Rotamer libraries and probabilities of transition between rotamers for the side chains in protein-protein binding

Proteins: Structure, Function and Bioinformatics

Volumn 80, Issue 8, 2012, Pages 2089-2098

  Kirys, Tatsiana ^a,b   Ruvinsky, Anatoly M ^a   Tuzikov, Alexander V ^b   Vakser, Ilya A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS   (United States)

^b UNITED INSTITUTE OF INFORMATICS PROBLEMS   (Belarus)

Author keywords

Conformational transition; Induced fit; Molecular recognition; Protein docking; Protein protein interactions

Indexed keywords

ARGININE; ASPARAGINE; ASPARTIC ACID; CYSTEINE; GLUTAMIC ACID; GLUTAMINE; HISTIDINE; ISOLEUCINE; LEUCINE; LYSINE; METHIONINE; MULTIPROTEIN COMPLEX; PHENYLALANINE; PROLINE; SERINE; THREONINE; TRYPTOPHAN; TYROSINE; VALINE;

ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; CONFORMATIONAL TRANSITION; MOLECULAR DOCKING; PEPTIDE LIBRARY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROBABILITY; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEIN STABILITY; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; ROTAMER; SURFACE PROPERTY;

ALGORITHMS; AMINO ACIDS; CRYSTALLOGRAPHY, X-RAY; MODELS, MOLECULAR; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEIN INTERACTION MAPS; PROTEINS; SURFACE PROPERTIES;

EID: 84863777101     PISSN: 08873585     EISSN: 10970134     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/prot.24103     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Janin J, Bahadur RP, Chakrabarti P. Protein-protein interaction and quaternary structure. Quart Rev Biophys 2008; 41: 133-180.
2. Lo Conte L, Chothia C, Janin J. The atomic structure of protein-protein recognition sites. J Mol Biol 1999; 285: 2177-2198.
3. Chakrabarti P, Janin J. Dissecting protein-protein recognition sites. Proteins 2002; 47: 334-343.
4. Tsai C-J, Lin SL, Wolfson H, Nussinov R. Studies of protein-protein interfaces: a statistical analysis of the hydrophobic effect. Protein Sci 1997; 6: 53-64.
5. Bosshard HR. Molecular recognition by induced fit: how fit is the concept? News Physiol Sci 2001; 16: 171-173.
6. Smith GR, Sternberg MJE, Bates PA. The relationship between the flexibility of proteins and their conformational states on forming protein-protein complexes with an application to protein-protein docking. J Mol Biol 2005; 347: 1077-1101.
7. Yogurtcu ON, Erdemli SB, Nussinov R, Turkay M, Keskin O. Restricted mobility of conserved residues in protein-protein interfaces in molecular simulations. Biophys J 2008; 94: 3475-3485.
8. Kimura SR, Brower RC, Vajda S, Camacho CJ. Dynamical view of the positions of key side chains in protein-protein recognition. Biophys J 2001; 80: 635-642.
9. Rajamani D, Thiel S, Vajda S, Camacho CJ. Anchor residues in protein-protein interactions. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2004; 101: 11287-11292.
10. Wlodarski T, Zagrovic B. Conformational selection and induced fit mechanism underlie specificity in noncovalent interactions with ubiquitin. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2009; 106: 19346-19351.
11. Goh CS, Milburn D, Gerstein M. Conformational changes associated with protein-protein interactions. Curr Opin Struct Biol 2004; 14: 104-109.
12. Gerstein M, Lesk A, Chothia C. Structural mechanism for domain movements in proteins. Biochemistry 1994; 33: 6739-6749.
13. Darnell SJ, Page D, Mitchell JC. An automated decision-tree approach to predicting protein interaction hot spots. Proteins 2007; 68: 813-823.
14. Tobi D, Bahar I. Structural changes involved in protein binding correlate with intrinsic motions of proteins in the unbound state. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2005; 102: 18908-18913.
15. Fischer E. Einfluss der Configuration auf die Wirkung der Enzyme. Ber Dt Chem Ges 1894; 27: 2985-2993.
16. Koshland DE. Application of a theory of enzyme specificity to protein synthesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1958; 44: 98-104.
17. Ma B, Kumar S, Tsai C-J, Nussinov R. Folding funnels and binding mechanisms. Protein Eng 1999; 12: 713-721.
18. Ma B, Elkayam T, Wolfson H, Nussinov R. Protein-protein interactions: structurally conserved residues distinguish between binding sites and exposed protein surfaces. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2003; 100: 5772-5777.
19. Betts MJ, Sternberg MJE. An analysis of conformational changes on protein-protein association: implications for predictive docking. Protein Eng 1999; 12: 271-283.
20. Najmanovich R, Kuttner J, Sobolev V, Edelman M. Side-chain flexibility in proteins upon ligand binding. Proteins 2000; 39: 261-268.
21. Zhao S, Goodsell DS, Olson AJ. Analysis of a data set of paired uncomplexed protein structures: new metrics for side-chain flexibility and model evaluation. Proteins 2001; 43: 271-279.
22. Koch K, Zollner F, Neumann S, Kummert F, Sagerer G. Comparing bound and unbound protein structures using energy calculation and rotamer statistics. In Silico Biol 2002; 2: 351-368.
23. Beglov D, Hall D, Brenke R, Shapovalov MV, Dunbrack RL, Kozakov D, Vajda S. Minimal ensembles of side chain conformers for modeling protein-protein interactions. Proteins 2011; 80: 591-601.
24. Guharoy M, Janin J, Robert CH. Side-chain rotamer transitions at protein-protein interfaces. Proteins 2010; 78: 3219-3225.
25. Dunbrack RL, Cohen FE. Bayesian statistical analysis of protein side-chain rotamer preferences. Protein Sci 1997; 6: 1661-1681.
26. Ruvinsky AM, Kirys T, Tuzikov AV, Vakser IA. Side-chain conformational changes upon protein-protein association. J Mol Biol 2011; 408: 356-365.
27. Gao Y, Douguet D, Tovchigrechko A, Vakser IA. DOCKGROUND system of databases for protein recognition studies: unbound structures for docking. Proteins 2007; 69: 845-851.
28. Hubbard SJ, Thornton JM. NACCESS. Computer Program, Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University College, London 1993.
29. Word JM, Richardson D, Richardson J. 'Dang', Computer Program, Duke University, Durham, NC, 2002.
30. Dunbrack RL, Karplus M. Backbone-dependent rotamer library for proteins: application to side-chain prediction. J Mol Biol 1993; 230: 543-574.
31. Heyer LJ, Kruglyak S, Yooseph S. Exploring expression data: identification and analysis of coexpressed genes. Genome Res 1999; 9: 1106-1115.
32. Ding F, Yin S, Dokholyan NV. Rapid flexible docking using a stochastic rotamer library of ligands. J Chem Inf Model 2010; 50: 1623-1632.
33. Ruvinsky AM, Kozintsev AV. Novel statistical-thermodynamic methods to predict protein-ligand binding positions using probability distribution functions. Proteins 2006; 62: 202-208.
34. Huey R, Morris GM, Olson AJ, Goodsell DS. A semiempirical free energy force field with charge-based desolvation. J Comput Chem 2007; 28: 1145-1152.
35. Hwang H, Pierce B, Mintseris J, Janin J, Weng Z. Protein-protein docking benchmark version 3.0. Proteins 2008; 73: 705-709.
36. Jacobson MP, Friesner RA, Xiang Z, Honig B. On the role of the crystal environment in determining protein side-chain conformations. J Mol Biol 2002; 320: 597-608.
37. Tuffery P, Etchebest C, Hazout S, Lavery R. A new approach to the rapid determination of protein side-chain conformations. J Biomol Struct Dyn 1991; 8: 1267-1289.
38. Benedetti E, Morelli G, Nemethy G, Scheraga HA. Statistical and energetic analysis of side-chain conformations in oligopeptides. Int J Pept Prot Res 1983; 22: 1-15.
39. Chandrasekaran R, Ramachandran GN. Studies on the conformation of amino acids. XI. Analysis of the observed side group conformation in proteins. Int J Protein Res 1970; 2: 223-233.
40. Bhat TN, Sasisekharan V, Vijayan M. Analysis of side-chain conformation in proteins. Int J Pept Prot Res 1979; 13: 170-184.
41. Janin J, Wodak S. Conformation of amino acid side-chains in proteins. J Mol Biol 1978; 125: 357-386.
42. Ponder JW, Richards FM. Tertiary templates for proteins. Use of packing criteria in the enumeration of allowed sequences for different structural classes. J Mol Biol 1987; 193: 775-791.
43. Mcgregor MJ, Islam SA, Sternberg MJE. Analysis of the relationship between side-chain conformation and secondary structure in globular-proteins. J Mol Biol 1987; 198: 295-310.
44. Schrauber H, Eisenhaber F, Argos P. Rotamers: to be or not to be? An analysis of amino acid side-chain conformations in globular proteins. J Mol Biol 1993; 230: 592-612.
45. Kono H, Doi J. A new method for side-chain conformation prediction using a Hopfield network and reproduced rotamers. J Comput Chem 1996; 17: 1667-1683.
46. DeMaeyer M, Desmet J, Lasters I. All in one: a highly detailed rotamer library improves both accuracy and speed in the modelling of sidechains by dead-end elimination. Fold Des 1997; 2: 53-66.
47. Lovell SC, Word JM, Richardson JS, Richardson DC. The penultimate rotamer library. Proteins 2000; 40: 389-408.
48. Shapovalov MS, Dunbrack RL. A smoothed backbone-dependent rotamer library for proteins derived from adaptive kernel density estimates and regressions. Structure 2011; 19: 844-858.
49. Dunbrack RL. Rotamer libraries in the 21st century. Curr Opin Struct Biol 2002; 12: 431-440.