Spatial controls for growth zone formation during the fission yeast cell cycle

Yeast

Volumn 25, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 59-69

  Csikász Nagy, Attila ^a,b   Gyorffy, Béla ^a   Alt, Wolfgang ^c   Tyson, John J ^d   Novák, Béla ^a,e  

^a BUDAPEST UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY AND ECONOMICS   (Hungary)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TRENTO   (Italy)

^c UNIVERSITY OF BONN   (Germany)

^d VIRGINIA POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE AND STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^e UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Actin polymerization; Mathematical modelling; Microtubules; Pattern formation; Reaction diffusion convection equation

Indexed keywords

ACTIN; CYTOSKELETON PROTEIN;

ACTIN POLYMERIZATION; ARTICLE; CELL CYCLE; CELL GROWTH; CELL SHAPE; CELL SIZE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEEDBACK SYSTEM; FUNGUS GROWTH; GENETIC ANALYSIS; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; MICROTUBULE; MITOSIS; MORPHOGENESIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN ASSEMBLY; WILD TYPE; YEAST CELL;

ACTINS; CELL CYCLE; CELL POLARITY; COMPUTER SIMULATION; MICROTUBULE-ASSOCIATED PROTEINS; MICROTUBULES; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; SCHIZOSACCHAROMYCES; SCHIZOSACCHAROMYCES POMBE PROTEINS;

SCHIZOSACCHAROMYCETACEAE;

EID: 38749131207     PISSN: 0749503X     EISSN: 10970061     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/yea.1571     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Arellano M, Niccoli T, Nurse P. 2002. Tea3p is a cell end marker activating polarized growth in Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Curr Biol 12: 751-756.
2. Bahler J, Pringle Jr. 1998. Pom1p, a fission yeast protein kinase that provides positional information for both polarized growth and cytokinesis. Genes Dev 12: 1356-1370.
3. Behrens R, Nurse P. 2002. Roles of fission yeast tea1p in the localization of polarity factors and in organizing the microtubular cytoskeleton. J Cell Biol 157: 783-793.
4. Browning H, Hayles J, Mata J, et al. 2000. Tea2p is a kinesin-like protein required to generate polarized growth in fission yeast. J Cell Biol 151: 15-28.
5. Brunner D, Nurse P. 2000. CLIP170-like tip1p spatially organizes microtubular dynamics in fission yeast. Cell 102: 695-704.
6. Castagnetti S, Behrens R, Nurse P. 2005. End4/Sla2 is involved in establishment of a new growth zone in Schizosaccharomyces pombe. J Cell Sci 118: 1843-1850.
7. Castagnetti S, Novák B, Nurse P. 2007. Microtubules offset growth site from the cell centre in fission yeast. J Cell Sci 120: 2205-2213.
8. Chang F. 2001. Establishment of a cellular axis in fission yeast. Trends Genet 17: 273-278.
9. Chang F, Peter M. 2003. Yeasts make their mark. Nat Cell Biol 5: 294-299.
10. Chant J, Herskowitz I. 1991. Genetic control of bud site selection in yeast by a set of gene products that constitute a morphogenetic pathway. Cell 65: 1203-1212.
11. Crampin EJ, Hackborn WW, Maini PK. 2002. Pattern formation in reaction-diffusion models with nonuniform domain growth. Bull Math Biol 64: 747-769.
12. Dauty E, Verkman AS. 2004. Molecular crowding reduces to a similar extent the diffusion of small solutes and macromolecules: measurement by fluorescence correlation spectroscopy. J Mol Recognit 17: 441-447.
13. Feierbach B, Chang F. 2001. Roles of the fission yeast formin for3p in cell polarity, actin cable formation and symmetric cell division. Curr Biol 11: 1656-1665.
14. Feierbach B, Verde F, Chang F. 2004. Regulation of a formin complex by the microtubule plus end protein tea1p. J Cell Biol 165: 697-707.
15. Gierer A, Meinhardt H. 1972. A theory of biological pattern formation. Kybernetik 12: 30-39.
16. Glynn JM, Lustig RJ, Berlin A, Chang F. 2001. Role of bud6p and tea1p in the interaction between actin and microtubules for the establishment of cell polarity in fission yeast. Curr Biol 11: 836-845.
17. Hayles J, Nurse P. 2001. A journey into space. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2: 647-656.
18. Irazoqui JE, Lew DJ. 2004. Polarity establishment in yeast. J Cell Sci 117: 2169-2171.
19. Johnson DI. 1999. Cdc42: an essential rho-type GTPase controlling eukaryotic cell polarity. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 63: 54-105.
20. Maini PK. 1999. Some mathematical models for biological pattern formation. In On Growth and Form. Spatio-temporal Pattern Formation in Biology, Chaplain MAJ, Singh GD, McLachalan JC (eds). Wiley: Chichester, UK; 111-128.
21. Marks J, Hyams JS. 1985. Localisation of F-actin through the cell-division cycle of Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Eur J Cell Biol 39: 27-32.
22. Martin SG, Chang F. 2003. Cell polarity: a new mod(e) of anchoring. Curr Biol 13: R711-713.
23. Martin SG, McDonald WH, Yates JR III, Chang F. 2005. Tea4p links microtubule plus ends with the formin for3p in the establishment of cell polarity. Dev Cell 8: 479-491.
24. Mata J, Nurse P. 1997. tea1 and the microtubular cytoskeleton are important for generating global spatial order within the fission yeast cell. Cell 89: 939-949.
25. McGrath JL, Tardy Y, Dewey CF Jr, Meister JJ, Hartwig JH. 1998. Simultaneous measurements of actin filament turnover, filament fraction, and monomer diffusion in endothelial cells. Biophys J 75: 2070-2078.
26. Meinhardt H. 1982. Models of Biological Pattern Formation. Academic Press: New York.
27. Meinhardt H. 1995. The Algorithmic Beauty of the Sea Shells. Springer-Verlag: Berlin.
28. Meinhardt H, Gierer A. 2000. Pattern formation by local self-activation and lateral inhibition. Bioessays 22: 753-760.
29. Mitchison JM, Nurse P. 1985. Growth in cell length in the fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe. J Cell Sci 75: 357-376.
30. Murray JD. 2003. Mathematical Biology. II: Spatial Models and Biomedical Applications, 3rd edn. Springer-Verlag: Berlin.
31. Niccoli T, Arellano M, Nurse P. 2003. Role of Tea1p, Tea3p and Pom1p in the determination of cell ends in Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Yeast 20: 1349-1358.
32. Rupes I, Jia Z, Young PG. 1999. Ssp1 promotes actin depolymerization and is involved in stress response and new end take-off control in fission yeast. Mol Biol Cell 10: 1495-1510.
33. Sawin KE, Nurse P. 1998. Regulation of cell polarity by microtubules in fission yeast. J Cell Biol 142: 457-471.
34. Sawin KE, Snaith HA. 2004. Role of microtubules and tea1p in establishment and maintenance of fission yeast cell polarity. J Cell Sci 117: 689-700.
35. Segel LA, Jackson JL. 1972. Dissipative structure: an explanation and an ecological example. J Theor Biol 37: 545-559.
36. Sheu Y-J, Santos B, Fortin N, Costigan C, Snyder M. 1998. Spa2p interacts with cell polarity proteins and signaling components involved in yeast cell morphogenesis. Mol Cell Biol 18: 4053-4069.
37. Snaith HA, Samejima I, Sawin KE. 2005. Multistep and multimode cortical anchoring of tea1p at cell tips in fission yeast. EMBO J 24: 3690-3699.
38. Snaith HA, Sawin KE. 2003. Fission yeast mod5p regulates polarized growth through anchoring of tea1p at cell tips. Nature 423: 647-651.
39. Sohrmann M, Peter M. 2003. Polarizing without a c(l)ue. Trends Cell Biol 13: 526-533.
40. Turing A. 1952. The chemical basis of morphogenesis. Phil Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 237: 37-72.
41. Verde F, Mata J, Nurse P. 1995. Fission yeast cell morphogenesis: identification of new genes and analysis of their role during the cell cycle. J Cell Biol 131: 1529-1538.
42. Verde F, Wiley DJ, Nurse P. 1998. Fission yeast orb6, a ser/thr protein kinase related to mammalian rho kinase and myotonic dystrophy kinase, is required for maintenance of cell polarity and coordinates cell morphogenesis with the cell cycle. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 95: 7526-7531.
43. Wedlich-Soldner R, Altschuler S, Wu L, Li R. 2003. Spontaneous cell polarization through actomyosin-based delivery of the Cdc42 GTPase. Science 299: 1231-1235.
44. Wolpert L. 1996. One hundred years of positional information. Trends Genet 12: 359-364.