Association between weight changes and changes in hip geometric indices in the Japanese female population during 10-year follow-up: Japanese Population-based Osteoporosis (JPOS) Cohort Study

Osteoporosis International

Volumn 23, Issue 5, 2012, Pages 1581-1591

  DongMei, N ^a   Iki, M ^a   Tamaki, J ^a   Sato, Y ^b   Kagamimori, S ^c   Kagawa, Y ^d   Yoneshima, H ^e  

^a KINKI UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (Japan)

^b JIN AI UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^c UNIVERSITY OF TOYAMA   (Japan)

^d KAGAWA NUTRITION UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^e Japanese Population based Osteoporosis (JPOS) Study Group Shuwa General Hospital   (Japan)

Author keywords

DXA; Femoral geometry; Hip structure analysis; Japanese women; Longitudinal study

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BODY HEIGHT; BODY WEIGHT; BONE DENSITY; BONE STRENGTH; DUAL ENERGY X RAY ABSORPTIOMETRY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HIP FRACTURE; HUMAN; JAPANESE; LONGITUDINAL STUDY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OSTEOPOROSIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; WEIGHT CHANGE;

ABSORPTIOMETRY, PHOTON; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; AGING; ANTHROPOMETRY; BODY HEIGHT; BODY MASS INDEX; BODY WEIGHT; BONE DENSITY; FEMALE; FEMUR; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HIP FRACTURES; HIP JOINT; HUMANS; MENOPAUSE; MIDDLE AGED; OSTEOPOROTIC FRACTURES; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84863630714     PISSN: 0937941X     EISSN: 14332965     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00198-011-1733-8     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Faulkner KG, Cummings SR, Black D, Palermo L, Glüer CC, Genant HK (1993) Simple measurement of femoral geometry predicts hip fracture: the study of osteoporotic fractures. J Bone Miner Res 8:1211-1217 (Pubitemid 23308114)
2. Nakamura T, Turner CH, Yoshikawa T, Slemenda CW, Peacock M, Burr DB, Mizuno Y, Orimo H, Ouchi Y, Johnston CC Jr (1994) Do variations in hip geometry explain differences in hip fracture risk between Japanese and white Americans? J Bone Miner Res 9:1071-1076 (Pubitemid 24191795)
3. Alonso CG, Curiel MD, Carranza FH, Cano RP, Peréz AD (2000) Femoral bone mineral density, neck-shaft angle and mean femoral neck width as predictors of hip fracture in men and women. Multicenter Project for Research in Osteoporosis. Osteoporos Int 11:714-720
4. Gnudi S, Ripamonti C, Lisi L, Fini M, Giardino R, Giavaresi G (2002) Proximal femur geometry to detect and distinguish femoral neck fractures from trochanteric fractures in postmenopausal women. Osteoporos Int 13:69-73 (Pubitemid 34157833)
5. Ahlborg HG, Nguyen ND, Nguyen TV et al (2005) Contribution of hip strength indices to hip fracture risk in elderly men and women. J Bone Miner Res 20:1820-1827 (Pubitemid 41361883)
6. Faulkner KG, Wacker WK, Barden HS et al (2006) Femur strength index predicts hip fracture independent of bone density and hip axis length. Osteoporos Int 17:593-599
7. Beck TJ, Looker AC, Ruff CB, Sievanen H, Wahner HW (2005) Structural trends in the aging femoral neck and proximal shaft: analysis of the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry data. J Bone Miner Res 15:2297-2304
8. Travison TG, Beck TJ, Esche GR, Araujo AB, McKinlay JB (2008) Age trends in proximal femur geometry in men: variation by race and ethnicity. Osteoporos Int 19:277-287
9. Yan L, Crabtree NJ, Reeve J, Zhou B, Dequeker J, Nijs J, Falch JA, Prentice A (2004) Does hip strength analysis explain the lower incidence of hip fracture in the People's Republic of China? Bone 34:584-588 (Pubitemid 38314924)
10. Takada J, Beck TJ, Iba K, Yamashita T (2007) Structural trends in the aging proximal femur in Japanese postmenopausal women. Bone 41:97-102 (Pubitemid 46891904)
11. Iki M, DongMei N, Tamaki J, Sato Y, Kagamimori S, Kagawa Y, Yoneshima H (2010) Age-specific reference values of hip geometric indices from a representative sample of the Japanese female population: Japanese Population-based Osteoporosis (JPOS) Study. Osteoporos Int 22:1987-1996
12. Kaptoge S, Dalzell N, Loveridge N, Beck TJ, Khaw KT, Reeve J (2003) Effects of gender, anthropometric variables, and aging on the evolution of hip strength in men and women aged over 65. Bone 32:561-570 (Pubitemid 39665716)
13. Yates LB, Karasik D, Beck TJ, Cupples LA, Kiel DP (2007) Hip structural geometry in old and old-old age: similarities and differences between men and women. Bone 41:722-732 (Pubitemid 47393665)
14. Nelson DA, Barondess DA, Hendrix SL, Beck (2000) Crosssectional geometry, bone strength, and bone mass in the proximal femur in black and white postmenopausal women. J Bone Miner Res 15:1992-1997
15. Khosla S, Atkinson EJ, Riggs BL, Melton LJ 3rd (1996) Relationship between body composition and bone mass in women. J Bone Miner Res 11:857-863 (Pubitemid 26172811)
16. Petit MA, Beck TJ, Lin HM, Bentley C, Legro RS, Lloyd T (2004) Femoral bone structural geometry adapts to mechanical loading and is influenced by sex steroids: the Penn State Young Women's Health Study. Bone 35:750-759 (Pubitemid 39141876)
17. Petit MA, Beck TJ, Shults J, Zemel BS, Foster BJ, Leonard MB (2005) Proximal femur bone geometry is appropriately adapted to lean mass in overweight children and adolescents. Bone 36:568-576 (Pubitemid 40403856)
18. El Hage R, Moussa E, Jacob C (2010) Femoral neck geometry in overweight and normal weight adolescent girls. J Bone Miner Metab 28:595-600
19. Beck TJ, Oreskovic TL, Stone KL, Ruff CB, Ensrud K, Nevitt MC, Genant HK, Cummings SR (2001) Structural adaptation to changing skeletal load in the progression toward hip fragility: the study of osteoporotic fractures. J Bone Miner Res 16:1108-1119 (Pubitemid 32467155)
20. Iki M, Kagamimori S, Kagawa Y, Matsuzaki T, Yoneshima H, Marumo F (2001) Bone mineral density of the spine, hip and distal forearm in representative samples of the Japanese female population: Japanese Population-Based Osteoporosis (JPOS) Study. Osteoporos Int 12:529-537 (Pubitemid 32777428)
21. Beck TJ, Ruff CB, Bissessur K (1993) Age-related changes in female femoral neck geometry: implications for bone strength. Calcif Tissue Int 53:S41-S46 (Pubitemid 23277167)
22. Kaptoge S, Jakes RW, Dalzell N et al (2007) Effects of physical activity on evolution of proximal femur structure in a younger elderly population. Bone 40:506-515 (Pubitemid 46054561)
23. Khoo BC, Beck TJ, Qiao QH, Parakh P, Semanick L, Prince RL, Singer KP, Price RI (2005) In vivo short-term precision of hip structure analysis variables in comparison with bone mineral density using paired dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry scans from multi-center clinical trials. Bone 37:112-121 (Pubitemid 40848424)
24. Tothill P, Hannan WJ, Wilkinson S (2001) Comparisons between a pencil beam and two fan beam dual energy X-ray absorptiometers used for measuring total body bone and soft tissue. Br J Radiol 74:166-176 (Pubitemid 32249045)
25. Van der Meulen MC, Beaupré GS, Carter DR (1993) Mechanobiologic influences in long bone cross-sectional growth. Bone 14:635-642 (Pubitemid 23198825)
26. Riggs BL, Khosla S, Melton LJ 3rd (2002) Sex steroids and the construction and conservation of the adult skeleton. Endocr Rev 23:279-302 (Pubitemid 34651948)
27. Ahlborg HG, Johnell O, Turner CH et al (2003) Bone loss and bone size after menopause. N Engl J Med 349:327-334 (Pubitemid 36886238)
28. Kaptoge S, Dalzell N, Folkerd E et al (2007) Sex hormone status may modulate rate of expansion of proximal femur diameter in older women alongside other skeletal regulators. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 92:304-313 (Pubitemid 46067548)
29. Beck TJ, Petit MA, Wu G et al (2009) Does obesity really make the femur stronger? BMD, geometry and fracture incidence in the Women's Health Initiative-Observational Study. J Bone Miner Res 24:1369-1379
30. Rivadeneira F, Zillikens MC, De Laet CE et al (2007) Femoral neck BMD is a strong predictor of hip fracture susceptibility in elderly men and women because it detects cortical bone instability: the Rotterdam Study. J Bone Miner Res 22:1781-1790 (Pubitemid 351235145)
31. Kaptoge S, Beck TJ, Reeve J et al (2008) Prediction of incident hip fracture risk by femur geometry variables measured by hip structural analysis in the study of osteoporotic fractures. J Bone Miner Res 23:1892-1904