Mixed methods research in public health: Issues and illustration;Recherche par lesméthodesmixtes en santé publique : enjeux et illustration

Sante Publique

Volumn 24, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 23-38

  Guével, Marie Renée ^a   Pommier, Jeanine ^a,b  

^a EHESP SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH   (France)

^b CRAPE   (France)

Author keywords

Mixed methods; Public health; Qualitative; Quantitative

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; PUBLIC HEALTH; RESEARCH;

HUMANS; PUBLIC HEALTH; RESEARCH;

EID: 84863679919     PISSN: 09953914     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3917/spub.121.0023     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Tashakkori A, Teddlie C. Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications; 2003.
2. Tashakkori A, Creswell JW. Mixed methodology across disciplines. Journal of Mixed Methods Research 2008;2(1):3-6.
3. O'Cathain A. Mixed methods research in the health sciences: a quiet revolution. Journal of Mixed Methods Research 2009;3(1):3-6.
4. Johnson RB, Onwuegbuzie AJ, Turner LA. Toward a definition of mixed methods research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research 2007;1(2):112-33.
5. Pluye P, Nadeau L, Gagnon MP, Grad R, Johnson-Lafleur J, Griffiths F. Les méthodes mixtes. In: Ridde V, Dagenais C, editors. Approches et pratiques en évaluation de programme. Montréal : Les Presses de l'Université de Montréal ; 2009. p. 123-41.
6. Pommier J, Guével MR, Jourdan D. Evaluation of health promotion in schools: a realistic evaluation approach using mixed methods. BMC Public Health 2010;10(43).
7. Denzin NK, Lincoln YS. Handbook of qualitative research. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications; 1994.
8. Teddlie C, Tashakkori A. Major issues and controversies in the use of mixed methods in the social and behavioral sciences. In: Tashakkori A, Teddlie C, editors. Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research.Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications; 2003. p. 3-50.
9. Lincoln YS, Guba EG. Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications; 1985.
10. Denzin NK. The logic of naturalistic inquiry. In: Denzin NK, editor. Sociological methods: a sourcebook. 2nd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1978. p. 6-29.
11. Howe KR. Against the quantitative-qualitative incompatibility thesis or dogmas die hard. Educational Researcher 1988;17(8):10-6.
12. Creswell JW. Research design: qualitative and quantitatives appraoches. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publication; 1994.
13. Greene JC, Caracelli VJ. Advances in mixed methods evaluation: the challenges and benefits of integrating diverse paradigms (New Directions for Evaluation, No.74). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass; 1997.
14. Newman I, Benz CR. Qualitative-quantitative research methodology: exploring the interactive continuum. Carbondale: University of Illinois Press; 1998.
15. Patton MQ. Qualitative evaluation and research methods. 2nd ed. Newbury Park: Sage Publications; 1990.
16. Reichardt CS, Rallis SF. Qualitative and quantitative inquiries are not incompatible: a call for a new partnership. In: Reichardt CS, Rallis SF, editors. The qualitative-quantitative debat: new perspectives. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass; 1994. p. 85-92.
17. Tashakkori A, Teddlie C. Mixed methodology: combining the qualitative and quantitative approaches (Applied Social Research Methods, No.46). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications; 1998.
18. Escofier B, Pagès J. Analyses factorielles simples et multiples : objectifs, méthodes et interprétation. 4e ed. Paris : Dunod ; 2008.
19. Miles M, Huberman M. Qualitative data analysis: an expanded sourcebook. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications; 1994.
20. Creswell JW, Plano Clark VL. Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications; 2007.
21. Punch KF. Introduction to social research: quantitative and qualitative approaches. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications; 1998.
22. Greene JC, Caracelli VJ, Graham WF. Toward a conceptual framework for mixed-method evaluation designs. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 1989;(11):255-74.
23. Creswell JW, Plano Clark VL. Designing and conducting mixed methods research. 2e ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications; 2011.
24. Morse JM. Approaches to qualitative-quantitative methodological triangulation. Nursing Research 1991; 40(2):120-3.
25. Morse JM. Principles of mixed methods and multimethod. In: Tashakkori A, Teddlie C, editors. Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research.Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications; 2003. p. 189-208.
26. Steckler A, McLeroy KR, Goodman RM, Brid ST, McCormick L. Toward integrating qualitative and quantitative methods: an introduction. Health Education Quaterly 1992;19(1):1-8.
27. Ivankova NV, Creswell JW, Stick S. Using mixed methods sequential explanatory design: from theory to practice. Field Methods 2006;18(1):3-20.
28. Pluye P, Grad RM, Levine A, Nicoleau B. Understanding divergence of quantitative and qualitative data (or results) in mixed methods studies. International Journal of Multiple Research Approaches 2009;3(1):58-72.
29. Bryman A. Paradigm peace and the implications for quality. International Journal of Social Research Methodology 2006;9(2):111-26. (Pubitemid 43791715)
30. Pluye P, Gagnon MP, Griffiths F, Johnson-Lafleur J. A scoring system for appraising mixed methods research, and concomitantly appraising qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods primary studies in mixed studies reviews. International Journal of Nursing Studies 2009;46(4):529-46.
31. Bryman A, Becker S, Sempik J. Quality criteria for quantitative, qualitative and mixed methods research: a view from social policy. International Journal of Social Research Methodology 2008;11(4):261-76.
32. Bonita R, Beaglehole R, Kjellström T. Basic epidemiology. 2nd edition ed. Geneva: WHO; 2006.
33. O'Cathain A. Assessing the quality of mixed methods research. Toward a comprehensive framework. In: Tashakkori A, Teddlie C, editors. SAGE Handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral research. 2e ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications; 2011. p. 531-55.
34. Rootman I, Goodstadt M, Hyndman B, McQueen DV, Potvin L, Springett J, et al. Evaluation in health promotion: principles and perspectives. Copenhagen: WHO regional publications; 2001.
35. McQueen DV, Jones C. Global perspectives on health promotion effectiveness. Saint-Denis: Springer; 2007.
36. Newman I, Ridenour CS, Newman C, DeMarco GMPJr. A Typology of Research Purposes and its Relationship to Mixed Methods. In: Tashakkori A, Teddlie C, editors. Handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral research.Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications; 2003. p. 167-88.
37. Tashakkori A, Teddlie C. The past and the futur of mixed methods research: from triangulation to mixed methods designs. In: Tashakkori A, Teddlie C, editors. Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research.Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications; 2003. p. 671-701.
38. Tashakkori A, Teddlie C. Current developments and emerging trends in integrated research methodology. In: Tashakkori A, Teddlie C, editors. Sage Handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral research. 2e ed. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications; 2011. p. 803-26.
39. Lincoln YS. "What a long, strange trip it's been": Twenty-five years of qualitative and new paradigm research. Qual Inq 2010;16(1).
40. O'Cathain A, Murphy E, Nicholl J. The quality of mixed methods in health services research. Journal of Health Services Research & Policy 2008;13(2):92-8. (Pubitemid 351702973)
41. Bryman A. Bariers to integrating quantitative and qualitative research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research 2007;1(1):8-22.