affect in the natural environment. In D. Stokols & I. Altman, (Eds), Handbook of Environmental Psychology. New York: Wiley pp. 783-825.
27. Kruskal, J. B. (1964a). Multidimensional scaling by optimizing goodness of fit to a nonmetric hypothesis. Psychometrika, 29, 1-27.
28. Kruskal, J. B. (19646). Nonmetric multidimensional scaling: a numerical method. Psychometrika, 29, 115-129
29. Kruskal, J. B., Young, F. W. & Seery J. B. (1973). How to Use KYST, a Very Flexible Program to do Multidimensional Scaling and Unfolding. Murray Hill, NJ: AT&T Bell Laboratories.
30. Kuusinen, J. (1969). Affective and denotative structures of personality ratings. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 17, 181-188.
31. McKechnie, G. E. (1974). ERI Manual: Environmental Response Inventory. Berkeley, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
32. Mehrabian, A. & Russell, J. A. (1974). An Approach to Environmental Psychology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
33. Miron, M. S. (1969). What is it being differentiated by the semantic differential? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 12, 189-193.
34. Orland, B. (1988). Aesthetic preference for rural landscapes: some resident and visitor differences. In J. L. Nasar, (Ed.), Environmental Aesthetics, Theory, Research and Applications. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 364-378.
35. Osgood, C. E. (1969). On the whys and therefores of E., P. and A. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 12, 149-199.
36. Osgood, C. E., Suci, G. J. & Tannenbaum, P. H. (1957). The Measurement of Meaning. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
37. Pitt, D. G. & Zube, E. H. (1987). Management of natural environments. In D. Stokols, & I. Altman, (Eds), Handbook of Environmental Psychology. New York: Wiley, pp. 1009-1051.
38. Purcell, A. T., Lamb, R. J., Mainardi Peron, E. & Falchero, S. (1994). Preference or preferences for landscape? Journal of Environmental Psychology, 14, 195-209.
39. Ruddell, E. J., Gramann, J. H., Rudis, V. A. & Westphal, J. M. (1989). The psychological utility of visual penetration in near-view forest scenic-beauty models. Environment and Behavior, 21, 393-412.
40. Russell, J. A. (1988). Affective appraisals of environments. In J. L. Nasar, (Ed.), Environmental Aesthetics. Theory, Research and Applications. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 120-132.
41. Scott, M. J. & Canter, D. V. (1997). Picture or place? A multiple sorting study of landscape. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 17, 263-281.
42. Shafer, E. L., Hamilton, S. F. & Schmidt, E. A. (1969). Natural landscape preferences: a predictive model. Journal of Leisure Research, 1, 1-19.
43. Shepard, R. N. (1962). The analysis of proximities: Multidimensional scaling with an unknown distance function. Psychometrika, 27, 125-139, 219-246.
44. Sonnenfeld, J. (1969). Personality and behavior in environment. Proceedings of the Association of American Geographers, 1, 136-140.
45. Stewart, T. R., Middleton, P., Downtown, M. & Ely, D. (1984). Judgments of photographs vs. field observations in studies of perception and judgment of the visual environment. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 4, 283-302.
46. Stokols, D. (1978). Environmental psychology. Annual Review of Psychology, 29, 253-295.
47. Sundstrom, E., Bell, P. A., Busby, P. L. & Asmus, C. (1996). Environmental psychology. Annual Review of Psychology, 47, 485-512.
48. Taylor, J. G., Zube, E. H. & Sell, J. L. (1990). Landscape assessment and perception research methods. In R. B. Betchel, R. W. Marans & W. Michelson, (Eds), Methods in Environmental and Behavioral Research. Malabar, FL: Krieger, pp. 361-393.
49. Ulrich, R. S. (1981). Natural versus urban scenes. Some psychophysiological effects. Environment and Behavior, 13, 523-556.
50. Ulrich, R. S. (1983). Aesthetic and affective response to the natural environment. In I. Altman & J. F. Wohlwill, (Eds), Human Behavior and Environment, Vol. 6: Behavior and the Natural Environment. New York: Plenum Press, pp. 85-125.
51. Ulrich, R. S. (1984). View through a window may influence recovery from surgery. Science, 224, 420-421.
52. Ulrich, R. S. & Simons, R. F., Losito, B. D., Fiorito, E., Miles, M. A. & Zelson, M. (1991). Stress recovering during exposure to natural and urban environments. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 11, 201-230.
53. Uzzell, D. (1989). People, Nature and Landscape. An Environmental Psychological Perspective. Landscape Research Group Report. University of Surrey.
54. Wohlwill, J. F. (1976). Environmental aesthetics: the environment as a source of affect. In I. Altman & J. F. Wohlwill, (Eds), Human Behavior and the Environment, Vol. 1. New York: Plenum, pp. 37-86.
55. Yang, B. & Brown, T. C. (1992). A cross-cultural comparison of preferences for landscape styles and landscape elements. Environment and Behavior, 24, 471-507.
56. Zube, E. H., Pitt, D. G. & Anderson, T. W. (1975). Perception and prediction of scenic resource values of the Northeast. In E. H. Zube, R. O. Brush & J. G. Fabos, (Eds), Landscape Assessment: Values, Perceptions and Resources. Stroudsburg, PA: Dowden, Hutchinson and Ross, pp. 151-167.