The effect of adaptive iterative dose reduction on image quality in 320-detector row CT coronary angiography

British Journal of Radiology

Volumn 85, Issue 1016, 2012, Pages

  Tatsugami, Fuminari ^a   Matsuki, M ^a   Nakai, G ^a   Inada, Y ^a   Kanazawa, S ^a   Takeda, Y ^a   Morita, H ^a   Takada, H ^a   Yoshikawa, S ^a   Fukumura, K ^a   Narumi, Y ^a  

^a OSAKA MEDICAL COLLEGE   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

IOMEPROL;

ADULT; AGED; ANGIOCARDIOGRAPHY; AORTA; ARTICLE; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY SCANNER; CORONARY ARTERY; FEMALE; HEART BEAT; HUMAN; IMAGE QUALITY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; NON INVASIVE PROCEDURE; RADIATION DOSE; RATING SCALE;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; BODY MASS INDEX; CLINICAL PROTOCOLS; CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; FEMALE; HEART RATE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MULTIDETECTOR COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; OBSERVER VARIATION; RADIATION DOSAGE; SIGNAL-TO-NOISE RATIO;

EID: 84863724413     PISSN: 00071285     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1259/bjr/10084599     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Raff GL, Gallagher MJ, O'Neill WW, Goldstein JA. Diagnostic accuracy of noninvasive coronary angiography using 64-slice spiral computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005;46:552-7. (Pubitemid 41040301)
2. Nikolaou K, Knez A, Rist C, Wintersperger BJ, Leber A, Johnson T, et al. Accuracy of 64-MDCT in the diagnosis of ischemic heart disease. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2006;187:111-17. (Pubitemid 46100154)
3. Leschka S, Alkadhi H, Plass A, Desbiolles L, Grünenfelder J, Marincek B, et al. Accuracy of MSCT coronary angiography with 64-slice technology: first experience. Eur Heart J 2005;26:1482-7. (Pubitemid 41378989)
4. Herzog C, Zwerner PL, Doll JR, Nielsen CD, Nguyen SA, Savino G, et al. Significant coronary artery stenosis: comparison on per-patient and per-vessel or per-segment basis at 64-section CT angiography. Radiology 2007;244:112-20. (Pubitemid 46981964)
5. Hausleiter J, Meyer T, Hermann F, Hadamitzky M, Krebs M, Gerber TC, et al. Estimated radiation dose associated with cardiac CT angiography. JAMA 2009;301:500-7.
6. Hausleiter J, Meyer T, Hadamitzky M, Huber E, Zankl M, Martinoff S, et al. Radiation dose estimates from cardiac multislice computed tomography in daily practice: impact of different scanning protocols on effective dose estimates. Circulation 2006;113:1305-10. (Pubitemid 43739452)
7. Leschka S, Stolzmann P, Schmid FT, Scheffel H, Stinn B, Marincek B, et al. Low kilovoltage cardiac dual-source CT: attenuation, noise, and radiation dose. Eur Radiol 2008;18:1809-17.
8. Earls JP, Berman EL, Urban BA, Curry CA, Lane JL, Jennings RS, et al. Prospectively gated transverse coronary CT angiography versus retrospectively gated helical technique: improved image quality and reduced radiation dose. Radiology 2008;246:742-53.
9. Kalra MK, Maher MM, Sahani DV, Blake MA, Hahn PF, Avinash GB, et al. Low-dose CT of the abdomen: evaluation of image improvement with use of noise reduction filters - pilot study. Radiology 2003;228:251-6. (Pubitemid 36736100)
10. Hara AK, Paden RG, Silva AC, Kujak JL, Lawder HJ, Pavlicek W. Iterative reconstruction technique for reducing body radiation dose at CT: feasibility study. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2009;193:764-71.
11. Liu YJ, Zhu PP, Chen B, Wang JY, Yuan QX, Huang WX, et al. A new iterative algorithm to reconstruct the refractive index. Phys Med Biol 2007;52:L5-13.
12. Cheng LCY, Fang T, Tyan J. Fast iterative adaptive reconstruction in low-dose CT imaging. In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Image Processing. New York, NY: IEEE, 2006. pp. 889-92.
13. Prakash P, Kalra MK, Digumarthy SR, Hsieh J, Pien H, Singh S, et al. Radiation dose reduction with chest computed tomography using adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction technique: initial experience. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2010;34:40-5.
14. Gosling O, Loader R, Venables P, Roobottom C, Rowles N, Bellenger N, et al. A comparison of radiation doses between state-of-the-art multislice CT coronary angiography with iterative reconstruction, multislice CT coronary angiography with standard filtered back-projection and invasive diagnostic coronary angiography. Heart 2010;96:922-6.
15. Prakash P, Kalra MK, Kambadakone AK, Pien H, Hsieh J, Blake MA, et al. Reducing abdominal CT radiation dose with adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction technique. Invest Radiol 2010;45:202-10.
16. Sagara Y, Hara AK, Pavlicek W, Silva AC, Paden RG, Wu Q. Abdominal CT: comparison of low-dose CT with adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction and routine-dose CT with filtered back projection in 53 patients. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2010;195:713-19.
17. Tatsugami F, Matsuki M, Inada Y, Kanazawa S, Nakai G, Takeda Y, et al. Feasibility of low-volume injections of contrast material with a body weight-adapted iodine-dose protocol in 320-detector row coronary CT angiography. Acad Radiol 2010;17:207-11.
18. Gosling O, Loader R, Venables P, Rowles N, Morgan-Hughes G, Roobottom C. Cardiac CT: are we underestimating the dose? A radiation dose study utilizing the 2007 ICRP tissue weighting factors and a cardiac specific scan volume. Clin Radiol 2010;65:1013-17.
19. Huda W, Sterzik A, Tipnis S, Schoepf UJ. Organ doses to adult patients for chest CT. Med Phys 2010;37:842-7.
20. Einstein AJ, Elliston CD, Arai AE, Chen MY, Mather R, Pearson GD, et al. Radiation dose from single-heartbeat coronary CT angiography performed with a 320-detector row volume scanner. Radiology 2010;254:698-706.
21. Christner JA, Kofler JM, McCollough CH. Estimating effective dose for CT using dose-length product compared with using organ doses: consequences of adopting International Commission on Radiological Protection publication 103 or dual-energy scanning. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2010;194:881-9.
22. Lembcke A, Wiese TH, Schnorr J, Wagner S, Mews J, Kroencke TJ, et al. Image quality of noninvasive coronary angiography using multislice spiral computed tomography and electron-beam computed tomography: intraindividual comparison in an animal model. Invest Radiol 2004;39:357-64. (Pubitemid 38669053)
23. Achenbach S, Giesler T, Ropers D, Ulzheimer S, Anders K, Wenkel E, et al. Comparison of image quality in contrast-enhanced coronary-artery visualization by electron beam tomography and retrospectively electrocardiogram-gated multislice spiral computed tomography. Invest Radiol 2003;38:119-28. (Pubitemid 36125895)
24. Austen WG, Edwards JE, Frye RL, Gensini GG, Gott VL, Griffith LS, et al. A reporting system on patients evaluated for coronary artery disease: report of the Ad Hoc Committee for Grading of Coronary Artery Disease, Council on Cardiovascular Surgery, American Heart Association. Circulation 1975;51:5-40.
25. Pretorius PH, King MA, Pan TS, de Vries DJ, Glick SJ, Byrne CL. Reducing the influence of the partial volume effect on SPECT activity quantitation with 3D modelling of spatial resolution in iterative reconstruction. Phys Med Biol 1998;43:407-20. (Pubitemid 28100141)
26. Knesaurek K, Machac J, Vallabhajosula S, Buchsbaum MS. A new iterative reconstruction technique for attenuation correction in high-resolution positron emission tomography. Eur J Nucl Med 1996;23:656-61. (Pubitemid 26187214)
27. Riddell C, Carson RE, Carrasquillo JA, Libutti SK, Danforth DN, Whatley M, et al. Noise reduction in oncology FDG PET images by iterative reconstruction: a quantitative assessment. J Nucl Med 2001;42:1316-23. (Pubitemid 32852605)
28. Wang G, Yu H, De Man B. An outlook on X-ray CT research and development. Med Phys 2008;35:1051-64. (Pubitemid 351322651)
29. Leipsic J, Labounty TM, Heilbron B, Min JK, Mancini GB, Lin FY, et al. Adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction: assessment of image noise and image quality in coronary CT angiography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2010;195:649-54.
30. Bittencourt MS, Schmidt B, Seltmann M, Muschiol G, Ropers D, Daniel WG, et al. Iterative reconstruction in image space (IRIS) in cardiac computed tomography: initial experience. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 2011;27:1081-7.
31. Tatsugami F, Husmann L, Herzog BA, Burkhard N, Valenta I, Gaemperli O, et al. Evaluation of a body mass index-adapted protocol for low-dose 64-MDCT coronary angiography with prospective ECG triggering. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2009;192:635-8.