Social relationships and intraindividual variability in interpersonal behavior: Correlates of interpersonal spin

Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

Volumn 102, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 646-659

  Côté, Stéphane ^a   Moskowitz, D S ^b   Zuroff, David C ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^b MCGILL UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

Affect; Interpersonal behavior; Intraindividual variability; Relationships; Social avoidance; Spin

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AFFECT; AGED; ARTICLE; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN RELATION; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PERCEPTION; PERSONALITY; PERSONALITY TEST; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR; SOCIAL DISTANCE; SOCIAL SUPPORT; WORKPLACE;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AFFECT; AGED; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTERPERSONAL RELATIONS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PERSONALITY; PERSONALITY INVENTORY; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR; SOCIAL DISTANCE; SOCIAL PERCEPTION; SOCIAL SUPPORT; WORKPLACE; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84863745832     PISSN: 00223514     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/a0025313     Document Type: Article

References (75)

1. Aan het Rot, M., Moskowitz, D. S., & Young, S. N. (2011). Behaving impulsively in interpersonal settings: Relationship with social interaction quality. Unpublished manuscript, Department of Psychology, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.
2. Albright, L., Kenny, D. A., & Malloy, T. E. (1988). Consensus in personality judgments at zero acquaintance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 387-395. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.55.3.387
3. Allgeier, A. R., Byrne, D., Brooks, B., & Revnes, D. (1979). The waffle phenomenon: Negative evaluations of those who shift attitudinally. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 9, 170-182. doi:10.1111/j.15591816.1979.tb00802.x
4. Allport, G. W. (1931). What is a trait of personality? Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 25, 368-372. doi:10.1037/h0075406
5. Baird, B. M., Le, K., & Lucas, R. E. (2006). On the nature of intraindividual personality variability: Reliability, validity, and associations with well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 512-527. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.90.3.512
6. Barrick, M. R., Mount, M. K., & Judge, T. A. (2001). Personality and performance at the beginning of the new millennium: What do we know and where do we go next? International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 9, 9-30. doi:10.1111/1468-2389.00160
7. Block, J. (1961). Ego identity, role variability, and adjustment. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 25, 392-397. doi:10.1037/h0042979
8. Brief, A. P., Burke, M. J., George, J. M., Robinson, B. S., & Webster, J. (1988). Should negative affectivity remain an unmeasured variable in the study of job stress? Journal of Applied Psychology, 73, 193-198. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.73.2.193
9. Brief, A. P., & Roberson, L. (1989). Job attitude organization: An exploratory study. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 19, 717-727. doi: 10.1111/j.1559-1816.1989.tb01254.x
10. Brown, K. W., & Moskowitz, D. S. (1998). Dynamic stability of behavior: The rhythms of our interpersonal lives. Journal of Personality, 66, 105-134. doi:10.1111/1467-6494.00005
11. Burke, M. J., Brief, A. P., George, J. M., Roberson, L., & Webster, J. (1989). Measuring affect at work: Confirmatory analyses of competing mood structures with conceptual linkage to cortical regulatory systems. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 1091-1102. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.57.6.1091
12. Cialdini, R. B. (2001). Influence: Science and practice (4th ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
13. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
14. Cohen, J., Cohen, P., West, S. G., & Aiken, L. S. (2003). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences (3rd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
15. Colvin, C. R., & Funder, D. C. (1991). Predicting personality and behavior: A boundary on the acquaintanceship effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 884-894. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.60.6.884
16. Costa, P. T., Jr., & Mccrae, R. R. (1992). Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO-PI-R) and NEO Five-Factor Inventory (FFI) professional manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
17. Côté, S., & Moskowitz, D. S. (1998). On the dynamic covariation between interpersonal behavior and affect: Prediction from Neuroticism, Extra-version, and Agreeableness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 1032-1046. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.75.4.1032
18. Devine, P. G., Sedikides, C., & Fuhrman, R. W. (1989). Goals in social information processing: The case of anticipated interaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 680-690. doi:10.1037/00223514.56.5.680
19. Eid, M. A., & Diener, E. (1999). Intraindividual variability in affect: Reliability, validity, and personality correlates. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 662-676. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.76.4.662
20. Erickson, T. M., Newman, M. G., & Pincus, A. L. (2009). Predicting unpredictability: Do measures of interpersonal rigidity/flexibility and distress predict intraindividual variability in social perceptions and behavior? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97, 893-912. doi:10.1037/a0016515
21. Fiske, D. W., & Rice, L. (1955). Intra-individual response variability. Psychological Bulletin, 52, 217-250. doi:10.1037/h0045276
22. Fleeson, W. (2001). Toward a structureand process-integrated view of personality: Traits as density distribution of states. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 1011-1027. doi:10.1037/00223514.80.6.1011
23. Fleeson, W., & Noftle, E. E. (2008). Where does personality have its influence? A supermatrix of consistency concepts. Journal of Personality, 76, 1355-1385.
24. Fournier, M. A., Moskowitz, D. S., & Zuroff, D. C. (2008). Integrating dispositions, signatures, and the interpersonal domain. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94, 531-545. doi:10.1037/00223514.94.3.531
25. Funder, D. C., & Colvin, C. R. (1988). Friends and strangers: Acquaintanceship, agreement, and the accuracy of personality judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 149-158. doi:10.1037/00223514.55.1.149
26. Gangestad, S. W., & Snyder, M. (1991). Taxonomic analysis redux: Some statistical considerations for testing a latent class model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 141-146. doi:10.1037/00223514.61.1.141
27. Gangestad, S. W., & Snyder, M. (2000). Self-monitoring: Appraisal and reappraisal. Psychological Bulletin, 126, 530-555. doi:10.1037/00332909.126.4.530
28. Granovetter, M. S. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78, 1360-1380. doi:10.1086/225469
29. James, L. R., & Brett, J. M. (1984). Mediators, moderators, and tests for mediation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 69, 307-321. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.69.2.307
30. John, O. P., Cheek, J. M., & Klohnen, E. C. (1996). On the nature of self-monitoring: Construct explication with Q-sort ratings. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 763-776. doi:10.1037/00223514.71.4.763
31. Kernis, M. H., Cornell, D. P., Sun, C., Berry, A., & Harlow, T. (1993). There's more to self-esteem than whether it is high or low: The importance of stability of self-esteem. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 1190-1204. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.65.6.1190
32. Kernis, M. H., Grannemann, B. D., & Barclay, L. C. (1989). Stability and level of self-esteem as predictors of anger arousal and hostility. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 1013-1022. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.56.6.1013
33. Kiesler, D. J. (1983). The 1982 interpersonal circle: A taxonomy for complementarity in human transactions. Psychological Bulletin, 90, 185-214. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.90.3.185
34. Leary, T. (1957). Interpersonal diagnosis of personality: A functional theory and methodology for personality evaluation. Oxford, England: Ronald Press.
35. Lorr, M., & Mcnair, D. M. (1965). Expansion of the interpersonal behavior circle. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2, 823-830. doi: 10.1037/h0022709
36. Maddux, W. W., Mullen, E., & Galinsky, A. D. (2008). Chameleons bake bigger pies and take bigger pieces: Strategic behavioral mimicry facilitates negotiation outcomes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 40, 461-468. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2007.02.003
37. Mardia, K. V. (1972). Statistics of directional data. New York, NY: Academic Press.
38. Mccrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T., Jr. (1995). Trait explanations in personality psychology. European Journal of Personality, 9, 231-252. doi:10.1002/per.2410090402
39. Meyer, G. J., Finn, S. E., Eyde, L. D., Kay, G. G., Moreland, K. L., Dies, R. R., . . . Reed, G. M. (2001). Psychological testing and psychological assessment. American Psychologist, 56, 128-165. doi:10.1037/0003066X.56.2.128
40. Miner, A. G., Glomb, T. M., & Hulin, C. (2005). Experience sampling mood and its correlates at work. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 78, 171-193. doi:10.1348/096317905X40105
41. Mischel, W. (1968). Personality and assessment. New York, NY: Wiley.
42. Mischel, W., & Shoda, Y. (1995). A cognitive-affective system theory of personality: Reconceptualizing situations, dispositions, dynamics, and invariance in personality structure. Psychological Review, 102, 246-268. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.102.2.246
43. Moskowitz, D. S. (1994). Cross-situational generality and the interpersonal circumplex. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 921-933. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.66.5.921
44. Moskowitz, D. S. (2009). Coming full circle: Conceptualizing the study of interpersonal behavior. Canadian Psychology, 50, 33-41. doi:10.1037/a0014425
45. Moskowitz, D. S., Ho, M.-R., & Turcotte-Tremblay, A.-M. (2007). Contextual influences on interpersonal complementarity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33, 1051-1063. doi:10.1177/0146167207303024
46. Moskowitz, D. S., & Sadikaj, G. (in press). Event-contingent recording. In M. R. Mehl & T. S. Conner (Eds.), Handbook of research methods for studying daily life. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
47. Moskowitz, D. S., Suh, E. J., & Desaulniers, J. (1994). Situational influences on gender differences in agency and communion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 753-761. doi:10.1037/00223514.66.4.753
48. Moskowitz, D. S., & Zuroff, D. C. (2004). Flux, pulse, and spin: Dynamic additions to the personality lexicon. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86, 880-893. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.86.6.880
49. Moskowitz, D. S., & Zuroff, D. C. (2005). Robust predictors of flux, pulse, and spin. Journal of Research in Personality, 39, 130-147. doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2004.09.004
50. Moskowitz, D. S., Zuroff, D. C., Aan het Rot, M., & Young, S. N. (in press). Tryptophan reduces interpersonal spin. Journal of Research in Personality.
51. Muller, D., Judd, C. M., & Yzerbyt, V. Y. (2005). When moderation is mediated and mediation is moderated. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 852-863. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.89.6.852
52. Nowack, W., & Kammer, D. (1987). Self-presentation: Social skills and inconsistency as independent facets of self-monitoring. European Journal of Personality Psychology, 1, 61-77.
53. Ozer, D. J., & Benet-Martínez, V. (2006). Personality and the prediction of consequential outcomes. Annual Review of Psychology, 57, 401-421. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.57.102904.190127
54. Patton, J. H., Stanford, M. S., & Barratt, E. S. (2006). Factor structure of the Barratt Impulsiveness Scale. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 51, 768-774. doi:10.1002/1097-4679(199511)51:6<768::AID-JCLP2270510607> 3.0.CO;2-1
55. Paulhus, D. L., & Bruce, M. N. (1992). The effect of acquaintanceship on the validity of personality impressions: A longitudinal study. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 816-824. doi:10.1037/00223514.63.5.816
56. Paulhus, D. L., & Martin, C. L. (1988). Functional flexibility: A new conception of interpersonal flexibility. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 88-101. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.55.1.88
57. Paunonen, S. V. (1989). Consensus in personality judgments: Moderating effects of target-rater acquaintanceship and behavior observability. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 823-833. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.56.5.823
58. Preacher, K. J., Curran, P. J., & Bauer, D. J. (2006). Computational tools for probing interactions in multiple linear regression, multilevel modeling, and latent curve analysis. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 31, 437-448. doi:10.3102/10769986031004437
59. Roberts, B. W., Kuncel, N., Shiner, R. N., Caspi, A., & Goldberg, L. R. (2007). The power of personality: The comparative validity of personality traits, socio-economic status, and cognitive ability for predicting important life outcomes. Perspectives in Psychological Science, 2, 313-345. doi:10.1111/j.1745-6916.2007.00047.x
60. Roberts, M. L., & Nesselroade, J. R. (1986). Intraindividual variability in perceived locus of control in adults: P-technique factor analyses of short-term change. Journal of Research in Personality, 20, 529-545. doi:10.1016/0092-6566(86)90130-3
61. Russell, J. J., Moskowitz, D. S., Zuroff, D. C., Sookman, D., & Paris, J. (2007). Stability and variability of affective experience and interpersonal behavior in borderline personality disorder. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 116, 578-588. doi:10.1037/0021-843X.116.3.578
62. Saavedra, R., & Earley, P. C. (1991). Choice of task and goal under conditions of general and specific affective inducement. Motivation and Emotion, 15, 45-65. doi:10.1007/BF00991475
63. Saavedra, R., & Kwun, S. K. (2000). Affective states in job characteristic theory. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 21, 131-146. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1099-1379(200003)21:2<131::AID-JOB39>3.0.CO; 2-Q
64. Sadikaj, G., Moskowitz, D. S., & Zuroff, D. C. (2011). Attachment-related affective dynamics: Differential reactivity to others' interpersonal behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100, 905-917. doi:10.1037/a0022875
65. Seibert, S. E., Kraimer, M. L., & Liden, R. C. (2001). A social capital theory of career success. Academy of Management Journal, 44, 219-237. doi:10.2307/3069452
66. Shaver, P. R., & Brennan, K. A. (1992). Attachment styles and the "Big Five" personality traits: Their connections with each other and with romantic relationship outcomes. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 18, 536-545. doi:10.1177/0146167292185003
67. Spanier, G. B. (1976). Measuring dyadic adjustment: New scales for assessing the quality of marriage and similar dyads. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 38, 15-28. doi:10.2307/350547
68. Sparrowe, R. T., Liden, R. C., Wayne, S. J., & Kraimer, M. L. (2001). Social networks and the performance of individuals and groups. Academy of Management Journal, 44, 316-325. doi:10.2307/3069458
69. Tiedens, L. Z., & Fragale, A. R. (2003). Power moves: Complementarity in dominant and submissive nonverbal behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 558-568. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.84.3.558
70. Weiss, D. S. (1979). The effects of systematic variations in information on judges' descriptions of personality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 2121-2136. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.37.11.2121
71. Wheeler, L., & Reis, H. T. (1991). Self-recording of everyday life events: Origins, types, and uses. Journal of Personality, 59, 339-354. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.1991.tb00252.x
72. Wiggins, J. S. (1979). A psychological taxonomy of trait-descriptive terms: The interpersonal domain. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 395-412. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.37.3.395
73. Wiggins, J. S. (1991). Agency and communion as conceptual coordinates for the understanding and measurement of interpersonal behavior. In W. M. Grove & D. Cicchetti (Eds.), Thinking clearly about psychology (pp. 89-113). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
74. Wolf, H., Spinath, F. M., Riemann, R., & Angleitner, A. (2009). Selfmonitoring and personality: A behavioural-genetic study. Personality and Individual Differences, 47, 25-59. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2009.01.040
75. Zuroff, D. C., Moskowitz, D. S., & Côté, S. (1999). Dependency, selfcriticism, interpersonal behavior and affect: Evolutionary perspectives. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 38, 231-250. doi:10.1348/014466599162827