Developing the standardized wound care documentation model: A delphi study to improve the quality of patient care documentation

Journal of Wound, Ostomy and Continence Nursing

Volumn 39, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 397-407

  Kinnunen, Ulla Mari ^a   Saranto, Kaija ^a   Ensio, Anneli ^a   Iivanainen, Ansa ^b   Dykes, Patricia ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF EASTERN FINLAND   (Finland)

^b Faculty of Medicine   (Finland)

^c BRIGHAM AND WOMEN S HOSPITAL   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; DELPHI STUDY; DOCUMENTATION; ELECTRONIC MEDICAL RECORD; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HUMAN; INJURY; NURSING; STANDARD; VALIDATION STUDY;

DELPHI TECHNIQUE; DOCUMENTATION; ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORDS; HUMANS; QUALITY OF HEALTH CARE; WOUNDS AND INJURIES;

EID: 84863780112     PISSN: 10715754     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/WON.0b013e318259c45b     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Waneka R, Spetz J. Hospital information technology systems' impact on nurses and nursing care. J Nurs Adm. 2010;40(12): 509-514.
2. Saranto K, Kinnunen U. Evaluating nursing documentation- research designs and methods: Systematic review. J Adv Nurs. 2009;65(3):464-476.
3. Kinnunen UM, Saranto K, Miettinen M. Effects of terminology based documentation on nursing. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2009;146:332-336.
4. Clancy TR, Delaney CW, Morrison B, Gunn JK. The benefits of standardized nursing languages in complex adaptive systems such as hospitals. J Nurs Adm. 2006;36(9):426-434. (Pubitemid 44401227)
5. Keenan G. Standardized nursing terminologies can transform practice. J Nurs Adm. 2008;38(3):103-106.
6. Jefferies D, Johnson M, Griffiths R. A meta-study of the essentials of quality nursing documentation. Int J Nurs Pract. 2010;16(2):112-124.
7. Brown G. Wound documentation: Managing risk. Adv Skin Wound Care. 2006;19(3):155-165, quiz 165-167.
8. Saba VK, Taylor SL. Moving past theory: Use of a standardized, coded nursing terminology to enhance nursing visibility. Comput Inform Nurs. 2007;25(6):324-331; quiz 32-33.
9. Häyrinen K, Lammintakanen J, Saranto K. Evaluation of electronic nursing documentation-Nursing process model and standardized terminologies as keys to visible and transparent nursing. Int J Med Inf. 2010;79:554-564.
10. Müller-Staub M, Needham I, Odenbreit M, Lavin MA, van Achterberg T. Improved quality of nursing documentation: Results of a nursing diagnoses, interventions, and outcomes implementation study. Int J Nurs Terminol Classif. 2007;18(1):5-17.
11. Kinnunen UM, Saranto K, Ensio A. Developing electronic wound care documentation [in Finnish]. J Nurs Sci. 2008;2(20): 70-81.
12. Keast DH, Bowering CK, Evans AW, Mackean GL, Burrows C, D'Souza L. MEASURE: A proposed assessment framework for developing best practice recommendations for wound assessment. Wound Repair Regen. 2004;12(3)(suppl):S1- S17. (Pubitemid 38880432)
13. Gunningberg L, Ehrenberg A. Accuracy and quality in the nursing documentation of pressure ulcers: A comparison of record content and patient examination. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs. 2004;31(6):328-335.
14. Törnvall E, Wilhelmsson S. Nursing documentation for communicating and evaluating care. J Clin Nurs. 2008;17(16):2116-2124.
15. Zeleznik J, Agard-Henriques B, Schnebel B, Smith DL. Terminology used by different health care providers to document skin ulcers: The blind men and the elephant. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs. 2003;30(6):324-333. (Pubitemid 37373756)
16. Ehrenberg A, Birgersson C. Nursing documentation of leg ulcers: Adherence to clinical guidelines in a Swedish primary health care district. Scand J Caring Sci. 2003;17(3):278-284. (Pubitemid 41724462)
17. Törnvall E, Wahren LK, Wilhelmsson S. Advancing nursing documentation-an intervention study using patients with leg ulcer as an example. Int J Med Inform. 2009;78(9):605-617.
18. Saba VK. Clinical Care Classification (CCC) System Manual: A Guide to Nursing Documentation. New York: Springer Publishing Company; 2006.
19. Saba VK. Clinical care classification (CCC) system. 2004-2011. http://www.sabacare.com. Accessed November 15, 2011.
20. Tanttu K, Rusi R. Nursing Documentation project in Finland: Developing a nationally standardized electronic nursing documentation model by 2007. In Oud N, Sheerin F, Ehnfors M and Sermeus W. Nursing Communication in Multidisciplinary Practice. Proceedings of the 6th ACENDIO Conference in Amsterdam in The Netherlands: 213-217; 2007. Oud Consultancy & Conference Management, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
21. Saranto K, Tallberg M. Enhancing evidence-based practice-a controlled vocabulary for nursing practice and research. Int J Med Inform. 2003;70(2/3):249-253. (Pubitemid 36959715)
22. Junttila K, Salanterä S, Hupli M. Developing terminology for documenting perioperative nursing interventions. Int J Med Inf. 2005;74(6):461-471. (Pubitemid 40840788)
23. Tiusanen TS, Junttila K, Leinonen T, Salantera S. The validation of AORN recommended practices in Finnish perioperative nursing documentation. AORN J. 2010;91(2):236-247.
24. Powell C. The Delphi technique: Myths and realities. J Adv Nurs. 2003;41(4):376-382. (Pubitemid 37255969)
25. Burns N, Grove SK, eds. The Practice of Nursing Research. Conduct, Critique and Utilization. Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier Saunders; 2005.
26. Baker J, Lovell K, Harris N. How expert are the experts? An exploration of the concept of "expert" within Delphi panel techniques. Nurse Res. 2006;14(1):59-70.
27. Kennedy HP. Methodological issues in nursing research. Enhancing Delphi research: Methods and results. J Adv Nurs. 2004;45(5):504-511. (Pubitemid 38368266)
28. Thompson M. Considering the implication of variations within Delphi research. Fam Pract. 2009;26(5):420-424.
29. Polit DF, Beck CT, Owen SV. Is the CVI an acceptable indicator of content validity? Appraisal and recommendations. Res Nurs Health. 2007;30(4):459-467.
30. Finnish Medical Society Duodecim/Current Care. Finnish current care guidelines. http://www.kaypahoito.fi/web/english/ home. Accessed June 15, 2011.
31. European Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel and National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel. Treatment of Pressure Ulcers: Quick Reference Guide. Washington, DC: National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel; 2009. http://www.epuap.org/ guidelines/Final-Quick-Treatment.pdf. Accessed June 15 , 2011.
32. Lavery LA, Armstrong DG, Harkless LB. Classification of diabetic foot wounds. J Foot Ankle Surg. 1996;35(6):528-531. (Pubitemid 27023854)