Economic analysis of different nuclear fuel cycle options

Science and Technology of Nuclear Installations

Volumn 2012, Issue , 2012, Pages

  Ko, Won Il ^a   Gao, Fanxing ^a  

^a Korea Atomic Energy Research Institute   (South Korea)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84863696887     PISSN: 16876075     EISSN: 16876083     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1155/2012/293467     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. OECD/NEA, The Economics of the Nuclear Fuel Cycle 1994 Paris, France OECD
2. Dixon B., Halsey W., Kim S., Matthern G., Piet S., Shropshire D., Dynamic Systems Analysis Report for Nuclear Fuel Recycle, INL/EXT-08-15201 Rev.1 2008
3. Economic Analysis Working Group. AFCI Economic Tools, Algorithms, and Methodology, INL/EXT-07-13293, 2009
4. Deutch J. M., Holdren J. P., The Future of Nuclear Power: An Interdisciplinary MIT Study 2003 Cambridge, Mass, USA Massachusetts Institute of Technology
5. OECD/NEA, Advanced Nuclear Fuel Cycles and Radioactive Waste Management, NEA No. 5990 2006 Paris, France OECD
6. Ko W. I., Choi J. W., Lee J. S., Park H. S., Lee K. J., Uncertainty analysis in DUPIC fuel-cycle cost using a probabilistic simulation method Nuclear Technology 1999 127 1 123 140
7. Hong S. G., 600 MWe sodium cooled fast reactor core designs for efficient TRU transmutation The Korean Nuclear Society Spring Meeting May 2006 Chuncheon, Korea
8. Inoue T., Actinide recycling by pyro-process with metal fuel FBR for future nuclear fuel cycle system Progress in Nuclear Energy 2002 40 3-4 547 554
9. Park B. H., Gao F., Kwon E. H., Ko W. I., Comparative study of different nuclear fuel cycle options: quantitative analysis on material flow Energy Policy 2011 39 11 6916 6924
10. Bunn M., Holdren J. P., Fetter S., Van Der Zwaan B., The economics of reprocessing versus direct disposal of spent nuclear fuel Nuclear Technology 2005 150 3 209 230 (Pubitemid 40784303)
11. OECD/NEA, Accelerator-Driven Systems (ADS) and Fast Reactors (FR) in Advanced Nuclear Fuel Cycles 2002 Paris, France OECD
12. OECD, Cost Estimating Guidelines for Generation IV Nuclear Energy Systems 2006 Paris, France OECD
13. OECD, Trends in the Nuclear Fuel Cycle: Economic, Environment and Social Aspects 2000 Paris, France OECD
14. Shropshire D., Advanced Fuel Cycle Cost Basis, INL/EXT-07-12107 2007
15. Shropshire D., Advanced Fuel Cycle Cost Basis, INL/EXT-07-12107 Rev.1 2008
16. Shropshire D., Advanced Fuel Cycle Cost Basis, INL/EXT-07-12107 Rev.2 2009
17. The Ux Consulting Company, Weekly spot Ux U 3 O 8 price, 2010, http://www.uxc.com/review/uxcPrices.aspx
18. Ko W. I., Choi H., Yang M. S., Economic analysis on direct use of spent pressurized water reactor fuel in candu reactors-IV: DUPIC fuel cycle cost Nuclear Technology 2001 134 2 167 186 (Pubitemid 32444187)
19. Ko W. I., Choi J. W., Kang C. H., Lee J. S., Lee K. J., Nuclear fuel cycle cost analysis using a probabilistic simulation technique Annals of Nuclear Energy 1998 25 10 771 789 (Pubitemid 128393814)