A chemical group graph representation for efficient high-throughput analysis of atomistic protein simulations

Journal of Bioinformatics and Computational Biology

Volumn 10, Issue 4, 2012, Pages

  Benson, Noah C ^a,c   Daggett, Valerie ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

^b University of Washington   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

Author keywords

data mining; Graph; molecular dynamics; network; protein

Indexed keywords

PROTEIN;

ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; CHEMICAL STRUCTURE; CHEMISTRY; COMPUTER SIMULATION; PROTEIN SECONDARY STRUCTURE;

ALGORITHMS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; MODELS, MOLECULAR; PROTEIN STRUCTURE, SECONDARY; PROTEINS;

EID: 84863680904     PISSN: 02197200     EISSN: 17576334     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1142/S0219720012500084     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Van der Kamp MW, Schaeer RD, Jonsson AL, Scouras AD, Simms AM, Toofanny RD, Benson NC, Anderson PC, Merkley ED, Rysavy S, Bromley D, Beck DAC, Daggett V, Dynameomics: A comprehensive database of protein dynamics, Structure 18(4):423-435, 2010.
2. Beck DAC, Jonsson AL, Schaeer RD, Scott KA, Day R, Toofanny RD, Alonso DO, Daggett V, Dynameomics: Mass annotation of protein dynamics and unfolding in water by high-throughput atomistic molecular dynamics simulations, Protein: Eng Design Selection 21:353-368, 2008.
3. Berman HM, Westbrook J, Feng Z, Gilliland G, Bhat TN, Weissig H, Shindyalov IN, Bourne PE, The protein data bank, Nucleic Acids Res 28:235-242, 2000.
4. Webber CL, Giuliani A, Zbilut JP, Colosimo A, Elucidating protein secondary structures using alpha-carbon recurrence quantifications, Proteins 44(3):292-303, 2001.
5. Vendruscolo M, Dokholyan NV, Paci E, Karplus M, Small-world view of the amino acids that play a key role in protein folding, Phys Rev E 65(6):061,910, 2002.
6. Amadei A, Linssen AB, Berendsen HJ, Essential dynamics of proteins, Proteins 17 (4):412-425, 1993.
7. Koch I, Kaden F, Selbig J, Analysis of protein sheet topologies by graph theoretical methods, Proteins 12(4):314-323, 1992.
8. Grigoriev IV, Mironov AA, Rakhmaninova AB, Interhelical contacts determining the architecture of alpha-helical globular proteins, J Biomol Struct Dynamics 12(3):559-572, 1994.
9. Bowman GR, Huang X, Pande VS, Network models for molecular kinetics and their initial applications to human health, Cell Res 20:622-630, 2010.
10. Vishveshwara S, Brinda KV, Kannan N, Protein structure: Insights from graph theory, J Theor Comput Chem 1:187-211, 2002.
11. Bode C, Kov-acs IA, Szalay MS, Palotai R, Korcsm-aros T, Csermely P, Network analysis of protein dynamics, FEBS Lett 581(15):2776-2782, 2007.
12. Krishnan A, Zbilut JP, Tomita M, Giuliani A, Proteins as networks: Usefulness of graph theory in protein science, Curr Protein Peptide Sci 9(1):28-38, 2008.
13. Wriggers W, Staord KA, Shan Y, Piana S, Maragakis P, Lindor-Larsen K, Miller PJ, Gullingsrud J, Rendleman CA, Eastwood MP, Dror RO, Shaw DE, Automated event detection and activity monitoring in long molecular dynamics simulations, J Chem Theor Comput 5:2595-2605, 2009.
14. Singh J, Thornton JM, Atlas of Protein Side-Chain Interactions, Vols. I & II, IRL Press, Oxford, United Kingdom, 1992.
15. Delaunay B, Sur la sph-ere vide. a la memoire de georges voronoi, Izvestiya Akademii Nauk SSSR, Otdelenie Matematicheskih i Estestvennyh Nauk 7:793-800, 1934.
16. Martinetz T, Competitive hebbian learning rule forms perfectly topology preserving maps, in Gielen S, Kappen B (Eds.), Proc Int Conf Artificial Neural Networks (ICANN- 93), Springer Verlag, Heidelberg, Germany, pp. 427-434, 1993.
17. Ramanathan A, Agarwal PK, M Kurnikova, Langmead CJ, An online approach for mining collective behaviors from molecular dynamics simulations, J Comput Biol 17 (3):309-324, 2010.
18. Simms AM, Daggett V, Protein simulation data in the relational model, J Supercomput DOI:10.1007/S11227-011-0692-3, 2012.
19. Schaeer RD, Jonsson AL, Simms AM, Daggett V, Generation of a consensus protein domain dictionary, Bioinformatics 27(1):46-54, 2011.
20. Beck DAC, Alonso DOV, Daggett V, in lucem molecular mechanics, Technical report, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, 2000-2012.
21. Levitt M, Hirshberg M, Sharon R, Daggett V, Potential energy function and parameters for simulations of the molecular dynamics of proteins and nucleic acids in solution, Computer Phys Commun 91(1-3):215-231, 1995.
22. Levitt M, Hirshberg M, Sharon R, Laidig K, Daggett V, Calibration and testing of a water model for simulation of the molecular dynamics of proteins and nucleic acids in solution, J Phys Chem B 101(25):5051-5061, 1997.
23. Simms AM, Toofanny RD, Kehl C, Benson NC, Daggett V, Dynameomics: Design of a computational lab work̊ow and scientific data repository for protein simulations,Protein: Design, Eng Select 21:369-377, 2008.
24. Day R, Beck DAC, Armen RS, Daggett V, A consensus view of fold space: Combining scop, cath, and the dali domain dictionary, Protein Sci 12:2150-2160, 2003.
25. Brinda KV, Vishveshwara S, A network representation of protein structures: Implications for pro tein stability, Biophys J 89:4159-4170, 2005.
26. Humphrey W, Dalke A, Schulten K, VMD: Visual molecular dynamics, J Mol Graphics 14:33-38, 1996
27. Wolfram Research I, Mathematica, 7th Edn, Wolfram Research, Inc., Champaign, Illinois, 2008.