Social connectivity in America: Changes in adult friendship network size from 2002 to 2007

American Behavioral Scientist

Volumn 53, Issue 8, 2010, Pages 1148-1169

  Wang, Hua ^a   Wellman, Barry ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

Author keywords

Friendship; Internet use; Network size; Social connectivity; Social isolation

Indexed keywords

EID: 77949526432     PISSN: 00027642     EISSN: 15523381     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0002764209356247     Document Type: Article

References (80)

1. Andrews, F., Morgan, J., Sonquist, J., & Klem, L. (1973). Multiple classification analysis (2nd ed.). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan, Institute for Social Research.
2. Bargh, J., & McKenna, K. (2004). The Internet and social life. Annual Review of Psychology, 55, 573-590.
3. Bastani, S. (2000). Muslim women on-line. Arab World Geographer, 3, 40-59.
4. Baym, N., Zhang, Y., & Lin, M. (2004). Social interactions across media. New Media & Society, 6(3), 299-318.
5. Berger, M. (1979). The devil wagon in God's country. Hamden, CT: Archon.
6. Boase, J., Horrigan, J., Wellman, B., & Rainie, L. (2006, January). The strength of Internet ties. Washington, DC: Pew Internet & American Life Project. Retrieved December 3, 2007, from http://www.pewinternet.org/PPF/r/172/report_display.asp.
7. Boase, J., & Wellman, B. (2006). Personal relationships: On and off the Internet. In A. Vangelisti & D. Perlman (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of personal relationships (pp. 709-726). New York: Cambridge University Press.
8. boyd, d., & Ellison, N. (2007). Social network sites. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13(1), article 11. Retrieved April 12, 2008, from http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol13/issue1/boyd.ellison.html.
9. Carrasco, J.-A., Hogan, B., Wellman, B., & Miller, E. (2008). Agency in social activities interactions. Tijdschrift voor economische en sociale geografie, 99(5), 562-583.
10. Castells, M. (1996). The rise of the network society. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
11. Center for the Digital Future. (2008, January). The 2008 digital future report: Surveying the digital future-Year seven. Los Angeles: Center for the Digital Future.
12. Center for the Digital Future. (2009, April). The 2009 digital future report: Surveying the digital future-Year eight. Los Angeles: Center for the Digital Future.
13. Chen, W., Boase, J., & Wellman, B. (2002). The global villagers. In B. Wellman & C. Haythornthwaite (Eds.), The Internet in everyday life (pp. 74-113). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
14. Chua, V., Madej, J., & Wellman, B. (forthcoming). Personal communities. In P. Carrington & J. Scott (Eds.), Handbook of social network analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
15. Cole, J., & Robinson, J. (2002). Internet use and sociability in the UCLA data. IT & Society, 1(1), 202-218.
16. Collins, J., & Wellman, B. (2010). Small town in the Internet society. American Behavioral Scientist, 53.
17. Cornish, D. (2006, October 13). Is computer glow the new hearth-light? Toronto Globe & Mail, p. A13.
18. Cowan, R. (1999). The consumption junction. In W. Bijker, P. Hughes, & T. Pinch (Eds.), The social construction of technological systems (pp. 261-280). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
19. Cummings, J., Lee, J., & Kraut, R. (2006). Communication technology and friends during the transition from high school to college. In R. E. Kraut, M. Brynin, S. Kiesler (Eds.), Computers, phones, and the Internet (pp. 265-278). New York: Oxford University Press.
20. Di Gennaro, C., & Dutton, W. (2007). Reconfiguring friendships. Information Communication & Society, 10, 591-618.
21. DiMaggio, P., Hargittai, E., Newman, W., & Robinson, J. (2001). Social implications of the Internet. Annual Review of Sociology, 27, 307-336.
22. Donath, J. (2007). Signals in social supernets. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13(1), article 12. Retrieved fromhttp://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol13/issue1/donath.html.
23. Ellison, N., Steinfield, C., & Lampe, C. (2007). The benefits of Facebook friends. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 12(3), article 1.
24. Firebaugh, G. (1997). Analyzing repeated surveys. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
25. Firebaugh, G. (2008). Seven rules for social research. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
26. Fischer, C. (1982). To dwell among friends. Berkeley: University of California Press.
27. Fischer, C. (2009). The 2004 GSS finding of shrunken social networks: An artifact? American Sociological Review, 74, 657-669.
28. Fountain, H. (July 2, 2006). The lonely American just got a bit lonelier. New York Times. Retrieved June 7, 2007, from http://www.nytimes.com/2006/07/02/weekinreview/02fountain.html.
29. Gans, H. (1962). The urban villagers. New York: Free Press.
30. Gans, H. (1967). The Levittowners. New York: Pantheon.
31. Gibson, W. (1984). Neuromancer. New York: Ace Science Fiction.
32. Hampton, K., Sessions, L., Her, E.J., & Rainie, L. (2009, November). Social isolation and new technology: How the Internet and mobile phones impact Americans' social networks. Washington, DC: Pew Internet & American Life Project. Retrieved November 5, 2009, from http://pewinternet.org/Reports/2009/18--Social-Isolation-and-New-Technology/ExecutiveSummary.aspx?r=1.
33. Hampton, K., & Wellman, B. (2003). Neighboring in Netville. City and Community, 2(4), 277-311.
34. Harmon, A. (1998, August 30). Sad, lonely world discovered in cyberspace. New York Times, p. 1.
35. Herring, S. (2004). Slouching toward the ordinary. New Media & Society, 6(1), 26-36.
36. Howard, P., Rainie, L., & Jones, S. (2002). Days and nights on the Internet. In B. Wellman & C. Haythornthwaite (Eds.), The Internet in everyday life (pp. 45-73). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
37. Jones, S., & Fox, S. (2009). Generations online in 2009. Washington, DC: Pew Internet & American Life Project. Retrieved May 5, 2009, from http://www.pewinternet.org/Reports/2009/Generations-Online-in-2009.aspx.
38. Katz, J., & Aspden, P. (1997). A nation of strangers? Communications of the ACM, 40(12), 81-86.
39. Katz, J., & Rice, R. (2002). Project syntopia: Social consequences of Internet use. IT & Society, 1(1), 166-179.
40. Kendall, L. (2002). Hanging out in the virtual pub. Berkeley: University of California Press.
41. Kraut, R., Kiesler, S., Boneva, B., Cummings, J., Helgeson, V., & Crawford, A. (2002). Internet paradox revisited. Journal of Social Issues, 58, 49-74.
42. Kraut, R., Patterson, M., Lundmark, V., Kiesler, S., Mukopadhyay, T., & Scherlis, W. (1998). Internet paradox: A social technology that reduces social involvement and psychological well-being? American Psychologist, 53, 1017-1031.
43. Lievrouw, L., & Livingstone, S. (2002). Introduction: The social shaping and consequences of ICTs. In L. A. Lievrouw & S. Livingstone (Eds.), Handbook of new media (pp. 1-16). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
44. Mallaby, S. (2006, June 26). Why so lonesome? Washington Post, p. A21. Retrieved June 7, 2007, from http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/06/25/AR2006062500566.html.
45. Marvin, C. (1988). When old technologies were new. New York: Oxford University Press.
46. Marx, L. (1964). The machine in the garden. New York: Oxford University Press.
47. McPherson, M., Smith-Lovin, L., & Brashears, M. (2006). Social isolation in America. American Sociological Review, 71, 353-375.
48. McPherson, M., Smith-Lovin, L., & Brashears, M. (2009). Models and marginals. American Sociological Review, 74(4).
49. Mok, D., Wellman, B., & Carrasco, J.-A. (2010). Does distance still matter in the age of the Internet? Urban Studies, 46.
50. Nie, N., & Hillygus, D. (2002). The impact of Internet use on sociability. IT & Society, 1(1), 1-20.
51. Nisbet, R. (1962). Community and power. New York: Oxford University Press.
52. Parks, M., & Floyd, K. (1996). Making friends in cyberspace. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 1(4). Available at http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol1/issue4/parks.html (accessed January 19, 2010).
53. Pope Benedict XVI. (2009). Message for the World Day of Communication. Available at http://www.vatican.va/holy_father/benedict_xvi/messages/communications/documents/hf_ben-xvi_mes_20090124_43rd-world-communications-day_en.html (accessed January 23, 2009).
54. Putnam, R. (2000). Bowling alone. New York: Simon & Schuster.
55. Quan-Haase, A., & Wellman, B. (with Witte, J., & Hampton, K.). (2002). Capitalizing on the net. In B. Wellman & C. Haythornthwaite (Eds.), The Internet in everyday life (pp. 291-324). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
56. Rainie, L., & Wellman, B. (forthcoming). Networked. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
57. Rice, R., Sheperd, A., Dutton, W., & Katz, J. (2007). Social interaction and the Internet. In A. Joinson, K. McKenna, T. Postmes, & U. Reips (Eds.), Oxford handbook of Internet psychology (pp. 7-30). New York: Oxford University Press.
58. Shklovski, I., Kiesler, S., & Kraut, R. (2006). The Internet and social interaction. In M. B. Kraut & S. Kiesler (Eds.), Computers, phones, and the Internet (pp. 251-264). New York: Oxford University Press.
59. Shklovski, I., Kraut, R., & Cummings, J. (2008). Keeping in touch by technology. Available at http://www.cs.cmu.edu/%7Ekraut/RKraut.site.files/articles/shklovski08-KeepingInTouchWithTechnology.pdf (accessed January 19, 2010).
60. Shklovski, I., Kraut, R., & Rainie, L. (2004). The Internet and social participation: Contrasting cross-sectional and longitudinal analyses. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 10(1). Available at http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol10/issue1/shklovski_kraut.html (accessed January 19, 2010).
61. Sigman, A. (2009) Well connected? The biological implications of social networking. Biologist, 56(1), 14-20.
62. Spencer, L., & Pahl, R. (2006). Rethinking friendship. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
63. Stein, M. (1960). The eclipse of community. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
64. Stern, M. (2008). How locality, frequency of communication, and Internet usage affect modes of communication within core social networks. Information, Communication and Society, 11(5), 519-616.
65. Thelwall, M. (2008). Social networks, gender, and friending. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 59(8), 1321-1330.
66. Tong, S., Van Der Heide, B., Langwell, L., & Walther, J. (2008). Too much of a good thing? Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13(3), 531-549.
67. Turkle, S. (1984). The second self. New York: Simon & Schuster.
68. Turkle, S. (1995). Life on the screen. New York: Simon & Schuster.
69. van Dijk, J. (2006). The network society (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
70. van Dijk, J. (2008, May). Do ICTs foster social connectivity or social isolation? Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Communication Association, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
71. Vedantam, S. (2006, June 23). Social isolation growing in U.S., study says. Washington Post, p. A03. Retrieved June 7, 2007, from http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/06/22/AR2006062201763_pf.html.
72. Walther, J. (2006). Nonverbal dynamics in computer-mediated communication, or: (and the net: ('s with you,:) and you:) alone. In V. Manusov & M. Patterson (Eds.), The Sage handbook of nonverbal communication (pp. 461-480). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
73. Wellman, B. (1979). The community question. American Journal of Sociology, 84, 1201-1231.
74. Wellman, B. (2001a). The persistence and transformation of community. Ottawa, Toronto: Law Commission of Canada.
75. Wellman, B. (2001b). Physical place and cyberplace. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 25(2), 227-252.
76. Wellman, B. (2002). Little boxes, glocalization, and networked individualism. In M. Tanabe, P. van den Besselaar, & T. Ishida (Eds.), Digital cities II (pp. 10-25). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
77. Wellman, B. (2004). The glocal village: Internet and community. Idea's, 1, 26-30.
78. Wellman, B., & Leighton, B. (1979). Networks, neighborhoods and communities. Urban Affairs Quarterly, 14, 363-390.
79. Wellman, B., Quan-Haase, A., Boase, J., Chen, W., Hampton, K., & Diaz de Isla, I. (2003). The social affordances of the Internet for networked individualism [Online]. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication, 8(3).
80. Wirth, L. (1938). Urbanism as a way of life. American Journal of Sociology, 44, 3-24.